Libel trial judgment McAlpine -v- Sally Bercow

From:	GordonJ Sheppard
Sent:	24 May 2013 21:30:53
To:	News @ Sky (news@sky.com); Tessa Jowell MP (jowellt@parliament.uk)

 I give my unqualified and unreservedly support to SALLY BERCOW; she is the only one to have had the guts to challenge the intimidation and blackmail of Lord McAlpine and his lawyer, Andrew Reid, who have been making a fortune out of false libel claims.

 Both the BBC and ITV, wholly gutless, succumbed to this intimidation and blackmail, and, foolishly, and,  without any justification at all, they paid out huge sums of money by, 'settling out of court'. To the false claims, that McAlpine made.
And, the consequence of that sheer cowardice has resulted, in both McAlpine and his lawyer getting away with securing big financial rewards from their blackmail; never ever having to prove their allegations in a Court.
SALLY BERCOW was having none of this. She refused to submit to this intimidation; and she defended herself in the Court.
Sadly, and wholly corruptly, she was on a very sticky wicket from the start. Not, because she was guilty of libel; but, because a corrupt 'establishment' Judge, would never find in her favour, because, he had to corruptly give his support to a. Lord of the Land, a pillar of the establishment.
No one has libelled Lord McAlpine at all.
No one has actually accused him of anything.
Mr. Justice Tugendhat's judgement was positively absurd.
SALLY BERCOW merely posed a question in her tweet.
But the judge ruled that it was libel.
The judge refused to accept, that SALLY BERCOW's tweet was merely asking a question.
Yet, the very first word of her tweet, (in posing that question), was the word, "WHY".

Justice Tugendhat either hasn't the intelligence to know that, the word "WHY", IS POSING A QUESTION.
Or, he is so corrupt, he ignores the word "WHY"; and, pretends, that the word “WHY” does not exist in the tweet at all.
We live in Great Britain today, where the common people, have no protection of law at all.

We have a "Reigning Monarch" sitting on the throne charged with the duty to protect the Crown's "Subjects" by honouring the terms of the "Original Contract"; yet she provides no protection at all.

We have a rotten and corrupt and an unlawful 'coalition administration masquerading as government'; that was not 'elected' by the People at all.

We have the political party rotten and corrupt and, 'unlawful', offices, procedures, and practices of the political party WHIPS in Parliament; that 'prejudice the people'; and, thereby break the law every week; by flouting and breaching the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".

We have a corrupt Judiciary that for 324 years has conspired to deceive the British People by denying the rightful challenge to an 'elected' Parliament; conning the People into believing that it is "LAW" that prevents that challenge. Yet, the "Bill of Rights 1689", (the, very 'Act' whereby Parliament even gets its "Supremacy"), that makes it abundantly clear that by 'precedent of law' anyone may challenge Parliament in the Courts; whenever Parliament, PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE.

Britain today is a sewer of corruption. The inevitable consequence of the DESPOTISM that always prevails, wherever, and whenever, there is a MONARCHY in the land.

Gordon J Sheppard  

DESPOTISM

 When despotism has established itself for ages in a country, as in France, it is not in the person of the King only that it resides. It has the appearance of doing so in show, and in nominal authority; but it is not so in practise, and in fact. It has it’s standards everywhere. Every office and department has it’s despotism, founded upon custom and usage. Every place has it’s Bastille, and every Bastille it’s despot. The original hereditary despotism resident in the person of the King, divides and subdivides itself into a thousand shapes and forms, till at last the whole of it is acted by deputation. This was the case in France; and against this species of despotism, proceeding on through an endless labyrinth of office till the source of it is scarcely perceptible, there is no mode of redress. It strengthens itself by assuming the appearance of duty, and tyrannizes under the pretence of obeying.

-------------------------------------------

 O! Ye that love mankind!  Ye that dare oppose not only tyranny but the tyrant, stand forth!  Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her as a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart.

Oh! receive the fugitive and prepare in time an asylum for mankind!

 

 Thomas Paine       “RIGHTS OF MAN”    (published in England 1791)