United States, SENATE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE

UNITED STATES,
"SENATE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE"

Examination of the nomination of JUDGE KAVANAUGH to be appointed to serve as a Judge on the "SUPREME COURT";
A, lifetime appointment, to the highest Court in the land.

THIS COMMITTEE HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY AND DUTY TO SERVE ALL THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA, PROTECTING THEM, FROM ANYONE WHO IS 'NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE' TO HOLD THAT OFFICE.

THEY HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO EXAMINE AND DISECT EVERY ASPECT OF THE LIFE OF THE NOMINEE.

In this case, where allegations of 'sexual abuse' has been made against JUDGE KAVANAUGH by the lady DR FORD; the Committee is faced with the dilemma that the allegations have been vociferously refuted by JUDGE KAVANAUGH;
It therefore transpires that the only conclusion that the Committee has to rely upon, is that it is, "One persons evidence against another persons evidence"; with no corroborative verification; on either side.

Yet, bearing in mind, what the Committee is actually required to judge here; "Electing the nominee to be appointed to a 'lifetime' service as a Judge on the SUPREME COURT"; the highest Court in the land,

The Committee must then rely on the old adage:

"THERE CAN BE NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE"

In this case, the 'FIRE', might be impossible to verify and prove,

But, there is, "SMOKE" IN ABUNDANCE, in the 'allegations' of not only DR FORD; but, more 'sexual abuse' claims by others, as well.

WITH ALL THIS "SMOKE" - ARROUSING POSSIBLE SUSPICION - THE COMMITTEE IN CARYING OUT IT'S DUTY, CANNOT POSSIBLY APPROVE THE NOMINATION OF THIS NOMINEE.

THE COMMITEE IS THEREFORE OBLIGED TO REFUSE THE NOMINATION OF JUDGE KAVANAUGH.

IF THE "PARTISAN" REPUBLICANS, BY THEIR VOTE FORCE APPROVAL OF THIS NOMINATION; AND PRESIDENT TRUMP DOES NOT INTERVENE?

THE ENTIRE WORLD WILL 'KNOW' THAT THE NOMINATION IN TRUTH, IS CORRUPT; AND, THERBY, AMERICA MUST BE CORRUPT, AS WELL


JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGH MUST BE "SQUEAKY CLEAN" WITHOUT ANY ALLEGATIONS WHATSOEVER AGAINST HIM, BEFORE HE CAN BE A JUDGE ON THE AMERICAN SUPREME COURT. THE HIGHEST COURT OF LAW, OF THE UNITED STATES.

HERE, THERE ARE ALLEGATIONS OF "SEXUAL ABUSE" MADE AGAINST HIM; THEREFORE WITHOUT EVEN PROVING THE ALLEGATIONS TO BE TRUE; HIS NOMINATION MUST BE REFUSED.

FAR TOO OFTEN THE WORD OF THE "VICTIM", FOR SO MANY YEARS, HAS NEVER BEEN LISTENED TO.

DR FORD, THE VICTIM HERE, REPORTS: "BRETT WAS ON TOP OF ME WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO SCREAM HE PUT HIS HAND OVER MY MOUTH, WHAT I MOST REMEMBER IS THE LAUGHTER GOING ON BETWEEN HIM AND MATT, AT MY EXPENSE."

WHEN ASKED "HOW CERTAIN SHE WAS THAT IT WAS BRETT KAVANAUGH THAT ABUSED HER"; SHE REPLIED,

"ONE HUNDRED PER CENT"

BREXIT & DEMOCRACY

DEMOCRACY

It is very interesting that absolutely every politician supporting the ‘LEAVE THE E.U.’ campaign consistently refers to, “DEMOCRACY”, in support of their campaign.

Just reflect, that in all these BREXIT debates and arguments that YOU have heard, how many times the word "DEMOCRACY" has been used. Virtually every time you have heard this word; the intent has been to deceive.

 

The TRUTH of the matter; in reality; is that they have no comprehension of DEMOCRACY at all. They merely use the word to support their own objectives and, deceive.

 

Respectfully suggest that all should now read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for proper participation. I pose fourteen questions for you to answer and, I provide the answers, that you need to know.

Read and learn how you are being badly and unlawfully governed and read also how Monarchy holds you in imposed subjugation without your consent.

The book is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book for download, and a paperback, and, it can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

 

BREXIT NEGOTIATIONS – BRITISH INTIMIDATION

 

Prime minister, THERESA MAY and Foreign Secretary, JEREMY HUNT, both attempt to intimidate the E.U. Commission, with threats.

 

The E.U. must not give way to this intimidation in any way; the British have chosen, foolishly, to leave the E.U.; the British therefore, must bear the consequences.

 

The E.U. principle priority now must be to, PROTECT THE E.U.; to, protect all the principles and policies of the E.U.; to, protect all the CITIZENS of the E.U.; including, all British “Subjects of the British Crown” who signed up to join the E.U. in the first E.U. Referendum, held in the U.K. They, ‘signed up’ to join the E.U. because the E.U. provided them with the “protection of law”, which their own country, Britain, denied. When they ‘signed up’ and joined the E.U. they instantly became, CITIZENS, of the E.U. where they were protected by the European Human Rights Court, and the European Human Rights Act.

 

In these ‘negotiations’; where Britain now seeks to leave the E.U.; the, EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS, must not now abandon these new British CITIZENS, that joined the E.U. in this way.

 

The E.U. COMMISSION must be firm in resolve to stick to all its ‘principles’; and, not let Britain intimidate; dominate and control all.

This is the typical BRITISH way; “Britain and British is Best” – “Rule Britannia” – “The Glorious days of Empire”; all over again.

 

THE E.U. MUST NOT ALLOW THIS INTIMIDATION.

 

I need and value, that, protection of E.U. law.

BRITISH PARLIAMENT CORRUPT E.U. LEGISLATION

E.U. “ARTICLE 50” BILL

 

The triggering ARTICLE 50 Bill passed in parliament was passed ‘under the influence and the diktat’ of the political party WHIPS; and, thereby, it has, no lawful legality at all.

 

Thus, this Bill must now be placed before Parliament again; but this time, with every Member of parliament having a FREE VOTE.

 

The present ARTICLE 50 Bill is unlawful because, when the political party WHIPS instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should vote; this overrules and supplants; all ‘rightful’ influence placed upon those Members, by the Constituents; and, this causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”

 

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”, is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”

 

This paragraph of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” specifically instructs Parliament, that it may have the “SUPREMACY” afforded to Parliament by “ARTICLE 9” of the Bill: or Parliament may ‘enact’ or apply any of the other “PREMISES’ of the Bill; but only if parliament complies with, “The Said Rights Claimed”, instructing Parliament, that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

The passing of ‘Acts’ ‘Motions’ and ‘Bills’ in Parliament UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS; therefore, has no legality whatsoever. It has no true ‘ validity’ at all.

 

Therefore, when the ‘REIGNING MONARCH’, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, grants the ROYAL ASSENT to any legislation passed in parliament under the ‘influence and diktat’ of the political party WHIPS; She, in fact, grants that “Assent” to CORRUPT LAW.

 

ELIZABETH the Second has the duty and responsibility to honour and comply with the “ORIGINAL CONTRACT” requiring her to act as “Head of Government”, to monitor parliament, in order to protect all “SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN” - It is her duty - to verify that all the ‘legislation’ passed in parliament is entirely free of CORRUPTION. She must ‘refuse’ to grant the ROYAL ASSENT, if the legislation has been passed CORRUPTLY. Or, if it is not in the interests of the country, and all, “SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN”

 

The QUEEN is required by ‘precedent of law’ to protect the PEOPLE

 

The, “Article 50” Bill, and, the “E.U. Withdrawal” Bill, as they stand at present,

 

BOTH HAVE NO TRUE LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

THE 16 MILLION PEOPLE WHO VOTED “REMAIN” SHOULD NOW CHALLENGE THIS ILLEGALITY IN LAW. THE BRITISH JUDICIARY SHOULD NOW ALSO DETERMINE AND VERIFY THAT A “WHIPPED VOTE” IN PARLIAMENT IS “LAWFUL”. Or rule, that it has no legality at all.

 

I am sick and tired of our country abandoning LAW and the “RULE OF LAW”, where the people apathetically, are allowing our government and parliament to create and pass legislation in the precise manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS, created their own law. With, all the horrific consequences that followed; without doing a damned thing about it.

 

I am also wholly disgusted in respect to the entire British PROFESSION OF LAW; that knows only too well; all about this terrible ILLEGALITY; but, stays silent. Just as in, 1933, the German “Profession of Law” did. Without, a ‘word’ being heard.

 

When HITLER created, and, the German democratic parliament passed his ENABLING ACT; allowing HITLER to become the supreme Head of State with the power to create his own law; this eventually, brought about, all the horrors of, WORLD WAR TWO, the,  HOLOCAUST; and, all the other crimes of the NAZI REGIME.

 

When the German people abandoned the “RULE OF LAW”, it opened the door, to all the crimes of that regime.

 

I am terrified, that, already, in my country; we are now doing precisely the same. We already, do not have a DEMOCRACY.

Our corrupt, GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT, heralds the, TOTALITARIAN REGIME.

TEXT AND HISTORY OF "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" http://pamphletteer.blogspot.com/2018/08/text-and-history-of-said-rights-claimed.html

 

European Convention on Human Rights

Saturday, 15 September 2018

20:21

When anyone British has their “Human Rights” violated, abused or denied; the BRITISH GOVERNMENT is required by the “LAW” of “Article 1” and “Article 13” of this Convention; (Which it has signed); to provide access to the British Courts, in order for them to secure, the possible remedy.

 

My “Human Rights” are violated; various British ‘authorities’ are DISCRIMINATING against me denying my access to a, TRUE DEMOCRACY.

 

I want to challenge that INJUSTICE in a Court of Law. The BRITISH GOVERNMENT is obliged by this CONVENTION to provide that access.

 

The ‘authorities’ violating my “HUMAN RIGHTS” and denying my access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY are,

 

1.     The “Reigning Monarch” HM QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND who has not honoured the “Original Contract” all of the time she has occupied the throne. This ‘unwritten’ contract, “Betwixt  King and People”, requires all “Reigning Monarchs” to act as  “HEAD OF GOVERNMENT”; to, monitor Parliament; and to protect the “CROWNS SUBJECTS” from the ‘abuse’ and ‘prejudice’ of Parliament. Granting the “Royal Assent” if the laws passed by Parliament are free of corruption; refusing the “Assent” if the laws so passed by Parliament are not in the interests of the country and the People, or if they are corrupt. HM QUEEN has frequently granted, or has allowed the granting of “Royal Assent, by the despots now acting in her name, to corrupt “Acts” “Motions” and “Bills” that have been passed in Parliament ‘under the diktat and influence’ of the political party WHIPS; and the WHIPS in Parliament has no ‘legality’ at all. Thereby, HM QUEEN violates my “Human Rights”, EVERY TIME SHE HAS GRANTED THE “ROYAL ASSENT” TO CORRUPT LAW.

2.     Government and Parliament also violate my “Human Rights” and deny my access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY, by creating and passing Acts, Motions, and Bills in Parliament today; in precisely the same manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their own laws. With, all the horrific consequences that followed.

3.     The political party WHIPS in Parliament also violate my “Human Rights” and deny my access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY because when they instruct ‘Members of Parliament’ on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all my OWN ‘rightful influence’ I may place upon my Member of Parliament; thereby causing, “THE PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” - Yet, “Prejudice of the People” is specifically proscribed by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed. This paragraph of that Bill specifically instructs Parliament that it may have its “SUPREMACY” afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” or Parliament may ‘enact’ any of the other ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; but only upon the conditions as set out in, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” which specifically instructs Parliament that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

4.     The entire BRITISH JUDICIARY also violates my “Human Rights” and denies my access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY; by consistently “Conspiring to Pervert the Course of Justice” and, deceiving the British People, that Parliament may not be ‘questioned’ in the Courts. By, ruling that “Article 9” is, ABSOLUTE in law, thereby ‘preventing’ the questioning of Parliament in the Courts, irrespective of any circumstance. This ruling is wholly untrue and corrupt, because the correct reading of the “Bill of Rights 1689” reveals that anyone has the right to ‘question’ Parliament in the Courts, if and whenever, Parliament “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

 

REMEDY SOUGHT:

 

IN CONSIDERATION AS TO WHETHER MY HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, AND I HAVE BEEN DENIED MY RIGHTFUL ACCESS TO DEMOCRACY, THE COURT MUST DECIDE ON ALL THE FOLLOWING CRITERION.

 

A. Whether the E.U. REFERENDUM ballot paper provided enough information, to properly consider how to vote. The ballot paper provided only two options; two boxes to tick, "Leave" and "Remain"; I contend that this was insufficient information because it provided no information as to what would happen if the declared result of the referendum determined, "LEAVE". There was no mention whatsoever provided in respect to the fact that in the UK joining the E.U. that this was a 'Treaty" and, thereby the 'withdrawal from the E.U.; required 'negotiations' with the E.U.; before the actual 'leaving' could take place. The ballot paper provided none of this, nor did it even mention the words: "Article 50". I therefore contend that this 'ballot paper' breached my "HUMAN RIGHTS".

B. The Court must also decide whether a "WHIPPED VOTE" in Parliament is lawful or not. I contend that the political party WHIPS in parliament instructing Members of Parliament on how they must vote; has no legality at all. They flout and breech the, 'precedent of law' set out in, "The Said Rights Claimed".

C.  Therefore, the Court must determine whether the "Whipped Vote" taken in Parliament passing the "Article 50" Bill; and the, "E.U. Withdrawal Bill"; is lawful or not. I contend that they are both unlawful and corrupt; and, that they both deny, my rightful access to, DEMOCRACY.

D.FINALLY, THE COURT MUST DECIDE ON THE LEVEL OF THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION TO BE AWARDED, IF THE COURT ACCEPTS, THAT BY THE "EVIDENCE" PROVIDED HERE; MY HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.

E.  I THEREFORE SUBMIT THE CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION AS FOLLOWS:

F.   I want and SUBMIT THE CLAIM for the huge financial compensation of, "ONE MILLION POUNDS PER YEAR; FOR EACH YEAR OF MY LIFE; MY ACCESS TO DEMOCRACY HAS BEEN DENIED.

G.      This huge compensation claim is based solely on the value that the British and American governments ACTUALLY place on, DEMOCRACY. Both of these governments have spent, "Billions of Pounds" waging war and killing thousands in order to install their 'idea' of DEMOCRACY in other lands: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc etc, wherever, the British or American soldiers’ boots have trampled on other lands.

H.THEREFORE, MY CLAIM OF "ONE MILLION POUNDS PER YEAR" FOR EACH YEAR OF MY LIFE; WHEREBY "DEMOCRACY" HAS BEEN DENIED TO ME; AND, MY "HUMAN RIGHTS' HAVE BEEN VIOLATED; IS MERELY 'TINY' IN COMPARISON.

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX

Open in new tab:

 

"European Human Rights Convention:

https://rightsinfo.org/the-rights-in-the-european-convention/

 

"The Said Rights Claimed"

http://pamphletteer.blogspot.com/2018/08/text-and-history-of-said-rights-claimed.html

 

 

 

 

THE ARROGANT JEW

THE SHEER ARROGANCE OF THE JEW

Assuming, that they have the right, to impose their definition of “Anti-Semitism” on everyone else.

 

ALL HUMANKIND EVER BORN TO PLANET EARTH, HAS THE IRREFUTABLE RIGHT OF, “SELF DETERMINATION”, ENTRENCHED IN THE “NATURAL LAW” INHERENT IN THEIR GENES.

ALL HUMANKIND HAS THE LAWFUL IRREFUTABLE RIGHT TO DETERMINE THEIR OWN DESTINY. THUS, THEY, EVERYONE OF THEM, HAS THE LEGAL IRREFUTABLE RIGHT TO DETERMINE, “ANTI-SEMITISM”, FOR THEMSELVES.

 

THE JEW MUST LEARN, THAT EVERY MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY, HAS THAT RIGHT, TO DETERMINE THIS FOR THEMSELVES.

 

THE JEWISH IMPOSITION OF, THE, “INTERNATIONAL HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE ALLIANCE” DEFINITION, AS, ESTABLISHING, THE LAWFUL CRITERION OF WHAT “ANTI-SEMITISM” REALLY IS; HAS NO VALIDITY WHATSOEVER, IN LAW.

EVERYONE ON PLANET EARTH HAS THE LAWFUL RIGHT, “INHERENT IN THE GENE” TO DETERMINE EVERYTHING FOR THEMSELVES.

 

JEREMY CORBYN AND THE LABOUR PARTY MUST NOT BE INFLUENCED BY THE CORRUPT MEDIA AND PRO JEWISH CAMPAIGN CALCULATED TO FORCE THE LABOUR PARTY TO SUBMIT TO THIS “IHRA” DEFINITION AND, SUBJUGATE THEMSELVES, TO THIS TYRANNY.

THEY, MUST REFUSE TO ACCEPT THIS "IHRA"DEFINITION. BY, ASSERTING, THE “NATURAL LAW”, "INHERENT IN THE GENE".
THE, RIGHT, TO “SELF DETERMINATION” BY EVERYONE; LIVING ON PLANET EARTH.

 

 

 

FRANK FIELD MP RESIGNS...

 

_{FRANK FIELD RESIGNS THE LABOUR PARTY,}

_{FRANK FIELD MP, ‘GRAND-STANDING’, YET AGAIN}

 

_{Typical of this Labour Party ‘freak’ (his ego knows no bounds) he pontificates about the ‘alleged’ anti-Semitism in the Labour Party; and says, “it must cease”; But, then, he offers no solutions on how this should be done.}

 

_{In my humble opinion, he could quit the Labour Party altogether; he has always been a, 'maverick' and ‘grand-standing’, throughout the whole of his political career.}

 

_{WHAT THE JEW, THE ETHNIC MINORITY, AND THE POLITICIAN WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND;} 

_{'DISCRIMINATION', IS THE “NATURAL LAW” INHERENT IN THE GENE.}

 

_{MY BIRTH; an imposed act and condition, in which I had no participation whatsoever, thereby, doomed me, to live a ‘life’ until I die; therefore, this imposed act; and, my, CONSENT TO LIVE BY THE RULE OF LAW; provides for me, all the 'rights' I need.}

 

<sub>Governments, the U.N. and Institutions do not 'GIVE' us our 'rights; from, the very instant of our birth; We, already have them; in the, “NATURAL LAW”,  “INHERENT IN THE GENES”.

Thereby, both myself, and, all HUMANKIND, have the irrefutable ‘right’, to, DISCRIMINATE, for or against, any damned thing or person, that we choose.</sub>

 

_{Man made, corrupt, fake, or ‘ersatz’ law; can never overrule or supplant; the, 'NATURAL LAW' INHERENT IN THE GENE.}

 

_{I AM SICK AND TIRED of all this ‘anti-Semitism’ nonsense that now prevails. The, JEW, may not have that, ‘special privilege’ of a 'LAW', protecting them from, DISCRIMINATION; that they now demand.}

 

_{THEY MAY NOT HAVE, that, ‘Positve Discrimination’, in favour of themselves; when, that, being provided for them; heaps, ‘NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION’; upon every one else.}

 

_{There is no, ‘LAW’ protecting ME from, DISCRIMINATION; I am, DISCRIMINATED  against, twenty four hours, of every day; I am being denied the access to a, TRUE DEMOCRACY, by all the 'authorities of my country', that dominate and control my life. These authorities are,}

 

_{1. HM QUEEN, WHO HAS NOT HONOURED THE “ORIGINAL CONTRACT” REQUIRING THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE; THROUGHOUT HER ENTIRE REIGN; AND, WHO FREQUENTLY GRANTS THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’, TO THE, ‘CORRUPT LAW”, CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT.}

 

_{2. GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT, CREATING AND PASSING ‘LAW’ IN PARLIAMENT TODAY; IN PRECISELY THE SAME MANNER AS ‘HITLER’ AND THE ‘NAZIS’ CREATED THEIR OWN LAW. BY, THE 'DIKTAT', OF THE POLITICAL PARTY; AND, NOT BY, DEMOCRATIC CONSENT.}

 

_{3. THE POLITICAL PARTY ‘WHIPS’ IN PARLIAMENT - THAT INSTRUCT 'ELECTED' MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW - THEY MUST VOTE - THAT HAS NO TRUE LEGALITY AT ALL.}

 

_{4. THE ROTTEN AND CORRUPT ‘JUDICIARY’ THAT PERSISTENTLY “CONSPIRES TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE", AND, DECEIVE, THE BRITISH PEOPLE; RULING, THAT THE “SUPREMACY” OF PARLIAMENT; AND, THE, ‘ABUSE OF PARLIAMENT; MAY NOT BE “QUESTIONED” IN THE COURTS.}

 

_{YET, I CANNOT CHALLENGE ALL THIS WICKED ‘INJUSTICE’ AND, THIS WHOLLY INCORRECT RULING, OF THE JUDICIARY; FROM, WITHIN LAW; BECAUSE, THE ENTIRE “PROFESSION OF LAW” IN THE COUNTRY; HAS NOT THE COURAGE; TO CHALLENGE THE ‘JUDICIARY’ ON THIS RULING.}

 _{The, "Bill of Rights 1689" fully establishes that anyone may 'question' or 'challenge' Parliament in the Courts; if and whenever; Parliament, "Prejudice the People".
 The, political party WHIPS in Parliament, do, "Prejudice the People", thereby the WHIPS in Parliament, has no true legality at all.}

<sub>IF I CANNOT CHALLENGE THIS WICKED ‘DISCRIMINATION’ - HEAPED UPON ME - IN A COURT OF LAW.

 I AM GOING TO MAKE DAMNED SURE ; THAT NO ‘JEW’ IS GOING TO BE AFFORDED THAT, “SPECIAL PRIVILEGE”, THAT I AM DENIED.</sub>

 

_{Will, ‘grand-standing’, FRANK FIELD MP, provide me with that access?}