BREXIT: E.U. Referendum Ballot Paper…
To every request in parliament of
Members of Parliament to the Government for either a new referendum or a ‘Peoples
Vote’, THERESA MAY and her right-wing Members of the Tory party have always
responded by saying this,
“Parliament gave the
People a referendum to decide whether to remain or leave the E.U. and the results
of that referendum determined that they wanted to leave, therefore every Member
of Parliament must now accept that decision and honour that decision.”
The Prime Minister and all her
right-wing Tory Members of Parliament, all say this so frequently, in reply to
questions, that it is almost like a ‘religious mantra’ that they always rely
upon.
Well, the very long term precedent
criterion in General Elections, whereby the Majority vote ‘Wins’ the election
and the Minority vote, in a spirit of friendship and democracy, accept that
decision, Can only apply ‘lawfully’ if the ‘ballot paper’ was free of
corruption; and, provided full and proper information.
In the event that the ‘ballot paper’
was deficient in failing to provide ‘full and proper’ information; whereby the
voter could properly understand all issues involved, prior to casting their vote;
the ‘ballot paper’ would be corrupt; and, ‘legally’, the final vote result
declared; would have no true validity at all.
In the case of the “2016 E.U. REFERENDUM”
ballot paper, this was highly deficient in failing to provide that information,
1. It provided for the voter only two options, two boxes to ‘tick’, to
select “LEAVE” or “REMAIN”.
2. It provided no other information at all.
The ballot paper was specifically
designed in this way in order to deny or obfuscate the proper information that
should have been provided; furthermore, in support of the “LEAVE” campaign, the
following wicked lies were told,
Voting to “LEAVE” would
provide that “£350.000 per week would be
available to the National Health Service.
Trade with the rest of the World would be enhanced and trade with the E.U. would continue as normal.
The ballot paper, failed
to advise,
A. That in being a Member of the E.U.
Great Britain had agreed to a “TREATY”; and had signed that TREATY.
B. For Great Britain to ‘LEAVE’ the E.U., it was necessary to, ‘Trigger
Article 50 of that Treaty” and then negotiate with the E.U. all future
relations with the E.U. Including, ‘Trade’.
C. That, the negotiating process, could take as long as two years.
NONE OF THAT ‘important information’ WAS
PROVIDED ON THAT BALLOT PAPER.
CONCLUSION
THE BALLOT PAPER WAS CORRUPT.
IT THEREFORE HAS NO LEGAL VALIDITY AT
ALL.
THE DECLARED VOTING RESULT OF THE “2016
E.U. REFERENDUM” THEREFORE, CANNOT ‘LAWFULLY’ STAND.
THERE IS NO ‘HONEST COURT OF LAW’
ANYWHERE ON PLANET EARTH THAT COULD UPHOLD THE ‘LEGALITY’ OF THIS CORRUPT
BALLOT PAPER.
THAT “BALLOT PAPER” MUST NOW BE
TESTED IN LAW.
No comments:
Post a Comment