31 FALCON COURT  ELMWORTH GROVE LONDON SE21 8RG

0208 670 5795

gordon@shepherd99.fsnet.co.uk

7 April 2020

Her Majesty The Queen

Buckingham Palace

London SW1A 1AA

Madam

In the year 1688 the CONVENTION (Parliament) removed King James the Second from the Throne. The CONVENTION charged him with “Breaking the Original Contract betwixt King and People. And, they determined that, by his own actions, he had “Abdicated” the Throne.

There then followed a huge debate which was held in the Painted Chamber of the House of Commons; held between both Lords and Commons, to determine the true meaning of the words,

“Abdicate” and “The Throne is now Vacant”

The “Original Contract” is an unwritten contract; yet during this debate The Speaker of the debate, HENRY POWLE, spelt out the true concept of the ‘contract’ and how it was entrenched in British ‘LAW’.

This is what he said,

“It is those upon the Throne that the People look to for their protection and to whom for that Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects; but there being none now to look to, for that Regal protection, and to whom for that Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects; the Commons conceive The Throne is Vacant.”

During this debate it was further determined that,

 The “Original Contract” was as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed; If Successor’s broke the ‘Contract’ they too may be Deposed”

Madam

You have never honoured that ‘Contract’ throughout all the years you have occupied that Throne; and even worse, multiplying your negligence; you have never ever honoured your, “Coronation Oath”.

YOU HAVE NEVER, “Governed the People”

YOU HAVE NEVER, “Honoured the Original Contract”

YOU HAVE CONSISTENTLY, “Granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ to corrupt “LAW”.

All “LAW” passed by Parliament under the influence and diktat of the Political Party Whips, has no legality at all. The “Whipped Vote” in parliament where Members of Parliament are instructed how they should or must VOTE, causes the, “Prejudice of the People” and this is proscribed by the “protection of the people” provided by “The Said Rights Claimed”; a paragraph within “THE BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”.

BUT, AS THE REIGNING MONARCH, THE WORST THING YOU HAVE EVER DONE IS THAT DURING “BREXIT”and, (Great Britain negotiating the withdrawal process for leaving the European Community), YOU ALLOWED GREAT BRITAIN TO LEAVE; BUT, YOU DENIED THE BRITISH PEOPLE ALL PROTECTION OF “LAW”.

Throughout that entire “BREXIT” process YOU never lifted a finger to intervene. YOU failed miserably to protect the British People.

YOU, as well as myself, were perfectly well aware, that the entire elite establishment of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government, Parliament, and even the Police, all treat “LAW” as being something that only ‘the common people’ must obey.

THERE IS NO “WRITTEN CONSTITUTION”, OR, “BILL OF RIGHTS” OR “SUPREME COURT OF LAW”, WHERE IT IS POSSIBLE TO TEST, QUESTION, OR CHALLENGE THE “EXECUTIVE’ OR PARLIAMENT; FROM WITHIN “LAW”.

THE ONLY “PROTECTION OF ‘LAW’ THAT THE BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE IS THE ‘SUPPOSEDLY’ PROTECTION OF THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ AND THE “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”; AND, “The European Court of Justice” and, “European Human Rights Law”

Yet, on Great Britain ‘Leaving the E.U.’ all of that protection is lost.

Madam
Evidence is now available indicating and demonstrating YOUR total travesty of disinterest and lack of caring for all the people YOU RULE. This can readily be seen in the flippant way you chose and selected BORIS JOHNSON to be PrIme Minister. YOU made no attempt to determine or explore his ‘character’; and, the ‘despots’ that dominate and control the MONARCHY, did not enlighten you.

Had you taken this precaution; YOU would have found out that at the precise moment of time that you were handing this ‘privilege’ to BORIS JOHNSON; that he had already been accused of a very serious crime. (See, Scotland Yard Police File Number: CAD2807/2.8.19).

It asserts that BORIS JOHNSON had, “Perverted the Course of Justice” during the Referendum of 2016. The ‘lies’ that he told in support of “LEAVING THE E.U. CAMPAIGN”  corrupted the final count VOTE of that Referendum.

17.4 Million People voted to leave the E.U.; But, there is no way of verifying whether they voted that way, out of their own convictions; or whether they had been influenced by the ‘lies’ BORIS JOHNSON told. 

It is not necessary to verify this, every word spoken by BORIS JOHNSON during that referendum, is fully registered in the PUBLIC DOMAIN. In which case, the ‘lies’ that he told, MUST HAVE HAD SOME INFLUENCE ON THAT FINAL VOTE. 

That is all any “Court of Law” must decide.

BREXIT had no ‘legality’ at all, the “FINAL VOTE” of that Referendum, can no longer be relied upon. The VOTE COUNT, is CORRUPT.

MADAM

YOU must now look at the role of the Police. CAD2807/2.8. had been reported to Scotland Yard Police. Yet the police have taken no action at all. They have not carried out their duty and ‘investigated’ the allegation made against BORIS JOHNSON. YOU must now ask, WHY?

Here’s the possible solution; “BORIS JOHNSON HAS BRIBED THE POLICE, NOT TO INVESTIGATE HIM”.

BORIS JOHNSON has offered the Police 2,000 new police officers and substantial financial improved assistance for police resources.

A substantial ‘BRIBE” Indeed. No wonder the senior executive of the Police do not want to do their, DUTY.

And, YOU, YOU NEGLIGENT LAZY ‘REIGNING MONARCH’; YOU DID NOTHING ABOUT All THIS; AT ALL.

IN FAILING TO HONOUR THE “ORIGINAL CONTRACT” AND “PROTECT THE BRITISH PEOPLE” JUST AS ‘JAMES THE SECOND’ DID; YOU “ABDICATE” THE THRONE.

GO MADAM GO – YOU HAVE BEEN AN UTTERLY USELESS QUEEN. IT IS TIME TO ABOLISH THE MONARCHY; IF IT CANNOT COMPLY WITH AND CARRY OUT ITS ‘DUTY’; THERE IS NO LONGER ANY LEGAL VALIDITY OR REASON TO HAVE A MONARCHY AT ALL.

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard

How Australia treats it’s immigrants - See letter sent to Prime Minister

Rt Hon Scott Morrison MP
Prime Minister
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT2600
Australia

Subject,
Melbourne Centre of Excellence
OFFICE:Level 25 Casselden Place 2 Lonsdale Street Melbourne VIC 3000
POSTAL:GPO Box 241 Melbourne VIC 3001
EMAIL: 457@border.gov.au WEBSITE: www.border.gov.au

22 March 2016
Christopher SALES
24A Liriope Parkway
Sinagra WA 6065
In reply please quote:
Client Name Christopher SALES
Date of Birth 29 November 1960
Date of Visa Application 10 December 2015
Application ID 1965587579
Transaction Reference Number EGOA4VV832
File Number BCC2015/3796375
Transmission Method Email sent to mark@migrationaustralia.com.au
Nominated Occupation Electrical Engineering Technician – 312312

Sponsor details
Sponsor Name Integral Electrical Services Pty Ltd
Sponsorship Approval Number/Application ID 235566268
Sponsorship TRN EGO5148NML
Nomination Approval Number/Application ID 1075583969
Nomination TRN EGO9E8XOMT

Dear Christopher SALES
Notification of grant of a Temporary Work(Skilled) (subclass 457) visa
I wish to advise that a decision has been made on this application and visas have been
granted on 22 March 2016 to the applicant(s) listed in the attached Visa Grant Notice, which
contains important information about your visa(s).
Please keep a copy of this letter and the Visa Grant Notice in a safe place for your reference.

Prime Minister
Shortly before the year 2012 a Minister of the Australian government visited Great Britain and Ireland to recruit skilled workers to move to Australia, with their families, to work and to live. He mounted a series of events in Hotels where he spoke about and demonstrated the inducements to the workers and their families if they took up the offers he explained. He said that if they moved to Australia,
1. Australia was a wonderful country.
2. That Australians were wonderful people who would be pleased to greet the immigrants with open arms.
3. The education for their children was FREE.
4. That if they liked living in Australia and wanted to live there permanently, providing they worked for the same sponsor for just two years; they would be eligible for PERMANENT RESIDENCY.
All of this was reported on both British and Irish television.

My daughter, JANICE SALES, and her husband CHRIS, seeing the reports on British television, believed every word and they made up their minds to move to AUSTRALIA, to work and to live there in order to start, “A New Life”. They hoped that they could live there for the rest of their lives.
I was opposed to this, I did everything possible to dissuade them.
I told them that they would lose all the security of the UK, especially the National Health Service which provided FREE every medical need. I phoned the Immigration Department of the Australian Embassy in the hope that they would not uphold what the Minister had said. But, they only confirmed every word.
In consequence my daughter and her husband sold their lovely home; and the whole family, JANICE, CHRIS, the children, MILLIE and ASHTON, moved to AUSTRALIA on the first available plane.

Within two months it all began to go wrong. Firstly the sponsor turned out to be a liar, he renaged on virtually every promise he had made.
Secondly, AUSTRALIA CHANGED ALL THE RULES,
A. Education for their children was no longer FREE, 4,000 Dollars per year had to be paid for each child’s education.
B. PERMANENT RESIDENCY was no longer available for those whose age was over 50. The new criteria set the age at 45.

There was more bad news as well. The AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT declared that it was proud of its 457 Visa system; but the ‘Trades Unions” disagreed. They asserted that 457 Immigrants took work away from ‘Permanent Residents’. And they started a campaign to attack that system.
The more that campaign was promoted and gained success, sponsors began to make 457 Visa Immigrants, REDUNDANT.
These immigrants were thereby made REDUNDANT and even worse, found it very difficult to secure new SPONSORS.
CHRIS SALES suffered greatly during this period. He was made REDUNDANT; and he found it almost impossible to get new employment. Seeking help he requested POLITICAL REPRESENTATION.
On the ‘Precept’ that “THERE SHALL BE NO TAXATION WITHOUT POLITICAL REPRSENTATION”,
CHRIS SALES now demands that every dollar paid in taxation, unlawfully, must now be repaid. Because, every request that he made for POLITICAL REPRESENTATION was denied.
Every Member of the AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT that he approached for assistance, refused that assistance because they stated that they did not want anything to do with “457 Visa Immigrant” issues. CHRIS SALES was refused “Political Representation” every time he asked for it.
AUSTRALIA must now repay every dollar of taxation that he paid.

FINAL ANALYSIS
The, U L T I M A T U M
There can be no doubt whatsoever that had not my daughter, JANICE SALES, seen and heard the words of the televised reports of the Australian Minister visiting Great Britain and Ireland on a skilled worker recruitment drive; neither she or her family would ever have moved to Australia at all. It was this Ministers words which motivated JANICE and her husband CHRIS to sell their lovely home and move to Australia for good.

But, when the Australian government and Parliament “Changed the Rules” they were then trapped in Australia; and they couldn’t go back; because they had no home to return to.
When Australia “Changed the Rules” both the government and Parliament ought to have made the ‘changed rules’ only applicable to the immigrants arriving in Australia ‘post the date’ that the ‘changed rules’ legislation had been passed by parliament. Thereby ‘excempting’ all the previous promises that had been given to all the ‘457 Visa Immigrants’ long before that ‘changed legislation’ was passed.
BECAUSE AUSTRALIA DID NOT DO THIS, AND JANICE AND CHRIS SOLD THEIR HOME; AUSTRALIA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR LOSS OF THAT HOME.
Now that JANICE and CHRIS have been deported back to the UK; and now have no money, (the return costing them virtually all the money they had), and, they have no home; Australia, being responsible for that loss; AUSTRALIA MUST NOW PROVIDE THEM WITH A NEW HOME.

In the event Australia seeks to ignore all its responsibilities as set out above, then I intend to pursue all of my daughter, JANICE and her husband’s HUMAN RIGHTS as provided by the “Universal Human Rights Legislation”. Win or Lose in that quest; Australia will come out the worst; for the bad publicity it will endure.
THE WORLD WILL SEE HOW BADLY AUSTRALIA TREATS ITS IMMIGRANTS.

Sincerely, Gordon J Sheppard
Father, of JANICE SALES

To all intents and purposes Britain has already left the EU;

But, according to the ‘lies’ that Boris Johnson told, and according to ‘LAW’, Britain may not have left the E.U.

It all depends on the ‘CRUCIAL TRUTH’ or ‘The Wicked Lie’.

During the Referendum of 2016 Boris Johnson made several statements. He was in charge of the ‘LEAVE EUROPE CAMPAIGN’ and he was persuading voters to leave. The statements were in the form of promises verifying if the voter voted to leave, certain events would be bound to follow.

The first of these statement by Boris Johnson promised,

“If you vote to leave £350,000 per week, presently paid to the E.U. Would become available for the NHS”.

The second was, “If you vote to leave Trade with Europe will continue, unaffected, just as it is now.”

Immediately one can see that Statement 2 is a lie.

If and when Britain leaves the EU there automatically begins a transition period of two years whereby Britain negotiates with the EU for a trade agreement. Britain has already been negotiating with the EU for three years, and so far has not been able to secure that trade agreement.

So it can be readily seen that when Boris Johnson stated “Trade would continue uninterrupted “ – That was a wicked lie.

Now we come to the statement verifying that the NHS will become available for “£350,000 per Week”

This, is the statement Boris Johnson made.

Boris Johnson, and his government, is now committed in perpetuity to pay the NHS that amount every week as long as Britain remains out of the EU.

So where is the money? Has the first instalment been already paid? And, what arrangements have been put in place to pay ‘per week’ all other instalments?

IF ALL THIS TURNS OUT TO BE A WICKED LIE,

THEN BRITAIN HAS NOT LEFT THE EU.

During the Referendum of 2016 all Boris Johnsons statements and lies, were recorded by live television; and they were transmitted in ‘News Reports’ to every TV receiver in the country; and throughout the World. Thus, those statements, and those lies, were prominent in the public domain.

That being the case, when 17.4 Million Voters vote to leave the EU the question must be posed: “Did they vote that way out of their own honest conviction?; or, were they influenced by the lies Boris Johnson told? There is now way of verifying this.

BUT FOR THE COURTS OF LAW; THIS IS A DIFFERENT CRITERION; ALL THE COURTS HAVE TO DECIDE IS THIS,

Because the Statements and Lies are so widely prominent in the public domain; and were so throughout the Referendum; then those lies MUST HAVE INFLUENCED THE FINAL VOTE OF THAT REFERENDUM. The COURTS must determine thereby, that the final vote of the Referendum of 2016; “CAN NO LONGER BE RELIED UPON.”

AS LONG AS BORIS JONSON’S LIES ARE PROMINENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, THOSE ‘LIES’ MUST HAVE INFLUENCED THE VOTE, IN THAT ELECTION. 

There is also another serious matter that requires attention. That is the ‘punishment’ for Boris Johnson.

If Boris Johnson’s lies corrupted the final vote of the Referendum, then Boris Johnson is responsible for all the chaos that ensued. The massive costs of a three year negotiation period with the EU, in order to actually leave the EU. Politicians, Diplomats, and their staff beavering away every day trying to negotiate a “WITHDRAWAL” BILL.

The cost of this for both Britain and the EU must have been tremendous. Hundreds of thousand million pounds.

BORIS JOHNSON MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CARRY OUT ALL THIS COSTLY CHAOS AND CONFUSION; WITHOUT BEING HELD TO ACCOUNT FOR HIS CRIMES.

BORIS JOHNSON’S ‘LIES’ CORRUPTED THE FINAL VOTE OF THE REFERENDUM, THEREFORE HE “PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE”; WHICH IS A SERIOUS CRIME.

THE POLICE MUST NOW BE INSTRUCTED TO INVESTIGATE BORIS JOHNSON,  TO CHARGE HIM WITH THIS OFFENCE AND BRING HIM TO TRIAL.

Gordon J Sheppard.                                    18.3.2020

TODAY, 31^ST JANUARY 2019 IS A DAY OF,

 INFAMY,

Seventeen, four hundred Million British People violated my ‘Human Rights’ taking those rights away.

 

In their selfish hysterical obsession to leave the European Community, and, in their ‘leaving’ today, these 17.4 Million SELFISH BASTARDS have now left me, (and all British people), with no access to LAW or protection of LAW at all.

The ‘elite’ establishment of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government, Parliament, and Police, provide no protection of LAW at all. They all merely look upon LAW as it being ‘something’ only the ‘common people’ must obey.

There is no Written Constitution, Bill of Rights, or 'Supreme Court of Law' where it is possible to question or challenge the Executive, Government, or Parliament. The 'Reigning Monarch' consistently fails to protect the People; thereby by precedent of Law, she 'abdicates' the throne.

 

In violating my ‘Human Rights’ I am now denied access and the protection of the “European Court of Justice” and, “European Human Rights Law”. The only “protection of law” that I had.

Normally after an election the ‘Victor’ winning the election takes the ‘spoils’ whilst the ‘vanquished’ in the spirit of friendship and DEMOCRACY forgetting all animosity, SUBMITS to living as normal.

 

NOT THIS TIME.

 

MY ‘HATRED’ AND ‘CONTEMPT’ FOR THE 17.4 MILLION BASTARDS, IS FAR TOO STRONG. I SHALL ‘HATE’ THEM UNTIL THE DAY I DIE.

I SHALL SEEK AND PURSUE EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO SECURE REVENGE.

 

 

 

 

LAST CHANCE TO PREVENT UK LEAVING THE EU.

DO NOT LOSE THIS ONE AND ONLY CHANCE TO PREVENT UK LEAVING THE EU.

 

CHALLENGE THE JUDICIARY IN THE HIGH COURT TO VERIFY, BY STARK VIVID VERIFICATION OF TRUTH THE STATEMENTS THAT BORIS JOHNSON MADE DURING THE REFERENDUM OF 2016.

 

IF THE JUDICIARY AND THE COURT VERIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS WERE TRUE; THEN THE COURT WILL RULE THAT THE UK CAN LEAVE THE EU, AS SCEDULED ON THE 31ST JANUARY 2019.

 

BUT, IF THE COURT FINDS THAT ONE STATEMENT OR ANY OF THE STATEMENTS ARE UNTRUE; THEN THE COURT MUST STOP THE LEAVING OF THE EU ON THE 31ST JANUARY; AND THE COURT MUST DELAY ALL FURTHER LEAVING OF THE EU; UNTIL THE MATTER IS FULLY INVESTIGATED AND PROPERLY RESOLVED.

 

BRITAIN MUST BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE EU IF THE STATEMENTS MADE BY BORIS JOHNSON ARE UNTRUE.

 

The statements made by Boris Johnson.

1. "I promise that if you vote to leave the EU, 350,000 pounds per week presently paid to the EU will become available for the NHS".
2. "I promise that if you vote to leave THE eu 'Trade with Europe will continue, uninterrupted, as it does now".
3. "I promise that if you vote to leave the EU "Trade with the rest of the World will be enhanced".

BORIS JOHNSON PROVIDED NO EVIDENCE IN SUPRT OF CLAIMS AND PROMISES OF 1 OR 3

But IN RESPECT OF PROMISE NO.2,

 THIS WAS A BARE FACED LIE. THIS WAS BOTH UNTRUE AND WICKEDLY DECEITFUL.

 

BECAUSE WHEN BRITAIN LEAVES THE EU, THERE THEN FOLLOWS A 'NEGOTIATION' PERIOD OF TWO YEARS WITH THE EU, DURING WHICH BRITAIN MUST SECURE A "TRADE DEAL" WITH THE EU. NOTE: BRITAIN HAS ALREADY NEGOTIATED WITH THE EU FOR THREE YEARS BUT HAS NOT YET SUCCEEDED IN SECURING A TRADE DEAL.


IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR "TRADE TO CONTINUE, UNINTERRUPTED", IN THIS PERIOD. THEREFORE BORIS JOHNSON LIED.

 

DO NOT MISS  THIS VERY LAST CHANCE TO STOP BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU.

 

Regards, Gordon J Sheppard

 

GENERAL ELECTIONS & TRUST

GENERAL ELECTION of 12^th December 2019

The key element for every voter is, “TRUST”

Can you believe the words of the political party leaders that are competing for election? Can you “TRUST” the promises that they now make?

 

In order to verify this “TRUST”, the acid test for every voter, is to ask every political party leader, this question:

 

“If I am to trust you then please tell me if you and your political party are elected will you continue to operate a “WHIPPED VOTE” in Parliament?

Then pay particular attention to what they say.

 

If they say “YES” or “They Might” dependant on the circumstances; then specifically remind them of what they have just said; and, then challenge them to produce the actual legal document from anywhere in the British National Archive; that verifies the legality of the political party “WHIPS”; even being in Parliament at all.

Challenge them to prove the legality of a “WHIPPED VOTE” taking place.

 

They cannot produce a word of ‘proof’ for any of the above, because it simply does not exist,

THERE IS NO SUCH DOCUMENT OR LEGAL INSTRUMENT AVAILABLE; THAT WILL ESTABLISH THE LEGALITY OF THE “WHIPS”; IN THE ENTIRE BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVE.

1. The “WHIPS” are not entrenched in LAW.
2. Documents or legal instruments proving legality, do not exist.
3. The “WHIPS” in Parliament are merely the ‘private’ arrangements of the political parties.
4. The “WHIPS” have no true legality at all.

 

Conclusion;

1. The “WHIPS” in parliament are wholly UNLAWFUL.
2. The political party leaders in this election who have declared they would still operate a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament, if they were elected; establish without a shadow of doubt; that they are NOT TO BE TRUSTED AT ALL.

 

THE EVIDENCE,

The People’s protection, provided by the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”, within the  “Bill of Rights 1689”; establishes that Parliament may have its “SUPREMACY” afforded by “Article 9” of the Bill; but it also instructs Parliament; that when Parliament ‘enacts’ or ‘applies’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; that nothing,

“OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

The political party “WHIPS” in Parliament do “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” because, when the “WHIPS” instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all rightful ‘influence’, of the Constituents.

 

THE “WHIPS” and THE “WHIPPED VOTE” in Parliament, HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

FATAL ACCIDENT CRASH OUTSIDE RAF CROUGHTON

Fatal accident head on collision kills young motorcyclist outside RAF CROUGHTON base.

Parents of the young man, HARRY DUNNE, in their understandable trauma and grief lash out requiring a ‘scapegoat’ for his death. They blame the American woman driving the car, that hit him. All British MEDIA latches on to the ‘sob story’; and, all NEWS both transmitted and printed, blames and vilifies this woman involved. They all claim that the, ‘car hit him’; and, not, that the motorcyclist, ‘hit the car’.  

 

I readily assert that in such a case; all EVIDENCE must be properly sought and thoroughly examined, before, ‘casting the first stone’.

Are the parents truly seeking ‘justice’ as they claim?

Or, are they merely wanting, REVENGE?

 

The police likewise assert the woman is responsible for HARRY DUNNE’s death; they say that they ‘believe’ that she was driving on the wrong side of the road.

 

Now this is both interesting and revealing; because the woman, ANNE SCALOOSA, is an American woman and in America they do, drive on that side of the road. She is also an American military ‘wife’ who with her husband, she was resident, in the RAF CROUGHTON ‘American Spy’ Base.

 

It is reasonable to assume that during her military experience in America; that she must have been resident and based on many military establishments and base camps. In exiting those establishments each day and carrying out the same procedure to ‘exit’ each day with her car; that procedure must have fully registered in her brain.

Daily she would have seen the ‘guards’ at the gate; she may have frequently spoken to the guard or shown her ‘pass document’; or merely waved him goodbye. She would then have ‘exited’ that establishment; and instantly she would have drove her car to, ‘that right side of the road’. This would have been a ‘daily’ procedure for her; which would have become rigidly embedded in her brain.

 

Now; she is in ENGLAND; in a similar military establishment; and she is leaving that establishment in her car in precisely the same way; she see the ‘guards’ at the gate, she sees everything at that ‘exit point’ in precisely the same way it was in, AMERICA, in all those American military establishments. She then ‘exits’ that establishment driving her car; and, in a fleeting moment of mental aberration; her brain thinking and imposing that she was still in America; she drives out in her car, driving immediately to the ‘right side of the road’.

There was no intent; no dangerous driving; no negligence; of any kind. She just had an ‘automatic’ mental aberration where her brain took control imposing the ‘idea’ that she was still in, AMERICA.

The, EVIDENCE OF TRUTH, in believing this to be so; is proven by the fact that, NO ONE, NO DRIVER OF ANY VEHICLE, PURPOSELY, EVER DRIVES ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD. In this case, it is blatantly obvious, that something ‘triggered’ ANNE SCALOOSA, to do so.

Sadly, and most unfortunately, the road in question was on the brow of a hill. So, neither the motorcyclist nor the driver of the car had any opportunity to see each other in order to avoid the crash. And, sadly, very sadly, merely seconds before the crash ANNE SCALOOSA’s ‘brain’ would have returned to ‘normality’ when she probably realised, what she had done.

 

I THINK THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT HAPPENED.

After the crash and seeing the plight of poor HARRY DUNNE dying from the accident; realising what she had done and, utterly confused and bewildered, she just wanted ‘out of it’ and the comfort of her AMERICAN home. She is there now and my advice to her is to resist every attempt to return to the UK. Both, the ‘parents’ and the Media, are persistently vilifying and crucifying her every day. Politicians likewise join in. ‘Questions’ are even asked about her in Parliament.

IF ANNE SCALOOSA RETURNS TO THE UK – SHE WOULD NEVER GET A FAIR TRIAL.