Tuesday, February 26, 2019

BREXIT-POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL


 

Many years research into the period of the “Glorious Revolution” researching, both history and past and present, LAW; verifies that the mere presence of the Political Party Whips, (and, their political activities), In Parliament; has no legality whatsoever.
The 'WHIPS' both flout and breach the ‘precedent of law’ provided by the ‘protection of the people’ as determined by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”.

 

Thus, all legislation passed in parliament under the ‘diktat’ domination and control of the Whips, has no legality at all.

 

Thereby, the present, BREXIT; the, “Triggering of Article 50 EU (Withdrawal) Bill”, is wholly, UNLAWFUL. It was passed in parliament under the influence and the ‘diktat’ of the Whips. Therefore, if the 'Whips' are unlawful; and, they are; then all or any 'legislation' passed in parliament 'under the influence and diktat' of the 'Whips'; must be UNLAWFUL as well.

 

“Article 50” to be lawful; would have to be presented to parliament again; but, then, this time; unlike last time; only by the FREE VOTE of every Member of Parliament.

 

Challenging the legality of the present, “Triggering of Article 50 (Withdrawal) Bill”, in the “Supreme Court”, irrefutably, stops BREXIT at once. The JUDICIARY would be powerless to even try to refute the 'precedent of law' providing the, “protection of the people”, provided by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”.

 

Members of Parliament, therefore, have no need to extend “Article 50” - It is already wholly unlawful and has no LEGALITY at all.

Parliament has never, and, cannot ever approve, the presence and  political activities of the Political Party Whips in Parliament. Because, ever since the "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689" was first created and granted the 'Royal Assent' in December 1689; the mere placing of the 'proposition' before parliament for a vote; flouts and breaches the 'protection of the people', provided by that Bill.

READ MY BOOK "DEMOCRACY"
Available in two formats, Kindle download £1.19; Paperback £3.50. Purchase it here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

 

Monday, February 25, 2019

Political Party WHIPS are Unlawful...


Many years research into the period of the “Glorious Revolution” researching, both history and LAW,  verifies that the Political Party Whips In Parliament, has no legality whatsoever. The WHIPS both flout  and breach the ‘precedent of law’ provided by the ‘protection of the people’ as determined by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”.

Thus, all legislation passed in parliament under the ‘diktat’ domination and control of the Whips, has no legality at all.

Thereby, the present, “Triggering Article 50 EU (Withdrawal) Bill”, is wholly, UNLAWFUL It was passed in parliament under the ‘diktat’ of the Whips.

To be lawful; it would have to be presented to parliament again; but, this time; only by the FREE VOTE of every Member of Parliament.

Challenge in the “Supreme Court” irrefutably stops BREXIT at once.

Therefore, there is no need to extend “Article 50” - It already is wholly unlawful and has no LEGALITY at all.

Thursday, February 21, 2019

I.S. THE ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST ORGANISATION


.

PROPERLY UNDERSTANDING I.S.

The Islamic Fundamentalist, so-called,

Terrorist Organisation.

 

The entire rotten British ‘Totalitarian Regime’ “Establishment”; fails to understand.

In their vicious attack upon JEMIMA BEGUN the young girl who quit the UK to go and join I.S. and now wishes to return; this rotten “Establishment” asserts that having lived with I.S. and being supportive of its aims; that she is now a ‘dangerous person’ who should never be allowed to return to the U.K. again.
 
JAVID DAVID, the Home Secretary, revokes her British Citizenship and takes her passport away. 

 

As evidence in support of this decision; this entire right-wing “Establishment” relies on a comment JEMIMA BEGUN made whilst being interviewed by Sky News; the interviewer reporter asked her if she knew what I.S. did and if she supported the ‘beheadings’ and the ‘terrorism’ they carried out in their cause. JEMIMA BEGUN replied that she was OK with that.

SHE WAS REFERRING TO THE 'CAUSE' - NOT THE 'BEHEADINGS'. CORRUPT 'MEDIA' AND THOSE WITH VESTED ULTERIOR MOTIVE, PURPOSELY INTERPRETED IT WRONG.

Likewise, in a Sky News “Papers Review” program last night; that, right-wing ‘rottweiler’ of the ‘Daily Mail’ – “Tory-boy-Pierce” – (ANDREW PIERCE), in a wicked vilification and an attack upon her; asserted that as she had chosen to leave the U.K. to go and join I.S. and that as she had lived with them; and was supportive of their cause; that she was a great threat and a danger and a ‘Monster’ that should never ever be allowed to come back to the U.K.

 

Yet, the wicked terrible misunderstanding of I.S. by this entire rotten right-wing “Establishment” makes the tragic mistake of believing that I.S. merely evolved. They do not have the slightest conception; of what ‘triggered’ the existence of I.S. in the first place.

 
I.S. DID NOT EVOLVE.

I.S. WAS CREATED AND TRIGGERED BY THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN MILITARY ‘BOOTS’ THAT WICKEDLY AND UNLAWFULLY INVADED AND TRAMPLED ON SACRED ISLAMIC LANDS.

THAT BOMBED THOSE SACRED LANDS AND MURDERED TENS OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

THAT TOTALLY DESTROYED THE INFRASTRUCTURE, DISMANTLED BOTH THE ARMY AND THE POLICE, LEAVING THE LAND BEREFT OF ALL LAW AND ORDER; AND, THE PROTECTION OF LAW. 

 

Intelligent MOSLEMS witnessing all this carnage and the obscene abuse of ISLAM; urgently and desperately sought the remedy to remove the ‘INFIDEL’ from their lands.

In desperation they turned to the “Holy Islamic Quran” and there they found the remedy, THEY HAD TO WAGE ‘JIHAD’.

 

I.S. IS NAUGHT BUT THE WAGING OF A RELIGIOUS ‘JIHAD’ – AND IT WAS BROUGHT ABOUT SOLELY BY THE MILITARY AGGRESSION OF THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN ‘BOOTS’ TRAMPLING ON SACRED ISLAMIC LANDS.

 

WE, BRITISH, ARE ENTIRELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE TERRORISM; FOR, EVERY ‘REFUGEE’, FLEEING FROM THE TERRORISM RISKING THEIR LIVES CROSSING DANGEROUS WATERS TRYING TO FIND A NEW LAND WHERE THEY AND THEIR FAMILIES MIGHT SECURE, SAFETY.

 

THE BRITISH IDEA, THAT WITH ITS ‘NUCLEAR WEAPON’ AND THE WAVING OF THE ‘UNION JACK FLAG’; IT CAN DOMINATE AND CONTROL THE WORLD; IS SOLELY AND ENTIRELY RESPONSIBLE, FOR THE INITIAL CREATION OF, I.S.

REGIME CHANGE, INVASION, WHEREVER THE TOTALITARIAN REGIME SO CHOOSES, IS THE BRITISH, ORDER OF THE DAY.

 

 

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

BREXIT-DIRECT CHALLENGE RE LEGALITY OF POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS.


I HEREBY ISSUE DIRECT CHALLENGE TO ALL AS LISTED BELOW;

 

The Lord Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

GEOFREY COX MP, the, Attorney General.

THERESA MAY and all of her government.

Every Member of Parliament.

 

I DEFY YOU AND CHALLENGE YOU ALL TO PROVIDE AND LAY BEFORE ALL THE BRITISH PEOPLE, THE ACTUAL “LEGAL INSTRUMENT” THAT ESTABLISHES THE TRUE ‘LEGALITY’ FOR THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS, IN PARLIAMENT.

 

THERE IS NO SUCH LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXISTING ANYWHERE IN GREAT BRITAIN.

Absolutely no one can provide the assurance that the ‘political party WHIPS in parliament; has been approved by parliament; because ever since, December in the year 1689, the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” was granted, ROYAL ASSENT.

Therefore; The, ‘protection of the people’ provided in that Bill; made it IMPOSIBLE for Parliament to even consider approving, by vote, the political party WHIPS in parliament; because even putting the ‘proposition’ before parliament for a vote; parliament would be taking the ‘peoples protection’ away. This, therefore would breach and flout the ‘precedent of law’, PROTECTING THE PEOPLE, set out in the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”

 

This, “PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE” set out in the paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” and known as the, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” is the superior AUTHORITY over everything written and recorded in the entire Bill; because, it states within its ‘text’ that it has the ‘authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

 

Thus, the mere ‘proposition’ to flout and breach the ‘precedent of law’ set out for the ‘protection of the people’; as afforded by the “SAID RIGHT CLAIMED”;  actually breaks the law; of the, SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED.

Parliament, therefore, can never amend or even abolish the, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.

 

The, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” therefore, is the ‘one law’, that is, “WRITTEN IN STONE”.

 

I DEFY ALL AS ABOVE TO TRY AND REFUTE THIS.

 

THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL. EVERY ‘ACT’ ‘MOTION’ AND ‘BILL’ PASSED IN PARLIAMENT UNDER THE ‘DIKTAT’ AND INSTRUCTION OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS; HAS NO LEGALITY WHATSOEVER. THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’; IF AND WHEN BEING GRANTED; IS GRANTED TO, SHEER CORRUPT LAW.

 

BREXIT

“Article 50” of the EU (Withdrawal) Bill” was created and passed under the influence and ‘diktat’ of the WHIPS; therefore, this Bill, is wholly corrupt; having no true LEGALITY at all.

Two years negotiating the ‘withdrawal’ from the EU. Will all have been entirely wasted. With the Bill, now being determined to have no LEGALITY,

BREXIT IS DEAD.

CONCLUSION:

Great Britain must REMAIN in the EU.

Monday, February 18, 2019

JEMIMA BEGUN


JEMIMA BEGUN and the BRITISH TOTALITARIAN REGIME

 

JEMIMA BEGUN a very young girl quit life in the UK in order to go to Syria to become an I.S.  BRIDE. The very instant she left the UK on that plane, she committed the greatest crime that any British ‘SUBJECT’ could commit. She demonstrated in stark vivid detail that she preferred to determine her own destiny; in preference to being a mere, “Subject of the British Crown”.

 

For that crime, the BRITISH TOTALITARIAN REGIME, will never forgive her. If she does return to the UK this vengeful vindictive “Establishment” consisting of Monarchy, the despots that dominate and control the Monarchy, the Foreign Office, and the Intelligence Services; they will not only never forgive her; they will undoubtedly ensure; that she is very severely punished for that crime. If she ever returns to the U.K.

 

“SUBJECTS OF THE BRITISH. CROWN” are not permitted ‘minds’ of their own. They are permanently held in the imposed  chains of ‘subjugation’ for as long as a Monarch shall reign. 

 

This rotten “Establishment” must ensure that she is severely punished, merely as an example of what will happen to all others, if any merely contemplate, doing the same. Rejecting, the totalitarian authority of the BritishCrown.

 

Should JEMIMA BEGUN return to the UK she will be seized, arrested, and interrogated; she will be charged with as many crimes as the authorities can create against her, she will be tried in the Courts, and she will be sentenced to prison for a very long time. Then in sheer wicked vindictiveness and revenge, that “Establishment” will inflict further hurt upon her by dragging her before a ‘rigged’ corrupt “Family Court” with a corrupt Judiciary who will rule that she is,
 “Not a fit and proper person to have a child or children”; and, they will take her children away.

They will separate the children to try and ensure that they never see each other again; and, they will put the children up for adoption, or place them separately, in government approved care homes.

 

JEMIMA, do not come back to the UK. Only severe hurt and great injury awaits you here. Try and make a new life for yourself and for your children precisely where you are now. The British people and the, British Totalitarian Regime, do not want you. Furthermore,
the right-wing rotten hysterical British Press and Media are already stirring up and publishing features, motivating ‘hatred’ against you. Be safe; stay where you are.

ADDENDUM 18.02.2019

This rotten 'Totalitarian Regime' Establishment; began the first phase of wickedly 'hurting' JEMIMA BEGUN; JAVID DAVID, the Home Secretary revoked her claim to be British; revoked her British Nationality; and, took her British passport away. All as I predicted would happen in the posted feature above.

 

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

FILMS - Note for Screenwriter, Deborah Davis


FILMS“THE FAVORITE”

BAFTA Screenwriter Award, DEBORAH DAVIS

 

Dear Deborah Davis

 

Interested to know, when you created screenplay for "The Favorite" featuring QUEEN ANNE; did you include the most important feature of her reign. Her refusal to grant the ROYAL ASSENT to a Bill passed by parliament.

 

For your information: She was the only Reigning Monarch that has done her DUTY and honoured the "Original Contract"; and, who has done this.

 

That was in March 1708; but, the very interesting thing is that ever since that date; there has not been one Reigning Monarch, sitting upon the English throne that has done that. Every Reigning Monarch since that date, including the present Queen, they have failed to comply with that DUTY; in the way that Queen Anne did.

It will be a terrible pity and a grave omission, if this aspect of her life, was not featured in the film.

Contact me if you want further information.

 

For your further information: The "Original Contract" is an un-written contract; but it is wholly entrenched in English 'LAW'. It is a contract "Betwixt King and People" solely designed for the protection of the people. It derives from this concept as recorded in, ‘Olde English Law’

 

"Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord".

 

When the Monarchy was first created this concept formed the basis of the, “Original Contract”.

 

KING JAMES the Second was removed from the throne by the CONVENTION (parliament) of 1688. He was charged with,
 
"Failing to protect the People and their Religion, Breaking the 'Original Contract Betwixt King and People,".
 
There then followed a huge debate of both LORDS and COMMONS held in the "Painted Chamber" of the House of Commons, where the words, "ABDICATED" and “THE THRONE IS NOW VACANT" was debated for several days.

 

During this debate, HENRY POWLE, ‘The Speaker’ of that debate referring to the “Original Contract” and the removal of KING JAMES II from the throne, said this,

 

“It is on those upon the throne of England that the people look to for their protection, and to whom for that Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, but there being none now to whom the people can look to for that Regal protection, and for which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, the Commons conceive the throne is Vacant.”

 

 At the conclusion of this debate the CONVENTION resolved that thereby; KING JAMES was 'guilty' as charged and, that he had therefore, 'Abdicated', the throne.

 

The CONVENTION ruled that the throne was Vacant.
PRINCE WILLIAM OF ORANGE became the next King.

 

The, Earl of Clarendon also made an important speech in that debate; in speaking of the ‘lineal descent’ in respect to all succeeding ‘Reigning Monarchs’ that would sit upon that throne; he determined and declared this,

 

"The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed".

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not once honoured the 'Original Contract' throughout all the time she has occupied that throne. She has not only "Broken the Original Contract";

She has also broken her "Coronation Oath".

At her coronation she swore to "Govern the People".

This required her, by this 'Oath', to act as "Head of Government and Parliament" and, to monitor parliament to ensure that the 'Bills' passed by Parliament are not corrupt.

Her DUTY thereby; is to grant the "ROYAL ASSENT" to the 'Bills' that are not corrupt and that are in the interests of the country and its people. Yet to, REFUSE TO GRANT IT, if they are not.

 

Every 'Reigning Monarch' since March 1708 has failed to honour that Contract.

 

Queen Anne, is much to be admired.

She was, UNIQUE.

 

Regards, Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

BREXIT IS BOTH UNLAWUL & DANGEROUS


BREXIT
LAW - and, The Warning of History.

 The "Triggering of Article 50" Bill in Parliament was wholly UNLAWFUL because it was created and passed by Parliament under the influence and 'diktat' of the political party Whips.
That 'political activity' of the Whips overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence of the Constituents. And, this causes the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".
 
Yet, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" is wholly proscribed by the, 'precedent of law' of the,"Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
 
PARLIAMENT ABANDONED, LAW

 

WITH THE IMPENDING PERIL OF 'BREXIT' IT IS IMPERATIVE NOW THAT AS MANY AS POSSIBLE SHOULD READ MY BOOK, “DEMOCRACY”.

(The URL link to purchase is provided below)

 

The vast, majority, of the people in the country have no idea how badly (and unlawfully) they are governed; and, ruled unlawfully, by MONARCHY.
The, entire British governing establishment and, all the British people, have now abandoned, 'LAW'.

 

It might interest most to know that in all of the 'BREXIT' legislation carried out in all of parliament debates, the WORDS, 'Law', 'The Rule of Law', and, 'The Protection of Law', was never spoken once.

 

I watched every one of those debates on the Parliament TV Channel. My Member of Parliament also sent me (at my request) all the copies of 'Hansard' providing verbatim copy of every speech made in parliament during those debates. 'LAW' was never mentioned, once, in all of those debates.

 

THE WARNING OF HISTORY- THE TRUE 'CATALYST' OF WORLD WAR TWO AND ALL THE CRIMES OF THE NAZI REGIME.

 

ADOLF HITLER, throughout the late 1920's early 1930's in all of the speeches he made; he warned the entire World what he was going to do when he got the power to govern. He repeatedly proclaimed,

 

"We, (the NAZI party) will use the democratic process in order to achieve the power to govern but once we have secured that power 'heads will roll' and we will create our own law."

 

The 'WORLD' PAID LITTLE ATTENTION.

 

HITLER was appointed 'Chancellor of Germany' in 1933; the very first thing he did was to place before the 'Reichstag' (the German democratic parliament) his "ENABLING LAW" which, (if passed by that parliament) would create him as 'FUHRER' 'Head of the German State' with the power to both create and impose his own law. That, 'DEMOCRATIC' PARLIAMENT, ON THE 23rd MARCH 1933, IN THE SHEER ABANDONMENT OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY, passed that 'HITLER's LAW', 441 votes to 94.

 

The entire, German Profession of Law, did nothing.

The entire population of Germany raised their arms and hands in the air, in giving the Nazi salute, heralding HITLER as their saviour; "WHO WOULD MAKE GERMANY GREAT AGAIN".

And, all of Germany, abandoned the "Rule of Law"

 

IN GREAT BRITAIN TODAY, WE BRITISH, ARE TREADING THE VERY SAME DISASTROUS PATH; WE ARE DOING PRECISELY THE SAME. 'ACTS' 'MOTIONS' and 'BILLS' ARE BEING CREATED AND PASSED IN PARLIAMENT TODAY. IN PRECISELY THE SAME MANNER AS 'HITLER' AND THE 'NAZIS' CREATED THEIR OWN LAW.

We must smash the present unlawful power of the Political Party's.
We must abolish the Political Party Whips in parliament; that have no 'legality' at all.

 

Read my book, “DEMOCRACY”

Available in two formats, Kindle download £1.19, Paperback £3.50. It can be purchased here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

Saturday, February 2, 2019

BREXIT-SHEER CHAOS CORRUPTION & DISASTER


BREXIT – ABSOLUTE DISASTER

Radical Remedy now required;

Therefore, LAW must now prevail.

I therefore challenge all the ‘elite’ establishment of our land, MONARCHY. JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT to provide the absolute proof of the LEGALITY for the use of the ‘Political Party Whips’ in PARLIAMENT.

 

IT IS MY CONTENTION that the ‘Political Party Whips’ in PARLIAMENT has no LEGALITY at all.

 

In instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituents; who ‘elected’ those Members of Parliament in the first place.

 

Therefore, when the Political Party Whips do this; they cause and create, “THE PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

But, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” by Parliament, is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ determined by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

This paragraph, of that Bill; “The Said Rights Claimed”; specifically instructs Parliament, (and all reading), the “Bill of Rights 1689” that Parliament, may have the provision of the  “SUPREMACY” of Parliament; afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of that Bill; or, Parliament may ‘enact’, any of the other “PREMISES” of the Bill. But, only upon the conditions that in anything that Parliament does in ‘enacting’ any of those “PREMISES” of the Bill; nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

Therefore, as determined by the ‘LAW’ of the ‘protection of the people’; set out in this “Bill of Rights 1689”; “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” prohibits Parliament, from the abuse of Parliament causing the, ”PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

The, “Said Rights Claimed” is the over-all ‘superior authority’ over ‘everything written’ within the “Bill of Rights 1689” – This is established by the fact and verification - that within the text of this paragraph of the Bill; it specially states that it is the ‘superior authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

 

IT IS THEREFORE MY CONTENTION that,

1.            The Political Party Whips in Parliament, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” and thereby, the Whips in Parliament; has no LEGALITY at all.

2.            Thus, with the Political Party Whips in Parliament having no LEGALITY whatsoever; all or any ‘Acts’ ‘Motions’ or ‘Bills’ created and passed in Parliament – under the ‘instruction’ or ‘diktat’ – of the Whips; also, has no LEGALITY at all.

3.            This being the established fact in LAW; the, “Statute, E.U. (Withdrawal) “Triggering Article 50” Bill”; is wholly unlawful. Having no LEGALITY at all.

4.            Parliament, “Triggering Article 50” Bill, is therefore both, ILLEGAL and CORRUPT.

5.            HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN therefore, in respect to this Bill; She granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ to corrupt law’.

6.            IF THE ‘ELITE’ ESTABLISHMENT OF MONARCHY; JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT, OR PARLIAMENT, WERE TO REFUTE THIS CLAIM OR ALLEGATION; THE MERE EXAMINATION BY THE “SUPREME COURT” IS AVAILABLE TO VERIFY OR REFUTE ALL THE ‘ALLEGATIONS’ SET OUT ABOVE.

7.      I, challenge them to do so.

 

NOTE – Parliament, and all this ‘elite’ establishment can never claim that in some previous history of Parliament; Parliament approved the use of the, ‘Political Party Whips’, in Parliament.

Because, the mere ‘proposition’ placed before Parliament; for the assenting vote of Parliament for such Bill; could never ever even been ‘put to Parliament’ without flouting and breaching the “Said Rights Claimed”.

This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically ‘protects’ the People from the “PREJUDICE” of Parliament.
Placing that ‘proposition’ before Parliament; takes that ‘protection of the people’ away. Therefore, such ‘proposition’ would flout and breach that, LAW.

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

 

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

BREXIT – Resorting to LAW here establishes that the ‘Triggering of Article 50’ by Parliament was both UNLAWFUL and CORRUPT.

 

This verifies that in respect to BREXIT now; “Article 50” is not ‘extended’ or ‘revoked’; It is totally abolished.

Therefore, all the E.U ‘Withdrawal’ legislation of the last two years; has no ‘LEGALITY’ whatsoever.

If the BRITISH people and Government still want to leave the E.U.? – There will have to be a new Referendum for the people to decide.

If that new Referendum result still decides the option to, ‘LEAVE’; then “Article 50” will have to be ‘triggered’ again.

 

Meanwhile, BRITAIN REMAINS IN THE E.U.