SKY NEWS STANDS ACCUSED;

PERSISTENTLY TRANSMITTING,

FAKE NEWS.

SKY NEWS, and virtually all other broadcasters and newspapers in the country consistently transmit and publish, FAKE NEWS.

 

FAKE NEWS is not only ‘News’ that is invented or fabricated but UNTRUE;

FAKE NEWS is also ‘News’ that is TRUE; and, is very well known by the broadcaster or publisher; but it is purposely ‘censored’ from publication; in the economic or political vested interests of the transmitter or publisher, who withholds that information.

ALL BRITISH MEDIA IS GUILTY OF DOING THIS.

 

PRIME EXAMPLES OF THIS FAKE NEWS ARE,

1.            DEMOCRACY

2.            HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

 

1.            DEMOCRACY

ALL BRITISH MEDIA CONSISTENTLY ASSERTS, PROMOTES, AND INDOCTRINATES THE BRITISH PEOPLE, THAT, ‘GREAT BRITAIN’, IS A “GREAT DEMOCRACY.”

 

Whereas, Britain, is not a DEMOCRACY at all. Today, Great Britain has become naught but a rotten totalitarian regime.

There can be no DEMOCRACY where LAWS, ‘Acts’, ‘Motions’ and ‘Bills’, are being created and passed by a British parliament, in precisely the same way as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their own LAWS. By, the, ‘diktat’ and the imposition of the, Political Party; and not by, DEMOCRATIC consent.

 

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE who voted in the EU Referendum of 2016 to ‘leave’ the EU; consistently wail and whine that they are being denied “DEMOCRACY” because, so far, the Government has failed to ‘leave’ the EU. They assert, that “their democracy” has been wickedly denied and abused.

 

THEY HAVEN’T THE SLIGHTEST IDEA WHAT “DEMOCRACY” IS. LIKEWISE, WITH VIRTUALLY EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY.

IT IS IMPERATIVE NOW; THAT EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY NEEDS TO READ MY BOOK “DEMOCRACY”; IN ORDER TO LEARN PROPERLY WHAT “DEMOCRACY” REALLY IS. AND, HOW TO PROPERLY, PARTICIPATE.

My book is available here,

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

 

2.             HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

SKY NEWS and virtually all other British Media consistently ‘indoctrinates’ the People with the concept that the Queen, “ELIZABETH THE SECOND”, is a “Wonderful Queen”, asserting that she has faithfully carried out her duty as a ‘Reigning Monarch’ throughout her entire sixty years she has occupied the throne.

 

THIS IS A SHEER WICKED "FAKE NEWS" LIE.

SHE HAS NEVER ‘ONCE’ CARRIED OUT HER DUTY DURING THE ENTIRE PERIOD SHE HAS OCCUPIED THE THRONE.

 

SHE HAS NEVER ‘ONCE’ HONOURED THE OATH THAT SHE SWORE AT HER CORONATION:

 

 “I swear and promise to Govern the People”

 

YET, SHE HAS NEVER ‘ONCE’ “GOVERNED THE PEOPLE” THROUGHOUT ALL OF THE YEARS, SHE HAS SAT ON THAT THRONE.

 

FURTHERMORE,

SHE HAS NEVER ‘ONCE’ HONOURED OR COMPLIED WITH THE “ORIGINAL CONTRACT” – THE ‘CONTRACT’ EXISTING BETWIXT KING AND PEOPLE, REQUIRING EACH ‘REIGNING MONARCH’, TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE.

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has never once provided the protection of Her Subjects, as required by the “Original Contract”; and, in consequence; She has repeatedly and consistently throughout her reign, granted the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law.

 

ALL LAWS, ‘ACTS’ ‘MOTIONS’ ‘BILLS’ PASSED BY PARLIAMENT DURING A “WHIPPED VOTE” HAS NO TRUE LEGALITY AT ALL. When the political party ‘Whips’ in parliament instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituents.

The ‘Constituents’ that elected that Member in the first place. This therefore causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”; Yet, that is specifically proscribed by the “protection of the people” provided by the,

“STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.

This paragraph of that Bill, specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only providing nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

The political party ‘Whips’ in parliament do “Prejudice the People”; therefore the ‘Whips’ in parliament; has no legality at all.

 

SKY NEWS AND ALL BRITISH NEWS MEDIA HAS NEVER ONCE BROADCAST OR PUBLISHED THIS.  THEY HAVE ALL PURPOSELY CENSORED IT FROM PUBLICATION, IN ORDER TO DECEIVE.

IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN,

          FAKE NEWS  

 

 

 

 

SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM 'TWIITER' BLATANTLY ABUSES HUMAN RIGHTS

TWITTER VIOLATES MY HUMAN RIGHTS

 

TWITTER the social media platform on the Internet, is a most valuable tool for the consumer fully exercising, FREE EXPRESSION and FREE SPEECH;

BUT, THE ADMINISTRATORS OF TWITTER, consistently treats the ‘user’ with sheer arrogant intent. They will SUSPEND AN ACCOUNT without any prior notification; and, without the ‘user’ having any access to defend against the complaint. TWITTER admin treats the ‘user’ wickedly and disgracefully, just as though, they had been charged of a criminal offence in a Court of Law whereby the accused has heard only the details of the charge; and, is denied all or any right of a defence; yet, then, has being found guilty and ‘sentenced’; without having any say in the matter at all.

 

 THE ADMINISTRATORS OF TWITTER will not only ‘suspend’ an account without any prior notification of the precise nature of any ‘complaint’ or who or what was the ‘origin’ of the complaint; but, they will also refuse to hear any ‘appeal’, against the complaint and the suspension. As example of this sheer arrogance, just look at the email message TWITTER sent to me,

About your Twitter account 0117675662 [ ref:_00DA0K0A8._5004A1i5juF:ref ]

Hello,
We’re writing to let you know that your account has been suspended due to multiple or repeat violations of our rules.

Please do not reply to this email, or send us new appeals for this account as we won’t monitor them.

Thanks,
Twitter/Help | Privacy
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

ref:_00DA0K0A8._5004A1i5juF:ref

 

NOTE: TWITTER states that the

 ‘suspension’ is the result, of my “multiple
or repeat violations of our rules” – but, fails to point out or indicate how, when, or wherefore, any ‘violation’ has taken place. Or, who in fact, REGISTERED, complaint, against me.  
 
 
 
 


 

I HAVE NOT VIOLATED ANY RULE

I HAVE REPEATEDLY POSTED ON TWITTER MY HONEST FREE SPEECH OPINION PERSISTENTLY CRITICISING POLITICS, POLITICIANS, MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, PARLIAMENT and GOVERNMENT; and, ANY ORGANISATION SEEKING OR DEMANDING SPECIAL PRIVILEGE FOR THEMSELVES; YET DENYING THAT ‘PRIVILEGE’ FOR THE MAJORITY.

Such as the, ‘JEW’ or, any of the ethnic minority races.

 

If that be the nature of my ‘violations’ on TWITTER. Then, TWITTER has no right whatsoever, for that ‘SUSPENSION’; or, for any complaint,

 

The right of FREE SPEECH, FREE EXPRESSION, and, DISCRIMINATION, is entrenched in the ‘NATURAL LAW’ inherent in my Genes.

By the ‘rule’ of ‘NATURAL LAW’,

 

I HAVE THE FREEDOM TO ‘DISCRIMINATE’ FOR OR AGAINST ANY DAMNED THING; OR, ANY PERSON, THAT I CHOOSE.

AS TWITTER ADMINISTRATION NOW REFUSES TO HEAR ANY APPEAL; AND WILL NOT DISCLOSE THE FULL NATURE OF WHO OR WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF ANY ‘COMPLAINT’ AGAINST ME. I HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE AVAILABLE TO ME NOW; I MUST THEREFORE CHALLENGE 'TWITTER' FOR THE ‘VIOLATION’ ON MY HUMAN RIGHTS; IN A COURT OF LAW.

 

I, THEREFORE, INTEND TO SECURE IMMEDIATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION; IN ORDER TO SUE ‘TWTTER’ FOR “EXEMPLARY DAMAGES”; FOR THE VIOLATION OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS; AND, THIS WICKED ABUSE.  

BREXIT URGENT CRITICAL ALERT

BREXIT – HIGHLY IMPORTANT, HIGHLY CRITICAL ALERT;

ACCORDING TO EXISTING CURRENT, LAW;

 

BRITAIN MAY NOT LEAVE THE E.U.

 

Before BRITAIN may leave the EU; BRITAIN must first put in place a complete legal ‘alternative’ structure providing access to LAW; where there is the provision for the proper protection against the abuse and violation of, HUMAN RIGHTS.

 

At present and, under the existing LAW, that provision is provided by the, “European Court of Justice” and the “European Human Rights Convention”;

 

But, if BRITAIN ‘leaves’ the EU now; without putting that ‘alternative’ protective legal ‘structure’ in place; BRITAIN will be leaving, not only the EU; but, both the jurisdiction of the “ECJ” and that “Human Rights Convention”; as well.

Thereby, leaving the “EU CITIZEN” with no, ‘protection of law’, at all.

 

BRITAIN does not provide any protection of LAW for the protection of “HUMAN RIGHTS”, at all. The ‘elite’ establishment of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament; merely look upon LAW as it being something that only the ‘common people’ must obey. Whilst, they, flout and breach LAW all the time.

There is no “Written Constitution”; “Bill of Rights”; or, “SUPREME COURT OF LAW” where the ‘abuses’ and the ‘prejudice’ of the “Executive” and “Parliament”, may be ‘questioned’ or challenged in, LAW.

 

Great Britain today is entirely ‘LAWLESS’ – It is naught but a rotten Totalitarian Regime.

 

Do not talk to me about the ‘QUEEN” – ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not carried out her ‘duty’ once; all the time she has occupied the throne.

She has not once honoured her “Coronation Oath” sworn to “Govern the People”; and, she has never once honoured the, “Original Contract”; requiring, the protection of the People. Furthermore, She has frequently and consistently “Granted the Royal Assent” to the ‘corrupt’ legislation, passed by parliament.

 

When BRITAIN agreed to and signed that “EU TREATY”; everyone living in Britain; immediately automatically became ‘CITIZENS’ of EUROPE, as well.

(In spite of them being classified in British law as being mere “Subjects of the Crown”). Accordingly, they were also entitled to the protection of EUROPE as well.

That, “CITIZENSHIP” of EUROPE; remains ‘legally’ in force; until the very instant; BRITAIN actually leaves the EU.

 

The mere proposition that BRITAIN should ‘leave’ the EU; as proposed in the, “2016 EU REFERENDUM”; without BRITAIN putting in place ‘alternative’ protection of LAW for the protection of HUMAN RIGHTS; flouts and breaches “HUMAN RIGHTS” and, it breaches and violates, the “European Human Rights Convention”; as well.

 

CONCLUSION

 

IN 'LAW'; BRITAIN CANNOT LEAVE THE EU UNTIL,

IN LAW, THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN

RIGHTS, IS IN PLACE.

 

 

 

 

 

BORIS JOHNSON IS A LIAR - HE CAN NEVER BE A 'PRIME MINISTER'

BORIS JOHNSON MUST NEVER BE THE PRIME MINISTER.

HE IS A CHRONIC HABITUAL PROVEN

ESTABLISHED LIAR; THAT PURPOSELY, WITH HIS LIES, SPECIFICALLY SET OUT TO MANIPULATE THE VOTE IN A DEMOCRATIC ELECTION. THE E.U. REFERENDUM OF 2016.

 

With virtually all Press and Media now reporting that he is the ‘front runner’ and the favourite in the Tory voting contest, to be the next Prime Minister; very drastic measures are now required in order to prevent that from ever happening.

 

LEGAL ACTION MUST NOW TAKE PLACE IN THE BRITISH COURTS.

 

BORIS JOHNSON MUST NOW STAND TRIAL BEFORE A COURT OF LAW AND DEFEND THE CHARGE,

 

“That whilst in Public office, he perverted the Course of Justice”

 

In the ‘EU REFERENDUM of 2016’; he masterminded the ‘LEAVE’ campaign; and, throughout that campaign; he repeatedly and wickedly, told ‘lie-after-lie’ consistently; in order to influence the “Peoples Vote”; in favour, of that campaign.

 

1.              The World witnessed on ‘live’ TV the pictures of BORIS JOHNSON standing in front of a red double-decker bus emblazoned with the slogan,

 

  “£350,000 per week paid to the EU, would be available, for the NHS”, (The National Health Service).

 

BORIS JOHNSON, specifically proclaiming that, “This was True”, if the People voted to ‘LEAVE’ the E.U.

 

That ‘bus’ was toured throughout the country; BORIS JOHNSON appearing with it; repeatedly proclaiming that lie.

 

HE MUST NOW BE HELD TO ACCOUNT.

 

BORIS JOHNSON also lied in that campaign when he assured the voters that,

 

A.          “TRADE WITH EUROPE, would continue uninterrupted, just as it is now, if Britain left the E.U.”

B.           “TRADE WITH THE REST OF THE WORLD, would be enhanced”.

C.            Without providing any ‘evidence’ in support, at all.

 

BORIS JOHNSON IS A WICKED LYING BABBLING BUFFOON; and, in that, he is wholly untrustworthy, and, dangerous.

HE MUST NEVER EVER BE THE, “PRIME MINISTER”. Of, our country.

BREXIT & LAW

BREXIT ABANDONS LAW

Entirely due to BREXIT, Great Britain has completely abandoned the, “RULE OF LAW”

 

I accuse all those as listed below of being wholly responsible for this wicked travesty that now prevails.

 

1.            All Ministers of Government.

2.            Every Member of Parliament.

3.            Every NEWS presenter and every NEWS program.

4.            Every, ‘so-called’ investigative journalist in the country; and,

5.            Every Member of the Profession of Law”

 

Everyone of those listed above in respect to BREXIT, never paid any attention to, LAW

Each one of those listed above pursued their own ‘vested interest’ and objectives in respect to BREXIT; wholly ignoring “LAW” and the “RULE OF LAW”; and, they did not even consider the possibility of what may be “LAWFUL” or “UNLAWFUL”.

 

PARLIAMENT

In all the BREXIT debates that took place in Parliament, not one Member of Parliament, even mentioned the word, “LAW”; or. The words, “The Rule of Law” and “The Protection of Law”; in the ‘speeches’ that took place.  (Checking the verbatim reports of ‘HANSARD’ verifies this.)

 

PROFESSION OF LAW

This cowardly “British Profession of Law” in respect to BREXIT, has never published one word advising all to consider what may be LAWFUL or UNLAWFUL. They all cowardly have kept wholly ‘silent’ not wishing to be involved. Behaving in precisely the same way as the cowardly, German Profession of Law” did; when, ADOLF HITLER’S “Enabling Act” was passed by the German “Reichstag” (Parliament) 441 votes to 94; in 1933. Which allowed HITLER and the NAZI party, to create their own LAW.

This corrupt and silent cowardly “British Profession of Law” must have known and be fully aware, that all “Acts” “Motions” and “Bills” are being created and passed in the British Parliament today; in precisely the same way as HITLER created his own ‘LAWS’ in 1933.

LAW being passed by the “Political Party” and not by, “Democratic Consent”.

Yet not one solicitor or Barrister has had the courage to speak out, about all this. In respect to BREXIT, not one of that profession has warned, or even questioned, what may be LAWFUL or UNLAWFUL.

 

Likewise, and, wickedly; neither has any HIGH COURT JUDGE.

         ---------------------------

Well, I have NEWS for all these negligent stupid wicked fools,

 

,

“LAW” HAS ALREADY RESOLVED ALL THE CHAOS CONFUSION AND CORRUPTION IN RESPECT TO BREXIT.

 

“LAW” HAS ALREADY DETERMINED THAT

BREXIT; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

1.  The “2016 Referendum Ballot Paper” itself was UNLAWFUL; The mere proposition to ‘LEAVE’ the EU; Breached, Flouted, and Violated; “HUMAN RIGHTS” LAW. It threatened to take away the only ‘protection of law’ that the British have. The entire ‘elite establishment’ of MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT provides no protection of law at all; there is no Written Constitution, Bill of Rights, or “Supreme Court of Law” where one can question or challenge the abuses of the Executive or parliament, from within LAW.

LEAVING THE EU, also leaves the protection of law provided by the “European Court of Justice” and the “Convention of Human Rights”; which BRITAIN in the “Treaty” agreed to and signed.

The “Convention of Human Rights” guarantees the right of ‘access to law’ – LEAVING the EU – violates that, HUMAN RIGHT LAW.

 

2.  LAW has also already determined that a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament has no LEGALITY at all. The, ‘Political Party Whips’ in parliament and their political party activities; instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; has no LEGALITY whatsoever. The ‘WHIPS’ are not entrenched in LAW; and, there is not one legal instrument or document in the entre British national ‘archive’; that can verify the LEGALITY of the WHIPS.

3. Furthermore, when the WHIPS instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituent. (Who elected those Members in the first place). This therefore cause the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

4. Which is wholly proscribed by the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

5. This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill (everything written in the Bill) but only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

6. The Said Rights Claimed

7.                “And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example.

 

CONCLUSION.

 

“Article 50” in the “European (Withdrawal) Bill” passed by Parliament in a “Whipped Vote” has no LEGALITY at all.

Tested and challenged in the SUPREME COURT the Judiciary would find it impossible to uphold the legality; by superior ‘precedent of law’ the Judges would have to declare both “Article 50” and BREXIT, had no LEGALITY at all.

 

“The Said Rights Claimed” is the superior authority of the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”. It states within its text, that it is the AUTHORITY over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.