How Australia treats it’s immigrants - See letter sent to Prime Minister

Rt Hon Scott Morrison MP
Prime Minister
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT2600
Australia

Subject,
Melbourne Centre of Excellence
OFFICE:Level 25 Casselden Place 2 Lonsdale Street Melbourne VIC 3000
POSTAL:GPO Box 241 Melbourne VIC 3001
EMAIL: 457@border.gov.au WEBSITE: www.border.gov.au

22 March 2016
Christopher SALES
24A Liriope Parkway
Sinagra WA 6065
In reply please quote:
Client Name Christopher SALES
Date of Birth 29 November 1960
Date of Visa Application 10 December 2015
Application ID 1965587579
Transaction Reference Number EGOA4VV832
File Number BCC2015/3796375
Transmission Method Email sent to mark@migrationaustralia.com.au
Nominated Occupation Electrical Engineering Technician – 312312

Sponsor details
Sponsor Name Integral Electrical Services Pty Ltd
Sponsorship Approval Number/Application ID 235566268
Sponsorship TRN EGO5148NML
Nomination Approval Number/Application ID 1075583969
Nomination TRN EGO9E8XOMT

Dear Christopher SALES
Notification of grant of a Temporary Work(Skilled) (subclass 457) visa
I wish to advise that a decision has been made on this application and visas have been
granted on 22 March 2016 to the applicant(s) listed in the attached Visa Grant Notice, which
contains important information about your visa(s).
Please keep a copy of this letter and the Visa Grant Notice in a safe place for your reference.

Prime Minister
Shortly before the year 2012 a Minister of the Australian government visited Great Britain and Ireland to recruit skilled workers to move to Australia, with their families, to work and to live. He mounted a series of events in Hotels where he spoke about and demonstrated the inducements to the workers and their families if they took up the offers he explained. He said that if they moved to Australia,
1. Australia was a wonderful country.
2. That Australians were wonderful people who would be pleased to greet the immigrants with open arms.
3. The education for their children was FREE.
4. That if they liked living in Australia and wanted to live there permanently, providing they worked for the same sponsor for just two years; they would be eligible for PERMANENT RESIDENCY.
All of this was reported on both British and Irish television.

My daughter, JANICE SALES, and her husband CHRIS, seeing the reports on British television, believed every word and they made up their minds to move to AUSTRALIA, to work and to live there in order to start, “A New Life”. They hoped that they could live there for the rest of their lives.
I was opposed to this, I did everything possible to dissuade them.
I told them that they would lose all the security of the UK, especially the National Health Service which provided FREE every medical need. I phoned the Immigration Department of the Australian Embassy in the hope that they would not uphold what the Minister had said. But, they only confirmed every word.
In consequence my daughter and her husband sold their lovely home; and the whole family, JANICE, CHRIS, the children, MILLIE and ASHTON, moved to AUSTRALIA on the first available plane.

Within two months it all began to go wrong. Firstly the sponsor turned out to be a liar, he renaged on virtually every promise he had made.
Secondly, AUSTRALIA CHANGED ALL THE RULES,
A. Education for their children was no longer FREE, 4,000 Dollars per year had to be paid for each child’s education.
B. PERMANENT RESIDENCY was no longer available for those whose age was over 50. The new criteria set the age at 45.

There was more bad news as well. The AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT declared that it was proud of its 457 Visa system; but the ‘Trades Unions” disagreed. They asserted that 457 Immigrants took work away from ‘Permanent Residents’. And they started a campaign to attack that system.
The more that campaign was promoted and gained success, sponsors began to make 457 Visa Immigrants, REDUNDANT.
These immigrants were thereby made REDUNDANT and even worse, found it very difficult to secure new SPONSORS.
CHRIS SALES suffered greatly during this period. He was made REDUNDANT; and he found it almost impossible to get new employment. Seeking help he requested POLITICAL REPRESENTATION.
On the ‘Precept’ that “THERE SHALL BE NO TAXATION WITHOUT POLITICAL REPRSENTATION”,
CHRIS SALES now demands that every dollar paid in taxation, unlawfully, must now be repaid. Because, every request that he made for POLITICAL REPRESENTATION was denied.
Every Member of the AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT that he approached for assistance, refused that assistance because they stated that they did not want anything to do with “457 Visa Immigrant” issues. CHRIS SALES was refused “Political Representation” every time he asked for it.
AUSTRALIA must now repay every dollar of taxation that he paid.

FINAL ANALYSIS
The, U L T I M A T U M
There can be no doubt whatsoever that had not my daughter, JANICE SALES, seen and heard the words of the televised reports of the Australian Minister visiting Great Britain and Ireland on a skilled worker recruitment drive; neither she or her family would ever have moved to Australia at all. It was this Ministers words which motivated JANICE and her husband CHRIS to sell their lovely home and move to Australia for good.

But, when the Australian government and Parliament “Changed the Rules” they were then trapped in Australia; and they couldn’t go back; because they had no home to return to.
When Australia “Changed the Rules” both the government and Parliament ought to have made the ‘changed rules’ only applicable to the immigrants arriving in Australia ‘post the date’ that the ‘changed rules’ legislation had been passed by parliament. Thereby ‘excempting’ all the previous promises that had been given to all the ‘457 Visa Immigrants’ long before that ‘changed legislation’ was passed.
BECAUSE AUSTRALIA DID NOT DO THIS, AND JANICE AND CHRIS SOLD THEIR HOME; AUSTRALIA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR LOSS OF THAT HOME.
Now that JANICE and CHRIS have been deported back to the UK; and now have no money, (the return costing them virtually all the money they had), and, they have no home; Australia, being responsible for that loss; AUSTRALIA MUST NOW PROVIDE THEM WITH A NEW HOME.

In the event Australia seeks to ignore all its responsibilities as set out above, then I intend to pursue all of my daughter, JANICE and her husband’s HUMAN RIGHTS as provided by the “Universal Human Rights Legislation”. Win or Lose in that quest; Australia will come out the worst; for the bad publicity it will endure.
THE WORLD WILL SEE HOW BADLY AUSTRALIA TREATS ITS IMMIGRANTS.

Sincerely, Gordon J Sheppard
Father, of JANICE SALES

To all intents and purposes Britain has already left the EU;

But, according to the ‘lies’ that Boris Johnson told, and according to ‘LAW’, Britain may not have left the E.U.

It all depends on the ‘CRUCIAL TRUTH’ or ‘The Wicked Lie’.

During the Referendum of 2016 Boris Johnson made several statements. He was in charge of the ‘LEAVE EUROPE CAMPAIGN’ and he was persuading voters to leave. The statements were in the form of promises verifying if the voter voted to leave, certain events would be bound to follow.

The first of these statement by Boris Johnson promised,

“If you vote to leave £350,000 per week, presently paid to the E.U. Would become available for the NHS”.

The second was, “If you vote to leave Trade with Europe will continue, unaffected, just as it is now.”

Immediately one can see that Statement 2 is a lie.

If and when Britain leaves the EU there automatically begins a transition period of two years whereby Britain negotiates with the EU for a trade agreement. Britain has already been negotiating with the EU for three years, and so far has not been able to secure that trade agreement.

So it can be readily seen that when Boris Johnson stated “Trade would continue uninterrupted “ – That was a wicked lie.

Now we come to the statement verifying that the NHS will become available for “£350,000 per Week”

This, is the statement Boris Johnson made.

Boris Johnson, and his government, is now committed in perpetuity to pay the NHS that amount every week as long as Britain remains out of the EU.

So where is the money? Has the first instalment been already paid? And, what arrangements have been put in place to pay ‘per week’ all other instalments?

IF ALL THIS TURNS OUT TO BE A WICKED LIE,

THEN BRITAIN HAS NOT LEFT THE EU.

During the Referendum of 2016 all Boris Johnsons statements and lies, were recorded by live television; and they were transmitted in ‘News Reports’ to every TV receiver in the country; and throughout the World. Thus, those statements, and those lies, were prominent in the public domain.

That being the case, when 17.4 Million Voters vote to leave the EU the question must be posed: “Did they vote that way out of their own honest conviction?; or, were they influenced by the lies Boris Johnson told? There is now way of verifying this.

BUT FOR THE COURTS OF LAW; THIS IS A DIFFERENT CRITERION; ALL THE COURTS HAVE TO DECIDE IS THIS,

Because the Statements and Lies are so widely prominent in the public domain; and were so throughout the Referendum; then those lies MUST HAVE INFLUENCED THE FINAL VOTE OF THAT REFERENDUM. The COURTS must determine thereby, that the final vote of the Referendum of 2016; “CAN NO LONGER BE RELIED UPON.”

AS LONG AS BORIS JONSON’S LIES ARE PROMINENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, THOSE ‘LIES’ MUST HAVE INFLUENCED THE VOTE, IN THAT ELECTION. 

There is also another serious matter that requires attention. That is the ‘punishment’ for Boris Johnson.

If Boris Johnson’s lies corrupted the final vote of the Referendum, then Boris Johnson is responsible for all the chaos that ensued. The massive costs of a three year negotiation period with the EU, in order to actually leave the EU. Politicians, Diplomats, and their staff beavering away every day trying to negotiate a “WITHDRAWAL” BILL.

The cost of this for both Britain and the EU must have been tremendous. Hundreds of thousand million pounds.

BORIS JOHNSON MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CARRY OUT ALL THIS COSTLY CHAOS AND CONFUSION; WITHOUT BEING HELD TO ACCOUNT FOR HIS CRIMES.

BORIS JOHNSON’S ‘LIES’ CORRUPTED THE FINAL VOTE OF THE REFERENDUM, THEREFORE HE “PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE”; WHICH IS A SERIOUS CRIME.

THE POLICE MUST NOW BE INSTRUCTED TO INVESTIGATE BORIS JOHNSON,  TO CHARGE HIM WITH THIS OFFENCE AND BRING HIM TO TRIAL.

Gordon J Sheppard.                                    18.3.2020