Wednesday, January 16, 2019

BREXIT-URGENT ATTENTION OF ALL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT


BREXIT: REVOKING OR EXTENDING “ARTICLE 50”

 

“Article 50” does not require either revoking or extending; because, it is already wholly unlawful as determined by “The People’s Protection’ provided by the “Bill of Rights 1689”.

This “Peoples Protection” provided by the paragraph of the Bill, and known as, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” specifically instructs Parliament (and anyone reading the Bill) that Parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only on the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

The ‘Political Party Whips’ in Parliament do “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” because when they instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ places upon those Members, (The Peoples elected representatives), by the Constituents.

 

The “Triggering of Article 50” Bill created and passed by Parliament was passed UNDER THE INFLUENCE AND INSTRUCTION AND THE IMPOSITION OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS;

Therefore, the “Triggering of ‘Article 50’ by parliament; has no legality at all.

 

URGENT ATTENTION OF ALL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT. In resolving all BREXIT resolutions and problems now; all that is required is to examine and test, everything and all BREXIT documents and legislation,
FROM WITHIN,

 “LAW”

SUBMIT and secure an immediate ‘injunction’ in the “SUPREME COURT” requiring the JUDICIARY to examine and test the true LEGALITY or ILLEGALITY of all as listed below,

 

1. The “Triggering of ‘Article 50’ passed in parliament ‘under the influence and imposition of the ‘Political Party Whips’.

2.  The, “Ballot Paper” provided for the Referendum of 2016.

3. Note: The JUDICIARY being required to test examine the true legality based solely upon the ‘actual document’ as it is; not to consider in any way what the VOTER may have believed or what they were told. The ‘document’ as it is, provided only two options: two boxes to ‘tick’ in order to vote LEAVE or REMAIN. The ‘Ballot Paper’ does not provide any other information, at all.

4. CONTENTION: The ‘Ballot Paper’ certainly did not provide any ‘MANDATE’ for what should happen NEXT, (if the voter ticked the box leave), or, for what would be required; in order to, LEAVE

 

MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT only need to submit this ‘injunction’ to the SUPREME COURT to end this ‘fiasco’ of BREXIT, once and for all. Because, no ‘honest’ Court on planet Earth, can uphold the ‘legality’ of the ‘Ballot Paper’ provided for the Referendum 2016; or the political activity of the ‘Political Party Whips’ in Parliament.

AN ‘HONEST’ SUPREME COURT WOULD HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO RULE, THE STARK VIVID REALITY OF BOTH; TO HAVE NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

 

Parliament can never claim that the political activity of the ‘Political Party Whips’ in Parliament is lawful because Parliament has at some stage in its ‘history’ has approved the use of the Whips; because, Parliament could never even put the ‘proposition’ to Parliament for a ‘vote’ without flouting and breaching the “Protection of the People” afforded by, “THE STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/ “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” – Which is, “Written-in-Stone”.

 

Note: “The Said Rights Claimed” is the overall ‘authority’ of the “Bill of Rights 1689” and even of the “SUPREMACY” of Parliament afforded to Parliament by ‘Article 9’; for it states within its ‘text’ that it is the AUTHORITY over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill. Parliament, nor JUDICIARY can never amend it or abolish it; without causing the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

No comments: