H M QUEEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT DUTY

BREXIT & THE NEGLIGENCE OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN…

 

In a democratic referendum held in the year 2016 deciding whether to LEAVE or REMAIN in the E.U., the declared peoples ‘vote’ of that referendum determined, that the ‘majority’ wanted to LEAVE.

 

THIS THEN WAS THE DECLARED 'WISHES OF THE PEOPLE'. DETERMINED BY THAT REFERENDUM VOTE.

 

The very instant that vote was declared, THERESA MAY, and her government immediately seized the right to arrange all negotiations with the E.U. in order to leave. She declared, “BREXIT IS BREXIT”     and took charge of everything in carrying out those negotiations.

 

This was wholly corrupt because the REFERENDUM was a DEMOCRATIC procedure; and therefore all or any ‘negotiations’ required to carry out the Peoples declared wishes to LEAVE the E.U.; ought to have been DEMOCRATIC as well. Thus, Parliament should have taken charge appointing an ‘all party’ BREXIT committee, to carry out those negotiations.

 

However, TERESA MAY CORRUPTLY SEIZED CONTROL.

She negotiated with the E.U.; and she has now produced to parliament, for approval, her final agreement approved by the E.U. for ‘ratification’ by Parliament. In a speech she made to Parliament she presented this ‘agreement’ for Parliament to approve; but, in the DEBATE that followed, virtually the majority of the Members of Parliament indicated that they would not support that, Agreement. They clearly indicated that when it came to the ‘VOTE’ they would not give assent to that, AGREEMENT.

 

Thus,

 

1.  The Peoples ‘wishes’ are to LEAVE. But,

2.  Parliament will not approve the LEAVING as negotiated.

3.  THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE ARE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE ACTIONS OF THE LEGISLATORS.

4.  THERE IS ONLY ONE REMEDY, IT IS THE DUTY OF THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ TO INTERVENE.

 

NOTE: By ‘precedent of law’; every ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ sitting upon the English throne, is bound to honour and comply with the “Original Contract”, which requires, the ‘protection’ of all Subjects of the Crown. This ‘contract’ although unwritten, is nevertheless wholly entrenched in English law.

It was the “Breaking of this Contract” by KING JAMES II which provided the actual legal ‘instrument’ whereby the CONVENTION (parliament) of 1688, was able to remove him from the throne.

The CONVENTION charged KING JAMES II of “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People” and,

In a huge debate named the, “DEBATE AT LARGE” held in the ‘Painted Chamber’ of the House of Commons; held between both ‘Commons’ and ‘Lords’ they debated the words “ABDICATE” and “THE THRONE IS NOW VACANT”.

During that debate the ‘Speaker’ HENRY POWLE declared this,

 

“It is upon those on the throne that the People of England look to for their protection and to which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects but there being none now to whom the People can look to for Regal protection and to which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects the Commons conceive the throne is Vacant.”

 

In respect to the next King and the ‘line of succession’ the EARL OF CLARENDON declared this,

 

“The contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the contract he too may be Deposed”.

 

The CONVENTION thereby resolved that KING JAMES II had indeed “Broken the Original Contract”; that he had failed to protect the People and their religion; and that he had ‘ABDICATED’ the throne. The throne was declared ‘VACANT’; and, PRINCE WILLIAM OF ORANGE, became King.

 

THE DUTY OF THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ SITTING UPON THE ENGLISH THRONE.

“ALLEGIANCE IS GIVEN TO THE LIEGE LORD FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE LEIGE LORD”

 

All English, “REIGNING MONARCHS” are thereby bound; to honour the “Original Contract” and, to provide protection, of all ‘Subjects' of the Crown.
In order to carry out this duty each King or Queen is provided with two ‘legal instruments’ to assist them in carrying out that role. These instruments are, “The Royal Assent” and the “Royal Prerogative”.

 

The, “ROYAL PREROGATIVE” provides the following options;

A.  The right to ‘praise’ Ministers of Government.

B.  The right to ‘warn’ Ministers of Government.

C.   The right to order the dissolution of parliament whenever the ‘wishes of the people’ are in direct conflict with the actions of the legislators, (Parliament”.

 

Here, in the current utter confusion and chaos in respect to BREXIT and, the sheer peril facing the country now; it can clearly be seen that the ‘wishes of the people’ are being overruled and flouted; by the actions of the legislators; Yet, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has not yet ‘lifted a finger’ to intervene.

She just sits in her Palace enduring all the privileges and benefits of MONARCHY; YET SHE FAILS TO CARRY OUT HER ‘DUTY’, every day.

 

The, “PEOPLE”; even though being, FREEBORN HUMAN BEINGS, CITIZENS OF PLANET EARTH; they are wickedly classified, in law, as being mere “Subjects of the Crown”; and, they are held in ‘subjugation’, to give ‘Allegiance’ to each ‘Reigning Monarch’, for as long as a Monarch shall reign.

 

But, if MONARCHY fails to carry out its DUTY; then, the precedent of English LAW getting rid of KING JAMES II in 1688; must still be valid in LAW, today.

 ELIZABETH THE SECOND, FAILING TO DO HER DUTY, MUST BE KICKED 'OFF' THAT THRONE.

CONCLUSION

THE 'REIGNING MONARCH' TODAY FAILS TO CARRY OUT THEIR DUTY. THERE IS NO PURPOSE OR RELEVANCE FOR MONARCHY AT ALL. PRESENT DAY MONARCHY IS ABSOLUTELY USELESS AND OF NO VALUE WHATSOEVER.