LADY CHATTERLEY'S LOVER...

LADY CHATTERLEY'S LOVER,

And, the BBC....

BBC television, in featuring this DH LAWRENCE classic story again; has in this version intentionally censored or played down the SEX, in the story and in the book. Complying with the current censorious diktat of both Church and the Totalitarian State; the BBC is scared rigid to portray the story of DH LAWRENCE, as it has been originally written.

Great Britain today is rapidly returning to the days of 'pre-1960's' repression.

LADY CHATTERLEY'S LOVER is 'SEX'.
The story written by DH LAWRENCE is all about 'SEX'.
To leave the 'SEX' out or to play down the 'SEX' wholly destroys the original classical work. Leaving the 'SEX' out or playing down the 'SEX' in this BBC production; is positively absurd.

This censored BBC production merely insults the TV viewer and their intelligence. Leaving the SEX out, or playing down the SEX in, "LADY CHATTERLEY's LOVER", is just as absurd as viewing, "Planet Earth", yet censoring from all view, "ALL OF THE PEOPLE"

 SEX is predominate throughout the entire book, it features,

1. The unfortunate 'impotence' of the, husband; who cannot perform the sexual act through injury sustained in war.
2. The urgent and desperate need of the wife who yearns for the sexual attentions and the sexual penetration of the male.
3. The sheer lust and sexual pleasure of both the 'gamekeeper' and this wife, who joyfully engage in copulation.

In the famous "Penguin" trial where the publisher was accused of publishing an obscene book; the Jury returned the verdict of “Not Guilty" determining in, LAW, that the book was not obscene and, furthermore, that it did not, "deprave or corrupt". Yet, as the prosecution pointed out during the trial the 'language' in the book contained the words "FUCK" and "FUCKING" no less than 30 times. And, other words complained of in the book, which the prosecution asserted would, 'deprave and corrupt'; were: CUNT, 14 times; BALLS, 13 times; SHIT and ARSE, 6 times each; COCK, 4 times; and, PISS, 3 times.

Yet, the Jury were still not convinced "beyond all reasonable doubt" that these words were intended to "deprave or corrupt".

How is it then that in this, 21st Century of Humankind, that we allow, both Church and the, 'Totalitarian State', and, the BBC, to censor these common 'English' words from our lives?

THE RIGHT OF "FREE EXPRESSION" IS INHERENT IN THE GENE.

Gordon J Sheppard

SAFER FEMALE TRAVEL....

JEREMY CORBYN's IDEA FOR SAFER FEMALE TRAVEL.

It should be noted how quickly LIZ KENDAL, YVETTE COOPER, and ANDY BURNHAM seize the political opportunity to attack and criticise JEREMY CORBYN's idea, to make it safer for female travel.

JEREMY CORBYN has only stated that, possibly, the introduction of 'Women Only' train carriages might help to ease the problem of women being attacked whilst travelling on a train. He, has not stated, at all, that he intends to introduce the carriages. HE MERELY PROPOSES, 'CONSULTATION"

But, the opportunistic three mentioned above; and, the 'politically correct' of both Media and, some women themselves, condemn the idea out of hand. Thereby, upholding, their 'politically correct' INDEPENDENCE, at any price.

This wholly clarifies in stark vivid detail how stupid both Media and these people, really are.

Were the 'Women Only' carriages to be introduced, no one is forcing the women to travel in them. Those women, who intelligently acknowledge the provision of the carriages is introduced to provide them with better protection, will travel in these carriages. But, the 'politically correct' in upholding their, INDEPENDENCE, will still intend to ignore that, 'safety'; and, by 'cutting off their noses to spite their faces'; they will insist, on travelling at risk.

Gordon J Sheppard

SEXUAL ABUSE ALLEGATIONS...

LORD JANNER ‘SEXUAL ABUSE’ ALLEGATIONS.

 

NOW WE ALL KNOW, WHAT ALL THESE 'SEXUAL ABUSE' ALLEGATIONS, ARE ALL ABOUT,

MONEY MONEY MONEY.

The DAILY MAIL reports, "Janner sued for damages by 6 alleged abuse victims"; and, asserts that the alleged victims have begun legal action to sue him for hundreds of thousands of pounds. The legal experts asserting, that in a combined compensation claim; the claim would exceed £2.5million pounds.

ALLEGED VICTIMS AND THEIR CORRUPT LAWYERS ARE NOT SEEKING "JUSTICE" AT ALL. MONEY, IS THE TRUE MOTIVATION.

Ever since the JIMMY SAVILE sex abuse allegations first hit the headlines alleged 'victims' have been coming out if the woodwork in droves, alleging they were sexually abused. Lawyers have been actively pursuing 'clients' to seize the opportunity to cash in. All asserting, that they only seek "JUSTICE".

It is imperative now for both Government and Parliament; and, the Judiciary; to make it absolutely clear that sexual abuse 'victims' pursuing any claim in the courts will only receive, "JUSTICE", in future; if the offender has been fully found 'Guilty' beyond all reasonable doubt; and, that the, "JUSTICE", so rendered by the court, will only be by, PUNISHMENT FOR THE CRIME; but, that, the courts, will not award or entertain, any claims for, MONEY, at all.

Removing the MONEY from all such claims; will verify, the true motivation of "ONLY SEEKING JUSTICE", where any 'sexual abuse' claim, has been made.

Today, with the wild ‘sexual abuse’ hysteria prevailing in the country, after the JIMMY SAVILE allegations first hit the headlines; it is far too easy to assert and allege, 'historical sexual abuse', has taken place; because, historical sexual abuse, is virtually impossible to prove.

The alleged 'victims' and their 'lawyers' merely relying on getting convictions, without actually having to produce any corroborative ‘EVIDENCE’ at all; solely, relying upon, the ‘sympathy’ for the victim; by a Jury.

IT IS NOW IMPERATIVE THAT THE COURTS MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT HISTORICAL SEXUAL ABUSE MUST BE ACTUALLY PROVED BY 'EVIDENCE' ESTABLISHING GUILT. AND, THAT NO MONEY WILL BE AWARDED AT ALL.

GUILT MUST IN FUTURE BE ESTABLISHED,
A. By forensic evidence, or,
B. By several witnesses that have actually witnessed the abuse.

Highly publicised recent sexual abuse trials in this country have been naught but the travesty of injustice; where there has hardly been any 'concrete evidence' being presented in the courts at all.

Guilt, has merely been established by, assertion, accusation, assumption, and speculation, without any actual ‘evidence’ being presented at all.

Everyone, rightly, must have sympathy for the terrible plight endured by the genuine victims of sexual abuse; but, where MONEY is present as a ‘motivator’ for accusation; the ‘word’ alone, of the accuser, must always be in doubt.

LABOUR PARTY LEADERSHIP ELECTION

Andy Burnham, Liz Kendal, Yvette Cooper, all display evidence of personal political ambitions. JEREMY CORBYN, to the contrary, displays only the need for, Socialism and Democracy. Thus, the 'choice' for a 'leader', is therefore, abundantly clear.

 

Gordonj

      

 

 

ITV, BGT, and the 'alleged' dog con....

ITV and the ‘alleged’ dog con.

BGT AND ITV DIDN'T CON, DUPE, OR, DECEIVE, ANYONE.

 STUNT MEN AND STUNT WOMEN HAVE ALWAYS BEEN USED IN BOTH FILM AND TELEVISION PRODUCTION EVER SINCE THE INVENTION OF THE CAMERA.

 I see no reason at all why 'stunt dogs' or any other animals should not also be used, in TV productions.

NEITHER BGT OR ITV was under any obligation to advise the BGT TELEVISION VIEWER that a stunt dog was being used, in any act being performed in that “Britain’s Got Talent” competition, that night. And, the TV viewer witnessing that entire 'production', as it was transmitted, that night, witnessed with their own eyes, a dog 'walking a tightrope' and, performing other wonderful tricks, throughout that entire act.

 If the TV viewers eyes deceived them into believing that 'only one dog' had performed that act; then that, 'illusion' and, that, 'reality', was entirely due to them. They, only actually saw 'one dog' performing in that act; it was the mischievous reporting of journalism that later informed them, otherwise.

But, neither, BGT or ITV were under any obligation, to tell the TV viewer, otherwise. In film and television productions 'stunt men' and 'stunt women' have always been used; and, in both circumstances, where the cinema goer or, the television viewer, has watched that film or production; the, producers of the production, have, never ever, advised beforehand or afterwards, that a 'stunt double' has been used. When, that film or production, was made.

IN THIS RESPECT THE ITV BGT TV VIEWER WAS NOT MISLEAD AT ALL.
 
THERE WAS NO CON, NO DUPING, AND, NO DECEIT.

The fact that a 'busybody' regulator, OFCOM, has now ordered ITV to refund the cost of viewers paid telephone contributions, made that night; is positively obscene.

BOTH BGT AND ITV SHOULD REFUSE TO REFUND ANYTHING.

Gordonj

THE LAW IN WAR CRIMES TRIAL..

OSKAR GROENING – War Crimes Trial

 In LAW, true and just LAW, in order to establish ‘Guilt’ for murder or killing it is necessary to wholly establish, ‘INTENT’. The, INTENT, to kill; if there is no intent of the accused to kill, the prosecution of such crime must fail. Murder cannot be established if the accused participated in the crime under duress; (being ordered to kill or, being merely present, when the crime is committed); in such circumstance, without, the INTENT to kill, even ‘joint enterprise’ cannot be proved.

Here, I am not concerned over the terrible wicked murder of 300,000 Jews. Here, I am only concerned in respect to, LAW. And, the correct administration of, LAW.

The verdict of the 'War Crimes Tribunal' ruled today that OSKAR GROENING, a Nazi officer at the Auschwitz Concentration Camp, was an, "Accessory in the murder of 300,000 Jews".

Whereas, actually, he was not 'Guilty' as charged at all; He was merely obeying the orders given to him by senior officers in the chain of command. He merely carried out his duty to, OBEY.

Every German soldier or, Member of the German Military, was obliged to obey the orders of a superior officer throughout the entire military chain of command. They were bound by the law of the "FUHRERPRINZIP" commanded to OBEY, all and any 'orders' issued by a superior officer. To disobey, resulted in instant arrest and court martial; and, the punishment, of being sent to the RUSSIAN front; a concentration camp; or, instant execution.

EVERYONE IN THE GERMAN MILITARY SWORE AN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO ADOLF HITLER SWEARING THE PROMISE TO OBEY.

From the very instant when Hitler came to power no one in Germany could disobey. The law of the "FUHRERPRINZIP" dominated and controlled all.

No one in Germany had the freedom of self will. On pain of death, they were forced to, OBEY.

These so-called "War Crimes Tribunals" refusing to accept the defence of, "Only obeying an Order" and, ruling that those accused are individually responsible, for all the crimes as charged; are wholly corrupt; because they attempt, "TO PUT RAIN BACK IN THE SKY".

They attempt to determine that 'all that had happened' in Nazi Germany ever since Hitler came to power; had not actually happened at all. They, corruptly, and, purposely, ignore the ‘LAW’ of the "FUHRERPRINZIP"

If the tribunal today determining the 'Guilt' of, OSKAR GROENING, determines that 'guilt' is verified by the fact that he was an, ACCESSORY, to the murder of 300,000 Jews at Auschwitz. Then, by the very same criterion, every American and every British pilot that participated in the bombing of the civilian population of Germany; were also 'Guilty' of being an, ACCESSORY, complicit in that war crime. It really depends on which ‘stance’ you view the proposition and circumstance, VICTOR, or, VANQUISHED ?

The proposition is positively absurd. But, the 'criterion' for the establishment of 'Guilt', is identically the same. OSKAR GROENING did his duty according to the 'LAW' that was applicable at that time. If he had refused to, OBEY, he would probably have been shot; and, all the Members of his family would have been severely punished as well.

THIS TRIBUNAL TODAY WAS WHOLLY CORRUPT.

What is at stake here is the true intent and purpose of, ‘LAW’.

You cannot have one LAW for the, VICTOR’s,

And, then have an entirely different, LAW, for the VANQUISHED.

True and just ‘LAW’ must be wholly applicable to both.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

July 17, 2015

Removing the Confederate Flag....

 The Censoring of, HISTORY.
The 'politically correct' and totalitarian administration of the South Carolina legislature unanimously voted for and approved the removal of the 'Confederate Flag' from the State building today. And, this was done solely to appease the 'black community's' objection to this flag, because, it is claimed, that the flag continuously reminds them vividly, of the terrible 'slavery' that the blacks endured.

Every American serving soldier who is given a 'State Funeral', when they are buried, their coffin is always draped with the 'Stars and Stripes' flag. The official escort to the coffin always fire their rifles in the air, as a salute to their brave comrade; and, the 'flag' is then folded carefully and handed to the family or 'next of kin' in order that they may cherish that flag, in the memory of their son they have just buried. And, in recognition of the honour, that AMERICA has just paid to him.

This is AMERICA honouring that soldier who has given his life in the service of his country.

The Confederate Flag honours the Confederate soldiers that were killed in the 'Civil War' in exactly the same way. They, had all fought and had given their lives, in the Confederate cause. Their relatives and loved ones, surviving, today, are just as 'equally' entitled to the same respect, as any soldier whose coffin, has been draped with the 'Union' flag.

But, today, the entire South Carolina State administration 'spits on the graves' of every Confederate soldier, that was killed in that Civil War. To appease the, 'black community', they attempted to erase the history of 'slavery' in the absurd hope that, in removing and censoring a 'flag', HISTORY, can be erased from the mind.

So typical of the 'totalitarian censor' throughout the entire history of, Humankind:
 

CENSORSHIP

CENSORSHIP IS FUTILE – TRUTH WILL ALWAYS OUT IN THE END

Egypt

Akhenaten(or rarely: Ikhnaton) meaning Effective spirit of Aten first known as Amenhotep IV (sometimes read as Amenophis IV and meaning Amun is Satisfied),  Pharaoh of the Eighteenth dynasty of Egypt, is especially noted for attempting to compel the Egyptian population in the monotheistic worship of Aten. He ordered the defacing of Amun's (the previous rulers) temples throughout Egypt. He sent his army to destroy all trace of the previous religion, and it’s God. He attempted to remove ‘history’ from the mind. Akhenaten's reign (subject to the debates surrounding Egyptian chronology) are from 1353 BC-1336 BC or 1351 BC–1334 BC.

Russia

In Soviet Russia under the savage dictatorship and tyranny of Joseph Stalin Members of the Ruling Council (The Politburo) that fell out of favor with Stalin, were frequently subjected to ‘trumped up’ treason trials and were executed. After execution Stalin ordered the removal of their image from all official photographs. Their names faces and their very lives, excised from all view.

Great Britain

In the United Kingdom the British Government censored the book “Spycatcher”.

It banned the distribution and sale of the book throughout the UK despite its open sale overseas. Mr. Peter Wright wrote Spycatcher upon retiring from MI5 and, while residing in Australia; he attempted publication in 1985. The Government also attempted the banning of the book's publication in Australia, but lost that court action in 1987; it appealed against that decision, but lost again in June 1988

British newspapers attempting proper reportage of Spycatcher's principal allegations were served gagging orders; and on persisting, they were tried for contempt of court, with the charges later dropped. Throughout all this, quantities of the book were smuggled for secret sale in the U.K. In summer of 1987, a high court judge lifted the ban on newspaper reportage on the book, but, in late July, the Law Lords, again barred reportage of Wright's allegations. Eventually, in 1988, the book was cleared for legitimate sale when the Law Lords acknowledged that overseas publication meant it contained no secrets. Additionally, in November 1991, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the British Government had breached the European Convention of Human Rights in gagging its own newspapers. The British Government’s legal cost estimated was £250,000.

Censorship is Futile: “Truth will out in the End”

Today, nigh on 4000 plus years later, we know exactly what Pharaoh Akhenaton did. We know of all the ‘insignia’ that he had removed from the temples, we know all about the previous religion and it’s God, worshipped by Egyptian’s at that time. Everything that Akhenaton tried to censor has been revealed.

Today also we know all that Joseph Stalin did. We know the names, and faces, of all that he tried to eradicate from ‘Soviet History’. That history and all of those events live on.

We can also see and ‘appreciate’ the utter foolishness of a ‘British Government’ that at exorbitant costs, attempted to censor a book.

Censorship is Futile because it always fails.

But there are grave dangers in censorship; and in tolerating censorship as well. As the history of Nazi Germany has shown:

The Nazi concept of a ‘pure German race’ as expounded by Adolf Hitler in his book “Mein Kampf” and, as carried out by his henchman Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Luitpold Himmler; brought about in Nazi Germany hatred of the Jew. Intent on the destruction of both the Jew and, ‘Jewish’; Nazi’s burnt the books of Jewish writers and authors, on huge bonfires throughout Germany. The famed picture of the, ‘burning of the books’ at Nuremberg’ in order to eradicate the Jew; was the very beginning of the Holocaust.

Burning books, to, destroy ‘Ideas’, inevitably ends up, in the burning of Humankind.

Ideas of humankind can never be destroyed. Easily, you can destroy the human being; but, never, the Idea. Ideas always live on; transmitted, one, to, the other, throughout the whole of Humankind.

The Nazis tried their best to eradicate the Jew and ‘Jewish’ from Germany. But today both Jew and ‘Jewish’ lives on. And, we know, all that the Nazis did, in that terrible time. The censorship of ‘Ideas’ failing yet again.

CONCLUSION

THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 'CONFEDERATE FLAG' IN SPITE OF ALL 'POLITICALLY CORRECT CENSORSHIP', WILL ALWAYS FLY PROUDLY, FOR ALL CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS THAT WERE KILLED IN THAT WAR; NOTHING WHATSOEVER, WILL EVER DESTROY, OR REMOVE THAT MEMORY, FROM THE MIND.

 I spit on all those that tried to erase ‘HISTORY’ from our minds today