BREXIT - THE CORRUPT 'TRIGGERING' OF ARTICLE 50

BREXIT – TRIGGERING “ARTICLE 50” VIOLATED MY HUMAN RIGHTS.

 

When Parliament activated, and, Parliament voted, to ‘trigger’ Article 50; this violated my Human Rights as set out in the “European Convention of Human Rights”, in the reasons as set out below; and, in the following Articles:

 

Article 1. Obligation to respect Human Rights.

Article 2. Right to Life, whereby everyone’s right must be protected by law.

Article 5. Right to liberty and security protected by law.

Article 8. Right to respect a private life.

Article 9. Right to Freedom of thought conscience and religion.

Article 10. Right to the Freedom of Expression.

Article 13. Right to effective Remedy.

Article 14. Right to prohibition of Discrimination.

Article 17. Right to the prohibition of the abuse of rights.

Article 34. Right to Individual Application: The Court may receive application for remedy from any person claiming to be a victim of the violation by any of the High Contracting Parties of the rights set forth in the Convention protocol.

Article 35. Admissibility: The (ECHR) “European Court of Rights” can only accept and deal with any violation of Human Rights after all ‘domestic’ remedies have been exhausted. (Meaning that all matters must have been exhausted first in the British Courts.)

THE REASONS WHY THESE ‘RIGHTS’ HAVE BEEN VIOLATED,

 

When the Government and the ‘right wing’ of the TORY Members of Parliament were intent on leaving the E.U. They all openly declared that they wanted to LEAVE THE E.U. specifically, in order to, “Get rid of the ‘European Court of Justice’ and the ‘European Convention of Human Rights’, so that Britain can manage its own affairs and create its own laws, without any interference from Europe”.

 

Therefore, when Parliament; wholly aware of this ‘intention’ of the Government and the right-wing Tory Members of Parliament; voted to agree to ‘trigger’ Article 50; this, VIOLATED my Human Rights, as set out above.

WHY?

Because, all the Human Rights ‘Articles’ as set out above verified my right to the ‘protection of law’ provided by the European Court of Justice and the Convention of Human Rights; thus, the ‘triggering’ of “Article 50” – took all those ‘rights’ away.

 

Note: If and when Great Britain LEAVES the E.U. (As scheduled for 29^th day of March 2019); Great Britain will have the rightful freedom to ‘get rid’ of all this unwanted European influence, without breaching, the present Human Rights set out by the Convention.

 

But, if the ‘triggering’ of “Article 50” takes place; whilst Great Britain is still a ‘paid up’ Member of the E.U.; as exists right now; that does VIOLATE MY HUMAN RIGHTS.

THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT HAS ALREADY HAPPENED.

I, NOW WANT ‘REMEDY’ OF THAT VIOLATION.

 

Note: Re. “Article 35” Admissibility:

All access to the British Courts is already exhausted. The wicked; “Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice” and deceive the British people; by the British Judiciary; ruling that under no circumstance can Parliament be ‘questioned’ in the Courts. Exhausts, all access to ‘LAW’ for all, “Subjects of the British Crown”; WANTING OR NEEDING TO 'QUESTION' PARLIAMENT IN THE COURTS.

 

Therefore, I have no alternative but to ask the “EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE” in Strasbourg, to uphold and remedy this injustice; and, to properly examine all the issues submitted; in order to establish and verify the ‘legality’ or 'illegality', thereof.

 

1.            Test and examine the true ‘legality’ or 'illegality' of the ‘Ballot Paper’ used in the Referendum of 2016. (I contend that the ballot paper was corrupt, because it only provided two boxes to tick, LEAVE or REMAIN. It provided no other information at all. It did not provide any ‘mandate’ for any ‘mechanism’ or ‘procedure’ for the actual LEAVING of the E.U.

2.            Test and examine the true legality or illegality of the, “Political Party Whips” and their ‘political activity’ in the British Parliament. (I contend that the ‘Whips’ have no legality at all. When the ‘Whips’ instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must ‘vote’; this overrules and supplants all rightful influence that might have been placed on Members of Parliament by the Constituents. This therefore creates the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”. Yet, “Prejudice of the People” is wholly proscribed by the, ‘precedent of law’ set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”. This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically instructs Parliament; that Parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill, including “Article 9” which provides Parliament with its “Supremacy; but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

3.            Test and evaluate for the ‘legality’ or the ‘illegality’ of the British Judiciary’s ruling that “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689” is, ABSOLUTE; thereby, preventing by ‘law’ that Parliament cannot be questioned in the Courts. (I contend that this ruling is corrupt, because the ‘Political party Whips in the British Parliament do “Prejudice the People”; and, the paragraph known as the, “Said Rights Claimed” as set out within the “Bill of Rights 1689”, verifies that this is unlawful; whereby, anyone has the right to ‘question’ Parliament in the Courts; if and whenever, Parliament, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

4.            This is most important; and the “European Court of Justice” must understand; that this ‘injustice’ by the British JUDICIARY denies my access to, DEMOCRACY.

5.            I WANT NOT ONLY ‘REMEDY’ HERE – I WANT “EXEMPLARY DAMAGES’ AS WELL. DEMOCRACY;   AND, THE ACCESS TO A TRUE DEMOCRACY; IS THE MOST VALUABLE AND PRECIOUS JEWEL; FOR ALL OF HUMANKIND. 
6.            When politicians and corrupt JUDICIARY attempt to deny, DEMOCRACY; no ‘remedy’ is satisfactory; without the severest condemnation, and the ‘award’ of massive ‘exemplary damages’, to be paid.