LAW

"LAW"

The true meaning, intent, value, and abuse, of, LAW. And, why the true lessons of Nazi Germany, has never been learned.

 LAW is not the property of politician or the profession of law, it is the property of all the People. When, ‘The People’ become ‘apathetic’ or, do not properly value “LAW” and, properly, participate; this provides the opportunity for the corrupt to create; the, Totalitarian Regime.

 

The Jewish people, constantly, and, rightly, keep the memory of the ‘Holocaust’ alive; and readily assert that anyone who questions the gassing of millions of their race, are a “Holocaust Denier” or, being anti-Semitic; but, even the Jewish people themselves, do not really recognize what happened to them in that terrible time. They, and, everyone else, repeatedly blame HITLER and the terribly wicked NAZI regime. But, it was not Hitler and the Nazis, who should be blamed. The blame, in reality, rests entirely upon the whole population of Germany, at that time. Who had no respect for, LAW.

Oh yes, they meticulously ‘obeyed’ the LAW; but, they had no respect for LAW; and, they did not ‘participate’. In sheer political apathy they allowed HITLER and the NAZIS to do what they did. This is the lesson that should be learnt of that terrible time. It was all done and fully accomplished under the true and due process of, ADOLF HITLER’S, LAW.

NAZ SHAH, a Member of Parliament, was heavily criticised and roundly condemned as racist and, anti-Semitic, when she commented that,

 "All that Hitler did was legal".

But, the EVIDENCE of history proves that, she was wholly accurate, and, had told the truth.

ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING THAT HITLER AND THE NAZIS DID AFTER HITLER CAME TO POWER IN 1933; WAS WHOLLY CONDUCTED, "UNDER DUE PROCESS OF LAW"

HITLER warned the whole world what he would do when he achieved the POWER to govern. Throughout the late 1920's and the early 1930's throughout speeches in Germany he solemnly declared:

"WE WILL USE THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE POWER TO GOVERN BUT ONCE WE SECURE THAT POWER "HEADS WILL ROLL" AND WE WILL CREATE OUR OWN LAW"

The whole world had been warned; but no one properly 'heeded' that warning.

The very instant that the German Industrialists and the 'capitalist' establishment of Germany appointed HITLER as "Chancellor of Germany"; foolishly, in order to, as they thought at that time, that he would prevent the threat of "Bolshevism"; HITLER presented to the "Reichstag" (the German parliament) his, "ENABLING ACT" that provided HITLER with the power to create his own law. And, that 'Act' was passed by that democratic "Reichstag", 441 votes to 94.

HITLER NOW HAD THE SUPREME RIGHT AS, 'FUHRER", TO CREATE HIS OWN LAW. And, it is from that very moment that the "THIRD REICH" of Germany actually began, With all of its disastrous aftermath and consequences.

Immediately, thereafter, ‘Reichmarcschall,’ HERMAN GOERING, introduced the law of the, "FUHRERPRINZIP";(The, "FUHRER PRINCIPLE"); which bound all the German Military to obey the orders of a Superior Officer in the chain of command, under pain of death to disobey.

And, later, when Germany was fighting in WORLD WAR II, this law of "FUHERPRINZIP" was extended to include every one, every German citizen, living in Germany, as well. Many ordinary German citizens were sent to concentration camps or even executed, having their heads chopped of by guillotine, for disobeying an order or for merely criticising the German war effort, during that war.

THE GERMANS WERE METICULOUS IN OBEYING THIS LAW AND MAINTAINING, 'ORDER'. Every incarceration to the concentration camps, every execution, every transportation of Jews and other undesirables to the death camps; and all the gassing of Jews and others in the gas chambers of the 'Holocaust', was all accomplished under, "DUE PROCESS OF LAW"

And, the German's were meticulous in this as well; they faithfully and meticulously recorded the names and data of everyone 'sentenced' to this fate, by the German, "VOLKSGERICHTSHOF", (The People's Court). That is why today, we know the name of every one persecuted and, put to death, under that, NAZI REGIME.

NUREMBERG, and, the, JUDGES, of the "Nazi War Crimes Tribunals" judged every defendant in, 'hindsight'; applying all the normal legal standards of today; but, these actual crimes took place, UNDER THE TRUE AND LEGALLY VALID CRITERION OF, LAW, THAT EXISTED IN GERMANY AT THAT TIME.

Thereby, in ignoring this law of "FUHERERPRIZIP";  and, erasing from the mind all that had happened in Nazi Germany, since HITLER came to power; these wholly corrupt JUDGES purposely attempted to, "PUT RAIN BACK IN THE SKY"

Every Nazi defendant in these 'Tribunals' that claimed that they were "Only obeying an order given by a Superior officer"; they actually, spoke the, TRUTH.

NAZ SHAH also spoke the absolute, TRUTH. History records the veracity.

 

The lessons to be learned:

 

1.     All the people must learn to value and respect, LAW.

2.     All the people, consenting to live by the “Rule of Law”,

3.      Must participate in the creation and framing of LAW.

4.     LAW, must never be in the hands of ‘political parties’ alone;

5.     Because, when this takes place, this inevitably leads to the terror of the, TOTALITARIAN REGIME.

 

Sadly, this is exactly what is happening in the “Law Making” in Great Britain today; LAWS and BILLS are not being created ‘democratically’ by the People; they are being created by the ‘diktat’ of the political parties alone. Dominated and controlled by the ‘political party’ WHIPS; which have no ‘legality’ at all.

The, WHIPS, in the British Parliament instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence' that might have been placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituents; who, actually, elected, those Members of Parliament. This, thereby, creates the, “Prejudice of the People”.

Yet, “Prejudice of the People” is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/ “The Said Rights Claimed”, as shown here:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

All this abuse of “LAW”, is openly taking place in the full knowledge of, and is being readily seen, by the wholly, politically, ‘apathetic’ People; that completely ignore and tolerate this abuse. That, permanently, ‘holds them in chains’; being commanded forever to, ‘submit and obey’; without, having any ‘democratic’ participation at all.

The entire German population gave their ‘apathetic’ consent to the “LAW” making of ADOLF HITLER, and the evidence of history proves conclusively how disastrous and ‘criminal’ that was. The British adult population today is also just as ‘apathetic’, and is hell bent, on doing the same.

 

LAW in Great Britain today, is looked upon by the elite of Monarchy, Judiciary, Parliament, Politician, and the Police, as being something that only the ‘common people’ must obey. Yet, they, all of them, flout and breech “LAW” all of the time.

All the British People must now learn to value, “LAW”, and, have, respect, for true “LAW”. And, create, a true, DEMOCRACY.

Read my book "DEMOCRACY".
Get it here:http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

HILLSBOROUGH-The Veracity....

Hillsborough Football Stadium Disaster,

The Ultimate test of veracity, to properly apportion blame.

Established Facts:

 

1.     Prior to the football match starting the “Lapping Road Spectator Stand” was already full to overflowing with football supporters waiting to view that football game.

2.     All of these supporters at that moment of time were perfectly, SAFE.

3.     Each and every one of those supporters, in that stand, were, (although having little room to move), completely healthy, enjoying life as it was at that moment, and, they were all able to ‘breath’, as normal, good clean fresh air.

 

So what was it? that in only a few minutes thereafter? 96 people in the front of that stand, were dead? What was the actual ‘catalyst’ that brought about those deaths?

THIS IS THE ONLY QUESTION TO ANSWER IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE TRUE VERACITY OF ALLOCATING THE BLAME; FOR ALL THESE DEATHS AT HILLSBOROUGH THAT DAY.

 

Established Facts:

4.       A further horde of other supporters from outside that spectator stand; wildly and hysterically forced their way forward, pushing and shoving with all of their might, and, secured access into that, already overfull, “Lapping Road Spectator Stand”.

5.     The more this mob of invading other supporters pushed forward and gained access to that stand, the more that those at the ‘front of that stand’ were crushed.

6.     They were ‘knocked over’, ‘trampled underfoot’, and crushed so severely with the weight of bodies on top and surrounding them, that they suffered terrible injuries and could not breath. Suffocating, as the result.

One minute every football supporter already in that spectator stand is perfectly ‘SAFE’ healthy and breathing correctly; and, yet within a matter of minutes thereafter, 96 of those supporters, at the front of that stand; were dead.

WHY?

Only one thing killed them and that is, PERFECTLY OBVIOUS FOR ANYONE TO SEE, it was the other ‘invading horde’ of other supporters who had forced their way into that already ‘over full’ spectator stand.

THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE THAT KILLED THESE 96 PEOPLE AT ALL.

The entire, wholly corrupt, “HILLSBOROUGH INQUIRY”, has been specifically ‘set up’ with the sole purpose and intent to ‘exonerate’; all those football supporters; WHO WERE ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE AND GUILTY; for all of these death's; from all blame. And, under the influence and pressure by corrupt politicians and press, (all with ‘vested interests’), the Jury ‘dutifully’ delivered the verdict, they required.

 

There is but one final question to answer: Why did Police Commander Duckingfield allow this ‘mob’ of other wild hysterical football supporters to invade the already full “Lapping Road” spectator stand?

For the answer to that,

It is only necessary to look at the TV camera footage that was transmitted that day showing this unruly ‘mob’ misbehaving at the “Lapping Road” entrance to the stadium.

The TV cameras reveal this ‘mob’ swirling about in vast numbers hysterically pushing and shoving their way forward with all of their weight and strength in order to secure entrance to the stadium. The TV camera shows police officers, one on horseback, actually being totally unable to control the behaviour of this ‘mob’. They were pushing their way forward with such force, that, those at the front were being ‘smashed’ up against the turnstiles and the “Lapping Road Gate”; and, the building. All those at the front were then in great danger of being crushed, injured, or killed.

Commander Duckenfield, therefore, had no alternative available to him. His police officers could not control this ‘mob’; they were, pushing their way forward wholly out of control; those at the front were bound to be injured or killed. He had no alternative but, to give the order, to open that gate. If he had not have done so, instead of 96 being killed ‘inside the stadium’ the very same might have occurred ‘outside the stadium’, at this location.

Commander Duckenfield should be congratulated and admired for try to alleviate this situation.  But, immediately this gate was opened, this wholly uncontrollable ‘mob’ wildly burst through. Charging, their way forcibly with all the force they could muster, into the tunnel leading to the already full, “Lapping Road” spectator stand.

This is what the TV Cameras EVIDENCE shows. Which, in all corruption and disgrace, the INQUIRY jury purposely ignored. And, which, with full intent, they ‘exonerated’ this wholly, ‘uncontrollable mob’, from all blame.

 Gordonj

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCRIMINATION

Naz Shah, Ken Livingston,

And, DISCRIMINATION

 

Both, today, suspended, or threatened with suspension, of their political party.

The most vociferous in demanding their suspension was JOHN MANN MP and NEIL COYLE MP. This is the comment I forwarded to them

 

Dear Sir's

 

The trouble with people like NEIL COYLE MP and JOHN MANN MP (that loud mouthed slob) is that they expect JEWS and other minority sections of society to be afforded 'special privileges'; not entitled to by everyone else.

This entire 'anti-Semitism' fiasco and furore is solely caused by JEW and ZIONISTS wanting special 'non discriminatory privileges', FOR THEMSELVES,

Yet 'DISCRIMIJATION' and the right of 'DISCRIMINATION' is inherent in the Gene.

All, FREEBORN HUMANKIND, have the right to DISCRIMINATE against anyone or anything they please.

This is the, "NATURAL LAW", inherent in the Genes, of all HUMANKIND.

One can see a crowd of people walking towards one; and one will know instantly which faces to TRUST and which faces to avoid 'like a bargepole'. This is, NATURAL INSTINCT. THE RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE.

NO CORRUPT LAW OF HUMANKIND HAS THE RIGHT TO OVERRULE THIS "NATURAL LAW" INHERENT IN THE GENE.

Thus, all LAW commanding, DISCRIMINATION, of any kind, has no TRUE legality or validity at all.

LAW, true and just LAW must conform to the criterion of, TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, INTELLIGENCE, LOGIC and RATIONALE. Thus, all that consent to live by the, "Rule of Law", are entitled to: the right to participate in the creation and framing of law; the right to 'equality' within law; and, the right to 'protection of law', as well.

But in Great Britain today, in this, TOTALITARIAN REGIME, there is no protection of law at all.

There is no Written Constitution;
There is no "Bill of Rights"; and,
There is no "Supreme Court of Law" where the 'common people' may test, question, or challenge the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of parliament, from within law.

Furthermore, the 'Reigning Monarch', ELIZABETH THE SECOND, who is charged with the responsibility and duty to honour the "Original Contract" requiring the protection of the people; actually has not provided that protection throughout all the years she has sat upon the throne. In fact. the very last time that the "ROYAL ASSENT" was refused to an Act passed by parliament, was on the 11th March 1708; when Queen Anne refused to grant it to the Bill passed by parliament for the, "Settlement of the Militia in Scotland". Ever since that date, every 'Reigning Monarch' that has sat on the 'English' throne, has merely acted in like manner to a village sub-postmaster or sub-postmistress, franking and rubber-stamping, every piece of paper laid before them, by parliament.

THE BRITISH PEOPLE BEING DEPRIVED OF ALL PROTECTION OF LAW.

LAW AND BILLs are created by parliament in Great Britain today, in exactly the same manner as ADOLF HITLER created his own laws in Nazi Germany from 1933. Though, HITLER, had the perfect legal right to create his own laws; his "Enabling Act" had been passed by the "Reichstag" (the German Parliament) voting 441 votes for, and, only 94 votes against.

But, the "Enabling Act" of the British Parliament; "The political party WHIPS in parliament", has no 'legality' at all. The political party WHIPS instructing 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"; because, it overrules and supplants all or any 'influence' the Constituents might have placed upon their Member of Parliament.

"PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" is specifically proscribed by the 'precedent of law' set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".

And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

NOTE: This paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed" is the over all, 'authority', of the entire "Bill of Rights 1689" for it states within its text that it has the 'authority' over all the "Premises" of the Bill. It even overrules the very Supremacy of parliament itself, (afforded by Article 9) whenever parliament, "Prejudice the People"

Before John Mann and Neil Coyle start shouting their mouths off about other people’s behaviour and denying their right to DISCRIMINATION; they should reflect that they also 'discriminate', every time that they abide by the WHIPS 'unlawful' instructions; and, flout the 'rightful influence' of their Constituents.
So I suggest; they 'climb off their high horse' from today.

NAZ SHAH and KEN LIVINGSTON therefore have the right to state their opinion on anything. They also have the same right, as myself, to state our opinions and to recruit others to our point of view.

Scum, like you two, assume the right, that everyone must submit to your opinions alone.

Respectfully suggest. Read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for proper participation. I pose fourteen questions to answer and, I provide the answers, that need to  be known. Read and learn how the British are being badly and unlawfully governed, and, read also how Monarchy holds all ‘Subjects of the Crown’ in imposed subjugation, without consent. The book is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book and a paperback, and it can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

 

HILLSBOROUGH CORRUPT JURY VERDICTS

The Hillsborough Travesty and Lie..

 IF YOU GET A BOTTLE AND YOU FILL IT UP TO THE BRIM WITH WATER AND SEAL THE TOP SO THAT NO WATER CAN ESCAPE; AND, THEN YOU INJECT FURTHER WATER AT VERY HIGH PRESSURE THROUGH THAT SEALED CAP; THE BOTTLE WILL AND MUST EXPLODE.

 

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT CAUSED THE MURDER OF 96 PEOPLE AT HILLSBOROUGH ON THAT FATEFUL DAY.

 

The 'LAPPING ROAD SPECTATOR STAND" was already completely full to overflowing with football supporters waiting to see the football match; when a massive horde of wildly hysterical other supporters used all their might and main and terrific FORCE; to force their way also into that spectator stand.

THAT STAND WAS ALREADY TOTALLY FULL; THERE WAS NO FURTHER AVAILABLE FREE SPACE AT ALL.

 

NOT ONE PERSON WOULD HAVE DIED OR BEEN INJURED OR EVER ENDURED A BRUISE THAT DAY; HAD NOT THOSE HYSTERICAL 'IDIOTS' FORCED THEIR WAY INTO THAT STAND.

 

SKY NEWS and all Media today proclaims and heralds the word "JUSTICE" and, portrays LIVERPOOL supporters, all claiming that at last "JUSTICE HAS BEEN DONE", and, shows them boisterously singing the Liverpool Football Anthem, "You never walk alone". But, this is just sickening and disgusting to both see and hear; because it heralds a huge, "Injustice and a massive Lie"

 

That JURY yesterday solemnly declared that; BLACK is actually WHITE and that WHITE is actually BLACK; so perverted was their verdicts. The Coroner. gave them 14 questions to answer to establish guilt. They selected 13 numbered 'Scapegoats' to blame, wholly unjustly, for the tragedy; but, the criterion number ‘6’ relating to the 'misbehaviour of the football fans'; the Jury completely exonerated them from all blame.

 

YET, NOTHING ELSE CAUSED THE MURDER OF THE 96 PEOPLE WHO DIED THAT DAY; OTHER THAN THE CRASS WILD HYSTERICAL WICKED BEHAVIOUR OF THE FOOTBALL FANS THAT FORCED THEIR WAY INTO THAT ALREADY FULL SPECTATOR STAND; AND, WHEN THEY COULD NOT MOVE FORWARD ANYMORE; THEY USED, EVEN MORE FORCE PUSHING FROM THE BACK WITH ALL THE FORCE THEY COULD MUSTER; DETERMINED TO GET INTO THAT STAND.

 

Just like the "EXPLODING BOTTLE" (as demonstrated above) the further these 'idiots' pushed their way forward into that stand; those already in that stand had nowhere to go or to escape; so inevitably, this resulted in them being, CRUSHED and KILLED.

 

If there are now to be any CRIMINAL prosecutions; I specifically want to 'assist' any defence.

I can never tolerate injustice. And, today, everyone and all Media is celebrating that, INJUSTICE, and, that, LIE.

 

TO THE FAMILIES OF THOSE THAT DIED THAT DAY, I SAY THIS: "HONOURING THEIR LIFE AND MEMORY WITH A LIE; DOES NOT HONOUR THEM AT ALL, ONLY THE "TRUTH" WILL SUFFICE.

 

Gordonj

HILLSBOROUGH

HILLSBOROUGH INQUIRY RESULT

 April 26 2016

So the HILLSBOROUGH JURY has now finally arrived at and delivered its verdict.

The Coroner posed fourteen questions for the jury to answer in order to establish either ‘innocence’ or ‘guilt’. And, strangely, perversely and corruptly, in response to question number six, the jury has determined that the “football fans behaviour” played no part in bringing about and causing the MURDER of 96 people that day.

Yet, the entire INQUIRY, from its very outset, has been naught but a corrupt travesty from start to finish; set up by politicians, and, those pursuing their own ‘vested interests’, with the sole intent of 'absolving' LIVERPOOL football fans from all blame. The, INQUIRY, corrupt politicians, and many of the families of the deceased supported by the Liverpool press, have all been intent from the very outset to point fingers at any 'scapegoat'; in order to distract from those; who actually MURDERED 96 PEOPLE that day.

The only ones responsible, for all those deaths; were the crass hysterical wicked behaviour of the 'FOOTBALL FANS'. Not one person would have been killed or injured or even suffered a mere bruise, if those so called 'football fans' had not gone berserk and purposely charged into that stadium, that day.

Those terrible deaths were not caused by the police, by the ambulance drivers and paramedics, or even by the stadium authorities and the 'architect' that had designed the stadium.

All, that, are now determined to be guilty, wholly corruptly, by this jury.

This jury completely charges and find ‘guilty’ thirteen ‘scapegoats’ for the tragedy; yet, the ones that are overwhelmingly ‘guilty’; the jury completely exonerates from all blame. This jury in reality has actually determined that,

 BLACK is actually WHITE.

WHITE is actually BLACK.

THE ONLY ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY ONE OF THOSE 96 DEATHS IN THAT DISASTROUS TRAGEDY THAT DAY, WAS THE CRASS WICKED BEHAVIOUR OF THE FOOTBALL FANS.

The television camera's actually reveal the, STARK VIVID TRUTH: before the 'kick off' of the match, a massive unruly mob of football fans was hysterically charging the Lapping Road turnstiles and gate. These idiotic morons at the front of this mob, were being crushed up against the building, and, the turnstiles; and, the police were forced to open that gate, in order to prevent anyone being seriously injured or killed.

Yet, at the very instant this gate was opened, this massive horde of wildly hysterical idiots charged forward through that gate pushing as hard as they could into the tunnel leading to the Lapping Road spectator stand. BUT, THIS SPECTATOR STAND WAS ALREADY COMPLETELY FULL TO OVERFLOWING. There was not any more any ‘free space’ available.

The question here to be asked is this: Did these mad hysterical idiots stop forcing their way forward, when they could not any longer go further forward? (Like intelligent people would do when queuing for admission to a theatre or cinema when moving forward is halted for some reason). No, they did not; they pushed and shoved even harder, with all of their weight; determined to get into that spectator stand.

The more they pushed, harder and harder, into that tunnel; all the poor spectators at the front of that stand, WERE CRUSHED. They were knocked off their feet, trampled upon causing severe injuries, and they were so crushed they were unable to breathe; dying by suffocation, as the result.

THIS IS THE ONLY CAUSE OR, 'CATALYST', THAT MURDERED 96 PEOPLE THAT DAY.

I don't care a damn, whatever to the contrary, this corrupt INQUIRY JURY or, any Judge, has actually decided today.

 

 

 

 

LEAVING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

Leaving the E. U.

 

If the British vote in the Referendum determines that Britain should leave the "European Community"; from the very instant of that declaration I shall proceed immediately to carry out the very drastic measures set out below.

 

1.     I shall immediately challenge ELIZABETH THE SECOND and her legal right to occupy the English throne; charging her with her failure to honour the "Original Contract" throughout the entire period of her reign.

 

2.     I shall immediately challenge the 'conspiracy' of the entire British Judiciary that has always denied the testing, questioning, or challenge of parliament in the courts; always ruling that "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689", as law, prevents that challenge.

 

3.       I shall challenge the actual true legal validity of the political party WHIPS in parliament, whose political party activities, in parliament, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"; thereby, flouting and breaching the, 'precedent of law', set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed."

 

NOTE:

Without the protection of the E.U. And the "European Human Rights Court" and the "European Human Rights Act", the British people have no protection of law at all.

 

The entire British Establishment of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament, provide no protection of law, whatsoever. There is no, "Written Constitution", "Bill of Rights", or "Supreme Court of Law" where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of Parliament from within law. And, without the 'protection' of the 'Reigning Monarch', QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND; the British have no protection of law whatsoever.

For that, 'protection'; they can only rely on the E.U.

 

Therefore, with the 'Reigning Monarch' failing to honour the "Original Contract"; (providing the protection of the "Crown's Subjects"), and, with the entire British Establishment of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament providing no protection of law at all. And, now, if the country decides to leave the E. U. Then, without a shadow of doubt; there is no 'legal right' or ‘justification’ or the need for a MONARCHY at all. Thus, the MONARCHY must be abolished.

 

 

EVIDENCE PROVING THAT ELIZABETH THE SECOND HAS REPEATEDLY BROKEN THE "ORIGINAL CONTRACT" THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF HER REIGN.

 

I shall challenge ELIZABETH THE SECOND proving that she is required to honour this contract and comply with it; by providing, both her, and, all the country, all of the 'evidence', that proves she has failed to honour this contract throughout her reign;

 

Firstly, by submitting, all the "Speeches" and the determination of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688; which can be seen here:  http://pamphletteer.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/the-original-contract.html

 

Secondly, by submitting specific instances of her failure to honour the “Original Contract” throughout her reign; as outlined below,

 

NOTE:

The 'Reigning Monarch' of England is provided with two 'legal instruments' that have been specifically created and designed for the protection of the people; they are, the "Royal Assent" and the "Royal Prerogative". The "Royal Assent" provides the 'Reigning Monarch' with the right and duty to monitor the Laws and Bills that are passed by Parliament and to verify that they are free of corruption; granting the "Assent" if they are; and, refusing the "Assent", if they are corrupt.

 

The "Royal Prerogative" provides the Monarch with three options: to advise her Ministers of Government; to warn Ministers of Government; and, whenever the People's wishes are in direct conflict with the actions of the legislators (Parliament), to order the immediate dissolution of Parliament.

 

A.    Yet, in respect to the "Royal Assent", the very last time the 'Assent' was refused was on the 11th March in the year 1708. Ever since that date every Law or Bill passed by Parliament has been granted the "Royal Assent" without the 'Reigning Monarch' bothering to vet for corruption and, without carrying out any 'checks' at all. Each 'Reigning Monarch', in turn, including ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has merely acted in like manner to a village sub-postmaster or postmistress; franking and rubber-stamping every 'piece of paper', laid before them by Parliament.

 

B.     Furthermore, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has granted the "Royal Assent" to every law or bill passed by Parliament; that has been passed and created, under the 'diktat', domination, control, and, influence of the political party WHIPS; and, the WHIPS in parliament, have no legality at all. The WHIPS instruct 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote on all the issues presented to parliament for the vote. This, specifically creates the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" and this is proscribed by the, 'precedent of law', set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed." So, every one of those Laws and Bills to which ELIZABETH THE SECOND has granted the "Royal Assent"; every one of those documents is corrupt; and, they have no true legality at all.

 

C.     In the General Election of the year 2010 the people's democratic vote determined that, (a), no political party should have a majority in parliament; and, (b), that there should be a, "CONSERVATIVE LED MINORITY GOVERNMENT"; and, that was the democratically declared 'wishes of the people' in that General Election. However, the leaders of the political parties elected to parliament in that election, they did not like that vote of the people; they decided they could ignore the 'wishes of the people' and thence to proceed to conspire with each other and create a new form of government, entirely on their own. They created a, 'coalition government', without any 'participation' of the people at all; and, they foisted that corrupt government on the country; without the people's consent.

 

D.    Here was the stark and vivid EVIDENCE that the "Wishes of the people were in direct conflict with the actions of the legislators"; but, ELIZABETH THE SECOND never lifted a finger to intervene. She ought to have used her powers of the "Royal Prerogative" to firstly, advise her Minister, DAVID CAMERON MP, that as he was the leader of the Conservative Party in parliament, he had the duty to form a minority government as determined by the people's vote in that General Election. In the event he  declined to do this or wouldn't do it; secondly, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, should then have 'warned’ him, that this was his duty; and, if he still refused to form a government, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, should then, have used the "Royal Prerogative" to order the immediate dissolution of parliament; and, ordering a new General Election to be held. In failing to do this and protect the people, she "Broke the Original Contract"; thereby, ABDICATING THE THRONE.

 

E.     When, the 'Daily Telegraph' published the startling clear stark vivid evidence that Members of Parliament had 'stolen money from the public purse' by submitting fraudulent parliamentary expenses claims; here was the stark vivid evidence for ELIZABETH THE SECOND to see and verify, that parliament was corrupt. But, she did not lift a finger to intervene. She ought to have used the "Royal Prerogative" to, immediately protect the people; ordering the immediate dissolution of parliament. Here, again, is the stark vivid evidence proving ELIZABETH THE SECOND "Broke the Original Contract" and failed miserably to protect, "HER SUBJECTS', of the British Crown.

 

 EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY OF THE BRITISH JUDICIARY

 

The British Judiciary has always denied access in the courts to, test, question, or challenge the business and the 'abuses' of parliament; the Judiciary has always ruled that "LAW" and, "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689", is the legal basis, for that denial.

 

"Article 9", reads as follows:

 "The Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament"

 

The Judiciary has always incorrectly interpreted this as, preventing, by law, all challenge to parliament in the courts. Wherever or whenever the 'business of parliament' is introduced by anyone in any case coming before a court; the Judge immediately stops all further proceedings, ruling, that parliament may not and cannot be, ‘questioned’, in any court.

 

But, the conspiring Judiciary, has always interpreted this “Bill of Rights 1689” incorrectly; because, the correct reading and interpretation of the Bill vividly reveals, the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”; which verifies that, anyone is legally entitled to test, question, or challenge parliament in the courts; whenever, PARLIAMENT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE.

 

Over-ruling ,"Article 9" and the, Supremacy of Parliament", "this paragraph in the Bill, provides the superior authority of the entire "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689"; because, it declares within its text, that this paragraph, has the authority over all the "Premises" of the Bill; and, it specifically determines that in all the "Premises" of the Bill, that nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE". Therefore, this paragraph of the Bill of Rights 1689, makes it abundantly clear by, ‘precedent of law’, that whenever parliament causes the "prejudice of the people", anyone has the right to challenge parliament from within law, in the British courts. See, Appendix “The Said Rights Clamed”, shown below.

 

EVIDENCE PROVING THAT THE POLITICAL PARTY 'WHIPS' IN PARLIAMENT, HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
 

The political party WHIPS dictate and instruct 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote, in respect of all the business of parliament, that calls for the vote. In doing this the WHIPS overrule and supplant all the 'rightful influence' that might have been placed upon those Members of Parliament, by the Constituents. This, thereby creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE", and, this is wholly unlawful and proscribed by the 'precedent of law' set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed."

See Apendix “The Said Rights Claimed” shown below.

 

APPENDIX

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

Respectfully suggest, read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for proper participation. I pose fourteen questions to answer and, I provide the answers, that need to be known. Read and learn how the British  are being badly and unlawfully governed, and, read also how Monarchy holds all ‘Subjects’ in imposed subjugation, without consent. The book is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book and a paperback, and it can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

Gordon J Sheppard                                                           15/4/2016

British, DESPOTISM

DESPOTISM

 Thomas Paine (Jan 9, 1737-June 8, 1809) an English political activist, philosopher, political theorist, and revolutionary; virtually sparked the American Revolution with his book “Common Sense”; and, he was very active and instrumental in respect to the French Revolution as well. In his book “The Rights of Man” he specifically determines that DESPOTISM always prevails, wherever in the world, there is a ‘Monarchy’.

The British would do well to heed this today. Read his determination carefully; then fully realise that this DESPOTISM is so very evident in the Great Britain, of today.

 

DESPOTISM

When despotism has established itself for ages in a country, as in France, it is not in the person of the King only that it resides. It has the appearance of doing so in show, and in nominal authority; but it is not so in practise, and in fact. It has it’s standards everywhere. Every office and department has it’s despotism, founded upon custom and usage. Every place has it’s Bastille, and every Bastille it’s despot. The original hereditary despotism resident in the person of the King, divides and subdivides itself into a thousand shapes and forms, till at last the whole of it is acted by deputation. This was the case in France; and against this species of despotism, proceeding on through an endless labyrinth of office till the source of it is scarcely perceptible, there is no mode of redress. It strengthens itself by assuming the appearance of duty, and tyrannizes under the pretence of obeying.

 

 

The vanity and the presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in Man.

 

O! Ye that love mankind!  Ye that dare oppose not only tyranny but the tyrant, stand forth!  Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her as a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart.

O! receive the fugitive and prepare in time an asylum for mankind!

 

Thomas Paine       “RIGHTS OF MAN”    (published in England 1791)

 

Note for the British: MONARCHY failing in its duty must not be tolerated. It must be abolished. “Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord”. Without the ‘Reigning Monarch’ honouring the “Original Contract”; requiring the ‘protection’ of the People; there is no need for a ‘MONARCHY’ at all.

 

The Pope...

The Pope, pontificating on,

How everyone should live.

 

The Pope declares, in respect to Gay people:

 "Every person, regardless of sexual orientation, ought to be respected in his or her dignity and treated with consideration... As for proposals to place unions between homosexual persons on the same level as marriage, there are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God's plan for marriage and family"


"THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO GROUNDS FOR CONSIDERING HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS TO BE IN ANY WAY SIMILAR OR EVEN REMOTELY ANALOGOUS TO GOD'S PLAN FOR MARRIAGE AND FAMILY".

 

GOD'S PLAN?

Thus, I challenge the Pope, and, everyone or anyone else; to actually prove that a 'GOD' exists. There is no scientific ‘evidence’ that any GOD exists or that there is a ‘life’ after death. The existence of ‘GOD’ cannot be proven at all.

GOD, is naught but the childish 'fantasy' of those that are so foolish to believe.
Every, RELIGION OF HUMANKIND, preaches the existence of a 'Life' in Heaven or Paradise'; or, in the torment of Hell, when all of HUMANKIND die. But, there is no scientific evidence for that at all. NO ONE HAS EVER RETURNED TO PLANET EARTH AFTER DYING. The existence of a 'GOD' and a 'Life after Death' has no more validity than the true existence of. 'Santa Clause'. The mere 'fantasy' solely designed, for young children to believe.

The Pope and all the 'religions' are naught but manipulating liars. Hell bent on securing total domination and control. In respect to Catholicism and the English Protestant Church; this is easily proved. Both proclaim that SEX is only permissible, and, has only been designed by ‘GOD’, for married people and procreation. Yet, the EVIDENCE proves wholly to the contrary.

IF THIS WAS THE CASE AND IF HUMAN BEINGS WERE ONLY INTENDED TO PARTICIPATE IN COPULATION FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PROCREATION;

Then I must ask the Pope, and the Protestant Church, to fully establish the true purpose and intent of the, FEMALE CLITORIS; which plays no part in 'procreation' at all.

Whoever or whatever created and designed HUMANKIND; provided the female of the species, with a 'CLITORIS'; and, that wonderful appendage for every woman, is designed solely for, SEXUAL PLEASURE and the achievement of orgasm. Either, by 'self-masturbation' or in the copulating sexual act. It is designed and intended for, SEXUAL PLEASURE; procreation thereby being the, ‘by product’, of the copulating act; by accident or design.

Assuming for the moment that there is a GOD; and, taking religion at it's word; then 'GOD'S PLAN' here, is purely providing, SEXUAL PLEASURE; achieved, by both love or lust. Not procreation.

Let the Pope and the English Protestant Religion deny that; and, let them provide the proof for that denial.

I am sick and tired of the domination and control of all the religions. None of them have any LAWFUL validity at all. And, they are the very ‘catalyst’ for all, WAR.

Note: Of course I have no complaint with all those that worship and believe; they are all entitled to their FREEDOM and the right of, FREE EXPRESSION, as anyone else; but, what they have no right to do, is to 'collectively' use their religion, to dominate and control others, that do not believe. Or, to 'indoctrinate' the very young.

 

Gordon J Sheppard