GAY MARRIAGE
To all those who oppose Gay Marriage:
With respect, and, with the attitude you take, in respect to redefining marriage; providing, in law, the right of GAY PEOPLE to marry; you fully demonstrate; as, do all others, that support this point of view; that you have no respect for, or, any true comprehension of, LAW.
What is this thing we call, LAW ?
The entire 'establishment' of Monarchy, Judiciary, Parliament, Politician, and, Government; who have now hijacked "LAW" as their own; fully believes that "LAW" is something that must be obeyed. Yet, that is not "LAW" at all.
"LAW" is best described by the words of an ex-Lord Chancellor of England, LORD HAILSHAM, who frequently said this:
"LAW is a Myth without the consent of the People there is no LAW"
I personally heard him say that many times.
Thus, "LAW" is naught but the voluntary consent of the People agreeing to live by "The Rule of Law".
Therefore, all that give that, 'voluntary consent'; are entitled to three things:
1. Firstly, they are entitled to fully 'participate' in the framing of LAW; and, in the creation of all LAWS.
2. Secondly, that, they are entitled to the 'protection' of LAW.
Note:
THOUGH THE BRITISH TODAY HAVE NO PROTECTION OF LAW AT ALL: They, have no access to a 'Written Constitution' or, a 'Bill of Rights' or, a 'Supreme Court of Law' where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of Parliament from within LAW. Furthermore, although there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting on the British throne charged with the responsibility of honouring the "ORIGINAL CONTRACT" requiring the protection of Subjects; ELIZABETH THE SECOND, provides no 'protection' at all. She has not honoured the "ORIGINAL CONTRACT", all of the time she has occupied the British throne. In consequence, and, by precedent of "LAW" she abdicates the throne. THE BRITISH THRONE IS AS VACANT TODAY AS IT WAS IN 1688 WHEN KING JAMES THE SECOND WAS REMOVED FROM THE THRONE. He had, "Broken the 'Original Contract' betwixt King and People" and, the CONVENTION (Parliament) determined, that, thereby, he had abdicated the throne. But, the CONVENTION went even further in respect to the "Lineal Descent" by ruling thus;
"The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor breaks the Contract, he too can be Deposed"
ELIZABETH THE SECOND in, "Breaking this Contract", can also be, Deposed.
3. Thirdly, all that give consent to live by "The Rule of Law", are entitled to EQUALITY in Law,
And, by that criterion, ALL HUMANKIND ARE EQUAL IN LAW; thus proving that GAY MARRIAGE is lawful. All that deny GAY PEOPLE that 'equal right' in LAW; demonstrate in stark vivid clarity that they have no respect for "LAW"; and, that, they, in truth, are merely bigots.
To all those who oppose Gay Marriage:
With respect, and, with the attitude you take, in respect to redefining marriage; providing, in law, the right of GAY PEOPLE to marry; you fully demonstrate; as, do all others, that support this point of view; that you have no respect for, or, any true comprehension of, LAW.
What is this thing we call, LAW ?
The entire 'establishment' of Monarchy, Judiciary, Parliament, Politician, and, Government; who have now hijacked "LAW" as their own; fully believes that "LAW" is something that must be obeyed. Yet, that is not "LAW" at all.
"LAW" is best described by the words of an ex-Lord Chancellor of England, LORD HAILSHAM, who frequently said this:
"LAW is a Myth without the consent of the People there is no LAW"
I personally heard him say that many times.
Thus, "LAW" is naught but the voluntary consent of the People agreeing to live by "The Rule of Law".
Therefore, all that give that, 'voluntary consent'; are entitled to three things:
1. Firstly, they are entitled to fully 'participate' in the framing of LAW; and, in the creation of all LAWS.
2. Secondly, that, they are entitled to the 'protection' of LAW.
Note:
THOUGH THE BRITISH TODAY HAVE NO PROTECTION OF LAW AT ALL: They, have no access to a 'Written Constitution' or, a 'Bill of Rights' or, a 'Supreme Court of Law' where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of Parliament from within LAW. Furthermore, although there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting on the British throne charged with the responsibility of honouring the "ORIGINAL CONTRACT" requiring the protection of Subjects; ELIZABETH THE SECOND, provides no 'protection' at all. She has not honoured the "ORIGINAL CONTRACT", all of the time she has occupied the British throne. In consequence, and, by precedent of "LAW" she abdicates the throne. THE BRITISH THRONE IS AS VACANT TODAY AS IT WAS IN 1688 WHEN KING JAMES THE SECOND WAS REMOVED FROM THE THRONE. He had, "Broken the 'Original Contract' betwixt King and People" and, the CONVENTION (Parliament) determined, that, thereby, he had abdicated the throne. But, the CONVENTION went even further in respect to the "Lineal Descent" by ruling thus;
"The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor breaks the Contract, he too can be Deposed"
ELIZABETH THE SECOND in, "Breaking this Contract", can also be, Deposed.
3. Thirdly, all that give consent to live by "The Rule of Law", are entitled to EQUALITY in Law,
And, by that criterion, ALL HUMANKIND ARE EQUAL IN LAW; thus proving that GAY MARRIAGE is lawful. All that deny GAY PEOPLE that 'equal right' in LAW; demonstrate in stark vivid clarity that they have no respect for "LAW"; and, that, they, in truth, are merely bigots.
