Parliamentary Political
and Constitutional Reform Committee
Written
evidence submitted by Gordon J Sheppard (VUK 57)
1. There is only one major reform
necessary; and, that is that Parliament must recognize that the People of this
country in General Elections, 'elect' their representative to represent
them in Parliament; they do not 'elect' a political party; and that
therefore Parliament ought to be, a "People's Parliament".
2. Sadly, today, the 'People' have hardly any influence at
all. Parliament, unlawfully, is wholly dominated and controlled by the
political parties.
3. This wicked domination and control
of the political parties is maintained in parliament by the political party
WHIPS. The WHIPS countermand, overrule and supplant all rightful influence
placed upon Members of Parliament by the Constituents; and, thereby 'prejudice
the people'.
4. "Prejudice of the People"
is wholly outlawed and proscribed by the 'precedent of law' set out in the
"Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
6. Thereby, whenever Parliament does
'prejudice the people' the very SUPREMACY of parliament becomes null and void.
Thus determining by 'precedent of law' that the political party activities of
the WHIPS in parliament, is wholly illegal and unlawful, and has no legal
validity at all.
7. The WHIPS in parliament should
therefore be abolished.
8. Every vote taken in parliament
should be a FREE VOTE.
9. Thus, creating a TRUE DEMOCRACY.
Sooner or later the People of Great Britain will secure their
rightful access to LAW; where it is possible to test, question, and
challenge the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of parliament from within law.
Sooner or later the People of this great country will awake from their
'political' apathy and, the slumbers of the middle ages, emerging
into the bright sunlight of the 21st Century; when they will destroy the
present dominance and control of their 'elected' parliament, by the political
parties. Sooner or later, Britain will create a TRUE DEMOCRACY.
Sooner or later Parliament must recognize that at present
the People (the 'common people' of this land have no protection of 'LAW'
whatsoever. They have no true Citizenship recorded in Law; they have no
'written constitution', or proper 'Bill of Rights'; or access to a
"Supreme Court of Law" where it is possible to test, question, or
challenge the abuses and the prejudice of parliament from within law.
Furthermore, although there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon
the throne charged with the responsibility and duty to honour the 'Original
Contract' and provide the protection of the Crown's Subjects; throughout her
entire reign, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has miserably failed to provide any
protection at all. Today, the British do not have a 'Reigning Monarch'; they
have a village sub-postmistress franking and rubber-stamping every piece of
paper laid before her by parliament.
LAW today in Great Britain is looked upon by the elite
and the establishment as being something that only the 'common people' must
obey. Whilst, they, abuse and flout 'LAW' all of the time.
HISTORY:
King James the Second was removed from
the throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 for "Breaking the
Original Contract betwixt King and People". The CONVENTION determined
that he had thereby, 'abdicated the throne'; the throne was declared
"Vacant" and Prince William of Orange was offered the throne. The
CONVENTION, however, did not want the same problems and interference it had to
endure from 'James II' and so therefore the CONVENTION appointed a Rights
Committee to create a Bill that would protect parliament, from this
interference by a King. The Rights Committee therefore knew at the
beginning of their task, that the Bill was only necessary and required in order
to protect parliament from a King. It was never intended to protect parliament
from the people. And, so the Rights Committee had the responsibility,
with any Bill that they created, to protect the people from any abuse. They had
to ensure that the Bill that they created would not be misused or wrongly
interpreted by parliament; and, therefore they created for insertion within
their Bill the overruling paragraph guaranteeing the peoples protection.
Firstly, the Rights Committee set
out a complete list of 'Articles' or 'Rights' that Parliament claimed from a
King; then directly below this list they inserted the paragraph, "The Said
Rights Claimed" and this reads as follows:
“The
Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and
Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and
Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the
Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be
drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
Note: Everyone assumes that the most important feature of the
"Glorious Revolution" and the "Bill of Rights 1689" is that
it provides parliament with its SUPREMACY and its protection from a King. But,
this is not the most important feature at all; the true most important feature
of all of this is, that it provided the PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE from within
law. It specifically determines that parliament may have its SUPREMACY but only
on the conditions as determined by the "Said Rights Claimed".
The most interesting feature of all of this is that the
"Said Rights Claimed" restricts parliament from 'amending' or even
'abolishing' the Bill of Rights 1689. Because, in order for parliament to try
to do either; actually creates, 'prejudice of the people'. Parliament is
thereby prevented from amending or abolishing the Bill on two counts: firstly, because it
breaks the Law; secondly, the people have their protection afforded by
"The Said Rights Claimed". They will never permit parliament taking
that protection away.
25
March 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment