INJUSTICE; THE HYSTERIA OF SEXUAL ABUSE...

Sexual Abuse Hysteria
With the wild sexual abuse hysteria prevailing in the United Kingdom today subsequent to the wild allegations being made by 'alleged victims' claiming that they were sexually abused by the celebrity JIMMY SAVILE; and, the sexual abuse trials that have taken place in the country ever since; it becomes absolutely necessary to properly examine in the most stringent manner every 'allegation' that is now being made. In order to verify actual 'guilt', "beyond all reasonable doubt". Before anyone else is convicted. To be absolutely sure that the allegations being made by the 'alleged' victims are not motivated by the hope of securing big financial compensation awards.

 With the wild hysteria about sexual abuse that there is in the country at this present time; by, way of caution; it would do well to examine and take note of, the wild accusations that we're levelled against the proprietors and staff of the EDENTON, "Little Rascals", child day care centre, and, in the BAKERSFIELD sexual abuse trials, and the, aftermath, of both; that took place in the United States between 1988-1999. Where, wholly innocent people were convicted and served very long term sentences in prison, before being acquitted and released; when, it was finally proved, that they had not sexually abused any young children at all.

Eighteen years, and, fourteen years, in prison; when they had not 'sexually abused' any children at all.

When a British solicitor proclaims to the World and the British Press that she has now ‘fifty clients’ who are all now ready to make claims for financial compensation against a ‘convicted’ alleged abusers assets, and, his estate; this is surely the time to question both the motivation for, and, the ‘evidence’ that was presented, by these accusers in these trials. Because, where a solicitor and her ‘fifty clients’ are now pursuing financial compensation, MONEY, must have been a prime motivator for the allegations being made. Claiming ‘compensation’ MONEY in this way, is so wicked and unfair; because, even if the accused did commit the abuse; his ‘family’ did not participate in that abuse in any way at all. So, why should the ‘family’ be punished as well.

Sympathy for the ‘alleged’ victims of sexual abuse may not overrule and supplant the establishment of ‘guilt’, by all ‘reasonable doubt’.

It should be borne in mind that the juries considering the verdicts in the two examples shown by the links below for EDENTON and BAKERSFIELD; that, the juries were considering, the ‘fresh evidence’ of sexual abuse allegations that had ‘allegedly’ taken place just a few weeks or a few months before the trial date. But, in the recent ‘historical sexual abuse’ trials that have taken place in Great Britain recently, those allegations being presented in the Courts, have all been for ‘allegations’ that are supposed to have taken place, twenty, thirty, and even forty years ago. And, what is more, there has been no corroborative evidence, being presented to the courts, at all. Convictions, have been established merely by the ‘word of mouth’ of those making the allegations.

Historical Sexual Abuse can never be proved by ‘word of mouth’ alone. Guilt can only ever be proved by verifiable corroborative forensic evidence, establishing guilt; or, by several actual witnesses that actually witnessed the abuse. Sadly, in virtually all of these trials that have taken place in the British courts recently, that ‘EVIDENCE’ has not been produced. The accused today are being found guilty, by, the, sheer, ‘SEXUAL ABUSE HYSTERIA’, and, the 'sympathy' for the, abused; that prevails in the country today. 

See these two FRONTLINE reports to properly understand how this ‘hysteria’ creates such terrible injustice.

EDENTON

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/innocence/etc/sum.html

BAKERSFIELD

http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_baker.htm