ATTORNEY GENERAL, GEOFFREY COX MP

ATTORNEY GENERAL, GEOFFREY COX MP.

LIAR, CHEAT, DECEIVER, and, OBFUSCATOR.

Not being a Member of Parliament; I am therefore not bound by the convention of parliament; not to demean any other Member; or, accuse any other Member of Parliament of not telling the truth. Not bound, by this convention; I can, without any hesitation; accuse GEOFFREY COX of being,

 

The most consummate liar and deceiver of the profession of ‘LAW’, practising in that profession, today.

 

GEOFFREY COX MP, the Attorney General, has been consistently advising Members of Parliament that all ‘legislation’ taking place in parliament in respect of  “BREXIT” and, the “EU (Withdrawal) Bill”; was all perfectly legal; and, that therefore, he asserted and claimed, and advised Members of Parliament to vote and agree THERESA MAY’S, “Agreement”, deal that had been negotiated with the EU.

 

IN THIS ADVICE THAT HE GAVE TO PARLIAMENT HE WAS A CONSUMATE LIAR.

 

Because, being a ‘man of law’ and, ‘dealing with law’ all the time; he must have been aware, AS I AM ONLY TOO AWARE; that a “Whipped Vote” in Parliament, has no legality at all.

 

The political party WHIPS office and political party activities in Parliament; ARE NOT ENSHRINED IN LAW; and, there is no ‘legal instrument’ anywhere in the national archive of parliament; that can be produced; proving and verifying that parliament; BY FREE VOTE, has ever approved the “WHIPS”, in parliament.

 

Furthermore, The “WHIPS” office; and, the political party activities of the “WHIPS” in parliament; flouts and breaches, the ‘protection of the people’, provided by the, ‘precedent of law‘, as set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/Said Rights Claimed”.

This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689”, specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

The Said Rights Claimed

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

The, “Whipped Vote” in parliament does, “Prejudice the People” – by overruling and supplanting - the lawful right of the Constituent to influence their elected Member of Parliament. Therefore, the “WHIPS” in parliament and the “Whipped Vote” in parliament, HAS NO LEGALITY, at all.

 

This, being the truth of the matter, verifies without a shadow of doubt, that the “WHIPS” in parliament, HAS NO LEGALITY WHATSOEVER; and, THAT THE ‘WHIPS’ MUST BE, ABOLISHED.

 

In respect to “BREXIT” this is vitally important.

Because, if the, “Whipped Vote”, in parliament is wholly UNLAWFUL; then, the “Triggering of Article 50” in the “EU (WITHDRAWAL) Bill”; will also, have no ‘legality’ at all.

 

This would mean that the “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL” and all the “BREXIT” LEGISLATION already passed by parliament; and in some cases, has even been granted the, “ROYAL ASSENT”; in truth and reality; and, in accordance with the ‘LAW’ of the land; WILL HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

Therefore, all the Government and EU negotiations that have been taking place for the last two years, will all have been wasted; because the, “Triggering of Article 50”, as required by the “TREATY”;

HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.


CONCLUSION

THE, UK, WILL HAVE TO "REMAIN" IN THE EU.