GINA MILLER'S "DEMOCRACY"

GINA MILLER

Everyone in Great Britain should now be ‘on-their-knees’ thanking this wonderful lady for, spending her own money, in order to secure from the Judiciary; that PARLIAMENT should have the last say; in respect to all ‘agreements’ negotiated and agreed with the EU; for actually leaving the EU.

 

If, it had not been, for this courageous action, by this lady; there would not have been any, “MEANINGFUL VOTES” in Parliament, at all; THERESA MAY, would just have ‘imposed’ her will on the country; without Parliament having any say, or any participation, at all. The very ‘epitome’ of the, TOTALITARIAN REGIME.

 

So, I say, “THANK YOU” GINA MILLER for what you did. You upheld and fought for, “DEMOCRACY”; and, just for that, you should be very proud indeed. Everyone else in the country, should be thanking you, as well. Because, today, Parliament is performing as it should; holding the, “EXECUTIVE”, to account.

In respect of BREXIT; there has now been three "Meaningful Votes" that have taken place; Parliament refused to pass all three.

 

The, 17 Million, who voted to ‘LEAVE’ the EU; may well now whine and wail that their “DEMOCRACY” has been abused. But, most of them do not have a clue what “DEMOCRACY” really is. They merely use and misuse the word “DEMOCRACY”, in order to support their own cause.

 

GINA MILLERS “DEMOCRACY” IS THE TRUE “DEMOCRACY” THAT EVERY INTELLIGENT ADULT, SHOULD REALLY APPLAUD.

"DEMOCRACY"

DEMOCRACY

The most ‘misused’ word in the English language. Used by most in order to deceive.

 

BREXIT

17 MILLION PEOPLE who voted to LEAVE the EU; now behave like moronic infantile children; whining and wailing, that their “DEMOCRACY” has been abused.

Practically, none of them, have any idea what “DEMOCRACY” is.

 

Politicians, Political Parties; People of all descriptions, and political persuasions, all readily assert that “DEMOCRACY” supports their cause.

Yet, again, hardly any of them have any true comprehension, as to what “DEMOCRACY” really is.

 

THAT IS WHY I WROTE MY BOOK,

“DEMOCRACY”

In my book I pose 14 questions every British adult should know if they want to participate in British “DEMOCRACY”.

 

Everyone, as mentioned above, desperately needs that advice.

They should all read that book; then maybe, just maybe, they might learn something very important that finally persuades them to actually ‘act’; to end the terrible, “Totalitarian Regime”. We all endure now.

 

My book is available in two formats; a Kindle download, at only £1.19; or a paperback at £3.50. It can be purchased here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

ATTORNEY GENERAL, GEOFFREY COX MP

ATTORNEY GENERAL, GEOFFREY COX MP.

LIAR, CHEAT, DECEIVER, and, OBFUSCATOR.

Not being a Member of Parliament; I am therefore not bound by the convention of parliament; not to demean any other Member; or, accuse any other Member of Parliament of not telling the truth. Not bound, by this convention; I can, without any hesitation; accuse GEOFFREY COX of being,

 

The most consummate liar and deceiver of the profession of ‘LAW’, practising in that profession, today.

 

GEOFFREY COX MP, the Attorney General, has been consistently advising Members of Parliament that all ‘legislation’ taking place in parliament in respect of  “BREXIT” and, the “EU (Withdrawal) Bill”; was all perfectly legal; and, that therefore, he asserted and claimed, and advised Members of Parliament to vote and agree THERESA MAY’S, “Agreement”, deal that had been negotiated with the EU.

 

IN THIS ADVICE THAT HE GAVE TO PARLIAMENT HE WAS A CONSUMATE LIAR.

 

Because, being a ‘man of law’ and, ‘dealing with law’ all the time; he must have been aware, AS I AM ONLY TOO AWARE; that a “Whipped Vote” in Parliament, has no legality at all.

 

The political party WHIPS office and political party activities in Parliament; ARE NOT ENSHRINED IN LAW; and, there is no ‘legal instrument’ anywhere in the national archive of parliament; that can be produced; proving and verifying that parliament; BY FREE VOTE, has ever approved the “WHIPS”, in parliament.

 

Furthermore, The “WHIPS” office; and, the political party activities of the “WHIPS” in parliament; flouts and breaches, the ‘protection of the people’, provided by the, ‘precedent of law‘, as set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/Said Rights Claimed”.

This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689”, specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

The Said Rights Claimed

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

The, “Whipped Vote” in parliament does, “Prejudice the People” – by overruling and supplanting - the lawful right of the Constituent to influence their elected Member of Parliament. Therefore, the “WHIPS” in parliament and the “Whipped Vote” in parliament, HAS NO LEGALITY, at all.

 

This, being the truth of the matter, verifies without a shadow of doubt, that the “WHIPS” in parliament, HAS NO LEGALITY WHATSOEVER; and, THAT THE ‘WHIPS’ MUST BE, ABOLISHED.

 

In respect to “BREXIT” this is vitally important.

Because, if the, “Whipped Vote”, in parliament is wholly UNLAWFUL; then, the “Triggering of Article 50” in the “EU (WITHDRAWAL) Bill”; will also, have no ‘legality’ at all.

 

This would mean that the “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL” and all the “BREXIT” LEGISLATION already passed by parliament; and in some cases, has even been granted the, “ROYAL ASSENT”; in truth and reality; and, in accordance with the ‘LAW’ of the land; WILL HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

Therefore, all the Government and EU negotiations that have been taking place for the last two years, will all have been wasted; because the, “Triggering of Article 50”, as required by the “TREATY”;

HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.


CONCLUSION

THE, UK, WILL HAVE TO "REMAIN" IN THE EU.

MY BOOK “DEMOCRACY”

Appearing to have no comprehension as to what DEMOCRACY REALLY IS, it is imperative, that YOU read my book. It is a small (just 48 pages) ‘guide’ for the British; advising how badly they are being governed by both Government and Parliament; and, how wickedly they are being unlawfully ruled by MONARCHY, as well.

The book is available in two formats, a Kindle download £1.19; and a paperback £3.50. It can be purchased here, https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

 

 

 

BREXIT - ILLEGALITY & HOUSE OF COMMONS ENQUIRY EMAIL CONFIRMATION THAT POLITICAL PARTY 'WHIPS' ARE UNLAWFUL.

Reply email message sent to, HOUSE OF COMMONS ENQUIRIES, Re. ‘LEGALITY’ of the Political Party Whips.

 

Dear HOC Enquiries 

Many thanks for this information; but in no way does it provide the answers for the information I require.

1.    I DO NOT CARE A DAMN REGARDING WHAT 'PRIVATE' ARRANGEMENTS THE POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE AGREED WITH THEMSELVES IN REFERENCE TO THE USE AND POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITIES OF THE "WHIPS" IN PARLIAMNENT.

2.    I AM ONLY CONCERNED; AND REQUIRE INFORMATION; AS TO THE TRUE LEGALITY OF THE "WHIPS" IN PARLIAMENT.

3.    THAT MEANS, THAT I WANT TO KNOW THE PRECISE DAY DATE AND TIME WHEN PARLIAMENT ITSELF AUTHORISED THE USE OF THE WHIPS; AND, THEIR CURRENT POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITY; IN PARLIAMENT.

NOTE: I KNOW AND CONCLUSIVELY CAN PROVE BY 'PRECEDENT OF LAW''; THAT THE PRESENT POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF THE WHIPS AND EVEN THEIR PRESECENCE IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

IT FLOUTS AND BREACHES THE, 'PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE', PROVIDED BY THE "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/in the paragraph/"THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".

 In consequence, ACTS, MOTIONS, and BILLS, are being created and passed in parliament today in precisely the same manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their own 'LAWS'. With all the disastrous consequences. There is no difference whatsoever to the political parties in Britain today; to the NAZI party in Germany, during the entire "Third Reich" regime.

THEY BOTH CREATED AND PASS LAW BY POLITICAL PARTY IMPOSITION AND 'DIKTAT' - NOT, BY DEMOCRATIC CONSENT.

​I WANT THE "WHIPS" ABOLISHED. I WANT THEM OUT OF PARLIAMENT.

 I am nigh approaching my 92nd birthday (16.05.2019); I have vowed to do my utmost before I die, to create a TRUE DEMOCRACY. I have lived with this rotten TOTALITARIAN REGIME; far too long.

Read my book, "DEMOCRACY"

It's available in two formats, a Kindle download £1.19; and a Paperback £3.50. It's a 'guide' for the British on how to properly participate in British, DEMOCRACY. It can be purchased here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

Sincerely, Gordon J Sheppard

NOTE

IN A FURTHER REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE HOC ENQUIRIES CONFIRMED,

 

“THE PRESENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT ARE NOT ENSHRINED IN LAW.”

 

AS I HAVE ALWAYS ASSERTED AND CLAIMED, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS AND, THEIR POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITY IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ WHATSOEVER.

 

THEREFORE, THE TRIGGERING OF “ARTICLE 50” IN THE, “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL”, PASSED IN PARLIAMENT BY A “WHIPPED VOTE”; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

ONE MILLION PEOPLE WASTING THEIR TIME

ONE MILLION PEOPLE march in London to secure a new people’s vote.

FIVE MILLION PEOPLE sign a petition to revoke "Article 50" and REMAIN in the EU.

Six Million people with their hearts in the right place, but, with their brains, up their arse.

 

MARCHES AND DEMONSTRATIONS IN THE STREETS, WAVING BANNERS FLAGS AND SLOGANS ACHIEVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. SIGNING PETITIONS LIKEWISE.

 

ONLY ‘VIOLENCE’ OR ‘LAW’ INFLUENCES THE TOTALITARIAN REGIME. HISTORY OF ALL REVOLUTION, VERIFIES THIS.

 

IF, ‘ONE MILLION PEOPLE’ or 'SIX MILLION PEOPLE', had contributed the paltry sum of just ‘0.10p’ each to an, “ARTICLE 50 LEGAL CHALLENGE FUND”; there would have been £100,000 or £600,000 made available to employ the services of the very best Barrister and the best team of legal ‘experts’ that could properly challenge the legality of, “The Triggering of Article 50”, in parliament; in the, “SUPREME COURT” – and if necessary – in the “European Court of Justice” as well.

 

This is a prima facie case of 'LAW' that cannot be lost; a case, that, the JUDICIARY, would be unable to refute. “Article 50” was triggered in parliament in a “Whipped Vote” ; elected Members of Parliament were instructed by the ‘political party WHIPS’; on how they must vote. This was wholly UNLAWFUL; because, this political party activity overrules and supplants all ‘rightful’ influence of the Constituents. The, 'Constituents' that elected those Members of Parliament, in the first place. In consequence, this causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is wholly proscribed by the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/in the paragraph/”The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

There it is, in black and white, prominently recorded and displayed in that Bill.

“PARLIAMENT OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

No, “Court of Law” anywhere on Planet Earth, can refute this.

 

THEREFORE, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS AND THEIR POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITY IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO TRUE ‘LEGALITY’ WHATSOEVER.

 

THE, “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50” BY PARLIAMENT, IN THAT, ‘WHIPPED VOTE’, HAD NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

THE QUEEN

THE QUEEN; in granting the "ROYAL ASSENT" to this Bill; granted that 'assent' to CORRUPT LAW. But,
under her responsibility, of carrying out her DUTY required by the, "Original Contract"; she was required by 'precedent of law' to honour that 'Contract'; and, provide the "protection" of her Subjects. Acting, as the "Head of Government", the Queen ought to have known that this 'Bill' was CORRUPT; by, the properly monitoring; of, Her Government.

Which, she promised to do; when she 'swore' the, "Coronation Oath". In swearing that 'Oath' at her Coronation, she promised, to "GOVERN THE PEOPLE". Here, in this 'highly critical' instance of, BREXIT; she failed to do so.

When the “Supreme Court” is therefore forced to declare the “WHIPS” unlawful; “Article 50” will be abolished. Two years of negotiating with the EU for leaving the EU will all have been wasted.

With “ARTICLE 50” being declared UNLAWFUL and being abolished; BRITAIN WILL HAVE TO “REMAIN” IN THE EU. Britain, then will be unable to ‘leave’ the EU without the CONSENT of the EU. But, it would not be in the interests of the EU, to grant that ‘consent’. The EU does not want any “NO DEAL” situation taking place.

BREXIT - THERESA MAY THREATENS PARLIAMENT WITH - NO DEAL

THERESA MAY, THREATENS AND INTIMIDATES PARLIAMENT YET AGAIN.

YET AGAIN, SHE SHOWS HER CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT.

She now threatens parliament that she will not present her ‘deal’ agreed with the EU, to parliament again; if there isn’t enough support for it; thereby threatening parliament, in consequence, with ‘leaving the EU’ with “No Deal”. Which she knows only too well, that parliament overwhelmingly opposes; and, the country does not want.

 

THIS NOW PRESENTS PARLIAMENT WITH BUT ONE CRISIS OPTION, IF IT DOES WANT, “NO DEAL”.

 

Members of Parliament must now abandon ‘political party’ allegiance and ‘stop playing politics’ and ‘partisan political bias games’; and they must challenge the ‘legality’ of the, “Triggering of Article 50”, in the, “EU (Withdrawal) Bill”.

 

This Bill was passed in parliament by a, “Whipped Vote” – The political party WHIPS in parliament instructed elected Members of Parliament - on how they must vote.

 

YET, THIS ‘WHIPS’ POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITY, IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO LEGALITY WHATSOEVER. THE ‘WHIPS’ IN DOING THIS, OVERRULES AND SUPPLANTS THE RIGHTFUL INFLUENCE OF THE CONSTITUENT. THEREBY, CAUSING THE, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” – WHICH IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED - BY THE ‘PRECEDENT OF LAW’ SET OUT; IN THE, “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”

 

It, is this; that must now be ‘tested’ and ‘challenged’ in the, “SUPREME COURT.

Members of Parliament now, have no other option, if they want to avoid, “NO DEAL”.

LAW and the RULE OF LAW must now decide.

NOTE

The “Supreme Court” upholding this challenge and declaring the “EU (Withdrawal) Bill” unlawful, will resolve BREXIT once and for all.

BRITAIN, will have to REMAIN IN THE EU.

 

Because, the only way to ‘leave’ the EU then; would require the CONSENT of the EU.

The EU would never grant that CONSENT; because, it would not be in the interests of the EU. The EU most certainly doesn’t want Britain to ‘leave’ without a deal. The very last thing the EU wants, is “NO DEAL”.

 

 

BREXIT - REMAINERS - TRY LAW FOR A CHANGE...

URGENT MESSAGE TO ALL BREXIT,

“REMAINERS”.

I am sick and tired of hearing about, and seeing your BREXIT plight constantly swamping social Media; when you are too damned lazy, too ignorant, and too apathetic, to even attempt to do anything to correct or stop the ‘abuse’ you presently endure.

 

16 MILLION ‘REMAINERS’, persistently stay silent and wholly inactive, whilst allowing THERESA MAY and her right-wing Tory activists in parliament; and, 17 Million ‘LEAVERS’, to shit upon their HUMAN RIGHTS; without taking any positive steps to correct the situation.

 

Oh yes, they do arrange for wholly useless ‘marches’ and demonstrations in the street, waving their banners and flags etc. that achieve absolutely nothing at all; but they never ever even think of,

Putting their hand into the purse or the wallet to contribute just the sum of .50p or £1.00; to set up and establish a very necessary, “REMAINERS SUPPORT LEGAL FUND”.

The ‘FUND’ to engage the services of the best and most legally experienced BARRISTER and LAWYER to challenge the ‘abuse’ and ‘violation’ of their Human Rights; in the “Supreme Court”.

 

Even at this very late stage; where Britain and all of them are on the brink of ‘insanity’ and the greatest peril faced by the country since World War Two; it is still not too late to make that challenge in the Supreme Court.

 

PAY UP NOW – CONTRIBUTE JUST £1.00 NOW – SET UP THAT FUND - AND USE, LAW FOR A CHANGE.

 

NOTE:

THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED BECAUSE, BREXIT, DEPRIVES,

 

A.The rightful access to LAW, by taking away the only ‘protection of law’ that the British have; the, “European Court of Justice” and the, “European Human Rights Act” – the ‘elite’ establishment of MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT, and PARLIAMENT provides no protection of law at all – the British have no “Written Constitution”; “Bill of Rights”; or, “Supreme Court of Law” where one can test, question, or challenge the abuse of parliament; from within law.

B. The rightful access to a true, DEMOCRACY. This is denied because when the political party WHIPS instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they must VOTE; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful’ influence the Constituents place upon their Member of Parliament. This therefore causes and creates the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”. But, “prejudice of the people” by parliament is specifically proscribed and made unlawful by the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the, “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”. In the paragraph of that Bill known as, “The Said Rights Claimed” this specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or apply any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill, (everything written in the Bill), but only on the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

It can therefore be fully established in law; that the political party WHIPS in parliament have no legality at all.

 

Now, in respect to BREXIT; this is very important; because the, “EU (Withdrawal) Triggering ‘Article 50’ Bill” was passed in parliament, in a ‘WHIPPED VOTE’ wholly under the influence of the WHIPS.

 

As, can be seen above, the WHIPS having no true legality at all; then the BREXIT, “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL” – LIKEWISE - has no legality WHATSOEVER, and therefore it must be abolished.

 

Challenged in the “Supreme Court” the JUDICIARY would have no alternative but to uphold this as true.

 

THUS, BREXIT WOULD HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL; TWO YEARS NEGOTIATING WITH THE EU FOR THE WITHDRAWAL BILL WILL ALL HAVE BEEN WASTED; AND THE QUEEN WILL HAVE GRANTED THE “ROYAL ASSENT” TO CORRUPT LAW.

 

REMAINERS – WILL WIN THE DAY.

 

BREXIT - PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

BREXIT

THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT; THE DUP;

And,

PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE.

 

For clarification purposes throughout this document, the meaning and intent of the words, as listed, are shown below,

 

“The last say” – This refers to the ruling that GINA MILLER, a private person, secured from the Supreme Court Judiciary; that parliament should have, ”The very last say”, in voting ‘Yay’ or ‘Nay’ to the final legislation ‘agreement’ negotiated by the government with the EU; for the withdrawal of Britain from the EU.

See: APPENDIX A: “LAW – GINA MILLER & PARLIAMENT” as shown below.

 

“The Treaty” – This refers to the final “Agreement Treaty” agreed between THERESA MAY and the British Government and the EU for the ‘withdrawal’ of Britain from the EU.

In referring to this ‘TREATY’; MICHELLE BARNIER, of the ‘European Commission’ and holding aloft the ‘Treaty’ in his hand, declared to the World, on live television transmission, that,

“This is the Treaty, the final Treaty that Great Britain has agreed to, it will not be tweaked amended or altered in any way. It can never be renegotiated or changed”.

 

“Her Deal” – refers to the final deal “Treaty Agreement” that THERESA MAY and her government agreed to with the EU; for Britain to leave the EU.

 

“The Said Rights Claimed” – this refers to the protection of the people provided by this paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” – this paragraph of that Bill specifically instructs parliament, that parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill, but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

If and whenever parliament “Prejudice the People” “The Said Rights Claimed” overrules the very “SUPREMACY” of parliament afforded to parliament by “Article 9” of that Bill. Because, “The Said Rights Claimed” is the overall superior authority of the Bill; for it states within its text; that it has the authority over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill; whenever parliament causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

 

WITH THE MEETING OF GOVERNMENT AND THE DUP, AND THE PRESENCE OF ‘PHILLIP HAMMOND’ THE CHANCELLOR PRESENT AT THAT MEETING; THERE IS EVERY INDICATION THAT BOTH THE GOVERNMENT AND THE DUP ARE CONTEMPLATING THE “PERVERTING OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE”, WHICH WOULD CAUSE, A GRAVE CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

 

I THEREFORE WARN BOTH GOVERNMENT AND THE DUP; that if the DUP, has already twice voted against “Her Deal”; on an unchangeable “Treaty”; and, if the DUP now changes tack and, now votes in support of “”Her Deal”; this will indicate and verify in stark vivid clarity that some corruption has taken place; that, some corrupt ‘inducements’ are being involved.

Either the DUP has demanded more money or other special favoured consideration from government to change its vote; or, government has offered some corrupt bribe more money or other required favourable consideration to the DUP, in order that it will support, “Her Deal” in the next, ‘Meaningful Vote’.

IRRESPECTIVE OF WHO OFFERED OR WHO DEMANDED; THERE IS NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER, THAT BOTH GOVERNMENT AND THE DUP HAVE NOW CONTEMPLATED, IF NOT ALREADY AGREED TO, “PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE”.

 

I therefore warn every elected Member of Parliament of the DUP, that all previous history of their voting is recorded in Handsard; therefore, if their vote changes now to support, “Her Deal”, in an unchanged “Treaty”; that will provide the stark vivid evidence that that Member has, “Perverted the Course of Justice” and be liable to be prosecuted by the police.

 

Every Member of Parliament that has twice voted against “Her Deal”; and, now changes their vote, to an ‘unchanged’ ‘Treaty’, in support of “Her Deal”; will be suspected of “Perverting the Course of Justice” leaving themselves wide open to prosecution for committing a criminal offence.

 

Members of Parliament cannot just rely on the “SUPREMACY” of parliament to protect them from prosecution; because, when they “Pervert the Course of Justice” they, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”; and, this is wholly proscribed by, “The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

APPENDIX A.

“GINA MILLER & PARLIAMENT”

 

Parliament did not apply for or appeal to the Supreme Court for the right to have the ‘last say’ to the BREXIT legislation for withdrawal from the EU, agreed by the British government. Parliament has little interest in LAW; it has contempt for LAW; and, it abandons Law;  because it relies upon the “Supremacy of Parliament” to provide parliament with the privilege of doing anything it pleases in everything; without any ‘question’ or ‘challenge’ from within, LAW. So, this is why parliament has never asked LAW to provide parliament with the right to have the “final last say” to the BREXIT legislation agreed by government.

 

GINA MILLER did not secure this right from the SUPREME COURT for the benefit of parliament; she did it for the benefit of all the people of the country, in order to ensure that parliament carried out its proper duty, to represent the people who elected them; and protect the procedure of, LAW creation, in parliament.

 

 

 

BREXIT - EXTENTION OF ARTICLE 50

BREXIT – URGENT ATTENTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.

 

As the British ‘House of Commons’ has now rejected Prime Minister THERESA MAY’s “Withdrawal Agreement” negotiated with the EU.

Suggestion:

The EUROPEAN COMMISSION should now grant the British a short ‘extension’ of “ARTICLE 50”; But, only for the specific purpose of providing the British People of the opportunity of a new REFERENDUM in order that they can think carefully again whether they want to LEAVE the EU, or not. But, this time; unlike last time; all ‘advantages’ and ‘disadvantages’ for LEAVING THE EU must be published; prior to any VOTE taking place. This time the BRITISH must be aware of all the, CONSEQUENCES.

 

The British people must be made aware that LEAVING THE EU, ‘leaves’, the protection of ‘LAW’ of the European Court of Justice and, the European Human Rights Act.

 

This should be of great concern to the British, because the BRITISH have no protection of ‘LAW’ whatsoever;

The, ‘Elite’ ESTABLISHMENT of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament, does not provide the People with any protection of ‘LAW’ at all;

 

The, BRITISH, have no access to a,

Written Constitution;

Bill of Rights; or,

Supreme Court of Law; where they can test question or challenge the ‘abuses’ or the ‘prejudice’ of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT or PARLIAMENT from within ‘LAW’.

The BRITISH are not ‘Citizens’ in the true legal sense; they are merely classified; and, are held in ‘subjugation’; as mere, “SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN”

 

NONE OF THIS WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE PRIOR TO THEIR VOTING TO LEAVE THE EU.

 

The EU now providing them with a short extension to hold a new REFERENDUM will give the British, the right and the opportunity to, “THINK AGAIN”

 

 

CORRUPT ATTORNEY GENERAL, GEOFFREY COX

ATTORNEY GENERAL GEOFFREY COX,

LIAR, CHEAT, AND HYPOCRITE,

WILL USE AND QUOTE ‘LAW’ WHEN IT SUITS AND SUPPORTS HIS OWN OPINION OR THE INTERESTS OF THE ‘OBJECTIVES’ OF THE TORY PARTY;

 

BUT HE WILL KEEP ABSOLUTELY SILENT IN RESPECT TO OTHER ‘LAWS’ WITH ADVERSE OPINION.

 

This, “Man of Law” – “Well versed in Law” and, “Dealing with Law” all the time; is wholly corrupt. He uses ‘LAW’, merely to suit HIMSELF.

 

In a terse ‘put down’ to a Member of Parliament who had asked him a question, GEOFFREY COX replied curtly with just these words,

 

“That’s law” – “That is the law”

As though that THIS was the ‘definitive’ answer.

Well, in respect to BREXIT - and the sheer wicked corruption and chaos presently going on in the country; and, in parliament now; and, where the impending peril to the lives of everyone in the country is going to be far greater and more fearful than, World War Two, when the UK leaves the EU.

I will tell, GEOFREY COX, that the, “Protection of the People”, provided to the people by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”,

Is also ‘LAW’ as well.

 

Attorney General, GEOFFREY COX, this ‘Man of Law’ has never ever said one word about this, because it conflicts with his own and his Tory Party objectives, in Parliament.

 

The, BILL OF RIGHTS 1689, in “Article 9” of that Bill, provides parliament with its, SUPREMACY.

Whereby, both the JUDICIARY and PARLIAMENT assume that this provides Parliament with the right to do anything it pleases in everything, without any challenge.

The JUDICIARY rules and determines that “Article 9” is, “ABSOLUTE” in LAW; and, thereby, denies all “Questioning” of Parliament in the Courts.

 

Yet, the JUDICIARY is either corrupt and purposely conspiring to pervert the course of justice and deceive the British people; or, they are wholly ignorant of the true intent of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” and the, “Protection of the People”, that it provides.

 

Within that Bill; in the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”, the ‘originators’ of the Bill, the, “Rights Committee” of the CONVENTION (parliament) of 1688 well aware that the true intent of the Bill was to protect Parliament from the interference of a King; had to ensure that the Bill could not be mis-interpreted or misused to the detriment of the People. This ‘Committee’ therefore, inserted into the Bill, the required “Protection of the People”; in the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”

 

This vital paragraph of, ‘LAW’, in that Bill; specifically instructs Parliament or, anyone reading the Bill, that Parliament may have its “SUPREMACY” afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of the Bill; or, Parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the other “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

“The said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

GEOFFREY COX, take special notice of this;

This paragraph of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” specifically instructs parliament, that parliament should not, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

The political party WHIPS in parliament do “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” because, when they instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should VOTE; this overrules and supplants the ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituents.

This clearly creates and causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”

 

In consequence, GEOFFREY COX, must now agree and acknowledge that the, POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT, has no ‘legality’ at all.

 

BREXIT

THEREFORE, GEOFFREY COX, MUST NOW INSTRUCT PARLIAMENT THAT THE, “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL”, PASSED IN PARLIAMENT UNDER THE ‘DIKTAT’ AND DOMINATION OF THE 'WHIPS' AND, THE “WHIPPED” VOTE" IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO LEGAL VALIDITY AT ALL.

THE, WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT ARE WHOLLY UNLAWFUL. THEREFORE, THE, “TRIGGERING OF ‘ARTICLE 50’, CANNOT NOW STAND.