BREXIT VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS LAW & DENIES ACCESS TO DEMOCRACY

BREXIT – VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

 

As the UK has not yet officially left the E.U. but at this stage is only in the process of ‘negotiation’ with the E.U. in order to leave;

THERESA MAY as the Prime Minister still has the legal duty to honour and comply with the TREATY that the Government signed.

That ‘Treaty’ requires the Government to ensure that instances of the ‘violations’ of HUMAN RIGHTS, are properly heard in the British Courts. This provision was inserted in the ‘TREATY’ in “European Human Rights Law” in order to prevent the ‘violations’ from having to be presented to the Court in Europe.

 

Thus, THERESA MAY, in instances of violations of HUMAN RIGHTS, must provide access to the British Courts.

BREXIT violates my Human Rights,

1.            It wickedly removes my right to my access to Law.

2.            Denies, all protection of LAW.

3.            Yet, my own country, Great Britain, provides no other protection of LAW at all,

A.          There is no ‘Written Constitution’.

B.           There is no proper, ‘Bill of Rights’.

C.            There is no access to a ‘Supreme Court’ where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the ‘abuses’ and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament, from within, LAW.

 

The, Statute, “European (Withdrawal) ‘Triggering of Article 50 Bill", created and passed by Parliament; and, granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ has no true ‘legality’ whatsoever. It was created and passed by Parliament under the direct domination, control, and imposition of the ‘diktat’ of the political party WHIPS.

Yet, this political imposition of the political party WHIPS in Parliament, instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; flouts and breaches the ‘precedent of law’ as determined by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

Therefore, “The Said Rights Claimed” specifically instructs Parliament, (and all reading the “Bill of Rights 1689”) in two ways,

Firstly, it instructs Parliament, that it is the ‘Superior Authority’ of all that is written in the Bill; for it states within its text that it is the ‘authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

Secondly, it instructs Parliament; that Parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only providing that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

BY THIS LEGAL AND LAWFUL CRITERION, THE “TRIGGERING OF ‘ARTICLE 50’ BY PARLIAMENT UNDER THE DOMINATION AND CONTROL OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS,

HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

BREXIT, THEREFORE, HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ WHATSOEVER. IT MUST BE DECLARED ‘UNLAWFUL’ IN LAW.

 

If the British still want to leave the E.U. THERE MUST BE A NEW FRESH REFERENDUM; and, if the result of the voting, still demands Britain ‘LEAVES’ the E.U. – “Article 50” must be triggered again. But this time with the WHIPS being declared unlawful and abolished from Parliament; every Member of Parliament would have a FREE VOTE.

All ‘ADVANTAGES’ and ‘DIS-ADVANTAGES’ for leaving the, E.U. would have to be published, before even one vote is cast. Very much unlike, the previous corrupt referendum.