David Cameron in Libya...
He should be comfortably at home there. He’s just, one more 'gangster' with all the other 'gangsters', who now control the Libyan state. These Libyan 'gangsters' murdered PRESIDENT GADDAFI and seized the country by force; and, Cameron, through, sheer illegality, seized the governing of Britain; the present coalition administration not being 'elected' by the people at all.
The voting results of the General Election of 2010 provided for a "Conservative led 'Minority Government'. But, just like, MAFIA GANGSTERS, Cameron, and, other political party leaders, who had been elected to parliament in that election, did not like that result; so they decided to 'ignore' the people's vote, and conspired with each other to create a coalition administration entirely on their own. In 'ignoring' the people's vote in this way; they brought about the "Prejudice of the People" and, thereby, breached and flouted the 'precedent’ of law set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
This present coalition administration masquerading as government, was not chosen or elected by the people; and, thereby, it has no true legality at all.
The very interesting thing about all this, is, the role of the 'Reigning Monarch' of England, ELIZABETH THE SECOND; "When the wishes of the people are directly in conflict with the actions of the legislators", the 'Reigning Monarch' of England, has the DUTY to intervene. Under the terms of the "Original Contract" (Providing the 'protection' of her Subjects) she ought to have used the "Royal Prerogative" to order the immediate dissolution of parliament.
Miserably failing to honour the "Original Contract"; she did, NOTHING AT ALL.
In consequence, legally, lawfully, and by 'precedent' of, ENGLISH LAW; she abdicates the throne. In truth and reality and under the 'precedent' of, English History, the British throne is as VACANT today as it was in 1688; when KING JAMES II was kicked off the British throne.
The British today are ruled over and governed by sheer illegality; without, any protection of LAW, at all. There are no provisions of a, ‘Written Constitution’; ‘Bill of Rights’; or, a ‘Supreme Court of Law’ where it is possible to test, question or challenge, the abuses and the prejudice of parliament; from within law. Furthermore, the “Reigning Monarch” sits on the British throne - charged with the responsibility and duty to provide the protection of the People - yet; she provides no protection at all.
KING JAMES THE SECOND was removed from the throne in 1688 by the CONVENTION (Parliament). He was charged with, "Breaking the "Original Contract" betwixt King and People". And, in respect to the "Lineal Descent", (All other 'Reigning Monarchs' sitting on the British throne), the CONVENTION ruled, that, "The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor broke the Contract, they too can be Deposed."
ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not honoured the "Original Contract" throughout her entire reign.
"Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord"
Without, that, PROTECTION; the, "Subjugation to the 'Reigning Monarch’ for as long as a Monarch shall reign"; has no value; or, any legality, at all.
He should be comfortably at home there. He’s just, one more 'gangster' with all the other 'gangsters', who now control the Libyan state. These Libyan 'gangsters' murdered PRESIDENT GADDAFI and seized the country by force; and, Cameron, through, sheer illegality, seized the governing of Britain; the present coalition administration not being 'elected' by the people at all.
The voting results of the General Election of 2010 provided for a "Conservative led 'Minority Government'. But, just like, MAFIA GANGSTERS, Cameron, and, other political party leaders, who had been elected to parliament in that election, did not like that result; so they decided to 'ignore' the people's vote, and conspired with each other to create a coalition administration entirely on their own. In 'ignoring' the people's vote in this way; they brought about the "Prejudice of the People" and, thereby, breached and flouted the 'precedent’ of law set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
This present coalition administration masquerading as government, was not chosen or elected by the people; and, thereby, it has no true legality at all.
The very interesting thing about all this, is, the role of the 'Reigning Monarch' of England, ELIZABETH THE SECOND; "When the wishes of the people are directly in conflict with the actions of the legislators", the 'Reigning Monarch' of England, has the DUTY to intervene. Under the terms of the "Original Contract" (Providing the 'protection' of her Subjects) she ought to have used the "Royal Prerogative" to order the immediate dissolution of parliament.
Miserably failing to honour the "Original Contract"; she did, NOTHING AT ALL.
In consequence, legally, lawfully, and by 'precedent' of, ENGLISH LAW; she abdicates the throne. In truth and reality and under the 'precedent' of, English History, the British throne is as VACANT today as it was in 1688; when KING JAMES II was kicked off the British throne.
The British today are ruled over and governed by sheer illegality; without, any protection of LAW, at all. There are no provisions of a, ‘Written Constitution’; ‘Bill of Rights’; or, a ‘Supreme Court of Law’ where it is possible to test, question or challenge, the abuses and the prejudice of parliament; from within law. Furthermore, the “Reigning Monarch” sits on the British throne - charged with the responsibility and duty to provide the protection of the People - yet; she provides no protection at all.
KING JAMES THE SECOND was removed from the throne in 1688 by the CONVENTION (Parliament). He was charged with, "Breaking the "Original Contract" betwixt King and People". And, in respect to the "Lineal Descent", (All other 'Reigning Monarchs' sitting on the British throne), the CONVENTION ruled, that, "The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor broke the Contract, they too can be Deposed."
ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not honoured the "Original Contract" throughout her entire reign.
"Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord"
Without, that, PROTECTION; the, "Subjugation to the 'Reigning Monarch’ for as long as a Monarch shall reign"; has no value; or, any legality, at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment