INJUSTICE in British Courts of Law...

Concerned as I am over the present 'injustice' in our courts; here is one instance of such a travesty, that I am considering launching, as an online petition now. If I do launch it, I'd like to know if TWITTER and FACEBOOK users would promote it and give it their support. Here is the proposed petition,

 

Petition to free GAYLE NEWLAND wrongfully convicted of three instances of sexual abuse.

All bounds of reason and intelligence fly right out of the window in the conviction and sentencing of GAYLE NEWLAND. She was sentenced to serve eight years of imprisonment, for something that she did not do. She was accused and charged of carrying out 'three sexual assaults' upon a young student victim, and, calculatingly posing as a man, in order to have sex with this young victim.

The 'alleged' victim stated in evidence in the trial, that she had sex ten times with GAYLE NEWLAND; who was using a 'strap on dildo'; but on each occasion that this took place, she genuinely thought she was having sex with a man. She further asserts in evidence, that on finding out the truth, that this had so traumatised and upset her at the deception; that, this, had seriously affected her well being.

In cross examination she also admitted that she had experienced 'multiple relations' with other men.

Sheer reason and intelligence proving, right here, that this 'victim' lied.

There is no woman living anywhere on this planet earth that cannot immediately identify and tell the difference, between a 'live warm bloodied human penis', and a dildo, penetrating her vagina during the sex act. The very texture and feel, between the two, is immediately identifiable.

Therefore, this so-called 'victim' knew, that on all 'ten occasions' that the sex had taken place, that she was having sex in a 'role play' lesbian act, consensual, or not, with, GAYLE NEWLAND, and a strap on dildo. In fact, GAYLE NEWLAND actually asserted in evidence in the trial, that it was the 'victim' that had suggested the purchase of the strap on.

Both the police and the prosecution knew all about this as well; yet, vindictively they pursued the persecution of, GAYLE NEWLAND, just because she was a lesbian.

In respect to the trial and the conviction; the most important issue is the element of 'doubt' that there is in this case; and, the Jury's obligation, determined in law, that a jury can only deliver the verdict of "GUILTY" providing that according to the evidence presented in the court, that they are satisfied that, 'guilt' is fully established, "Beyond all reasonable doubt".

I contend that in this case there is the irrefutable 'doubt' established in respect to fact, that the victim, in her own evidence, could not tell the difference, between a 'warm bloodied male penis', and a dildo.

No matter how skilled the 'dildo' manufacturers are, they still have not resolved how to get the 'warmth' of a human penis into the dildo. And, this is the 'crux' of this case.

Next we come to the Judge. The judge has heard all of the evidence in the case, he has heard how the 'alleged' victim could not determine the difference in her vagina of a warm bloodied male penis, and, a dildo; so he has heard all of the 'doubt' that there is in this case; but, he viciously and vindictively, still sentences GAYLE NEWLAND to eight years imprisonment; because he prefers the 'lie' of the 'alleged' victim; to, the 'truth' of a, LESBIAN. This judge is wholly corrupt.

I respectfully urge everyone who values true 'LAW and JUSTICE' in our country, to sign this petition; because, there truly is, a terrible INJUSTICE, in this case.

Gordon J Sheppard

BECKY WATTS MURDER TRIAL And, the Injustice....

Travesty of injustice in the Becky Watts murder trial..

 

Nathan Matthews convicted, gets 33 years today.

Shauna Hoare (his girl friend) convicted of manslaughter, gets 17 years.

 

Yet, there was not a shred of evidence proving or verifying that Shauna Hoare was in any way involved. She was convicted on the mere assumption that 'jocular' text messages sent between them; proved 'beyond all reasonable doubt' that they intended to 'kidnap' young pretty girls, with the intent to sexually abuse them, and do them harm.

These text messages were as follows:

 

"F***, you bring me bak two pretty schoolgirls den";

 

And, MATTHEWS, reply,

 

"Lol yeh I'll just kidnap them from school"

 

And, another text message, (also sent in the same 'jocular' manner), sent from HOARE to MATTHEWS, her boy friend:

"Saw two very pretty young girls (at so and so?) almost knocked them on the head to bring them home lol"

 

LOL in Internet jargon represents, "LAUGHS OUT LOUD" - The very verification that the message is merely intended as a 'joke', with intent to amuse.

 

THE, VERY VERIFICATION, THAT THESE TEXT MESSAGES, WERE MERELY INTENDED AS A JOKE; with, no 'intention' whatsoever, to kidnap at all.

 

1. There is no evidence at all proving that SHAUNA HOARE kidnapped any young girl.

2. There is no evidence at all proving that SHAUNA HOARE was present when BECKY WATTS was killed.

3. There is no evidence at all proving SHAUNA HOARE was present when BECKY WATTS body was cut up.

4. SHAUNA HOARE was convicted solely upon the evidence of these three text messages; and, the fact, that she or NATHAN MATTHEWS had admitted during interrogation, that they had participated in a 'consensual' sexual 'threesome' with a willing female friend.

  

SHAUNA HOARE, has been wickedly convicted and she will now have to serve her 17 year imprisonment; entirely unjustly. Because, her conviction rested entirely on the mere speculation and assumption by the police, the, prosecution, (and, all of rotten Press and Media) that corruptly determined, that, SEXUAL PERVERSION, had taken place. And, that is the only reason why SHAUNA HOARE has been convicted today.

THIS IS THE SHEER TRAVESTY OF INJUSTICE.

 Note:

In spite of the British established attitude, constantly, in ‘fear of sex’, and, the constant censorship by both Church and State persistently indoctrinating that ‘sex’ is only for those who are married and that it is only intended for procreation; the key criterion in this case is as follows:

A.    Adults viewing pornography does not verify intent to kidnap, hurt, harm, or kill.

B.    The consensual free participation of a sexual ‘threesome’ with willing adults, does not verify the intent to kidnap, hurt, harm, or kill.

C.     The 'fancying' or attraction, sexually or otherwise, of pretty young girls, is no verification of the intent to kidnap, hurt, harm, or kill.

But, all three of this ‘criterion’, was the police and the prosecution’s ‘evidence’ criteria; in the conviction of SHAUNA HOARE, in this trial.

 

I, LOATHE AND, CANNOT TOLERATE, INJUSTICE.

 

 

BECKY WATTS MURDER TRIAL...

Shauna Hoare, and, the injustice of the ‘Becky Watts’ murder trial...

Becky Watts murder was an horrendous and wicked crime; but, prosecuting and persecuting an innocent person alleging that they were involved, when they were not involved, will not return Becky Watts to her family again; nor will it serve the cause of, JUSTICE. Consider this:

Wednesday 11^th November 2015

NATHAN MATTHEWS was convicted today of the murder of Becky Watts and of cutting up her body, in order to hide her body from being found by the police.

His, girlfriend, Shauna Hoare, was also convicted of manslaughter. The prosecution asserting that, both she and NATHAN MATTHEWS had kidnapped Becky Watts, in order to carry out their perverted sexual criminal attacks upon young girls.

Yet, NATHAN MATTHEWS had already told the police that Shauna Hoare had nothing to do with the killing of Becky Watts. In fact, he told the police, that she did not know anything about Becky's death at all.

Shauna Matthews also denied the she knew anything about Becky Watts death; she repeatedly proclaimed her innocence, and, she actually told the police that, when she, actually found out what her boyfriend had done, she felt sick.

Yet, the rotten police and the rotten corrupt prosecution, were so intent on securing her conviction, that they insisted, that they both had kidnapped Becky Watts, for perverted sexual intent; and, as evidence in support of that wicked absurd  'fantasy'; they produced a copy of a text message from Shauna Hoare sent to her boyfriend Nathan Matthews, which contained the sentence as follows:

"Saw a very pretty girl almost knocked her on the head to bring her home lol"

For anyone who is familiar with the jargon of the Internet and Messaging, here is the stark vivid evidence, proving that this was merely a "JOKE"; without any attempt whatsoever; to carry out the intent; as implied by the police and the prosecution, in the trial.

LOL = "Laughs out Loud."

Therefore this text message actually reads: "Saw a very pretty girl at (so and so) today almost knocked her on the head to bring her home 'laughs out loud".

IT WAS THE SHEER WICKED PROSECUTION, AND THE CORRUPT POLICE, AIDED BY THE FILTY CORRUPT AND ROTTEN PRESS AND MEDIA; that so vindictively influenced a jury to convict Shauna Matthews of this crime. They all repeatedly and consistently promoted the concept of "perverted sexual intent". Where, in truth and reality, there was no 'such intent' at all.

I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL REPORTED ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE PRESS AND MEDIA OF THIS COUNTRY, PROVING, THAT, SHAUNA HOARE, WAS ACTUALLY 'INVOLVED' IN THIS CRIME.

She has been unjustly and wickedly convicted. I hope and trust she will appeal.

Footnotes:

The Jury in British Criminal Trials are always instructed by the trial Judge that they can only convict if on hearing all the evidence presented in the trial that they are satisfied, 'beyond all reasonable doubt' that the accused is, Guilty.

In this trial, and in respect to SHAUNA HOARE, there was an abundance of 'doubt' that required the verdict of, NOT GUILTY.

Adults viewing porn provides no 'intent' to kill; in spite of those allegations reported, by the hysterical and corrupt Media and Press.
 

Here, is the typical verifiable evidence that the recommendations of the LEVESON INQUIRY for the statutory control of the Press, should be implemented in full. The, wild ‘perverted sexual abuse’ allegations hysterically reported by the Press prior to and during the trial, without any corroborative ‘evidence’ at all; has so specifically influenced a jury to convict, SHAUNA HOARE, of the crime of ‘manslaughter’.
Yet, it is highly evident, and, in support, there is considerable evidence of doubt proving, that she has been entirely innocent of that crime.

I NEVER COULD TOLERATE INJUSTICE.

PISTORIUS; The Prosecution Appeal...

SOUTH AFRICAN JUSTICE ON TRIAL...

 

The present 'prosecution' Appeal.

FACT.  The Appeal Court can only consider 'LAW' and the 'LAW', pertaining, in this Appeal.

Then, test the 'LAW' in this Appeal.

In 'LAW' (true and just) 'LAW'; there is only one defence against the trial for MURDER. That is to present to the Court, 'evidence', proving 'beyond all reasonable doubt', that the defendant was 'actually' in fear of his life; that, an 'assailant', was 'actually', "THREATENING HIS LIFE.

The Appeal Court should not listen to any other evidence intending to obfuscate or distract; as has been presented to the World, in abundance, during the ridiculous live televised trial; that, had nothing whatsoever to do with the case at all. Weeks of ‘evidence’ creating the sheer waste of the courts valuable time, merely calculated, to distract and deceive. This Appeal Court and its Judges, owe it to the World, that they now concentrate solely on the 'testing' of this 'threat to life'; both in fact, and, in 'LAW'.

If shots are fired through a locked toilet door and someone behind that door suffers injury from which they subsequently die; that is MURDER, pure and simple. That, is, 'LAW'.

For the accused to plead 'SELF DEFENCE' in, 'LAW', in respect to the charge of MURDER, certain criterion must be established:

A. The accused must have actually seen an assailant, ‘actually’, threatening his life.

B. The accused must have seen the actual 'weapon' or 'weapons' threatening him.

In the PISTORIUS defence of 'SELF DEFENCE', being presented to the Court, both (a) and (b) have not been proved at all:

1. Pistorius had never seen any assailant, whatsoever.

2. Pistorius had never seen any weapon or weapons actually threatening his life.

3. There was no gun, knife, or any other weapon, ever found; 'behind the locked toilet door'.

 

4. There was no ‘evidence’ proving the existence of any intruder.

THE ENTIRE DEFENCE OF PISTORIUS IS BASED UPON SHEER 'FANTASY'.

He, ASSERTS and CLAIMS; that he merely, "thought there was an intruder", behind the toilet door.

True "LAW' and "JUSTICE"; and, these, APPEAL COURT JUDGES; cannot legally deal with, or give any recognition to, 'FANTASY', in, 'LAW'. They must only be concerned with,

"LAW" and the "LETTER OF THE LAW"

PISTORIUS HAS NO DEFENCE, HE MURDERED REEVA STEENKAMP, WHO WAS FOUND WOUNDED AND DYING, BEHIND THAT TOILET DOOR.

The previous Judge's corrupt verdict of, "MANSLAIGHTER" is positively absurd; it makes SOUTH AFRICAN "LAW and JUSTICE" the laughing stock of the World.

Note: REEVA STEENKAMP's mother may 'forgive' PISTORIUS for what he did in killing her beautiful daughter; in order, for her, to forgo all 'hate'; and, move on with her life. That is her rightful prerogative;

But, SOUTH AFRICA and the WORLD, "MUST NOT FORGIVE"

 

WE, MUST ALL DEMAND. "JUSTICE"

SOUTH AFRICA; the WORLD is watching you closely today,
 

Gordonj



 

 

WRITTEN CONSTITUTION

Great Britain’s,

“WRITTEN CONSTITUTION”

The, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/

“The Said Rights Claimed”

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

It is widely believed by ‘The People’ at large, (and, promoted, by all the ‘elite’ and the ‘establishment’ existing, in the country); that, Great Britain does not have a “Written Constitution”. But, that is wholly untrue. The mere correct reading of British history reveals that, Great Britain does have a “Written Constitution. It is, “The People’s Written Protection Constitution” as, recorded, and, as is entrenched in “English Law”, set out in the “Bill of Rights 1689”.

The paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed” (as shown above) is the ultimate authority of entire “Bill of Rights 1689”, for it states within its text that it has the commanding authority over all the “Premises” of the Bill. And, this paragraph specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament applies or ‘enacts’ any of the “Premises” of the Bill;

 “Noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

This is ‘The People’s’  “Written Constitution” providing and protecting them from the tyranny of the ‘abuse’ and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament.

In stark vivid ‘written evidence’ it clearly and emphatically states that in everything Parliament ‘says’ or ‘does’ nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

Note:

The political party WHIPS in parliament in instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote on the issues presented to Parliament, for the vote; overrules and supplants all rightful ‘influence’ placed upon those Members, by the Constituents. This results in the “Prejudice of the People”. Therefore and, thereby, the WHIPS in Parliament flout and breach “The Said Rights Claimed”, verifying that the WHIPS in Parliament, has no true legality at all.

1.   The political party WHIPS in parliament should be abolished immediately.

2.   The Judiciary must now end their ‘conspiracy’ denying “The People” of their right to test, question, or challenge the ‘abuses’ of Parliament in the courts, ruling that, “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689” prevents all legal challenge. When this “CONSTITUTION” verifies that, anyone is free to challenge Parliament, from within law; whenever Parliament, “Prejudice the People”.

3.   Read my book, “DEMOCRACY” available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

Conclusion:

Laws and Bills are being created and passed by the British Parliament today in exactly the same way as Adolf Hitler created his ‘own laws’ in Nazi Germany. But, Hitler, had the true legality for doing this.

Adolf Hitler, warned the whole world what he would do when he secured the power to govern; in speeches throughout Germany he declared that he, “would use the democratic process in order to secure the power to govern”, but, on achieving that power, he said, “heads would roll” and he, “would create his own laws”. The first thing that Hitler did when he was appointed the Chancellor of Germany, was to present to the ‘Reichstag’ (The German Parliament) his “Enabling Act”, which allowed him to create his own law. That, ‘democratic parliament’, voted to pass that "Enabling Act", into law, voting 441 votes to 94. By that vote of the German ‘Reichstag’ declared on the, 23 March 1933, the “German Third Reich” was born. With all the terrible aftermath that followed.

The British Government’s also, have had their own ‘Enabling Act’; the political party WHIPS in Parliament; instructing Members of Parliament, on they must vote.

Yet, the ‘WHIPS’ in Parliament, has no legality at all.

The "Bill of Rights 1689" is one of the cleverest pieces of legislation and 'LAW' that has ever been created. For, it has been so created and constructed that it protects the 'Bill' itself, from ever being abolished or even amended. Any attempt of parliament to alter the 'Bill of Rights 1689' in any way or, 'remove the people's protection' afforded by the 'Bill' in the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed"; would, prejudice the people. And, 'prejudice of the people' is proscribed by, "The Said Rights Claimed".

Thus, parliament cannot even propose the use of the political party WHIPS, in parliament; in order to secure the approval 'vote' of parliament for that objective; because, the mere 'proposition' would "Prejudice the People", and, flout and breach, "The Said Rights Claimed".

Gordonj

 

 

 

 

 

The Myth of a, CONSTITUTION....

CONSTITUTION, and the, ‘House of Lords’...

What a load of clap-trap is being broadcast today on TV News programs about the 'Constitution' and the 'House of Lords'; news broadcasters and, vested interested politicians, all asserting that the 'Lord's' have no right to go against the 'Constitution' in respect to challenging the government's Bill for imposing the proposed changes to "TAX CREDITS" legislation.

 "CONSTITUTION" ? there is no 'Written Constitution'; there is no legal "Constitution" at all in Great Britain today; so therefore the 'Constitution' is anything that YOU, or, Myself, or, what anyone else asserts that it is; and, which, no one can 'verify', at all, in, LAW.
 
But, in respect to the actual legal validity of the "TAX CREDITS" changes that the government is proposing in this Bill; there is a written legal "Statute in Force" as the 'precedent of law', whereby the changes being proposed, HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

The actual Bill proposing these changes was passed by Parliament 'under the influence' of the political party WHIPS; the 'vote' of parliament passing this legislation therefore was dominated and controlled by the political party WHIPS; who instructed Members of Parliament on how they should vote.
 
The WHIPS, in parliament, instructing Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote, overrules and supplants, all 'rightful influence' that has been placed upon those 'elected', Members of Parliament, by the Constituents; and, this creates, the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".

The, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament applies or 'enacts' any of the "PREMISES" of the "Bill of Rights 1689”; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 Therefore, by, 'precedent of law', any law or Bill or any Act passed by Parliament under the influence of the Whips; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

Thus, the "TAX CREDITS" legislation being considered by the 'House of Lords' today cannot be passed, or, be declared to be lawful; because, the legislation, created, under the influence of the WHIPS, is wholly unlawful; flouting and breaching the "Statute in Force/ "The Said Rights Claimed".

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

All explained in my book "DEMOCRACY" available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

CYBER CRIME-continued...

CYBER CRIME - THE REMEDY,

1. TREAT CYBER CRIME SERIOUSLY. RECOGNISE THAT IT IS THE WORST CRIME THAT THERE IS IN THE WORLD TODAY.

2. Instead of the Governments, GCHQ, wasting enormous resources and valuable time 'prying' into the lives and activities of all British Humankind; let them do something USEFUL for a change.
LET THEM INVESTIGATE ALL CYBER CRIME. LET THEM LOCATE ALL, THE CYBER CRIMINALS, WORLD WIDE. As soon as there is a 'Cyber Attack' put GCHQ to work, to find the person or persons involved.

3. INSTITUTE IMMEDIATELY THE "DEATH PENALTY" FOR ANYONE WHO 'HACKS INTO' A COMPUTER.

LET IT BE WIDELY KNOWN THROUGHOUT THE WORLD: That if you hack into a computer, we are going to find you, and then you will die.

Irrespective of whether you hack into Government computers, or computers in Banks and other commercial companies and institutions; or, you merely hack into the domestic personal computer of anyone; HACK INTO A COMPUTER, WE WILL FIND YOU, THEN YOU WILL DIE.

That, is taking this CRIME seriously. And, that is what it will take to bring it to its end.

Gordon J Sheppard