BREXIT - TRIGGERING "ARTICLE 50" IS UNLAWFUL

BREXIT – Utter Confusion and Corruption –

Wholly abandoning - LAW - and the “Rule of Law”. BREXIT, breach flouts and violates, “Human Rights Law”; and, denies, the right to, DEMOCRACY.

 

All Members of Parliament, with all the various factions, each having their own vested interests; perform daily like chickens that have just had their heads chopped off, running around wildly, not knowing where to go or what to do next.

 

All of BRITISH Media, newspapers and TV News (especially, SKY NEWS), constantly fans the flame of fear and uncertainty. Promoting, the mistrust of Members of Parliament, consistently.

 

The entire British people are so confused, misled, and manipulated, by all the sheer chaos prevailing, that they have foolishly come to believe that BREXIT is, DEMOCRACY.

 

OPTIONS AVAILABLE

1.          Accept THERESA MAY’s “Plan B”.

2.          Leave the E.U. without a deal.

3.          New Referendum and a People’s vote.

4.          Extend the, “29^th March 2019” scheduled date, to leave the E.U.

YET, IN ALL THE DEBATES THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN PARLIAMENT; AND, IN ALL THE DEBATES AND IDEAS MUTED BY MEDIA AND THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY;

NOT ONE ‘MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT’, OR ANY ‘JOURNALIST’, OR, ANY ‘NEWS REPORT’; HAS EVER MENTIONED THE WORD,

“LAW”

No one in the country; and, certainly not one Member of the ‘Profession of Law’; has even mentioned the words, “Law”, “The Rule of Law” or the “Protection of Law”; in respect to all BREXIT debates.

Yet, going to, LAW, is the only way to properly resolve all the problems prevailing.

 

GINA MILLER, a private individual, had to go the trouble and expense of going to ‘LAW’ for Parliament to have the right of the ‘meaningful vote’, the ‘last word’, in the approval or the rejection of the negotiated, “Withdrawal Agreement”, reached with the E.U.

Parliament did not secure this right; GINA MILLER did. Thereby, providing the sheer indication, that Parliament and Members of Parliament have little respect for, LAW. As, is now evident with BREXIT.

 

BREXIT violates “Human Rights Law” because,

A.                       It denies the rightful access to LAW.

B.                        It denies the right to true, DEMOCRACY.

 

The, Statute, “E.U. (Withdrawal) Triggering of Article 50 Bill” passed by Parliament; and, granted the “ROYAL ASSENT”, is wholly CORRUPT; and has no true legal validity in LAW, because it was created and passed by Parliament wholly ‘under the complete imposition, domination, and control of the political party, WHIPS. Which instructed elected Members of Parliament, on how they should or must vote.

This, therefore caused the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” which flouts and breaches the ‘precedent of law’ as set out and established in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/ in the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

THUS, THE “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50 BILL” PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND PROVIDED BY THE GRANTING OF THE “ROYAL ASSENT”; IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL; IT THEREFORE HAS NO LEGAL VALIDITY, AT ALL.

BREXIT – HAS NO LEGALITY WHATSOEVER

IT WAS CREATED CORRUPTLY BY A REFERENDUM, ‘UNLAWFUL BALLOT PAPER’, WHICH PROVIDED NO INFORMATION AT ALL ABOUT THE ‘ADVANTAGES’ AND THE ‘DISADVANTAGES’ WHEN VOTING TO LEAVE THE E.U.

IT PROVIDED ONLY ‘TWO BOXES TO TICK’ – TO, ‘LEAVE’ OR ‘REMAIN’. THUS, WHEN THE VOTER TICKED ‘LEAVE’ – ALL THEY ACTUALLY VOTED FOR – WAS TO DECLARE THE ‘INTENTION’ TO LEAVE THE E.U.

THE ‘BALLOT PAPER’ AND TICKING ‘LEAVE’- PROVIDED NO ‘MANDATE’ WHATSOEVER AS TO WHAT ‘CAME NEXT’ OR ANY INSTRUCTIONS TO ANYONE, ON HOW ‘LEAVING’ THE E.U. SHOULD TAKE PLACE.

 

Therefore, BREXIT as it stands now must be abolished.

If the British still want to LEAVE the E.U.; then a new referendum must take place; and, if the vote result still determines the decision to ‘LEAVE’; then, “ARTICLE 50”, must be triggered again. But, with one crucial difference; This time -WITH THE WHIPS BEING ABOLISHED – Every Member of Parliament would have a ‘FREE VOTE’.