Who actually 'owns' Humankind?
So many times have I actually witnessed terminally ill people 'on their knees' virtually begging the Judiciary and the 'State' for the right to die; and, for so many times, have I witnessed the refusal of that right in the courts; that I am now motivated to write this.
The Judiciary never ever provide a rational and logical reason for the refusal; they merely assert and rule, that, "It is the Law", and, that, in order for the 'right to die' to be lawful; it becomes necessary to, "Change the Law".
This absurdity, and, this travesty, therefore motivates me to pose the following question:
Who actually 'owns' Humankind?
So, let me spell out the truth:
1. None of Humankind born to this planet earth chose of their own volition to be born.
2. None of Humankind ever had a part in their own creation.
3. That act of their 'birth', is an act of imposition.
4. At the appointed moment of time each of Humankind is compulsively ejected from the womb.
So many times have I actually witnessed terminally ill people 'on their knees' virtually begging the Judiciary and the 'State' for the right to die; and, for so many times, have I witnessed the refusal of that right in the courts; that I am now motivated to write this.
The Judiciary never ever provide a rational and logical reason for the refusal; they merely assert and rule, that, "It is the Law", and, that, in order for the 'right to die' to be lawful; it becomes necessary to, "Change the Law".
This absurdity, and, this travesty, therefore motivates me to pose the following question:
Who actually 'owns' Humankind?
So, let me spell out the truth:
1. None of Humankind born to this planet earth chose of their own volition to be born.
2. None of Humankind ever had a part in their own creation.
3. That act of their 'birth', is an act of imposition.
4. At the appointed moment of time each of Humankind is compulsively ejected from the womb.
5. From that precise
moment of time, each of Humankind, is 'doomed' to live a 'Life' until they die.
6. This, reality and truth, provides for all of Humankind, all the 'rights' they need.
7. Governments and Institutions do not give Humankind these rights.
8. All Humankind have these 'rights' from the very instant of their birth; inherent in their genes.
The inherent 'rights' of all Humankind are these:
The right to individual conscience.
The right to self determination.
The right of free expression.
The right to discriminate and to offend.
The right to survive.
The right to 'life' and,
The right to die.
None of Humankind, born to planet earth, has ever been able to, 'live a life', without dying.
Therefore, the 'right to life' must include the 'right to die'.
6. This, reality and truth, provides for all of Humankind, all the 'rights' they need.
7. Governments and Institutions do not give Humankind these rights.
8. All Humankind have these 'rights' from the very instant of their birth; inherent in their genes.
The inherent 'rights' of all Humankind are these:
The right to individual conscience.
The right to self determination.
The right of free expression.
The right to discriminate and to offend.
The right to survive.
The right to 'life' and,
The right to die.
None of Humankind, born to planet earth, has ever been able to, 'live a life', without dying.
Therefore, the 'right to life' must include the 'right to die'.
NATURAL LAW
The truth and reality and
the right of all Humankind as set out above, are, ‘Natural Law’. ‘Man made Law’ cannot ever overturn or supplant the, ‘Natural Laws’, inherent in the gene.
ALL HUMANKIND, 'OWN' THEMSELVES.
They therefore have the 'right to die' at any time they choose. Furthermore, they also have the 'rights' to ask, anyone they like, to assist them in their demise, without anyone being punished for 'breaking' the law'. And, they have the right, to access the required drugs necessary that will swiftly and painlessly, provide that demise.
THEY 'OWN' THEMSELVES. The 'State' has no right whatsoever to intervene.
ALL HUMANKIND, 'OWN' THEMSELVES.
They therefore have the 'right to die' at any time they choose. Furthermore, they also have the 'rights' to ask, anyone they like, to assist them in their demise, without anyone being punished for 'breaking' the law'. And, they have the right, to access the required drugs necessary that will swiftly and painlessly, provide that demise.
THEY 'OWN' THEMSELVES. The 'State' has no right whatsoever to intervene.
In the event that the
'State' claims the life of all Humankind; the 'State' must provide, the actual
'legal instrument', verifying that claim.
I am sick and tired of
always being told or indoctrinated by the concept that we must, “Obey the Law”.
So, let us here establish what 'LAW' actually is.
Today in Great Britain the 'elite' and the 'establishment' of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government, and Parliament, look upon law, as being something that, only the 'common people' must obey. Whilst they all of them flout and breach 'Laws', all of the time.
Whenever, LORD HAILSHAM, (An ex-LORD CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND) was asked the question, "What is Law”? He would always reply saying this,
"Law is naught but a myth without the consent of the people, there is no, Law."
Thus, 'LAW' is naught but the people's voluntary consent to live by the, "Rule of Law".
Therefore, all of Humankind, voluntarily giving of that consent, are entitled to four specific things:
A. They are entitled to participate in the creation and framing of law.
B. They are entitled to 'equality' within law.
C. They are entitled to the protection of law.
D. They are entitled to the criterion that all true and just 'Law', must comply with, truth, freedom, justice, intelligence, logic, and rationale.
So, any of the Judiciary, ruling on any case before them in the courts, must provide the actual reasons for the, 'breach of law', when 'judgment' is declared.
The mere denial of 'right', based upon the mere assumption or opinion of a judge, determining that, the law has been broken or, ruling that, it is necessary to "change the law" without full explanation. Will not suffice.
So, let us here establish what 'LAW' actually is.
Today in Great Britain the 'elite' and the 'establishment' of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government, and Parliament, look upon law, as being something that, only the 'common people' must obey. Whilst they all of them flout and breach 'Laws', all of the time.
Whenever, LORD HAILSHAM, (An ex-LORD CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND) was asked the question, "What is Law”? He would always reply saying this,
"Law is naught but a myth without the consent of the people, there is no, Law."
Thus, 'LAW' is naught but the people's voluntary consent to live by the, "Rule of Law".
Therefore, all of Humankind, voluntarily giving of that consent, are entitled to four specific things:
A. They are entitled to participate in the creation and framing of law.
B. They are entitled to 'equality' within law.
C. They are entitled to the protection of law.
D. They are entitled to the criterion that all true and just 'Law', must comply with, truth, freedom, justice, intelligence, logic, and rationale.
So, any of the Judiciary, ruling on any case before them in the courts, must provide the actual reasons for the, 'breach of law', when 'judgment' is declared.
The mere denial of 'right', based upon the mere assumption or opinion of a judge, determining that, the law has been broken or, ruling that, it is necessary to "change the law" without full explanation. Will not suffice.
TRUE AND HONEST REASONS, MUST BE FULLY EXPLAINED.
Read my book “DEMOCRACY” available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
Read my book “DEMOCRACY” available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
No comments:
Post a Comment