LAW:
Living today, in a terrible time...
Where, 'LAW' and, true 'LAW', mean nothing at all.
Today, the general concept of 'LAW' held by almost
everyone is that,
LAW MUST BE OBEYED
Yet, that is not, 'LAW'
Law is as, Lord Hailshan, an ex Lord Chancellor of
England, always used to say,
"LAW IS A MYTH WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE
PEOPLE THERE IS NO LAW!
Thus, it is WE THE PEOPLE and, our freely given
consent, to 'live by the 'Rule of Law'.
That is, LAW.
Great Britain today desperately needs and requires a full scale national debate
in respect to LAW.
Because, the travesty's of LAW that are taking place daily now, in respect to the
police, and,
our Courts and, the Judiciary, are positively obscene.
EXAMPLE
Both the BBC and ITV have succumbed to the
intimidation and blackmail of
LORD McALPINE and his lawyers, who have threatened
them both with prosecutions
for libel. Both, have agreed to settle out of court
with McALPINE. The, BBC, paid
him £185,000; and, ITV has just paid him, 125.000.
Yet, neither, the BBC or ITV, has 'accused' him of
being a paedophile.
Which, is the assertion, that both McALPINE and his
lawyers, are making.
The BBC in the "Newsnight" programme, complained of, never even
mentioned
LORD McALPINE's name.
And, ITV, who were being blackmailed by McALPINE, in respect of an incident
occurring
during a "This Morning" programme, never 'displayed' or 'mentioned'
his name, or, accused
him of being a paedophile. It is alleged by, McALPINE and his lawyers, that
when PHILLIP
SCHOFIELD passed over a list to the Prime Minister which SCHOFIELD asserted was
a
list of names that he had secured from the Internet, "in just five minutes of browsing";
that, the 'name' of LORD McALPINE, could be seen by the 'viewer', on that list.
Yet, not a shred of proof has been produced verifying that this is so.
I witnessed the original TV footage clip of that incident, featured on my own
television
receiver; and, I assert, that in those fleeting seconds, when the list was
passed to the
Prime Minister, I could not discern any names;, even though I tried slow motion
and,
stopping the frames. If, I, could not see 'names' on that list; then, nobody
else could see them, either.
For, McALPINE's and his lawyers assertions to stand up in 'LAW'; everyone has
the right
and entitlement to actually see the proof that, McALPINE's 'name' can be
clearly seen on
that list.
PROOF HAS TO BE ESTABLISHED IN ORDER THAT 'THE PEOPLE' OF THIS COUNTRY CAN
SEE THE TRUTH FOR THEMSELVES.
As, I could not see or, distinguish LORD MCALPINE's name displayed on that
list. I am
wholly confident; no one else could see this, either.
So the obvious conclusions to all this are:
A. That LORD McALPNE and his lawyers, are 'conning everyone' and, they are
using blackmailing
and intimidation, in order to secure settlements 'out of court'.
B. That, cowardly, both the BBC and ITV, has succumbed, to that intimidation.
Whatever:
Until irrefutable 'evidence' is produced by McALPINE and his lawyers that,
McALPINE, has
been truly 'libelled', and, that his 'name and reputation' has been truly
damaged;
ALL OF THIS IS MERELY A GREAT TRAVESTY OF, "LAW".
And, the 'establishment' and the 'elite' of this country; are merely treating
the 'common
people', as, MORONS and IMBECILES.
Furthermore, McALPINE and his lawyers are also intimidating many users and
those who
post 'tweets' on the social network website, TWITTER. One person so intimidated
is
SALLY BERCOW, the wife of the “Speaker” of the House of Commons. She posted a 'mischievous
comment' about LORD McALPINE. But, it should be recognized and acknowledged by,
'LAW', that posting 'opinion' 'assumptions' and, 'speculations', freely on the
Internet, is not LIBEL. It is perfectly legal and lawful to publish the
'opinion' that someone might be a paedophile. I, assert, and contend that this
is merely 'free speech', and, 'free expression'. It becomes LIBEL, only if it is
asserted, that, they are, a, paedophile.
Sincerely
Gordon J Sheppard
No comments:
Post a Comment