Monday, September 15, 2014

SKY NEWS and ISLAM..


SKY NEWS today poses this question:

"Why do some Muslims become terrorists? "


The answer is very simple: Because in order to be a Muslim, all Muslim's must obey the commands of the Islamic Quran. And, the Quran commands the waging of 'Jihad' against all, UNBELIEVERS.

It is wholly ridiculous to continue claiming that 'ISLAM' is peaceful and has nothing to do with what the terrorist 'Islamic State' is doing in Iraq. When, all that the 'Islamic State' is doing, is commanded by, the Islamic Quran.



ISLAM – QURAN – TREATMENT OF UNBELIEVERS..

 

In Islam, all non-Muslims are called unbelievers or infidels. The treatment of the infidels in Islam is divided into two categories. The polytheists, pagans, idolaters and heathens have the choice of converting to Islam or suffer death. The Jews and Christians, whom the Koran calls people of the book, can retain their religion but on the sufferance of accepting humiliation and subjugation to Islam and payment of Jizyah (poll-tax) to the Islamic rulers.
 

Now, look closer, at what the Koran says about the infidels:-

 

·         Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them(2:191)

 

·         Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood (9:123)

 

·         When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)

 

·         Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)

 

·         Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)

 

·         The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)

 

·         Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)

 

·         The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)

 

·         Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
(
22:19)

 

·         Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)

  

*     When Ye meet the unbeliever in fight Smite at their necks (47:4) 

 

·         The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)

 

·         Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)

 

·         Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)

 

·         Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)

 

     

The Qur’an certainly proclaims that when the time is appropriate, Muslims must use force to convert the unbelievers to Islam. For the non-Muslims, the alternative to this is to pay the humiliating protection money (Jizya tax) or be killed (by beheading). A militarily dominant Islam, without doubt, precludes the peaceful co-existence with the unbelievers if the Muslims have to abide strictly by the unalterable stipulations of the Qur’an.
 

This is why we see very few “moderate” muslims coming out and speaking against the violence. There is so much overwhelming evidence stacked against them not able to be “moderate” because of the fundamental belief’s of Islam.

Referenced from
Islam-Watch

 

Gordon J Sheppard 

Friday, September 12, 2014

PISTORIUS and the "Rule of Law"

 

All true and just 'LAW' must conform to certain criterion:

That it is consistent with:

TRUTH; FREEDOM; JUSTICE; INTELLIGENCE; LOGIC, and, RATIONALE.

The verdicts in the PISTORIUS TRIAL flouts every one of this criterion.

The verdict pronounced by the Judge that PISTORIUS was
not guilty in respect to the charge of 'premeditated murder'; and, that he was not guilty in respect to 'intent to murder'; is positively absurd and obscene.

TRUTH; both of these verdicts are not truthful.

FREEDOM, they both conflict with the recognition and the right of the FREEDOM of the victim murdered in this case.

JUSTICE, REEVA STEENKAMP, the victim murdered, got no 'justice' at all.

INTELLIGENCE, when the person charged with murder in this case, admits to firing four shots through a toilet door; although he had never ever seen any intruder, and, had never even seen anything that actually threatened his life; and, those four bullets fired through that door brought about the death of REEVA STEENKAMP; THERE CAN BE NO OTHER CHARGE BUT MURDER. Because, if you fire four shots through a toilet door, in that highly confined space of that toilet, it is wholly obvious that there is the intent to hurt, to wound, or to kill. The fact that REEVA STEENKAMP was actually killed by those shots; proves beyond any reasonable doubt PISTORIUS murdered her and INTENDED TO KILL. For the Judge to pronounce his 'innocence' in this regard, flouts the very INTELLIGENCE of all of Humankind.

LOGIC, in assessing the 'facts' set out in 'INTELLIGENCE' above; proves beyond any doubt that these verdicts have no 'LOGIC' at all.

RATIONALE, likewise, there is no 'RATIONALE' whatsoever. The 'verdicts' are entirely false and unbelievable.

The verdicts of the Judge in this case are ridiculous.
If she asserts and rules that PISTORIUS is
not guilty of 'premeditated murder' and, she asserts, that there was no 'intent to murder'; then she must explain to the World, what was the intent of PISTORIUS when he fired four shots through that bathroom toilet door? What was his true 'intent' when he fired four shots through that door, into that very confined space? What other motives could he have had?

REEVA STEENKAMP WAS 'MURDERED' AND, THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS IT.

SOUTH AFRICA AND SOUTH AFRICAN's IN CONTEMPT, SPIT UPON HER GRAVE.

Gordon J Sheppard