Petition: “Create a true
Democracy”.
DEMOCRACY, is Government of the
People, by the People, and, for the People.
It is not,
and, it never can be, Government, and, a Parliament, wholly manipulated under
the control and domination of the political parties. That, is not, “Democracy”.
That is a tyranny.
Signing this Petition will make it
abundantly clear: That, you wish to end this political party domination of
Parliament. That, it is your intention to end the present political party
unlawful power in Parliament; by abolishing, the political party WHIPS in
Parliament. That has no ‘legality’ at all.
The Offices,
Procedures and Practices of the political party WHIPS in Parliament ‘prejudice the people’. Each week the
WHIPS issue political party ‘diktat’ and instructions to Members of Parliament,
instructing them on how they must behave in Parliament and, on how they must
vote. This political party activity is unlawful.
Because, (a), such instructions overrule and supplant all ‘rightful
influence’ placed upon Members of Parliament by the Constituent. And, (b), that
this, ‘prejudice of the people’, flouts
and breaches the ‘precedent of law’ set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.
History:
Parliament secures its Supremacy in, LAW, thru, "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689".
This reads:
"That the Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament".
Both the British Judiciary and Parliament has always determined that this actual wording prevents all challenge to Parliament in the Courts.
But, for more than three hundred and twenty four years, ever since the "Bill of Rights" was first granted the "Royal Assent" on the 13th day of December 1689; both Parliament and the entire British Judiciary has been interpreting this 'Bill', incorrectly. Both Parliament and the Judiciary have only been concerned, with the wording of, "Article 9". But, reading the "Bill of Rights 1689" in its entirety, tells a very different story. Reading the entire "Bill of Rights 1689" makes it abundantly clear that anyone may challenge Parliament in the Courts, whenever Parliament, 'prejudice' the People.
Parliament secures its Supremacy in, LAW, thru, "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689".
This reads:
"That the Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament".
Both the British Judiciary and Parliament has always determined that this actual wording prevents all challenge to Parliament in the Courts.
But, for more than three hundred and twenty four years, ever since the "Bill of Rights" was first granted the "Royal Assent" on the 13th day of December 1689; both Parliament and the entire British Judiciary has been interpreting this 'Bill', incorrectly. Both Parliament and the Judiciary have only been concerned, with the wording of, "Article 9". But, reading the "Bill of Rights 1689" in its entirety, tells a very different story. Reading the entire "Bill of Rights 1689" makes it abundantly clear that anyone may challenge Parliament in the Courts, whenever Parliament, 'prejudice' the People.
The "Bill of Rights 1689" was created by the "Rights Committee" of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688.
The sole intention of the creation of this, ‘Bill’, was to protect Parliament
from the interferences of a King. Parliament did not want the same problems
that it had experienced with King James II, the previous King. But,
in the creation of the Bill, the 'Rights Committee' recognized that
although the intent of the Bill was to protect Parliament from a King;
that, their Bill might well be misunderstood or misinterpreted;
which could result to the detriment of the People. So, this Committee, inserted
into the Bill, directly below all the 'rights' that Parliament was claiming
from a King, another extra paragraph, providing the 'protection' of the
People. This can be seen in the Bill today. It is the paragraph: "The Said Rights Claimed". It reads as follows:
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises
as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements
Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said
Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or
Example”
Therefore, if
Parliaments “Supremacy”, afforded to Parliament, by “Article 9” of the “Bill of
Rights 1689”, is current law, and, is upheld, by Parliament and the Judiciary,
as being wholly lawful? Then, why is it? That both Parliament and the Judiciary,
do not recognize, and, honour, the paragraph of that very same Bill, that
provides the protection of, “The People”?
Protecting, them, from the ‘abuses’ and the ‘prejudice’, of Parliament?
If Parliaments “Supremacy”
is legal and lawful; as determined by the “Bill of Rights 1689. Then, so is the
paragraph, of that very same Bill: “The
Said Rights Claimed”.
Because, both,
in fact and in Law, “The Said Rights
Claimed” overrules “Article 9” of
the “Bill of Rights 1689”, whenever
Parliament, “prejudice the people”.
This paragraph of the
“Bill of Rights 1689” is current and existing, “LAW”.
Yet, Parliament and
the Judiciary deny that recognition.
This petition therefore calls for:
- The immediate
abolishment of the WHIPS in Parliament.
- The immediate
recognition by Parliament of “The Said Rights Claimed”.
- The immediate
declaration by the British Judiciary that the WHIPS in Parliament are
unlawful.
Sign this petition here if you agree: http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/create-a-true-democracy-abolish-the-whips-in-parliament-now
No comments:
Post a Comment