Monday, October 10, 2011

Big Repression threat facing Britain today..

Big Censorship and Repression threat facing Britain today:
The British should take a long hard and serious look at what is happening in the country today.

The people of Great Britain, today, through their apathy in not participating in politics as they should, are now entering into a period or, era of repression, not seen in the country, before.

A ‘freak’ living amongst us who does not wish to live in the real world (as most of us do); prefers instead to try and create this fantasy world; that exists, only, in, his own head. And, he wants to impose this fantasy world on everyone else. His voice is being heard ‘loudly’ in the country today. So much so, that even Prime Minister, David Cameron, and, other politicians are now considering these silly ideas. They are actually considering that this, fantasy world; should be given serious consideration; for implementation, as government policy. Ministers of Government, are, now proposing that these ridiculous ideas should now be adopted and be put into effect. This man is a lunatic; who, dangerously threatens, the very freedom of all. Endorsing and adopting his proposals will launch the greatest era of ‘repression’ the country has ever seen.

His name is Reginald Bailey, and, he is the chief executive of the ‘Mother’s Union’.

In a report, commissioned by the Prime Minister, he declares that, “Parents are deeply concerned that sexual imagery in television, advertising and pop videos is making children grow-up too fast.” His report calls for a hard-hitting crackdown on internet pornography, demanding tighter parental controls over access to explicit websites. Under his idea, of controls, he demands:

Laptop and computer manufacturers must provide their products with parental control filters already activated, prior to purchase. Consumers will have to specifically request to receive porn and adult content; if they want the product to provide access. (A complete reversal of the current position).

A crackdown on lewd ‘lads magazines’ such as “Nuts” and “Zoo”. Retailers being obliged to sell the magazines in plain wrappers or, put them behind ‘modesty boards’, preventing their lurid content from children.
Government to set up a single website where parents can report excessive sexual content on television adverts and, when high street stores and retailers sell inappropriate clothing to children.

Introduction of cinema-style age classification for pop videos. Raunchy music adverts to be banned on television and, in the ‘vicinity of schools’.
High street stores will have to sign a ‘code of conduct’ to prevent the sale of ‘padded bras’ and clothes emblazoned with sexual slogans being sold to children.
Mr. Bailey demands: That, retailers sign a voluntary ‘code of practise’ with clear rules on how to sell to children. Rather than relying on the ‘good taste’, of their own buyers.

Mr. Bailey insists that retailer’s comply with the code set up by the “British Retail Consortium” whose guidelines provide:

Slogans and imagery including licensed images must be age-appropriate and without undesirable associations or connotations – for example, sexually suggestive, demeaning, derogative or political material. ‘Humorous slogans need to be tested against a broad range of views as they can cause unforeseen and unintended offence.
Underwear ranges ‘require the utmost care’; knickers and pants must provide modesty.
Thongs are not appropriate for children.
Products must not treat young children as grown-up women.
Vests and crop tops should also be designed for modesty with no need for ‘structural support’.
Under-wiring is not necessary or appropriate for the smallest cup sizes. First ‘bras’ should be constructed to provide comfort, modesty and support, but not enhancement or under-wiring in any children’s ranges.
Mr. Bailey’s report calls for a ban on children’s swimwear in shop windows displays next to ‘sexy’ adult clothing. He asserts:
By far the most contentious issue is the availability of bras and bikini-style swimwear for the ‘under 16’s’.
Mr. Bailey says, children under 16, including celebrities and sports stars, should be banned from acting as ‘brand-ambassadors’ to sell products to children.


Analysis:

In looking at all this idiotic ‘repression’ the questions that must be posed are,

Why are the British so terrified of sex?
Why are they so afraid of their own sex and sexuality?
Why are they so afraid of the male and female naked body?
Consider this:

In virtually any large city throughout Europe, especially in Italy and Greece; one can readily see statues of the male naked body, with the ‘genitals’ fully on view.

Try and find such statues in Great Britain. There are none. At, least, I have never seen one throughout my entire life to date; all of 83 years.

Why is this? Why, in, centuries, of British art; why, hasn’t, any British artist, created such art.

Why is the penis of the male, both, flaccid and erect, so terrifying; that it must never be seen?

Yet, throughout the entire existence of Humankind on planet earth, virtually every hour of every single day, the erect penis of the male ‘services’ the female, for procreation purposes; or, just for sheer mutual pleasure of those participating. Why then, in Great Britain, are the genitals of the female and the erect penis of the male always hidden from view? Why? Because, the, British, are terrified of sex. Why is this so?

Because; Centuries of indoctrination by the repressive controlling influences of Church, Religion, and State, indoctrinating that, ‘sex’ is ‘dirty’ or ‘naughty’, has been drummed into mind. It has done immeasurable harm. It is also the basis or, the catalyst, for all sexual crime. The ridiculous notion and indoctrination of the church and state that 'sex' is predominately only for those 'married' and, or, for 'procreation'; is wholly demolished, in truth, by the reality and existence of the clitoris. This female bodily organ has no other function whatsoever, than, the receipt of 'sexual' pleasure for the female. It plays no part whatsoever in procreation.

Recently, in a Channel 4 television program attempting sex education of the young, before an audience of young boys and girls at a school, fully naked males and females were presented to the children to look at. The camera switching from the naked bodies to the children, revealed their attitudes to what they were seeing. Three boys were seen with their heads together as though they were sharing a secret or a private joke and, they were laughing and sniggering. The camera then switched to the young girls, showing a different reaction altogether. Some of them looked bewildered, some aghast, some screwing up their faces and covering their eyes with their hands, as though they were in pain. Some girls were seen giggling as well. Why this reaction? Because virtually all of their young lives from birth, they had been indoctrinated that their genitals were ‘privates’. And, that, their ‘privates’ should never be seen. That ridiculous indoctrination gets so deeply imbedded in the psyche of the young female; that even some married women will not undress in front of their husbands at night; without putting the light out first.

These anti-sex ‘influences’ are so well entrenched in the People, today; that, in the guise of ‘protecting children’; the repressive forces, of those so indoctrinated; now ‘harm the children’, that they claim to protect. By, denying a child of the enjoyment and exploration of their own sexuality; by, forcefully, delaying or stopping the ‘genetic’ onset transition of the female child to the becoming of a ‘woman’; those carrying out the very denial of the child’s ‘natural state’; and, their natural sexuality; are not protecting the child; they are ‘harming’ the child, by denying normal ‘natural’ development.

When the young female child first asks ‘Mummy’ for a sexy bra; even, unrecognized by the child, that young female is following the inbuilt natural ‘genetic’ influences of both her body, and, her mind: the compulsion to ‘sexually’ display. To, ‘display’ their own sexuality, to ‘flaunt’ that sexuality, in order to attract the male. The entire female species of planet earth animal as well as human sexually, ‘displays’, for the male.

The idiot censors and repressor’s that assume that they can impose restrictions upon the young girl in order to delay or stop this natural development, by, censoring sex and sexual content, from their lives; delude themselves; and, irrespective of whatever they do; ‘the biological clock has been set in motion’. Young girls will always find their own way, to pursue their own sexual development; irrespective of anything the censor employs.

Stopping and preventing the music and advertising industry from producing ‘raunchy’ videos of pretty girls singing and dancing in sexy underwear or costumes; will only infuriate the young. They see this ‘flaunting’ of female sexuality as being perfectly natural and normal. It is only the ‘repressors’, the ‘censors’, the political opportunists, and, those ‘terrified of sex’; who claim that it really offends.



Resisting this repression:

Clothing stores and retailers:

No big clothing store or retailer of clothes should ever agree to these proposals of, Mr. Bailey.

No big clothing store or retailer of clothes should ever submit to these repressive demands.

To do so, insults the consumer; for, complying with these proposed demands of Mr. Bailey, restricts the FREEDOM of every customer.



Those that value this FREEDOM, and, value and appreciate the ‘freedom’ of the Internet, providing ‘free speech’ and ‘free expression as its prime objectives; should boycott any clothing store or shop that capitulates and submits to Mr. Bailey’s demands.



Manufacturers of laptops and computers:

Manufacturers of these products should design their products to provide the consumer with the ability to access anything the consumer might want to access. On selling the product to the consumer; if the manufacturer wants to remain in business; the product at the time of sale should be in perfect ‘pristine’ condition for the reception and transmission of anything that the consumer wishes to access; the product should not be interfered with, in order to ‘censor’ or prevent’ the reception of any data; in any way. The manufacturer of these products, most certainly should not succumb, to Mr. Bailey’s demands.



Any manufacturer of this hardware that does submit to installing these repressive measures on their products, prior to sale; in order to comply with Mr. Bailey’s demands; they should be boycotted by every consumer; because by doing so; that manufacturer is taking ‘your ‘freedom away. If the product offered for sale is pre-fitted with censoring or filter devices that prevent free ‘access’ to receive data, in any way; even, if the devices can be switched off – if the consumer requests this – that is an imposition forced on the consumer that is specifically designed to take ‘your’ freedom away. The mere fact that the consumer is able to ‘opt out’ makes no difference at all. If such devices or systems are required by those wishing to activate filtering or censorship of content that the product is to receive in broadcast transmissions; then that consumer should be required to ‘opt in’. Let him pay for and buy, the censoring devices he requires.



The Video and Music Industry.

It will be an absolute folly and travesty if the Music and Video industry succumbs to Mr. Bailey’s demands. Mr. Bailey’s demands, triggered by misguided parents and censoring freaks complaining to OFCOM, are essentially based upon the alleged ‘suggestive dancing’ video, featuring ‘Rihanna’ in the TV broadcast of the X-Factor show. Mr. Bailey claims that 4,500 complaints were received by OFCOM about the ‘singing and dancing’ seen on this show. Take a referendum, or, an ‘opinion poll’, of all the kids in the country; or, all of the People in the country; there would be an overwhelming response showing ‘little concern’ at all. All, the young kids, and all the teenagers today, ‘flaunt’ their sexuality, ‘in dancing’; in this way. There was nothing ‘dirty’ in ‘Rihanna’s’ performance at all.

All the ‘dirt’ is firmly embedded in the minds of the misguided parents and the complainers to, OFCOM; and, the, censoring and repressive newspapers, like, the Daily Mail



The Music and Video Industry should resist this repression with all the force it can command.

Mounting, for instance, a massive ‘publicity campaign’. Motivate, and persuade all the kids and teens in the country, to swamp Prime Minister, David Cameron’s mailbox; with postcards declaring, ‘Hands off our videos, we like dancing in this way”. Motivate, all the ‘freedom loving’ users of the Internet, to resist this ‘repression’ in every way that they can.

Consumers should permanently boycott any of the Music and Video Industry that complies with Mr. Bailey’s demands.



Mr. Bailey does not like the “Real World”; let him create and live in the fantasy world in his own head; but, ensure, that he lives there, ENTIRELY ON HIS OWN.



RESIST CONTINUALLY ALL THIS TERRIBLE REPRESSION THREATENING OUR COUNTRY NOW.