Monday, September 30, 2013

Clarion call to the People of the UK...


AWAKE UK AWAKE


 When are the British going to awake from their slumbers and, the tyranny of the dark ages, to emerge into the bright sun light era of the, 21st Century?

When are they going to escape from the chains of their ‘subjugation’? And, begin to learn, how to govern themselves?

When are they going to smash the illegal powers of the political parties? That, presently dominate and control the ‘people’s elected parliament’; by the, illegal powers, of the political party, WHIPS?

When are they going to create, a true, PEOPLES DEMOCRACY?

The British people do not even like or respect the political parties. As, can easily be proven, by the total number of people who are, at present, Members, of the political parties.

According to the census there are 48,085,800 adults (over the age of 20) in the country. Yet, in all of the political parties, all lumped together that there are in the country; the total Membership is less than, 400,000. It is difficult to be precise about this, because, both the Conservatives and the Liberals refuse to disclose their Membership numbers.

The Labour Party responded with alacrity to the request for the number, reporting that the total Membership was 193,300. But, similar requests made to both the Conservatives and the Liberal parties provided a very different response. They both treated their ‘Membership’ numbers, as a “State Secret”. Even, “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION” requests, were refused; demonstrating, the sheer arrogance; of these two, political parties.

Why, then, should this tiny minority of less than 400,000 total membership; control and dominate every aspect of life, of more than 48 Million adults in the land. Less than 1 per cent dominating and controlling 99 per cent, is both absurd and obscene. Yet, that is what is happening in the UK today. Bear in mind, also, that in reality, it is not even the 400,000 that exercise this domination and control. In, reality, it is only the “National Executive” of those political parties where the true powers lay. And, that is the tiniest minority of all.

Now let’s examine the legality of all this abuse?

Each political party controls and dominates parliament by the offices, procedures and practices, of the political party WHIPS. The, WHIPS, of each political party, each week, issue instructions to their, Members of Parliament, as to how they must behave in parliament, and, on how they must vote. But, this political party WHIPS activity, and, their ‘diktat’ and ‘instruction’, is wholly unlawful; because, such instructions, ‘prejudice the people’; which is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

The, WHIPS, ‘prejudice the people’;  because, the political party ‘diktat’ and ‘instructions’ that they issue to their Members of Parliament each week; overrules and supplants, all ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those Members, by the Constituent. Constituents can influence their ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on any issue until they are, ‘blue in the face’. Yet, they, and, their influence, are completely overruled by the WHIPS and the political parties.

Parliament claims and secures its “Supremacy” relying for the legality upon “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”. This reads:

“That the Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament”

And, both Parliament and the British Judiciary has always ‘interpreted’ this literally; without any consideration, at all, being given; as to any other, ‘interpretation’, within the “Bill of Rights 1689”, that, might determine otherwise; that, might actually, permit, the testing, questioning, or challenge to parliament, in the British Courts. Thus, both Parliament and the Judiciary has always read this sentence in the Bill, as though it is, sacrosanct; and, that it cannot be interpreted otherwise.

But, for three hundred and twenty four years, ever since the “Bill of Rights” was first created and, was granted, the “Royal Assent”; (in December 1689); both, Parliament and the Judiciary has always ‘interpreted’ and ‘applied’ this, “Article 9”; wholly, incorrectly.

 Because, within that very same Bill, there is another, ‘interpretation’, of the Bill; and, that, ‘interpretation’, overrules, “Article 9”.

The “Bill of Rights 1689” was created by the “Rights Committee” of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688, solely, in order, to protect Parliament from the interferences’ of a King. The CONVENTION had removed King James the Second from the throne, because, he had “Broken the original contract betwixt King and People”; and, Parliament did not want the same troubles it had experienced with, King James; when, offering the throne to a new King, Prince William of Orange. So, Parliament required ‘protection’ from the King. Hence, the need for the “Bill of Rights 1689”; But, this Bill, was never ever created, in order to protect Parliament, from, “The People”.

Though, the “Rights Committee”, in creating this Bill, were fully aware that it might be misinterpreted or misused in that way. And, so, after listing the thirteen ‘Articles’ or ‘Rights’ Parliament was claiming from each, ‘Reigning Monarch’; directly, below that list, the “Rights Committee” inserted another paragraph into the Bill; in order to ensure the ‘protection’ of, “The People”. And, that paragraph is, “The Said Rights Claimed”; which, reads as follows:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

Thereby, when Parliament ‘enacts’ or ‘applies’, “Article 9”, or any of the other “Premises” of that, “Bill of Rights 1689”; Parliament must comply with the conditions as determined by the ‘precedent of law’, set out in, “The Said Rights Claimed. And, if, and, when, Parliament, ‘prejudice the people’; “The Said Rights Claimed” overrules “Article 9”; and, Parliament, then, loses all its claims to the, Supremacy.

The, “Said Rights Claimed”, overrules, all the “Premises” of the entire Bill of Rights 1689.

 CONCLUSION

The political party WHIPS, in the People’s elected Parliament, is wholly unlawful.

Therefore, if you want to smash the illegal power and the control and domination of ‘your elected parliament’ by, the political parties, and, their WHIPS; then sign the petition located here:

https://www.change.org/petitions/government-parliament-and-judiciary-recognize-the-statute-in-force-bill-of-rights-1689-the-said-rights-claimed-and-abolish-the-illegal-activities-of-the-political-party-whips
 

 Gordonj

No comments: