PUTTING RAIN BACK IN THE SKY

"Putting rain back in the Sky"

One of the greatest failings of Humankind in Great Britain today, is the way that, 'Yesterday', is always judged by the 'standards' of, 'Today'.

And, this has always resulted in great injustice.

Here are two stark vivid examples of this travesty:

The first:

The Nuremberg Tribunal Trials.

Virtually every NAZI war criminal tried at the Nuremberg Tribunal for horrific crimes, pleaded as their defence, that they were only obeying the orders of a superior.

But, the Tribunal judges, corruptly, would not accept this defence. They, ruled that every defendant, must be 'individually responsible', for one’s own actions.

These judges, "Put rain back in the Sky".

Because, they completely ignored all that had happened in NAZI Germany, from the very moment that, ADOLF HITLER, became 'Chancellor of Germany' in 1933; thru, to the end of World War II, in 1945.

 

HITLER, created the law in Germany known as, the, "FuhrerPrinzip"; (The Leadership Principle); this law, first, applicable to the Military, but, later, during World War II, became applicable to everyone in Germany; required that every German citizen, must obey the order of a superior officer or, a superior official administrator, under the pain of imprisonment, and, even death; if one refused.

The, "FuhrerPrinzip", was an established fact in, German law. And, it, was, LAW. Yet, the judges in the Nuremberg Tribunal, would not 'recognise; this.

 

They,

 "Put rain back in the Sky".

Every war criminal pleading the defence of "FuhrerPrinzip" spoke the absolute truth. But, the 'Judges' corruptly ignored that, “LAW” for expediency. The, 'Law of the Victor'  of World War II; thereby, demanding, that the 'Vanquished' had no right of claim to the protection of, LAW.

Every defendant at Nuremberg was found 'Guilty' of the crimes for which they were tried. They were either imprisoned for very many years, or, they were executed; hung, by the neck, until dead.

It was the greatest travesty of the corruption of, 'LAW' and 'JUSTICE’, of this Century.

The ‘Holocaust’ and the horrific crimes of Nazi Germany deserved the severest punishment; but, every defendant at the, Nuremberg Tribunals, deserved a fair trial. They did not get that ‘fair trial’, because, the ‘corrupt’ Judges, “Put rain back in the Sky”.

The second example:

The 'Child Sex Abuse' hysteria prevailing in Great Britain today.
In this wild hysterical furore, escalating, in more and more allegations of, 'child sexual abuse', being revealed every day, there is the demand being made by Government, many politicians, and, the 'Child Protection Agencies', for an 'Inquiry' to be set up, in order to investigate, "The Culture of the BBC". Allegations, are being made, every day, asserting that, BBC stars, deejays, and celebrity personalities, abused young children on the premises of the BBC. It is not the 'Culture of the BBC' that, requires, to be investigated. What, needs to be understood, is the 'culture' prevailing throughout the entire country, at that time:

 

To, judge, "The Culture of the 1960's thru, to the early, 1970's" by the standards of today, is both corrupt and ridiculous. In order to understand the, accusations that are being made today, to, judge, these, allegations, completely ignoring the 'national culture' that was in existence in the country when these 'asserted' child abuses took place; is to completely deny, all that happened in this period, as though, it had never taken place at all.

 

It, is, "Putting rain back in the Sky".

 

The 1960's brought about the most massive explosion of sexual freedom the country had ever seen, in my lifetime. All the censorship of sex and sexuality, all the repressions of censorship, sex, sexual experimentation, and, sexual exploration, of both Church and State; were all swept away. Providing the greatest era of SEXUAL FREEDOM, the country had ever seen.

 

Women had the 'pill' which enabled them to experiment and enjoy their sexuality without the fear of pregnancy; The 'mini-skirt' was born, allowing young girls and women to display their legs, high up, almost to their 'bare bum'; where, their knickers, were frequently 'on show', when they walked in the street or danced in the disco's. Grown up adult women were even whipping off their 'erotically’ charged 'damp panties' , throwing them at TOM JONES as he sang and performed. Commercial radio with the, 'pirates' , had smashed the previous radio monopoly of the BBC; and, the radio 'deejay' and the 'pop music artists and groups' , became big star attractions, virtually overnight.

Young girls, throughout the Kingdom, embraced this, FREEDOM; and, they joined in. Every pop concert attracted hordes of sexually charged 'horny' young girls 'screaming their heads off' as they watched these artists perform. Anyone who witnessed these young girls at a, “Beatles Concert", could not mistake the 'sexuality' there involved. Young girls became 'fame chasers' throwing themselves at the pop star, pop groups, deejays, and celebrities, exploring, their sexuality; and, even, in some cases, 'notching up conquests on their bedposts', in competition, for sexual favours received.

There was, SEX and SEXUAL FREEDOM, everywhere. A, great, SEXUAL EXPLOSION, for all ages and classes; and, the young girls, were affected as well.

 

EXAMPLE: Personal experience:

 

From late 1965 thru to May of 1976 I served as the promotions manager of two commercial radio stations: Pirate, Radio London, and, Capital Radio. During this time I was responsible for all publicity activities of these companies, outside of the actual broadcasting studios. I mounted concerts, pop shows and disco's all over the catchment area, of Greater London. Daily, I was in the thick of, showbiz, and, the pop groups, pop stars, and the pop music industry. Throughout the whole of this period, although, I witnessed, thousands of young girls and the celebrities; I never once saw any young girl being sexually abused. I, frequently, saw them being 'fondled', often, seeing their 'boobs' being touched; but, always with their complicity, or, at their consent. I also frequently witnessed many of these young girls, competing with each other, to gain points, for the 'sexual conquests' they had achieved.

 

On one occasion, which I recall vividly, I had to accompany a famous American pop group to a BBC studio. They had a 'hit record' out at that time; and, promoting, that record, they were scheduled to perform at the BBC. On arrival at the BBC, the schedule indicated that they were not required immediately, so I left these boys in the dressing room and went out to see the studio set up. Nearing the time when they were required, I returned to the dressing room to alert them to get ready. The dressing room was full of young girls, there was smooching and groping, being performed, by all. And, the drummer was missing. Frantically, I searched the building for this drummer; and, I eventually found him in a 'toilet cubicle' with three girls. I screamed at him to get back to the dressing room, and as he sheepishly left; the three girls emerged, 'laughing their heads off', from the toilet cubicle. Wholly, ignoring me, standing there, they then each in turn, claimed that they had won the competition, describing in detail, what they had sexually done to the boy, and, what, sexually, he had done to them. The details described, ranged from the showing and touching of 'boobs', all the way thru a sexual agenda, culminating, in anal sex.

These girls were not whores or slags, or, of the sex industry. They were ordinary young girls, thoroughly enjoying their sexuality, and, experimenting, with, sex. I made no attempt to report them or to lecture them. I merely 'laughed with them', recognizing fully, that it was the 'culture', of that time.

In judging today, anything that happened 'sexually' then; is to ignore the 'culture' of that time. It is,

 

 "Putting rain back in the Sky".

 Gordonj

 

CORRUPTION?

FIFA, SEBB BLATTER, and CORRUPTION...

FIFA Ethics Committee bans both SEBB BLATTER and MICHEL PLATINI for eight years; but fails to produce one word of actual 'evidence' against them.

The Committee merely responds to the "Hate Blatter" campaign engineered specifically by the British who failed in their "World Cup" bid; and want revenge; and the Americans, who consistently allege, CORRUPTION. But, produce no evidence at all.

 

CORRUPTION

When I hear and witness an American State Prosecutor alleging CORRUPTION; I practically vomit in contempt.

 

It was the rotten CORRUPTION of the entire American Government and Judicial Administration: Government, Judiciary, the trial judge, the Supreme Court Judges, the FBI, and the Security Services; that conspired and falsely and corruptly charged ETHEL and JULIUS ROSENBERG of giving the 'atom bomb secrets' to Russia; and, putting them to death in the electric chair.

That's real, CORRUPTION;

Knowingly and calculatingly, murdering two innocent people, who had nothing to do with the charges levelled against them, at all. The entire evidence against them was false, and it was wholly fabricated by the American Government and the Security Service. Even the President of the United States was a willing participant to this, CORRUPTION.

AMERICA put ETHEL and JULIUS ROSENBERG to death; to satisfy the corrupt and wicked anti-communist 'witch hunts' that hysterically prevailed in the country at that time.

ETHEL and JULIUS were communists, and they did spy for Russia. But, they were both specifically instructed by MOSCOW to discontinue all spying activity; long before the 'incidents' took place for which they were charged. They had no participation in those 'alleged incidents' at all. The evidence, presented during their trial alleging that ETHEL ROSENBERG had typed up the 'secrets of the atom bomb' on a table in a room in her house; was all false. And, the Security Services and the Government - knew that it was false - because, they had entirely fabricated that 'evidence' in every detail.

 

David Greenglass, ETHEL ROSENBERG's, own brother, who worked in the 'Los Alamos' Nuclear Research Establishment where the atom bomb was being produced; had been caught spying; and, the Security Services put pressure on him, in order for him, to implicate the ROSENBERGS. It was his false testimony that actually convicted them both and sentenced them to die in the electric chair. That ‘incident’, “typing up the atom bomb secrets”, actually never took place at all; it was the entire ‘fiction’ of David Greenglass, and, the Security Service.

 

CORRUPTION of the highest degree;

MURDERING TWO INNOCENT PEOPLE; PUTTING THEM TO DEATH IN THE MOST HORRIFIC WAY; VIRTUALLY FRYING THEM, IN THE ELECTRIC CHAIR.

Thus, and thereby, let no American prosecutor ever point the finger at anyone, alleging, CORRUPTION, again.

 

"THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"

Glorious Revolution and, “The Said Rights Claimed”

My letter to KEITH PORTEOUS WOOD of the Secularist Society.

 

Congrats re the banning of prayers at Council Meetings.

I agree, that both prayers in Parliament, and also in the ‘imposition’ in schools, should also be banned in LAW.

 

For your immediate attention and interest and in respect to The Speaker, JOHN BERCOW’s pronouncement that prayers will still be said in Parliament, because Parliament is protected by the “Bill of Rights 1689”,

 

From all experience in this country, my country, sad to say, that it would appear that I am practically the only one in the country that has read and researched the period of “The Glorious Revolution” correctly. Because the ‘evidence’ is abundantly clear that hardly anyone has interpreted the “Bill of Rights 1689” correctly at all.

 

The entire British Educational curriculum and establishment has abysmally failed to teach this correctly. The majority of the People of the country know nothing of Parliaments “Supremacy” and the way that they are being governed today.

 

Parliament and the Courts (Judiciary) have been misinterpreting the “Bill of Rights 1689” for more than 300 years. And, they both continue to misinterpret it, even today.

 

You can ask at random thousands of people in the streets and ask them to list the three principal instruments by which they are governed; and, more than 90 per cent would not know. Ask them to tell you about “Article 9”; and they would be, bewildered.

 

Then ask them to tell you about “The Said Rights Claimed” and they would stand open mouthed before you not having a clue. Even Parliament and the Judiciary know nothing of this “Statute” in the Bill.

 

Parliament claims its lawful validity for its “Supremacy” relying upon “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”. This reads:

 

“The Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament”

 

And. both Parliament and the Judiciary has interpreted that wording as though it was a ‘stand-alone’ piece of legislation requiring no other considerations at all. That is why the Judiciary has always denied the testing, questioning or the challenging of Parliament, in their Courts.

 

But the correct interpretation of “Article 9” and, the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”; proves that “Article 9” is not a ‘stand-alone’ Statute at all’.

Parliaments ‘enactment of “Article 9”, (And all the other, ‘Premises’, of that Bill), are wholly dependent upon the conditions set out in another paragraph of that same Bill: i.e. the paragraph: “The Said Rights Claimed”

 

And, this reads as follows:

 

“The said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

This makes it abundantly clear that as a ‘precedent’ in English Law, that, Parliaments “Supremacy”, legally afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”, is only applicable, in LAW; providing Parliament does not ‘prejudice’ the People. Whenever Parliament does ‘prejudice’ the People; the “Supremacy” of Parliament, has no lawful validity at all.

 

So, when The Speaker, JOHN BERCOW MP or any other Member of Parliament asserts that “Prayers will still be conducted in Parliament” because Parliament is protected by the “Bill of Rights 1689”; anyone can challenge that assertion, in LAW, relying on “The Said Rights Claimed”.

If it can be shown and proved in a Court of LAW that ‘prayers said in Parliament’ does ‘prejudice the People’; the Courts will have no alternative but to rule that ‘prayers said in Parliament', must cease.

Hardly any of the British People are aware; that, even if we do not have a “written constitution” or a proper “Bill of Rights”; and, even if we have no access to LAW to challenge Parliament in a “Supreme Court” of LAW; the British are protected against the ‘prejudice’ and the ‘abuses’ of Parliament; by, “The Said Rights Claimed”

This, has never ever been taught in our schools.

People will never be able to participate in a DEMOCRACY correctly, unless they ‘participate’ twenty four hours of each day; and, unless they are aware of the precise manner by which they are governed. The British have not the slightest conception as to how they are governed. That is why today we are governed by a wholly illegal coalition government; that was not elected by the People, at all. The People’s vote in the General Election of 2010 verified that there should be a ‘Conservative led Minority Government’; but the leaders of the Political party’s elected to Parliament in that election did not like that result. So, they illegally ‘ignored’ the People’s vote; and, they then conspired with each other to foist upon this nation, this coalition government. In ‘ignoring’ the People’s vote in this way, they corruptly, ‘prejudiced’ the People. Which, was wholly prohibited in ‘LAW’ by “The Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/“The Said Rights Claimed”.

The British Parliament though elected by The People; is not a Peoples Parliament.

Parliament is dominated entirely by the Political Party’s; and, the political ‘diktat’ of those parties.

The only way this will ever change, in order to create a truly, ”Peoples Parliament”; is when the entire population of the country recognizes and respects “The Said Rights Claimed”. When that is done, the Offices, Procedures and Practises of the WHIPS in Parliament, (that does ‘prejudice’ the People), will be challenged in LAW; and, will then be abolished. Whereby, every vote taken in Parliament thereafter, would become a ‘free vote’.

Sincerely, Gordonj

PS. Read my book “DEMOCRACY”:  http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

SACK HILLARY BENN

JEREMY CORBYN has no alternative now; he must sack his Cabinet Shadow Foreign Secretary HILLARY BENN; and, this is the reason why:

I can never recall, even one instance, where a Member of the front bench of the Labour Party, an actual Shadow, Foreign Secretary; has actually ‘campaigned’ to persuade all Members of his own political parliamentary party, to vote for a TORY party political policy motion, that, in just a matter of only a few minutes away, would be called for the vote. Especially, when that motion, and, that TORY policy, is of such a serious nature, in respect to the waging of war.

HILLARY BENN, last night, had the same, 'FREE VOTE', option in that debate and vote, as every other Member of the, Labour Parliamentary Party. JEREMY CORBYN had provided each of them with the 'individual' option of the 'FREE VOTE'; in the name and the cause of, Democracy.

This provided every Member of that, Labour Parliamentary Party, with the 'individual' option to vote in that debate according to his or her 'own conscience' and as 'influenced' by the 'constituents' they represented. 

They each had the right to vote as an 'individual' when the vote was taken.

But, none of them had the right to actively campaign, FROM THE FRONT BENCH, OF THE LABOUR PARTY, to 'persuade' all Members of their own political party to, 'vote for', that TORY motion.

He had the absolute right to vote his own opinion.
He had no right whatsoever to 'persuade others' on how they should vote.

This was the clear arrogant intent of HILLARY BENN to sabotage and flout, JEREMY CORBYN, and, his leadership of the Labour Party.

This 'arrogance' of HILLARY BENN should not be tolerated. HE HAS TO GO.

I could not believe what I was seeing and hearing, when this travesty took place.

Gordonj 

CORBYN, Democracy; CAMERON, The, Totalitarian Regime....

JERMY CORBYN entirely fulfilling his leadership election promise to try and create a new way of doing politics and establishing a more true democracy; provides a 'FREE VOTE' for all Labour Members of Parliament in respect of the vote taking place today regarding the 'bombing' of the 'Islamic State' in Syria.

Yet, DAVID CAMERON, the totalitarian dictator, denies all Conservative Members of parliament a 'FREE VOTE'. He is determined to create his own law in exactly the same way as ADOLF HITLER did, in Nazi Germany. HITLER presented his 'Enabling Act' to the German 'Reichstag', (Parliament), which specifically allowed HITLER to create his own laws. And, this Act was passed by that democratic parliament, by 441 votes for ‘Yes’ and only 94 votes for ‘No’. Therefore and thereby, HITLER, legally, had every right, to create his own laws.

But, CAMERON's "enabling act'; the, "WHIPS, in Parliament"; has no legality at all.
The WHIPS in parliament flout and breach the 'precedent of law' that is established and set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".

Therefore, if the TORY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT today, under the influence of the WHIPS, give DAVID CAMERON, a majority vote, resulting in the 'bombing' of Syria;

That vote will be wholly illegal and unlawful and it will be wholly eligible for challenge in law.

In order for the 'bombing' of Syria vote in parliament to be perfectly lawful; all Members of Parliament must be afforded the right of the, FREE VOTE. A 'Whipped' vote in parliament has no legality at all.

The WHIPS in instructing Members of Parliament on how they must vote; overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' placed upon those Members, by the Constituents. This thereby creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"

Yet the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament 'enacts' or applies any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

Here is the 'evidence' of that paragraph, in that Bill,
 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.


Gordonj 

BOMBING SYRIA.....

The definitive reason why,
 

We should not bomb Syria;

There has never been a bomb created that will allow the killing of an enemy; but not kill or injure the ordinary common innocent people present, when the bomb explodes.

BOMBING any country or anyone is entirely indiscriminate; you cannot control who will be killed and, who will not.

All those 'freaks' in the UK today who willingly will sanction the British Government to bomb the terrorist "Islamic State" in Syria, do not care a jot about the innocents who are going to be killed; wholly. corruptly, they see them as being merely disposable collateral, in their obscene greater cause.

They are contemptible!

The mentally deranged “Press the Nuclear Button” attitude that prevails with these lunatics in our country today has nothing to do with the defence of our country; just one nuclear weapon will justify that claim; Great Britain persistently arms and re-arms in order to act as the “World’s Policeman”, and to dominate and control the World; determining, continually, by threat of, WAR and REGIME CHANGE; how all other countries must live and who they are to be governed by.

Great Britain, desperately trying, to recreate the glorious days of “EMPIRE”, yet again.

 

DAVID CAMERON'S, 'DEFENCE SPENDING REVIEW'.....

WHEN EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY MUST NOW ENDURE ALL THE GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL CUTS; WITH IMPENDING CUTS OF TAX CREDITS AS WELL; AND, WITH OUR NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, THROUGH LACK OF FUNDS, NOW ON THE BRINK OF NEAR COLLAPSE.

The wasteful resources of the country's finance in this proposed national defence spending review, is an absolute travesty and a disgrace. Consider,


178 Billion Pounds. Plus 31 Billion Pounds, for the building of four more nuclear submarines.
600 new armoured Scout vehicles;
13 new frigates including 8 submarine frigates;
138 new F35 Strike Fighter aircraft;
9 new Boeing P8 maritime patrol aircraft for surveillance and anti-submarine and anti-surface war  purposes;
2 Billion Pounds for renewal of SAS equipment;
RAF Typhoon Jets, life, to be extended by 10 years.

And, very much more.

Can anyone truly believe that all this national expenditure is solely intended for the defence of the country?

GARBAGE! WE ALREADY HAVE ALL THE MILITARY RESOURCES NECESSARY TO DEFEND THE COUNTRY AS IT IS. The true intention of all this terrible waste; is the intent for the waging of WAR. And, the, intimidation, of every other nation on planet earth.

ALL THIS WICKED EXPENDITURE is solely required in order that Great Britain can have a seat at the "Nuclear Table" in the UN SECURITY COUNCIL; where it continually acts, as the "World’s Policeman"; dominating the World.

WAR WAR WAR, REGIME CHANGE, REGIME CHANGE, over and over again, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, and now, SYRIA, as well. Great Britain determining, how all the people of other nations must live and who they are to be governed by.

THAT's why CAMERON and his rotten government need to spend all this wicked expenditure. It is not for the defence of our country; it is in order that Britain can live the 'glorious days' of EMPIRE, all over again; BRITAIN’s influence, dominating the World.

OVERTLY AND COVERTLY British interference in the rightful affairs of other nations knows no bounds today. It is surely the time that the rest of the World put Great Britain in its true place on this beautiful Globe. Compared to the massive populations and, the presence of other nations on this planet earth, Great Britain is naught but an insignificant small island. That, has now got, far too big, for its boots!

THE BOMBING OF SYRIA

DAVID CAMERON and the, “Bombing of Syria”....

 FRANCE is bombing the I.S. in Syria.

RUSSIA is also bombing the I.S. in Syria as well.

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO NEED WHATSOEVER FOR THE UK TO BOMB THE I.S. IN SYRIA AS WELL.

CAMERON and the British Government; and, all those hysterical idiots that profess that they would "Press the Nuclear Button" with impunity; only want to bomb I.S. in Syria in order to wield and force, "British Influence", in the World.

THE NUCLEAR WEAPON
The claim is always made that the 'nuclear weapon' is always absolutely necessary for two reasons: (a), in order to defend the country from nuclear attack; (b), to deter other nations, from ever attacking Great Britain, with a nuclear weapon. The greatest 'deceit' ever imposed upon the British people; by a Government. Just look at the, FACTS:

In consequence of this, 'defence requirement'; Great Britain already has all the nuclear weaponry it needs, in order to fulfil this requirement. So, why is it necessary now to order the building of four more new nuclear submarines?

IT IS ONLY FOR THE SAME REASON WHY NOW 'DAVID CAMERON' WANTS TO BOMB SYRIA; GREAT BRITAIN HAS TO HAVE THE BUILDING OF FOUR MORE NUCLEAR SUBMARINES; in order for BRITAIN to have a seat at the 'Nuclear Table' at the U.N. Security Council; so that it can continuously, 'Act as the World's Policeman', and, dominate and control all other nations of this World. Great Britain can never forget the 'glorious days' of the, "BRITISH EMPIRE", and it continuously wants, that 'dominance and control' again.

GREAT BRITAIN WALLOWS IN AND, GLORIFIES IN WAR: AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, and now SYRIA as well. REGIME CHANGE after REGIME CHANGE, over and over again, never ending until Britain gets its own way. Great Britain dictating, how all other nations and their 'People' must live; and, who they must be governed by.

RUSSIA is not the tyranny threatening the 'Peace of this World' today. The greatest tyranny and threat in the World today, is Great Britain and the United States of America, constantly, covertly and overtly, interfering in the affairs of other nations; and, in their arrogance asserting, that they have the right to continually act as, THE WORLDS POLICEMAN. And, dominate the World.

The United States Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, once said: “The United States will not tolerate Communism in our Hemisphere”. The sheer arrogance of this is just typical of America today, IT THINKS IT OWN’S HALF OF THE WORLD.

INJUSTICE in British Courts of Law...

Concerned as I am over the present 'injustice' in our courts; here is one instance of such a travesty, that I am considering launching, as an online petition now. If I do launch it, I'd like to know if TWITTER and FACEBOOK users would promote it and give it their support. Here is the proposed petition,

 

Petition to free GAYLE NEWLAND wrongfully convicted of three instances of sexual abuse.

All bounds of reason and intelligence fly right out of the window in the conviction and sentencing of GAYLE NEWLAND. She was sentenced to serve eight years of imprisonment, for something that she did not do. She was accused and charged of carrying out 'three sexual assaults' upon a young student victim, and, calculatingly posing as a man, in order to have sex with this young victim.

The 'alleged' victim stated in evidence in the trial, that she had sex ten times with GAYLE NEWLAND; who was using a 'strap on dildo'; but on each occasion that this took place, she genuinely thought she was having sex with a man. She further asserts in evidence, that on finding out the truth, that this had so traumatised and upset her at the deception; that, this, had seriously affected her well being.

In cross examination she also admitted that she had experienced 'multiple relations' with other men.

Sheer reason and intelligence proving, right here, that this 'victim' lied.

There is no woman living anywhere on this planet earth that cannot immediately identify and tell the difference, between a 'live warm bloodied human penis', and a dildo, penetrating her vagina during the sex act. The very texture and feel, between the two, is immediately identifiable.

Therefore, this so-called 'victim' knew, that on all 'ten occasions' that the sex had taken place, that she was having sex in a 'role play' lesbian act, consensual, or not, with, GAYLE NEWLAND, and a strap on dildo. In fact, GAYLE NEWLAND actually asserted in evidence in the trial, that it was the 'victim' that had suggested the purchase of the strap on.

Both the police and the prosecution knew all about this as well; yet, vindictively they pursued the persecution of, GAYLE NEWLAND, just because she was a lesbian.

In respect to the trial and the conviction; the most important issue is the element of 'doubt' that there is in this case; and, the Jury's obligation, determined in law, that a jury can only deliver the verdict of "GUILTY" providing that according to the evidence presented in the court, that they are satisfied that, 'guilt' is fully established, "Beyond all reasonable doubt".

I contend that in this case there is the irrefutable 'doubt' established in respect to fact, that the victim, in her own evidence, could not tell the difference, between a 'warm bloodied male penis', and a dildo.

No matter how skilled the 'dildo' manufacturers are, they still have not resolved how to get the 'warmth' of a human penis into the dildo. And, this is the 'crux' of this case.

Next we come to the Judge. The judge has heard all of the evidence in the case, he has heard how the 'alleged' victim could not determine the difference in her vagina of a warm bloodied male penis, and, a dildo; so he has heard all of the 'doubt' that there is in this case; but, he viciously and vindictively, still sentences GAYLE NEWLAND to eight years imprisonment; because he prefers the 'lie' of the 'alleged' victim; to, the 'truth' of a, LESBIAN. This judge is wholly corrupt.

I respectfully urge everyone who values true 'LAW and JUSTICE' in our country, to sign this petition; because, there truly is, a terrible INJUSTICE, in this case.

Gordon J Sheppard

BECKY WATTS MURDER TRIAL And, the Injustice....

Travesty of injustice in the Becky Watts murder trial..

 

Nathan Matthews convicted, gets 33 years today.

Shauna Hoare (his girl friend) convicted of manslaughter, gets 17 years.

 

Yet, there was not a shred of evidence proving or verifying that Shauna Hoare was in any way involved. She was convicted on the mere assumption that 'jocular' text messages sent between them; proved 'beyond all reasonable doubt' that they intended to 'kidnap' young pretty girls, with the intent to sexually abuse them, and do them harm.

These text messages were as follows:

 

"F***, you bring me bak two pretty schoolgirls den";

 

And, MATTHEWS, reply,

 

"Lol yeh I'll just kidnap them from school"

 

And, another text message, (also sent in the same 'jocular' manner), sent from HOARE to MATTHEWS, her boy friend:

"Saw two very pretty young girls (at so and so?) almost knocked them on the head to bring them home lol"

 

LOL in Internet jargon represents, "LAUGHS OUT LOUD" - The very verification that the message is merely intended as a 'joke', with intent to amuse.

 

THE, VERY VERIFICATION, THAT THESE TEXT MESSAGES, WERE MERELY INTENDED AS A JOKE; with, no 'intention' whatsoever, to kidnap at all.

 

1. There is no evidence at all proving that SHAUNA HOARE kidnapped any young girl.

2. There is no evidence at all proving that SHAUNA HOARE was present when BECKY WATTS was killed.

3. There is no evidence at all proving SHAUNA HOARE was present when BECKY WATTS body was cut up.

4. SHAUNA HOARE was convicted solely upon the evidence of these three text messages; and, the fact, that she or NATHAN MATTHEWS had admitted during interrogation, that they had participated in a 'consensual' sexual 'threesome' with a willing female friend.

  

SHAUNA HOARE, has been wickedly convicted and she will now have to serve her 17 year imprisonment; entirely unjustly. Because, her conviction rested entirely on the mere speculation and assumption by the police, the, prosecution, (and, all of rotten Press and Media) that corruptly determined, that, SEXUAL PERVERSION, had taken place. And, that is the only reason why SHAUNA HOARE has been convicted today.

THIS IS THE SHEER TRAVESTY OF INJUSTICE.

 Note:

In spite of the British established attitude, constantly, in ‘fear of sex’, and, the constant censorship by both Church and State persistently indoctrinating that ‘sex’ is only for those who are married and that it is only intended for procreation; the key criterion in this case is as follows:

A.    Adults viewing pornography does not verify intent to kidnap, hurt, harm, or kill.

B.    The consensual free participation of a sexual ‘threesome’ with willing adults, does not verify the intent to kidnap, hurt, harm, or kill.

C.     The 'fancying' or attraction, sexually or otherwise, of pretty young girls, is no verification of the intent to kidnap, hurt, harm, or kill.

But, all three of this ‘criterion’, was the police and the prosecution’s ‘evidence’ criteria; in the conviction of SHAUNA HOARE, in this trial.

 

I, LOATHE AND, CANNOT TOLERATE, INJUSTICE.

 

 

BECKY WATTS MURDER TRIAL...

Shauna Hoare, and, the injustice of the ‘Becky Watts’ murder trial...

Becky Watts murder was an horrendous and wicked crime; but, prosecuting and persecuting an innocent person alleging that they were involved, when they were not involved, will not return Becky Watts to her family again; nor will it serve the cause of, JUSTICE. Consider this:

Wednesday 11^th November 2015

NATHAN MATTHEWS was convicted today of the murder of Becky Watts and of cutting up her body, in order to hide her body from being found by the police.

His, girlfriend, Shauna Hoare, was also convicted of manslaughter. The prosecution asserting that, both she and NATHAN MATTHEWS had kidnapped Becky Watts, in order to carry out their perverted sexual criminal attacks upon young girls.

Yet, NATHAN MATTHEWS had already told the police that Shauna Hoare had nothing to do with the killing of Becky Watts. In fact, he told the police, that she did not know anything about Becky's death at all.

Shauna Matthews also denied the she knew anything about Becky Watts death; she repeatedly proclaimed her innocence, and, she actually told the police that, when she, actually found out what her boyfriend had done, she felt sick.

Yet, the rotten police and the rotten corrupt prosecution, were so intent on securing her conviction, that they insisted, that they both had kidnapped Becky Watts, for perverted sexual intent; and, as evidence in support of that wicked absurd  'fantasy'; they produced a copy of a text message from Shauna Hoare sent to her boyfriend Nathan Matthews, which contained the sentence as follows:

"Saw a very pretty girl almost knocked her on the head to bring her home lol"

For anyone who is familiar with the jargon of the Internet and Messaging, here is the stark vivid evidence, proving that this was merely a "JOKE"; without any attempt whatsoever; to carry out the intent; as implied by the police and the prosecution, in the trial.

LOL = "Laughs out Loud."

Therefore this text message actually reads: "Saw a very pretty girl at (so and so) today almost knocked her on the head to bring her home 'laughs out loud".

IT WAS THE SHEER WICKED PROSECUTION, AND THE CORRUPT POLICE, AIDED BY THE FILTY CORRUPT AND ROTTEN PRESS AND MEDIA; that so vindictively influenced a jury to convict Shauna Matthews of this crime. They all repeatedly and consistently promoted the concept of "perverted sexual intent". Where, in truth and reality, there was no 'such intent' at all.

I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL REPORTED ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE PRESS AND MEDIA OF THIS COUNTRY, PROVING, THAT, SHAUNA HOARE, WAS ACTUALLY 'INVOLVED' IN THIS CRIME.

She has been unjustly and wickedly convicted. I hope and trust she will appeal.

Footnotes:

The Jury in British Criminal Trials are always instructed by the trial Judge that they can only convict if on hearing all the evidence presented in the trial that they are satisfied, 'beyond all reasonable doubt' that the accused is, Guilty.

In this trial, and in respect to SHAUNA HOARE, there was an abundance of 'doubt' that required the verdict of, NOT GUILTY.

Adults viewing porn provides no 'intent' to kill; in spite of those allegations reported, by the hysterical and corrupt Media and Press.
 

Here, is the typical verifiable evidence that the recommendations of the LEVESON INQUIRY for the statutory control of the Press, should be implemented in full. The, wild ‘perverted sexual abuse’ allegations hysterically reported by the Press prior to and during the trial, without any corroborative ‘evidence’ at all; has so specifically influenced a jury to convict, SHAUNA HOARE, of the crime of ‘manslaughter’.
Yet, it is highly evident, and, in support, there is considerable evidence of doubt proving, that she has been entirely innocent of that crime.

I NEVER COULD TOLERATE INJUSTICE.