Saturday, December 29, 2018

BREXIT - THERESA MAY'S REPETITIVE ASSERTIONS AND CLAIM


BREXIT – THERESA MAY’S REPEATED CLAIM

To every question posed in Parliament to THERESA MAY requesting a new “Peoples Vote” or a "Second Referendum"; THERESA MAY always responds with these words in reply:

 

“Parliament provided the People with their right to vote on whether to leave or remain in the E.U.; they overwhelmingly voted to leave; now Parliament must honour that vote”

 

She repeats this so often that she is using this as though it were a sacrosanct religious mantra.

 

So, what should PARLIAMENT do to combat this arrogant CONTEMPT.

 

PARLIAMENT MUST NOW TEST THE LEGAL VALIDITY OF THAT REFERENDUM ‘VOTE’ IN A COURT OF LAW.

PARLIAMENT MUST NOW DEMAND OF THE COURTS, THAT THE LEGAL VALIDITY OF THE “2016 REFERENDUM” ‘BALLOT PAPER’; MUST NOW BE TESTED IN LAW; TO VERIFY WHETHER IT WAS LAWFUL OR NOT.

 

Because, I assert, it was wholly, corrupt!

For the following reasons, it is CORRUPT,

 

1. The ‘ballot paper’ only provided two boxes to tick; “LEAVE” and “REMAIN”.

2. It provided no other information at all.

3. Therefore when 17 Million plus people ticked the box ‘LEAVE’; In, fact, in truth, and, in reality; they only voted for the “INTENT” to LEAVE.

4. They did not vote, or provide for any ‘mandate’, providing the actual ‘mechanism’ required, in order to leave.

5. In this respect the ‘ballot paper’ is CORRUPT.

 

AS THE ‘BALLOT PAPER’ IS CORRUPT; THEREFORE ALL ‘VOTES’ SUBMITTED IN THAT REFERENDUM, MUST ALSO BE CORRUPT.

 

The Court, or the HIGH COURT hearing this case, if ‘honest’; will have no alternative but to rule that the ‘ballot paper’ is and was CORRUPT.

Especially, when in support of the allegation that the ‘ballot paper’ is CORRUPT; The Court also takes into consideration, the wicked ‘lies’ that were told and promoted by the ‘LEAVE’ campaign; throughout that campaign.

 

A. Example:The wicked lie that by voting to ‘Leave the E.U.’ “£350,000 PER WEEK WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE”.

B. This outright ‘lie’ was emblazoned sign-written on the side of a bus, which toured the country, accompanied with prominent Ministers and politicians, all supporting the ‘LEAVE’ campaign. BORIS JOHNSON, the Foreign Secretary, was frequently shown on television news, standing by the bus, and, pointing to this 'sign' on the bus, and asserting; that "it was true".

C.  The ‘LEAVE’ campaign also lied profusely asserting, that if the people voted to ‘Leave the E.U.’ - ‘TRADE WITH EUROPE’- would continue as normal; and, ‘TRADE’ with the rest of the World would be enhanced. All, without a shred of proof. Not one, ‘export order’ or 'import order', was produced.

D. In the weeks just prior to the Referendum, and during the Referendum, British press and media was swamped with hysterical "anti-immigrant" propaganda. There can be no doubt that this had an effect on the voting of 'LEAVE' in the Referendum; because, when the people were interviewed in the streets for live TV and were asked "Why did they vote 'Leave'? " - they readily responded: "To get rid of the immigrant". This was particularly prevalent in 'DOVER' and in 'READING'. When several of them were asked this question in Reading, they screamed the reply: "To get rid of the bloody Poles (Polish people) in Reading". The wicked Referendum 'LEAVE' campaign used this 'anti-immigrant' hysteria, throughout the whole period of the Referendum. Wicked 'right-wing' Tory politicians promoted and supported this 'anti-immigration' stance and the tactic throughout. 

 

When the Court or ‘High Court’ rules and establishes that the ‘ballot paper’ is and was CORRUPT, (and, it has no other alternative).

 

THERESA MAY’S assertions about “Parliament having to honour the Referendum vote”; will have no ‘validity’ at all. With all the voting results in that Referendum then being ‘established’ as ‘CORRUPT’, as ruled by a Court,
Britain’s only option available then is to either,

Hold another Referendum; or,

REMAIN in the E.U.

 

‘Referendums’ always take a long time to organise. Best solution, is to REMAIN in the E.U.

No comments: