LAW - and the – “Rule of Law”
THE SHEER CHAOS, CONFUSION, COMPLICITY, and CORRUPTION taking place now
in parliament and, in the country; in respect to everything about BREXIT; and,
the legislation;
Where, the Prime Minister and, the 'right wing' element of the Tory
Members of Parliament, consistently, are relying upon the fact that the People
voted to 'LEAVE' the E.U.; therefore, this is the 'sacrosanct' reason, asserted
by their claim, that "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT"; and, that parliament must
now recognize and accept that this was the democratic 'vote' of the People, that now must be obeyed.
Repeatedly, we hear Members of Parliament proclaiming, "The
People have voted to LEAVE we must honour that referendum vote, and ensure we
LEAVE"
THERE IS ONLY ONE COURSE OF ACTION NOW
AVAILABLE TO ALL THAT VOTED "REMAIN"
TO CHALLENGE, FROM WITHIN LAW, THE
ACTUAL LEGALITY OF THE "BALLOT PAPER" PROVIDED FOR THAT REFERENDUM
VOTE.
WHAT SICKENS ME ABOUT MY COUNTRY TODAY
IS THAT 'LAW' AND THE "RULE OF LAW" IS NEVER EVER EVEN MENTIONED. IN
ALL THE "BREXIT" LEGISLATION DEBATES THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN
PARLIAMENT; NOT ONE MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT, HAS EVEN MENTIONED THE WORD. "LAW".
This is most important, because the
British People have no "protection of law" whatsoever.
1.
There is no Written Constitution;
2.
There is no proper "Bill of
Rights";
3.
There is no "Supreme
Court of Law"; where it is possible to 'question' the 'abuse' of
parliament from within, LAW.
4.
Furthermore, the "Reigning
Monarch" sitting upon the English throne, charged with the duty of
honouring and complying with the "Original Contract" requiring the
protection of all "Subjects of the Crown”; has failed miserably to
carry out that 'duty'; throughout all the years she has occupied that throne.
5.
Far worse, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has
repeatedly granted; the “ROYAL ASSENT”,
to corrupt LAW.
6.
Or, if she has not actually granted that
“Assent” by herself; but, has allowed it to be granted, 'in her name', by
the despots now dominating and controlling the Monarchy. Irrespective, of whoever granted that,
“ROYAL ASSENT”. It, was granted to, "CORRUPT LAW".
7.
All Acts, Motions, and Bills, created
and passed by parliament UNDER THE 'DIKTAT' AND INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL
PARTY WHIPS, has no 'legality' whatsoever; all such legislation is both
UNLAWFUL and CORRUPT.
8.
The, political party WHIPS, instructing
Members of Parliament on how the should or must vote; overrules and supplants
the Constituents right to 'influence' their Member of Parliament. Therefore,
this causes the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".
9.
Yet, "PREJUDICE OF THE
PEOPLE" is specifically proscribed by the, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF
RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".
This paragraph of the
"Bill of Rights 1689" specifically instructs parliament; that
parliament may have its "SUPREMACY" afforded to Parliament by
"Article 9"; or, Parliament may 'enact' any of the
"PREMISES" of the Bill; but, only by complying with the requirements
of, "The Said Rights Claimed". Which states, and requires, that
nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
A. MONARCHY DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY,
'PROTECTION OF LAW'
B. PARLIAMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY, 'PROTECTION
OF LAW'
C. THE JUDICIARY DO NOT ‘PROTECT THE
PEOPLE’ AT ALL;
In fact, truth, and reality, the
rotten JUDICIARY consistently, "Conspires to Pervert the Course of
Justice", and deceive the BRITISH PEOPLE; by ruling that,
"Parliament may not be 'questioned' in the Courts", UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCE. -
Whereas, the "Bill of Rights
1689" in the paragraph, "The
Said Rights Claimed", wholly verifies that anyone may
'question' or 'challenge' the 'abuses' of Parliament in the Courts; if, and
whenever, Parliament,
"PREJUDICE THE
PEOPLE"
Because, "The People" have no
'protection of law' whatsoever;
The 'legality' of the E.U. REFERENDUM
"BALLOT PAPER"; must be tested in, "LAW".
I contend;
1.
The 'ballot paper' contained
insufficient INFORMATION for the people to properly understand the implications
of what they were 'actually' voting for.
2.
The ballot paper provided no
INFORMATION at all in respect to the fact that Britain, in joining the E, U.,
agreed and signed a "TREATY". And therefore, in order to
"LEAVE" the E.U.; Britain would be required to 'negotiate' with the
E.U.; in order to, LEAVE.
3.
The ballot paper made no mention of
this at all.
4.
The ballot paper made no mention
of the triggering of "Article 50".
5.
The ballot paper provided no
INFORMATION at all about a, "Customs
Union" or a "Single Market".
6.
The ballot paper provided no
INFORMATION at all about what would happen if the People voted to.
"LEAVE".
7.
The People, therefore blindly boarded
a 'bus' without any 'destination' being revealed; and, not having a clue, where
the 'bus' was going.
8.
NO ONE GETS ON BUS - NOT KNOWING
- WHERE THE BUS IS GOING.
9.
But, that is what the People did, when
they voted, in respect to that ballot paper.
10.
The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION
at all about the role of Parliament.
I contend, that, further; the
People, were unlawfully motivated to vote "LEAVE" by,
1.
The massive ANTI-IMMIGRANT campaign
mounted and waged by virtually all British News Media, in the weeks leading up
to the actual vote.
2.
Right Wing" Members of
Parliament persistently promoting this 'anti-immigrant' stance, in order
to 'influence' the voter to vote, "LEAVE".
3.
Plus; The calculated 'lie' told and
promoted by the "LEAVE" camp, that, "£350,000
per Week" would be saved to be available for the
"National Health Service", if the People, voted to LEAVE.
4.
Plus; The constant 'lie' told and
promoted by the "LEAVE" camp; that, "Britain would be
far better off and be able to trade successfully with any country in the World,
if the People voted to "LEAVE" - Yet, without presenting any
'evidence' at all, to the voter; that this could be, TRUE.
5.
NOT ONE SIGNED
CONTRACT, FOR, ANY TRADE DEAL, was provided to the 'voter', in order
to verify that claim.
I contend,
That no honest person; or honest
"COURT OF LAW"; can assert, verify, or rule that the "Referendum
Ballot Paper" provided to the voter; was, LAWFUL.
That, 'ballot paper', was wholly UNLAWFUL
and CORRUPT.
THE TRUE LEGALITY MUST BE TESTED IN
LAW.
No comments:
Post a Comment