Unlawful prorogation of parliament.

For GINA MILLER – Re Prorogation of Parliament.

You cannot ask High Court to rule “prorogation of parliament is unlawful”.

Court will only tell you, as it has already told you, that this is a ‘political matter’ and it is not for the Courts.

You should have used a different tactic altogether. You should have presented to the Court, the allegation that the ‘suspension of parliament’ for this particular reason and for this very long time, does cause the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”; and, that is wholly proscribed, by the ‘protection of the people’ provided by and set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

EXPLANATION.

1. Britain is a, PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY”
2. Where the ‘emphasis’ rests on the word, “Representative”.
3. Therefore, when the people in General Election elect their “political representative to represent them in Parliament; they are entitled to be represented, in that parliament, twenty-four hours of every day.
4. This ‘prorogation’, for this, 'political reason', and 'for this ‘extraordinary long time’, denies the people that right of representation;
5. This therefore causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”
6. THE COURT, THEREFORE, MUST TAKE NOTE AND COMPLY AS FOLLOWS:
    

1. The paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” known as, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” specifically instructs Parliament, that it is the ‘Supreme Authority’ of the entire Bill. Within, its text, it specifically declares that it is the ‘authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.
2. It even overrules “Article 9” and the “Supremacy of Parliament; if and whenever parliament causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.
3. “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” also specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ and use any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; But, only upon the ‘conditions’ that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

BREXIT – Now highly critical; just one chance left for ‘sanity’ to prevail;

The ‘legality’ of BREXIT must be challenged in the Courts. Three irrefutable specific ‘prima facie’ allegations cannot be rejected by any Court.

Regards, Gordon J Sheppard