THIRTY BILLION POUNDS

 30 BILLION POUNDS

 

Petition to determine how you want 30 Billion Pounds of taxpayer’s money to be spent. The following two options provide YOU with the right to choose. Do not allow Government and politicians to decide this issue. Insist, that only all the British People have the right to choose.

 

Option 1

Spend and waste 30 Billion Pounds building four new nuclear submarines and nuclear Trident missiles, (that, Great Britain does not really need), having already sufficient nuclear weaponry at its disposal), to 'deter' any nuclear attack by retaliation in, “Mutually Assured Destruction.”

 

Great Britain having nuclear weapons does not 'deter' any nuclear attack; they cannot prevent an enemy's nuclear missile aimed at the country, landing in the country at all. Great Britain's reliance on the nuclear weapon is solely to provide, 'aggression' in the waging of nuclear war; or, for 'retaliation' if ever attacked, with a nuclear weapon. Spiteful, retaliation, wickedly calculated, to murder millions of innocent people.

 

Or,

 

Option 2

Spend this 30 Billion Pounds of taxpayer’s money trying to improve the treatment and the possible cure of CANCER. Spending all this money on building and installing PROTON BEAM THERAPY machines all over the country, replacing the present "Radio Therapy"; that often causes the present bad side effects. RADIO THERAPY is X-Ray, and irrespective of how it is directed specifically at the cancer tumour, the X-Ray's remain in the body often attacking other tissue and the other vital organs of the body. Whereas, PROTON BEAM THERAPY, can be 'targeted' far more accurately; and, as experience has already shown, has far less of these disastrous side effects.

 

Your right to choose, which of these two options do YOU prefer?

 

Signing this petition indicates that YOU undoubtedly prefer, OPTION 1

 

Note: Great Britain today has no PROTON BEAM THERAPY; the first machine is being installed in the country only now. So, why do we not at present have this wonderful medical technology available in the treatment of CANCER?  Could it be that our governments and politicians have been far more interested in spending billions of pounds of taxpayer’s money on, 'military adventures' in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and now Syria, as well. Constantly, trying to bring about, REGIME CHANGE?

 

Sign this petition and stop this nonsense now.

 https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-george-osborne-mp-chancellor-of-the-exchequer-30-billion-pounds? recruiter=63876526&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive

GOOGLE AND TAXATION...

Google and taxation

GOOGLE, subjected to intimidation by both Government and the Press, and, by wildly 'manipulated' public opinion, has now agreed to pay £130 Million in respect of alleged taxation as demanded by the Treasury; GOOGLE, has also agreed, to pay more taxation in future.

 

I URGE EVERY CORPORATE COMPANY TRADING IN GREAT BRITAIN TO ONLY PAY TAXATION AS SPECIFICALLY DETERMINED BY 'LAW"; AND, NOT TO PAY ANY 'UNNECESSARY' TAXATION, AT ALL. TO AVOID PAYING ANY TAXATION, NOT ACTUALLY REQUIRED BY 'LAW'.

 

WHY?

 

Well, first look at the origin as to where GOOGLE has acquired all this money; it derives solely from the consumer; all the consumers that purchase or use GOOGLE products or services.

 

Now consider, would all or any of those consumers, have actually contributed their money, in purchasing those products and services from GOOGLE; had they known that their money would be used by the British Government, to build four new nuclear submarines and nuclear Trident missiles?

 

WOULD ALL THESE CONSUMERS WILLINGLY HAVE PAID GOOGLE THEIR MONEY IN ORDER THAT IT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO GREAT BRITAIN BEING ABLE TO ACT AS THE WORLD's POLICEMAN DOMINATING AND CONTROLLING THE WORLD IN THE WAY THAT IT FREQUENTLY DOES? WOULD THEY HAVE CONTRIBUTED THEIR MONEY IN ORDER THAT GREAT BRITAIN CAN PURSUE AND RELIVE THE SO CALLED GLORIOUS DAYS OF "EMPIRE" ALL OVER AGAIN?

 

I am confident they would not; and this is why I assert 'unnecessary taxation' should never be paid. You can never trust a British Government.

 

LOOK AT THE FACTS: Just look at Britain's history of domination in the world in respect to REGIME CHANGE: REGIME CHANGE IN AFGHANISTAN; REGIME CHANGE IN IRAQ; REGIME CHANGE IN LIBYA; And, now Britain wants and pursues REGIME CHANGE in Syria as well.

 

DIKTAT; DOMINATION; and, CONTROL. Britain’s "NUCLEAR WEAPONRY" continually threatening and intimidating the World.

 

GOOGLE has been very foolish in paying this £130 Million. It is my ardent hope that AMAZON and others are not so foolish; paying only the taxes that are specifically required by "LAW".

 

THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT PROPOSES TO SPEND "THIRTY BILLION POUNDS" OF THE MONEY RAISED BY TAXATION, IN ORDER TO BUILD FOUR NEW NUCLEAR SUBMARINES AND TRIDENT NUCLEAR MISSILES.

 

Not one penny of this money is being spent on improving the lives of 'The British People'

 Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon MP, is a bare faced liar when he asserts that Britain needs these four nuclear submarines and Trident missiles as a deterrent against nuclear attack; because, all this nuclear weaponry will not 'deter' one nuclear missile from hitting our country; if such a weapon is ever launched against us. 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE NEVER, 'DETERRENTS' THEY ARE SOLELY DESIGNED FOR: 'INTIMIDATION' AND 'SECURING POWER' IN THE WORLD'; 'AGGRESSION' IN THE WAGING OF WAR; OR, FOR, IN RETALIATION, EXACTING REVENGE.

EXACTING, REVENGE, IN THE, SLAUGHTERING OF MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, WHO DID NOT ATTACK OUR COUNTRY AT ALL.

In any case, Great Britain DOES NOT NEED all this new nuclear weaponry; Britain has already got all the nuclear weaponry it needs; in order to exact, that revenge.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

TONY BLAIR and the DAILY MAIL attack.....

TONY BLAIR and IRAQ

In response to the vicious attack upon Tony Blair by STEPHEN GLOVER of the ‘Daily Mail’ in respect to the ‘Iraq’ affair; I wrote to him as shown below. All, that repeatedly condemn TONY BLAIR in respect to the invasion of Iraq, ought to read this:

20 January, 2011

Stephen Glover

Daily Mail
2 Derry Street
London W8 5TT

 Re. Your feature: “At last, the damning evidence that should bury Blair for his lies over Iraq.”

Sir, with respect,

Read the Attorney General’s advice. Lawyers never instruct their clients on how they should act. They merely provide for their clients the contingencies that may arise and suggest ways of dealing with them. The Attorney General’s advice given to Government; is exactly the same.

Read it carefully, Sir;  Attorney General Lord Goldsmith merely sets out the contingencies that may arise:

In (A) circumstance; (B) might be the circumstance that might follow. But if you do (C) that circumstance might not arise. And, so on throughout the entire advice given. At no stage does he commit himself to determine whether war against Iraq is illegal. Furthermore, Lord Goldsmith does not provide all his advice in one session. There is a break between. In the second session Lord Goldsmith clearly indicates a change of mind. What actually influenced him to change his mind hasn’t actually been made clear; but one of things, that I believe might have done, was the report of UNMOVIC (Hans Blix) to the UN. Precisely at that time. Hans Blix in a worldwide televised report to the UN said this:

“The Iraqi has given some compliance with Resolution 1441 but they have still not provided any material or information in respect to the weapons of mass destruction that we know that they have.”

This was the clear breach of Resolution 1441. I believe that statement by Hans Blix might well have influenced the Attorney General. This statement is actually very interesting indeed: pay particular attention to the words: “that we know that they have.”. Here is the clear emphatic indication that, at that time, prior to the invasion of Iraq “WE” indicates not only UNMOVIC, but all Western Intelligence, at that time, fully believed Iraq did possess ‘weapons of mass destruction’:

 “They have still not provided any material or information in respect of the weapons of mass destruction that we know that they have. “

From the intelligence available at that time both Bush and Blair had every right to believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Sadaam Hussein, though provided with every opportunity by the UN, failed to take that opportunity to properly prove to the UN; that he did not have them. Sadaam Hussein was one of the world’s greatest propagandists; he beat the Nazi Joseph Goebels, in spades. Strategically and militarily it was in Sadaam’s interests to have the nations in the region of Iraq, and the rest of the World, to believe that he did have weapons of mass destruction. And, in that deceit he fooled everybody.

 

There is one other thing that also ought to be made clear about the “45 minute” claim.

Tony Blair in his speech given to parliament mentioned that Iraq could launch a weapon of mass destruction in 45 minutes. The words, “45 minutes” being mentioned only once by Tony Blair throughout his long speech. Furthermore, throughout the rest of the debate in parliament, that night, not one other Member of Parliament referred to those words; nor was it mentioned in any other speech. Parliament barely paid heed to it at all. Yet the very next day the filthy right wing press made a song and dance about it asserting that Tony Blair had informed Parliament that Iraq could attack Britain with weapons of mass destruction and those weapons could be launched against us in 45 minutes. The entire “45 minute claim” is the fiction and manipulation of Media. Tony Blair made no such claim.

Interestingly, at that time, DR. David Kelly, also supported that claim. That, Iraq could launch such a weapon in 45 minutes. Interviewed by a BBC lady reporter, she specifically asked him about this. She asserts that Dr. Kelly replied:

 “Of course Iraq could launch within 45 minutes. If the weapons had been pre-armed and if the trajectories had been pre-programed”

 

Mr. Glover, your hatred for Tony Blair; and the right wing’s hatred of Tony Blair; can be seen for what it is.

 

You, Sir; aspire to and represent TORY rotten concepts and ideas, unbridled Capitalism, the pursuit of individual self aspiration and greed. Whereas, Blair, represents myself and all socialists; believing in the subjugation of the selfish self for the common good. You and your kind are rabidly anti-State. Whereas, we, believe in the “State”; where “The State”, is all of “The People”. You hate me and my political aspirations; and I, forever, hate and detest yours.

It is that ‘hatred’ between us that motivates your writing every day.

I buy the ‘Mail’ every day in order to get my daily dose of hate.

It’s wholly biased contributors, never ever let me down

 

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard