ONE MILLION PEOPLE WASTING THEIR TIME

ONE MILLION PEOPLE march in London to secure a new people’s vote.

FIVE MILLION PEOPLE sign a petition to revoke "Article 50" and REMAIN in the EU.

Six Million people with their hearts in the right place, but, with their brains, up their arse.

 

MARCHES AND DEMONSTRATIONS IN THE STREETS, WAVING BANNERS FLAGS AND SLOGANS ACHIEVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. SIGNING PETITIONS LIKEWISE.

 

ONLY ‘VIOLENCE’ OR ‘LAW’ INFLUENCES THE TOTALITARIAN REGIME. HISTORY OF ALL REVOLUTION, VERIFIES THIS.

 

IF, ‘ONE MILLION PEOPLE’ or 'SIX MILLION PEOPLE', had contributed the paltry sum of just ‘0.10p’ each to an, “ARTICLE 50 LEGAL CHALLENGE FUND”; there would have been £100,000 or £600,000 made available to employ the services of the very best Barrister and the best team of legal ‘experts’ that could properly challenge the legality of, “The Triggering of Article 50”, in parliament; in the, “SUPREME COURT” – and if necessary – in the “European Court of Justice” as well.

 

This is a prima facie case of 'LAW' that cannot be lost; a case, that, the JUDICIARY, would be unable to refute. “Article 50” was triggered in parliament in a “Whipped Vote” ; elected Members of Parliament were instructed by the ‘political party WHIPS’; on how they must vote. This was wholly UNLAWFUL; because, this political party activity overrules and supplants all ‘rightful’ influence of the Constituents. The, 'Constituents' that elected those Members of Parliament, in the first place. In consequence, this causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is wholly proscribed by the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/in the paragraph/”The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

There it is, in black and white, prominently recorded and displayed in that Bill.

“PARLIAMENT OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

No, “Court of Law” anywhere on Planet Earth, can refute this.

 

THEREFORE, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS AND THEIR POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITY IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO TRUE ‘LEGALITY’ WHATSOEVER.

 

THE, “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50” BY PARLIAMENT, IN THAT, ‘WHIPPED VOTE’, HAD NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

THE QUEEN

THE QUEEN; in granting the "ROYAL ASSENT" to this Bill; granted that 'assent' to CORRUPT LAW. But,
under her responsibility, of carrying out her DUTY required by the, "Original Contract"; she was required by 'precedent of law' to honour that 'Contract'; and, provide the "protection" of her Subjects. Acting, as the "Head of Government", the Queen ought to have known that this 'Bill' was CORRUPT; by, the properly monitoring; of, Her Government.

Which, she promised to do; when she 'swore' the, "Coronation Oath". In swearing that 'Oath' at her Coronation, she promised, to "GOVERN THE PEOPLE". Here, in this 'highly critical' instance of, BREXIT; she failed to do so.

When the “Supreme Court” is therefore forced to declare the “WHIPS” unlawful; “Article 50” will be abolished. Two years of negotiating with the EU for leaving the EU will all have been wasted.

With “ARTICLE 50” being declared UNLAWFUL and being abolished; BRITAIN WILL HAVE TO “REMAIN” IN THE EU. Britain, then will be unable to ‘leave’ the EU without the CONSENT of the EU. But, it would not be in the interests of the EU, to grant that ‘consent’. The EU does not want any “NO DEAL” situation taking place.