CORRUPTION?

FIFA, SEBB BLATTER, and CORRUPTION...

FIFA Ethics Committee bans both SEBB BLATTER and MICHEL PLATINI for eight years; but fails to produce one word of actual 'evidence' against them.

The Committee merely responds to the "Hate Blatter" campaign engineered specifically by the British who failed in their "World Cup" bid; and want revenge; and the Americans, who consistently allege, CORRUPTION. But, produce no evidence at all.

 

CORRUPTION

When I hear and witness an American State Prosecutor alleging CORRUPTION; I practically vomit in contempt.

 

It was the rotten CORRUPTION of the entire American Government and Judicial Administration: Government, Judiciary, the trial judge, the Supreme Court Judges, the FBI, and the Security Services; that conspired and falsely and corruptly charged ETHEL and JULIUS ROSENBERG of giving the 'atom bomb secrets' to Russia; and, putting them to death in the electric chair.

That's real, CORRUPTION;

Knowingly and calculatingly, murdering two innocent people, who had nothing to do with the charges levelled against them, at all. The entire evidence against them was false, and it was wholly fabricated by the American Government and the Security Service. Even the President of the United States was a willing participant to this, CORRUPTION.

AMERICA put ETHEL and JULIUS ROSENBERG to death; to satisfy the corrupt and wicked anti-communist 'witch hunts' that hysterically prevailed in the country at that time.

ETHEL and JULIUS were communists, and they did spy for Russia. But, they were both specifically instructed by MOSCOW to discontinue all spying activity; long before the 'incidents' took place for which they were charged. They had no participation in those 'alleged incidents' at all. The evidence, presented during their trial alleging that ETHEL ROSENBERG had typed up the 'secrets of the atom bomb' on a table in a room in her house; was all false. And, the Security Services and the Government - knew that it was false - because, they had entirely fabricated that 'evidence' in every detail.

 

David Greenglass, ETHEL ROSENBERG's, own brother, who worked in the 'Los Alamos' Nuclear Research Establishment where the atom bomb was being produced; had been caught spying; and, the Security Services put pressure on him, in order for him, to implicate the ROSENBERGS. It was his false testimony that actually convicted them both and sentenced them to die in the electric chair. That ‘incident’, “typing up the atom bomb secrets”, actually never took place at all; it was the entire ‘fiction’ of David Greenglass, and, the Security Service.

 

CORRUPTION of the highest degree;

MURDERING TWO INNOCENT PEOPLE; PUTTING THEM TO DEATH IN THE MOST HORRIFIC WAY; VIRTUALLY FRYING THEM, IN THE ELECTRIC CHAIR.

Thus, and thereby, let no American prosecutor ever point the finger at anyone, alleging, CORRUPTION, again.

 

"THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"

Glorious Revolution and, “The Said Rights Claimed”

My letter to KEITH PORTEOUS WOOD of the Secularist Society.

 

Congrats re the banning of prayers at Council Meetings.

I agree, that both prayers in Parliament, and also in the ‘imposition’ in schools, should also be banned in LAW.

 

For your immediate attention and interest and in respect to The Speaker, JOHN BERCOW’s pronouncement that prayers will still be said in Parliament, because Parliament is protected by the “Bill of Rights 1689”,

 

From all experience in this country, my country, sad to say, that it would appear that I am practically the only one in the country that has read and researched the period of “The Glorious Revolution” correctly. Because the ‘evidence’ is abundantly clear that hardly anyone has interpreted the “Bill of Rights 1689” correctly at all.

 

The entire British Educational curriculum and establishment has abysmally failed to teach this correctly. The majority of the People of the country know nothing of Parliaments “Supremacy” and the way that they are being governed today.

 

Parliament and the Courts (Judiciary) have been misinterpreting the “Bill of Rights 1689” for more than 300 years. And, they both continue to misinterpret it, even today.

 

You can ask at random thousands of people in the streets and ask them to list the three principal instruments by which they are governed; and, more than 90 per cent would not know. Ask them to tell you about “Article 9”; and they would be, bewildered.

 

Then ask them to tell you about “The Said Rights Claimed” and they would stand open mouthed before you not having a clue. Even Parliament and the Judiciary know nothing of this “Statute” in the Bill.

 

Parliament claims its lawful validity for its “Supremacy” relying upon “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”. This reads:

 

“The Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament”

 

And. both Parliament and the Judiciary has interpreted that wording as though it was a ‘stand-alone’ piece of legislation requiring no other considerations at all. That is why the Judiciary has always denied the testing, questioning or the challenging of Parliament, in their Courts.

 

But the correct interpretation of “Article 9” and, the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”; proves that “Article 9” is not a ‘stand-alone’ Statute at all’.

Parliaments ‘enactment of “Article 9”, (And all the other, ‘Premises’, of that Bill), are wholly dependent upon the conditions set out in another paragraph of that same Bill: i.e. the paragraph: “The Said Rights Claimed”

 

And, this reads as follows:

 

“The said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

This makes it abundantly clear that as a ‘precedent’ in English Law, that, Parliaments “Supremacy”, legally afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”, is only applicable, in LAW; providing Parliament does not ‘prejudice’ the People. Whenever Parliament does ‘prejudice’ the People; the “Supremacy” of Parliament, has no lawful validity at all.

 

So, when The Speaker, JOHN BERCOW MP or any other Member of Parliament asserts that “Prayers will still be conducted in Parliament” because Parliament is protected by the “Bill of Rights 1689”; anyone can challenge that assertion, in LAW, relying on “The Said Rights Claimed”.

If it can be shown and proved in a Court of LAW that ‘prayers said in Parliament’ does ‘prejudice the People’; the Courts will have no alternative but to rule that ‘prayers said in Parliament', must cease.

Hardly any of the British People are aware; that, even if we do not have a “written constitution” or a proper “Bill of Rights”; and, even if we have no access to LAW to challenge Parliament in a “Supreme Court” of LAW; the British are protected against the ‘prejudice’ and the ‘abuses’ of Parliament; by, “The Said Rights Claimed”

This, has never ever been taught in our schools.

People will never be able to participate in a DEMOCRACY correctly, unless they ‘participate’ twenty four hours of each day; and, unless they are aware of the precise manner by which they are governed. The British have not the slightest conception as to how they are governed. That is why today we are governed by a wholly illegal coalition government; that was not elected by the People, at all. The People’s vote in the General Election of 2010 verified that there should be a ‘Conservative led Minority Government’; but the leaders of the Political party’s elected to Parliament in that election did not like that result. So, they illegally ‘ignored’ the People’s vote; and, they then conspired with each other to foist upon this nation, this coalition government. In ‘ignoring’ the People’s vote in this way, they corruptly, ‘prejudiced’ the People. Which, was wholly prohibited in ‘LAW’ by “The Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/“The Said Rights Claimed”.

The British Parliament though elected by The People; is not a Peoples Parliament.

Parliament is dominated entirely by the Political Party’s; and, the political ‘diktat’ of those parties.

The only way this will ever change, in order to create a truly, ”Peoples Parliament”; is when the entire population of the country recognizes and respects “The Said Rights Claimed”. When that is done, the Offices, Procedures and Practises of the WHIPS in Parliament, (that does ‘prejudice’ the People), will be challenged in LAW; and, will then be abolished. Whereby, every vote taken in Parliament thereafter, would become a ‘free vote’.

Sincerely, Gordonj

PS. Read my book “DEMOCRACY”:  http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

SACK HILLARY BENN

JEREMY CORBYN has no alternative now; he must sack his Cabinet Shadow Foreign Secretary HILLARY BENN; and, this is the reason why:

I can never recall, even one instance, where a Member of the front bench of the Labour Party, an actual Shadow, Foreign Secretary; has actually ‘campaigned’ to persuade all Members of his own political parliamentary party, to vote for a TORY party political policy motion, that, in just a matter of only a few minutes away, would be called for the vote. Especially, when that motion, and, that TORY policy, is of such a serious nature, in respect to the waging of war.

HILLARY BENN, last night, had the same, 'FREE VOTE', option in that debate and vote, as every other Member of the, Labour Parliamentary Party. JEREMY CORBYN had provided each of them with the 'individual' option of the 'FREE VOTE'; in the name and the cause of, Democracy.

This provided every Member of that, Labour Parliamentary Party, with the 'individual' option to vote in that debate according to his or her 'own conscience' and as 'influenced' by the 'constituents' they represented. 

They each had the right to vote as an 'individual' when the vote was taken.

But, none of them had the right to actively campaign, FROM THE FRONT BENCH, OF THE LABOUR PARTY, to 'persuade' all Members of their own political party to, 'vote for', that TORY motion.

He had the absolute right to vote his own opinion.
He had no right whatsoever to 'persuade others' on how they should vote.

This was the clear arrogant intent of HILLARY BENN to sabotage and flout, JEREMY CORBYN, and, his leadership of the Labour Party.

This 'arrogance' of HILLARY BENN should not be tolerated. HE HAS TO GO.

I could not believe what I was seeing and hearing, when this travesty took place.

Gordonj 

CORBYN, Democracy; CAMERON, The, Totalitarian Regime....

JERMY CORBYN entirely fulfilling his leadership election promise to try and create a new way of doing politics and establishing a more true democracy; provides a 'FREE VOTE' for all Labour Members of Parliament in respect of the vote taking place today regarding the 'bombing' of the 'Islamic State' in Syria.

Yet, DAVID CAMERON, the totalitarian dictator, denies all Conservative Members of parliament a 'FREE VOTE'. He is determined to create his own law in exactly the same way as ADOLF HITLER did, in Nazi Germany. HITLER presented his 'Enabling Act' to the German 'Reichstag', (Parliament), which specifically allowed HITLER to create his own laws. And, this Act was passed by that democratic parliament, by 441 votes for ‘Yes’ and only 94 votes for ‘No’. Therefore and thereby, HITLER, legally, had every right, to create his own laws.

But, CAMERON's "enabling act'; the, "WHIPS, in Parliament"; has no legality at all.
The WHIPS in parliament flout and breach the 'precedent of law' that is established and set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".

Therefore, if the TORY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT today, under the influence of the WHIPS, give DAVID CAMERON, a majority vote, resulting in the 'bombing' of Syria;

That vote will be wholly illegal and unlawful and it will be wholly eligible for challenge in law.

In order for the 'bombing' of Syria vote in parliament to be perfectly lawful; all Members of Parliament must be afforded the right of the, FREE VOTE. A 'Whipped' vote in parliament has no legality at all.

The WHIPS in instructing Members of Parliament on how they must vote; overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' placed upon those Members, by the Constituents. This thereby creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"

Yet the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament 'enacts' or applies any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

Here is the 'evidence' of that paragraph, in that Bill,
 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.


Gordonj 

BOMBING SYRIA.....

The definitive reason why,
 

We should not bomb Syria;

There has never been a bomb created that will allow the killing of an enemy; but not kill or injure the ordinary common innocent people present, when the bomb explodes.

BOMBING any country or anyone is entirely indiscriminate; you cannot control who will be killed and, who will not.

All those 'freaks' in the UK today who willingly will sanction the British Government to bomb the terrorist "Islamic State" in Syria, do not care a jot about the innocents who are going to be killed; wholly. corruptly, they see them as being merely disposable collateral, in their obscene greater cause.

They are contemptible!

The mentally deranged “Press the Nuclear Button” attitude that prevails with these lunatics in our country today has nothing to do with the defence of our country; just one nuclear weapon will justify that claim; Great Britain persistently arms and re-arms in order to act as the “World’s Policeman”, and to dominate and control the World; determining, continually, by threat of, WAR and REGIME CHANGE; how all other countries must live and who they are to be governed by.

Great Britain, desperately trying, to recreate the glorious days of “EMPIRE”, yet again.

 

DAVID CAMERON'S, 'DEFENCE SPENDING REVIEW'.....

WHEN EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY MUST NOW ENDURE ALL THE GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL CUTS; WITH IMPENDING CUTS OF TAX CREDITS AS WELL; AND, WITH OUR NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, THROUGH LACK OF FUNDS, NOW ON THE BRINK OF NEAR COLLAPSE.

The wasteful resources of the country's finance in this proposed national defence spending review, is an absolute travesty and a disgrace. Consider,


178 Billion Pounds. Plus 31 Billion Pounds, for the building of four more nuclear submarines.
600 new armoured Scout vehicles;
13 new frigates including 8 submarine frigates;
138 new F35 Strike Fighter aircraft;
9 new Boeing P8 maritime patrol aircraft for surveillance and anti-submarine and anti-surface war  purposes;
2 Billion Pounds for renewal of SAS equipment;
RAF Typhoon Jets, life, to be extended by 10 years.

And, very much more.

Can anyone truly believe that all this national expenditure is solely intended for the defence of the country?

GARBAGE! WE ALREADY HAVE ALL THE MILITARY RESOURCES NECESSARY TO DEFEND THE COUNTRY AS IT IS. The true intention of all this terrible waste; is the intent for the waging of WAR. And, the, intimidation, of every other nation on planet earth.

ALL THIS WICKED EXPENDITURE is solely required in order that Great Britain can have a seat at the "Nuclear Table" in the UN SECURITY COUNCIL; where it continually acts, as the "World’s Policeman"; dominating the World.

WAR WAR WAR, REGIME CHANGE, REGIME CHANGE, over and over again, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, and now, SYRIA, as well. Great Britain determining, how all the people of other nations must live and who they are to be governed by.

THAT's why CAMERON and his rotten government need to spend all this wicked expenditure. It is not for the defence of our country; it is in order that Britain can live the 'glorious days' of EMPIRE, all over again; BRITAIN’s influence, dominating the World.

OVERTLY AND COVERTLY British interference in the rightful affairs of other nations knows no bounds today. It is surely the time that the rest of the World put Great Britain in its true place on this beautiful Globe. Compared to the massive populations and, the presence of other nations on this planet earth, Great Britain is naught but an insignificant small island. That, has now got, far too big, for its boots!

THE BOMBING OF SYRIA

DAVID CAMERON and the, “Bombing of Syria”....

 FRANCE is bombing the I.S. in Syria.

RUSSIA is also bombing the I.S. in Syria as well.

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO NEED WHATSOEVER FOR THE UK TO BOMB THE I.S. IN SYRIA AS WELL.

CAMERON and the British Government; and, all those hysterical idiots that profess that they would "Press the Nuclear Button" with impunity; only want to bomb I.S. in Syria in order to wield and force, "British Influence", in the World.

THE NUCLEAR WEAPON
The claim is always made that the 'nuclear weapon' is always absolutely necessary for two reasons: (a), in order to defend the country from nuclear attack; (b), to deter other nations, from ever attacking Great Britain, with a nuclear weapon. The greatest 'deceit' ever imposed upon the British people; by a Government. Just look at the, FACTS:

In consequence of this, 'defence requirement'; Great Britain already has all the nuclear weaponry it needs, in order to fulfil this requirement. So, why is it necessary now to order the building of four more new nuclear submarines?

IT IS ONLY FOR THE SAME REASON WHY NOW 'DAVID CAMERON' WANTS TO BOMB SYRIA; GREAT BRITAIN HAS TO HAVE THE BUILDING OF FOUR MORE NUCLEAR SUBMARINES; in order for BRITAIN to have a seat at the 'Nuclear Table' at the U.N. Security Council; so that it can continuously, 'Act as the World's Policeman', and, dominate and control all other nations of this World. Great Britain can never forget the 'glorious days' of the, "BRITISH EMPIRE", and it continuously wants, that 'dominance and control' again.

GREAT BRITAIN WALLOWS IN AND, GLORIFIES IN WAR: AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, and now SYRIA as well. REGIME CHANGE after REGIME CHANGE, over and over again, never ending until Britain gets its own way. Great Britain dictating, how all other nations and their 'People' must live; and, who they must be governed by.

RUSSIA is not the tyranny threatening the 'Peace of this World' today. The greatest tyranny and threat in the World today, is Great Britain and the United States of America, constantly, covertly and overtly, interfering in the affairs of other nations; and, in their arrogance asserting, that they have the right to continually act as, THE WORLDS POLICEMAN. And, dominate the World.

The United States Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, once said: “The United States will not tolerate Communism in our Hemisphere”. The sheer arrogance of this is just typical of America today, IT THINKS IT OWN’S HALF OF THE WORLD.