Understanding British Monarchy

Prince Charles meddling again....
Press and politicians frequently declare, in respect to Prince Charles that, "We should know what he is discussing, what subjects he is pushing and why, and, whether it is influencing government policy."

I respectfully suggest that this is none of their business.

As the next 'Reigning Monarch' he will have the duty and the responsibility of honouring the ORIGINAL CONTRACT; requiring the 'protection' of Subjects of the British Crown. Thus, it is the Monarchy's duty to 'meddle' and 'interfere' with any aspect of the 'life of the nation'; that he wishes to influence or explore. The 'Reigning Monarch' of England is required, by the terms of the 'Original Contract' to act as 'Head of Government' monitoring Parliament in the interests of Subjects of the British Crown. All 'Reigning Monarchs' in the line of succession are obliged to protect 'Subjects' from the tyranny of the 'abuses' and 'prejudice' of Parliament. And, in order that the 'Reigning Monarchs' can carry out that role, they are provided with two legal and lawful instruments to make that possible: the "ROYAL ASSENT" and the "ROYAL PREROGATIVE".

Both of these two 'legal instruments' are specifically designed for the protection of "The People".
They have no other purpose or intent at all. The 'Royal Assent' is specifically designed in order that the 'Reigning Monarch' may grant or refuse to grant, the 'laws' and 'bills' passed by Parliament. And, the 'Royal Prerogative' provides, the 'Reigning Monarch', with the right and responsibility to (a), encourage Ministers of Government, (b), to warn Ministers of Government, and, (c), in any circumstance, where the, “Wishes of The People are in direct conflict with the actions of the legislators”, to wield the 'Royal Prerogative', to order the dissolution of Parliament.

Sadly, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has not honoured the 'Original Contract' all of the time she has occupied the British throne. As a 'Reigning Monarch' she has been hopeless and a complete failure and disaster. In consequence, therefore, and, thereby; and, in truth and reality, she abdicates the throne.

The British throne is a 'vacant' today as it was in the days of 1688 when KING JAMES II was removed from the throne. The CONVENTION (Parliament) determined that 'he' had "Broken the Original Contract betwixt King and People" and, that thereby he had abdicated the throne. The CONVENTION declared the throne was vacant; and, PRINCE WILLIAM OF ORANGE became the next King.

However, the CONVENTION declared even, further, in respect to the 'Lineal Descent' by declaring that,

"The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor broke the Contract, they too can be Deposed."

ELIZABETH THE SECOND is well aware that the British People have no 'protection' of LAW.
The British have no access to: a written constitution, or, a proper 'Bill of Rights' setting out the rights and responsibilities of 'Subjects'; and, they have no "Supreme Court of Law", whereby they can test, question, or challenge Parliament from within LAW.

Aware, that the 'Original Contract' protection of the 'Reigning Monarch', is the only protection of LAW that the British have, ELIZABETH THE SECOND has failed miserably and, has provided no protection at all. She must be aware of these facts:

A. That, the Offices, Procedures, and, Practices of the political party WHIPS in Parliament 'prejudice the people' wholly flouting and breaching the 'precedent' of LAW set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed"; which makes it abundantly clear that in Parliaments 'enactment' of its "Supremacy"; NOTHING SHOULD PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE.
The WHIPS 'prejudice the people' by overruling and supplanting all 'rightful influence' placed upon Members of Parliament, by the Constituent.

B. That, the present 'coalition administration' masquerading as government, was not elected by "The People" at all. That, the corrupt leaders of the political parties, created this 'coalition administration' entirely on their own. That, the voting results of the General Election of 2010 determined that there should be a "Conservative led, Minority Government"; and, that, here, was the clear 'evidence' where the, "Wishes of the people were in direct conflict with the 'actions' of the Legislators"; making it the duty of the 'Reigning Monarch', to intervene.

Whereby, in both instances shown above; ELIZABETH THE SECOND, in complying with the 'Original Contract', providing the 'protection' of Her People; should have intervened. In respect to (A) above, She ought to have 'warned' Her Ministers that the WHIPS in Parliament are wholly illegal and unlawful. And, in respect to (B), she ought to have used the 'Royal Prerogative', to order the immediate dissolution of Parliament.

SHE ACTUALLY DID NOTHING AT ALL.

Prince Charles with his frequent 'meddling' makes it abundantly clear that he knows where his duty lays in 'protecting' the British People. IT IS VERY EVIDENT, IN STARK VIVID DETAIL, WHY THE 'ESTABLISHMENT' FEARS HIM SO MUCH.

For my FREEDOM I do not rely on Parliament. Though, Parliament is 'elected', it is not a "People's Parliament". It is wholly corrupt, dominated, by the political 'diktat' of the political parties.
Throughout the entire nation there are less than 400,000 Members of 'all the political parties' heaped together. So, it is positively obscene that this tiny minority, should dominate every aspect of the lives of nearly, 50 Million Adults, that there are in the country today.

No, Parliament is rotten and corrupt. For my FREEDOM, I rely on the BRITISH PRESS, the INTERNATIONAL PRESS; and, the, FREE EXPRESSION INTERNET.

Sincerely
Gordon J Sheppard