BREXIT - FOR THE ATTENTION OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

BREXIT – For the attention of Members of Parliament, ESPECIALLY, Yvette Cooper & Nick Boles.

Some MPs have taken advice from clerks of the House on a bill that would prevent a No Deal exit. A number of potential draft bills have been published, for example the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Bill, from Nick Boles MP, which would mandate the Government to seek an extension of the Article 50 process to 31 December 2019. Yvette Cooper MP has proposed another.

(Suggested citation: R. Craig, 'Could the Government Advise the Queen to Refuse Royal Assent to a Backbench Bill?', U.K. Const. L. Blog (22nd Jan. 2019) (available at https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/))

 

NOTE: There is no need whatsoever to seek an extension of the “Statute European (Withdrawal) Triggering of Article 50” Bill; because, that ‘Statute’, even though granted the “ROYAL ASSENT”; has no LEGALITY at all.

Passed by Parliament, ‘under the influence diktat and instruction of the political party WHIPS’ the Bill has no legality at all.

Because, when the WHIPS instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must VOTE; that overrules and supplants all ‘’rightful influence’ that might have been placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituents.

This therefore creates the ‘PREJUDICE’ of the people.

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ provided by the, “Statute in Force/ Bill of Rights 1689/ “The Said Rights Claimed”.

This paragraph of the Bill, “The Said Rights Claimed”, was specifically inserted into the Bill by the ‘Rights Committee’ of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 in order to ‘protect’ the People. The Committee had first created the Bill including, all the thirteen ‘articles’, ‘designed to protect Parliament from the ‘interference’ of a King’; when they suddenly realised two important aspects to what they had created, and, what they had omitted.

The first realisation was that the Bill had only been ‘required’ in order to provide Parliament with ‘protection’ from a King. It had never been required or ‘designed’ to protect Parliament; from the People.

The second realisation, therefore, was the fact, that they realised that the Bill as it was (at that stage) could be mis-read and mis-interpreted to the ‘PREJUDICE’ of the People. (Just as Parliament, Judiciary, and Governments, do so now today).

So, they then inserted “The Said Rights Claimed” into the Bill, to protect the People.

But, the Committee (many of them highly intelligent and well versed in ‘LAW’ as well), went even further in their intent to ‘protect the people’; they ensured that “The Said Rights Claimed” was the over all ‘authority’ of the entire Bill, and, everything that was written in the Bill. They, then included in the text of, “The Said Rights Claimed”, that it was the ‘Supreme Authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

Thereby, “The Said Rights Claimed”, even overrules the "Supremacy of Parliament", afforded to Parliament, by "Article 9".

 

Thus; The political party WHIPS in parliament do ‘PREJUDICE’ the people.


Therefore, all the legislation passed by Parliament under the influence and instruction of the WHIPS; has no legality at all.

ALL THAT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO DESTROY ‘BREXIT’ ONCE AND FOR ALL. IS TO SUBMIT TO THE “SUPREME COURT” THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS IN ORDER FOR THE JUDGES TO TEST THE TRUE LEGALITY; TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY ARE ‘LAWFUL’, OR NOT.

 

1.  The ‘Ballot Paper’ provided for the Referendum of 2016.

2.  The Statute, “The Triggering of ‘Article 50’ European (Withdrawal) Bill”.

 

CONTENTION: The Referendum “Ballot Paper” is corrupt, and, therefore unlawful; because, it provided only two options for the Voter to choose: ‘LEAVE’ or ‘REMAIN”; but, it provided no other information at all. It certainly did not provide for any information as to what should happen next; or provide any ‘MANDATE’ for anything at all.
Therefore, when the Voter, ‘ticked’ the box, ‘LEAVE’; all they voted for, was the ‘INTENTION’ to leave the E.U. – BUT, THEY DID NOT DETERMINE, IN ANY WAY, THE ‘LEAVING’ PROCESS’ REQUIRED. In order to, LEAVE.

 

CONTENTION: The, Statute, “Triggering Article 50 European (Withdrawal) Bill”, is also corrupt and unlawful; because, it was passed in Parliament ‘under the influence and diktat’ of the political party WHIPS.

The WHIPS flout and breach “The Said Rights Claimed”. Therefore, the “Triggering of Article 50” has no LEGALITY whatsoever.

Thus; ‘BREXIT’ and the vote to ‘LEAVE the E.U’, cast by, ’17.4 Million Voters’; has no LEGALITY at all.