GINA MILLER & THE HIGH COURT & THE ARROGANCE OF THERESA MAY

BREXIT – GINA MILLER - & - THE HIGH COURT

 

GINA MILLER secured in the Courts that parliament would have the final say in approving or disapproving the final “E.U. Withdrawal Agreement” negotiated by government.

 

The government has now presented that final agreement to parliament, in a speech made by the Prime Minister, THERESA MAY.

 

Parliament then set the date for that debate and for when that VOTE should take place. But, in the debate in parliament following THERESA MAY’s speech; parliament overwhelmingly indicated that it would not approve that agreement.

 

THERESA MAY and her right-wing of government; then faced with the certainty that their negotiated ‘Agreement’ would not be approved by parliament; and, recognising that parliament, would undoubtedly refuse to pass that legislation; immediately stopped that debate and that, ‘meaningful vote’, from taking place. THERESA MAY now persistently refuses to ‘name and allocate’ a date, in parliament, when that debate and vote could be held.

 

MOST URGENTLY NOW; GINA MILLER MUST RETURN AGAIN TO THE COURTS, DEMANDING THAT THE COURTS IMMEDIATELY INSTRUCT THERESA MAY TO COMPLY WITH THE PREVIOUS ‘RULING’ OF THE COURTS’; “THAT PARLIAMENT MUST HAVE THE FINAL SAY”.

 

THEREFORE, THE COURT MUST URGENTLY INSTRUCT THERESA MAY TO ARRANGE, FOR THAT DEBATE AND VOTE TO TAKE PLACE IMMDIATELY.

IT IS FOR PARLIAMENT TO SET THAT DATE; NOT THE GOVERNMENT. THIS PREVIOUS HIGH COURT RULING OVERTURNS AND OVERRULES THE 'NORMAL' BUSINESS PROCEDURE OF PARLIAMENT. WHERE, THE 'MAJORITY' PARTY DETERMINES THE BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.

 

THE COURTS MUST RULE ON THIS IMMEDIATELY, WITHOUT ANY DELAY.