"WHIPPED VOTE" IN PARLIAMENT IS UNLAWFUL - MESSAGE SENT TO HELEN HAYES MP

GordonJ Sheppard

Thu 30/05/2019 16:42

• Helen Hayes

 

Dear Helen Hayes MP

 

LABOUR PARTY must get to grips properly understanding that a “Whipped Vote” in Parliament has no LEGALITY at all.

 

1. The WHIPS and their political party ‘activities’ in Parliament are not entrenched in LAW.

2. They are merely the ‘private arrangements’ of the political parties.

3. There is not one LEGAL DOCUMENT or LEGAL INSTRUMENT in the entire archive of Great Britain, that verifies and establishes the LEGALITY of the WHIPS in Parliament.

4. The political party WHIPS in Parliament has no legality at all.

5. Furthermore, when the WHIPS instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituents; who elected those Members in the first place.

6. This therefore causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”

7. Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” by Parliament is specifically proscribed by the, “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.

8. This paragraph within the “BILL OF RIGHTS” provides the ‘protection of the people’; It specifically instructs Parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only providing, that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

9. The “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” is the ‘Supreme Authority” over everything that is written in the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”. For, it states within its text; that it is the ‘authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.                                  

 

CONCLUSION

A. THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT DO “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”;  THEREFORE, THE “WHIPS” HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

B. A “WHIPPED VOTE’ PASSED. BY PARLIAMENT; IS ENTIRELY UNLAWFUL; HAVING NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

 

C. IN CONSEQUENCE; THE “BREXIT” TRIGGERING OF “ARTICLE 50” IN THE “European (Withdrawal) Bill” PASSED BY PARLIAMENT IN A “WHIPPED VOTE” IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL; HAVING NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

 

D. THEREBY, ALL THE NEGOTIATIONS, ALL THE ENORMOUS COST, AND ALL THE WORK THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE BETWEEN THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE EU COMMISSION IN RESPECT OF GREAT BRITAIN ‘LEAVING’ THE EU; HAS ALL. BEEN WASTED. BECAUSE, ALL OF IT, HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT, WITHOUT ANY ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

 

E. TESTING THE LEGALITY OR ILLEGALITY OF THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT CAN EASILY BE VERIFIED, BY THE MERE SUBMISSION OF THE CASE TO THE BRITISH “SUPREME COURT” OR, TO THE “EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE”.

 

Anyone, or, any MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT; that still insist on the LEGALITY of the WHIPS; They must now establish that ‘insistence’ in these COURTS OF LAW, Otherwise, the WHIPS in Parliament; must be ABOLISHED at once. With, BREXIT, “ARTICLE 50” being declared as unlawful.

 

JEREMY CORBYN

250,000 people voted for JEREMY CORBYN to be the leader of the LABOUR PARTY. They each voted for him because they were of the opinion that he was to be ‘trusted’ and that he would LEAD THE LABOUR PARTY. He has not only betrayed that ‘TRUST’ by not ‘leading’ at all; but, worse than that, he by his own actions has established he should not be trusted at all. By his own actions he has proved to be a, HYPOCRITE. Throughout his own political party career in parliament and in ‘voting’ he has failed to comply with the instructions of the Labour Party Whips; doing so because he chose to represent those that elected him in preference to the political party ‘diktat’. He exercised his FREEDOM to choose.

 

Yet, the very instant he becomes the leader of the Labour Party; he denies that same FREEDOM to all elected Members of the Labour Parliamentary Party. He instructs them all, to comply, with the instructions of the, “WHIPS”

 

Nothing could be more hypocritical.

 

 BFN Regards, Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

The Said Rights Claimed

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

 

 

URGENT MAJOR ALERT FOR EURO COMMISSION

Urgent Warning for all Members of the European Commission.

Please take heed.

 

Sooner or later someone is going to get ‘access’ to either the “BRITISH SUPREME COURT” or the “EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, in order to test, question and challenge the, LEGALITY of the,

“Triggering of Article 50”,

 Which was passed in the British Parliament; under the domination and control of a “Whipped Vote”. Which, had no legality at all.

 

And, when that happens; and the JUDICIARY of those Courts, will have no alternative but to uphold that ‘illegality’ and rule that “Article 50” was passed by the British Parliament, UNLAWFULLY;

 

The entire World will then erupt in paroxysms of uncontrollable laughter and ridicule for the “EUROPEAN COMMISSION”; for wasting two whole years of costly ‘negotiations’ with the British, trying to arrange the procedure and final agreement arrived at, in order for the United Kingdom to leave the EU.

 

The entire World will wonder, WHY THE EU, did not even have the intelligence or bother to check the LEGALITY of what was taking place in the British Parliament, at this time.

 

CONCLUSION

1.          “Article 50” was triggered and passed in the British Parliament under a “Whipped Vote”.

2.          A “Whipped Vote” in the British Parliament; has no LEGALITY at all.

3.          The “Political Party WHIPS in the British Parliament”, has no LEGALITY whatsoever.

4.          The “WHIPS” are not entrenched in British Law.

5.          The “WHIPS” in parliament are merely the ‘private arrange-ments’ of the Political Parties.

6.          Furthermore, “The WHIPS” political party activities in the British Parliament; instructing, elected Members of Parliament on how they must ‘VOTE’; overrules and supplants all rightful influence of the Constituents

7.          That, elected those Members of Parliament, in the first place.

8.          This political party activity is entirely, UNLAWFUL; because, it causes, the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

9.          Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”, is wholly ‘proscribed’ by the, “Protection of the People” provided by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”.

10.In the paragraph of this Bill, known as the, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”; this specifically instructs Parliament; and, Members of Parliament; that they may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” written in the Bill; (anything written in the Bill); but only upon the conditions, that nothing that Parliament does, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

A.        The, “Political Party “WHIPS” do, “Prejudice the People”.

B.         A, “WHIPPED VOTE” in Parliament, also causes the “Prejudice of the People”; therefore, it has no legality at all.

 

C.         “Article 50”, WAS PASSED IN PARLIAMENT, in a “Whipped Vote”; therefore, likewise, it has no legality at all.

 

 

WAKE UP 16 MILLION REMAINERS.....

When will all the 16 Million "Remainers" come to their senses and properly understand that BREXIT (as it stands at present) is entirely UNLAWFUL.

 Article 50 passed in parliament under the influence of a "Whipped Vote" had no LEGALITY at all.

The "WHIPS" in parliament instructing elected Members of Parliament on how trhey must vote; is entirely UNLAWFUL.

The "WHIPS" are not entrenched in LAW; they are merely the private arrangements of the political parties.

There is not one LEGAL INSTRUMENT anywhere in the archive of Great Britain that will verify the legal validity of the "WHIPS" in parliament. THEY ARE ENTIRELY UNLAWFUL.

This 'WHIPS' political party activity also flouts and breaches the 'protection of the people' provided in the "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689".
In the paragraph of the Bill, known as, "The Said Rights Claimed" parliament is specifically instructed that, parliament may 'enact' or 'apply' any of the "PREMISES" of the Bill; (everything written in the Bill); but only on condition that nothing parliament does, "OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

The "WHIPS" do "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE". And, "ARTICLE 50" of the "European (Withdrawal) Bill" was passed in parliament under a "WHIPPED VOTE"

Therefore it has no LEGALITY at all. All the two year negotiations that have taken place by the government and the EU, in order to LEAVE the EU, have all been wasted. Because,

THE TRIGGERING OF "ARTICLE 50" HAD NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

ALL THAT NEEDS DOING NOW IS TO TEST AND CHALLENGE THAT 'LEGALITY' IN THE "SUPREME COURT"

BREXIT - URGENT ATTENTION OF VINCE CABLE MP

BREXIT - URGENT MESSAGE FOR VINCE CABLE MP; Leader of the Liberal Party.

 

In respect of ‘BREXIT’; You now announce that you are going to, ‘REVOKE’ “Article 50”.

 

Please take note, Sir;

 

There is no need to revoke “Article 50” because it is already wholly illegal and unlawful; all that is necessary; is to test and challenge the, LEGALITY, in the ‘SUPREME COURT”.

Where the JUDICIARY, will be unable to refute all the contentions and the submissions ‘submitted’ in support of the claim. As set out here,

 

Explanation:

“Article 50” of the “EU (Withdrawal) Bill” was passed in parliament in a “WHIPPED VOTE”. Elected Members of Parliament were instructed by the ‘WHIPS’, on how they should vote.

 

This political activity by the ‘WHIPS’ in parliament has no LEGALITY whatsoever.

The ‘WHIPS’ are not entrenched in ‘LAW’.

They are merely the ‘private’ arrangements of the political parties.

There is not one LEGAL INSTRUMENT anywhere within the entire archive of the United Kingdom, that can prove and establish the, LEGALITY OF THE ‘WHIPS’, in parliament.

 

Furthermore, when the ‘WHIPS’ instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote; this, over-rules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituents. WHO ELECTED THOSE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, in the first place.

This, therefore, causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is specifically proscribed by the ‘peoples protection’ afforded by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”. – In the paragraph of that Bill known as, “The Said Rights Claimed” – this specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but, only upon the conditions, that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

1.            The political party ‘WHIPS’ in parliament do, “Prejudice the People”

2.            Article 50 passed in parliament by a ‘WHIPPED VOTE’, has caused, the “Prejudice of the People”

3.            The JUDICIARY OF THE ‘SUPREME COURT’ WILL FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO REFUTE THIS. Because,

4.            The, “Said Rights Claimed” is the “Supreme Authority” of the entire “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”. For, it states within its text that it is the, ‘AUTHORITY’, over all the “PREMISES”, of the Bill.

5.         The Said Rights Claimed  

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

6.            The, “Said Rights Claimed” even over-rules the “SUPREMACY” of Parliament itself if and whenever parliament; “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

7.            The, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” is the one ‘LAW’ that is, “Written in Stone”.

 

8.             It can never be amended or even abolished, without causing the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”

9.            The mere ‘proposition’ being presented to parliament for the ‘consent’ of parliament for the use of the ‘WHIPS’; could not even take place; without causing the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

VINCE CABLE, Sir,

I urge you to my read my book “DEMOCRACY”. It is available here in two formats: Kindle e-book download £1.90; or, Paperback £3.,50.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

16 MILLION STUPID REMAINER'S

BREXIT – 16 Million Foolish ‘Remainer’s’

I did not spend ’20 years’ researching for the ‘legality’ of the way the British are governed; and, how they are ruled by Monarchy. For nothing;

I researched the whole period of the “Glorious Revolution” and the origins of “Parliaments Supremacy” because I was absolutely convinced that there was no ‘legality’ at all. And, I wanted to write my book, about all this.

At the completion of my research, as I suspected, I found no ‘legality’ whatsoever.

So, I then wrote this ‘guide’ for proper participation in British Democracy.

The book “DEMOCRACY” can be purchased here:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

 

TO ALL ‘BREXIT’ REMAINERS,

 

I provide for you a ‘PETITION’ that will end ‘BREXIT’ at once. Yet, all you lazy and negligent ‘Remainer’s’, wholly ignore and refuse to sign. You all prefer the USELESS wasting of resources mounting stupid wild demonstration protests in the streets;

(One Million marching in London to get a “People’s Vote’, and; Four Million signing a petition to get a new referendum)

 That, gets nowhere. Because, without necessary ‘force’; government pays no attention to at all.

 

My petition has the force of, “LAW”

It challenges the ‘legal validity’ of the “Triggering of Article 50”, by a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament. And, it contends that, there is no ‘legality’ at all.

Signing my petition ‘forces’ the Judges of the SUPREME COURT to carefully examine and test the lawful validity of the “Whipped Vote” in Parliament.

 

I can assure every ‘Remainer’ that due, to the conclusions of my ’20-year research’, the JUDICIARY will be unable to refute the allegations submitted.

Why?

Because, the, “PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE” provided within the “Bill of Rights 1689”, in the paragraph, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”; specifically instructs Parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but, that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 The Said Rights Claimed

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular,
The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

The political party ‘WHIPS’ in parliament, instruct elected Members of Parliament, on how they must vote. Which, therefore, overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituent. Which, thereby, does, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

So, a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament has no legality at all; Therefore, the “Triggering of Article 50”, passed in parliament under the coercion of a “Whipped Vote”, cannot have any, LEGALITY at all.

IN CONSEQUENCE, all the, “EU WITHDRAWAL LEGISLATION” and, all the negotiations that have been carried out by government and the EU for the last two years, has all been wasted; because, it was carried out; without any, ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

 

SIGN THE PETITION,

https://www.change.org/p/lord-chief-justice-of-supreme-court-violation-of-human-rights

 

  

VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

BREXIT VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS

SEE READ AND SIGN THIS PETITION SENT TO THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT.
TEST AND EXAMINE THE LEGAL VALIDITY OF,

1. THE 2016 REFERENDUM BALLOT PAPER

2. THE TRIGGERING OF “ARTICLE 50” IN THE “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL” PASSED IN PARLIAMENT IN AN UNLAWFUL WHIPPED VOTE”

3. THE POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITY OF THE ‘WHIPS’ IN PARLIAMENT


https://www.change.org/p/lord-chief-justice-of-supreme-court-violation-of-human-rights

BREXIT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL

BREXIT – THERESA MAY’S BIG MISTAKES

She failed to rely on DEMOCRACY and the ‘democratic vote’; She, preferred the unlawful imposition of the ‘diktat’ of the Totalitarian Regime.

WHICH HAD NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

EXPLANATION

In BREXIT she imposed a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament in order to pass “Article 50” of the EU Treaty; so that negotiations could commence with the EU; for leaving the EU.

 

But, here, she made two big drastic miscalculations and mistakes,

 

1.                       The first big mistake she made was that, a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament, HAS NO LEGALITY whatsoever; it flouts and breaches the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the “Bill of Rights 1689”. The, 'WHIPS' and their political party activities in parliament are not 'entrenched' in LAW; the, 'WHIPS' very presence in parliament; irrespective of their 'unlawful' activities; are merely the private arrangements of and between, the political parties. There is no 'LEGAL INSTRUMENT' anywhere in the United Kingdom; to verify the 'legality' of the 'WHIPS' in parliament.
      
     

    

2.                       The ‘Whips’ instructing Members of Parliament on how they must vote causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”. It overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' of the Constituent. Yet, this is proscribed in the "Bill of Rights 1689"; by, “The Said Rights Claimed”


   The Said Rights Claimed

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example"  
  

HUMAN RIGHTS 

1.  The second big mistake she made was that, BREXIT and the withdrawal from the EU, also ‘violates’ “Human Rights”. Because, withdrawal, from the EU, also withdraws from the jurisdiction of the “European Court of Justice” and, “European Human Rights Law”; provided by the Treaty. This therefore denies access to all or any remedy, for the ‘violation’ of, “Human Rights”.

2. BREXIT flouts and violates my “Human Rights”. It denies my right of access to both ‘LAW’ and, a true ‘DEMOCRACY”.

3. Thus, the, “WHIPPED VOTE”, in parliament passing the “EU (Withdrawal) Bill”; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

THERESA MAY and her arrogance, GOT IT ALL WRONG; She should have relied on the democratic vote; and, a true, “DEMOCRACY”

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL SIXTEEN MILLION “REMAINERS” – IF YOU WANT TO STOP ‘BREXIT’ – IT IS NOT TOO LATE.

SCREAM FROM THE ROOFTOPS,

 

“We want access to the “SUPREME COURT” in order to test and challenge the LEGALITY of “Article 50” passed in parliament by a “Whipped Vote”.

Chant repeatedly, “BREXIT IS UNLAWFUL” “ARTICLE 50” and “SUPREME COURT”.

SIXTEEN MILLION VOICES ALL SCREAMING THIS AND CHANTING THESE WORDS; WILL ACHIEVE THE END OF BREXIT.