BREXIT VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS LAW & DENIES ACCESS TO DEMOCRACY

BREXIT – VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

 

As the UK has not yet officially left the E.U. but at this stage is only in the process of ‘negotiation’ with the E.U. in order to leave;

THERESA MAY as the Prime Minister still has the legal duty to honour and comply with the TREATY that the Government signed.

That ‘Treaty’ requires the Government to ensure that instances of the ‘violations’ of HUMAN RIGHTS, are properly heard in the British Courts. This provision was inserted in the ‘TREATY’ in “European Human Rights Law” in order to prevent the ‘violations’ from having to be presented to the Court in Europe.

 

Thus, THERESA MAY, in instances of violations of HUMAN RIGHTS, must provide access to the British Courts.

BREXIT violates my Human Rights,

1.            It wickedly removes my right to my access to Law.

2.            Denies, all protection of LAW.

3.            Yet, my own country, Great Britain, provides no other protection of LAW at all,

A.          There is no ‘Written Constitution’.

B.           There is no proper, ‘Bill of Rights’.

C.            There is no access to a ‘Supreme Court’ where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the ‘abuses’ and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament, from within, LAW.

 

The, Statute, “European (Withdrawal) ‘Triggering of Article 50 Bill", created and passed by Parliament; and, granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ has no true ‘legality’ whatsoever. It was created and passed by Parliament under the direct domination, control, and imposition of the ‘diktat’ of the political party WHIPS.

Yet, this political imposition of the political party WHIPS in Parliament, instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; flouts and breaches the ‘precedent of law’ as determined by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

Therefore, “The Said Rights Claimed” specifically instructs Parliament, (and all reading the “Bill of Rights 1689”) in two ways,

Firstly, it instructs Parliament, that it is the ‘Superior Authority’ of all that is written in the Bill; for it states within its text that it is the ‘authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

Secondly, it instructs Parliament; that Parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only providing that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

BY THIS LEGAL AND LAWFUL CRITERION, THE “TRIGGERING OF ‘ARTICLE 50’ BY PARLIAMENT UNDER THE DOMINATION AND CONTROL OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS,

HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

BREXIT, THEREFORE, HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ WHATSOEVER. IT MUST BE DECLARED ‘UNLAWFUL’ IN LAW.

 

If the British still want to leave the E.U. THERE MUST BE A NEW FRESH REFERENDUM; and, if the result of the voting, still demands Britain ‘LEAVES’ the E.U. – “Article 50” must be triggered again. But this time with the WHIPS being declared unlawful and abolished from Parliament; every Member of Parliament would have a FREE VOTE.

All ‘ADVANTAGES’ and ‘DIS-ADVANTAGES’ for leaving the, E.U. would have to be published, before even one vote is cast. Very much unlike, the previous corrupt referendum.  

BREXIT - TRIGGERING "ARTICLE 50" IS UNLAWFUL

BREXIT – Utter Confusion and Corruption –

Wholly abandoning - LAW - and the “Rule of Law”. BREXIT, breach flouts and violates, “Human Rights Law”; and, denies, the right to, DEMOCRACY.

 

All Members of Parliament, with all the various factions, each having their own vested interests; perform daily like chickens that have just had their heads chopped off, running around wildly, not knowing where to go or what to do next.

 

All of BRITISH Media, newspapers and TV News (especially, SKY NEWS), constantly fans the flame of fear and uncertainty. Promoting, the mistrust of Members of Parliament, consistently.

 

The entire British people are so confused, misled, and manipulated, by all the sheer chaos prevailing, that they have foolishly come to believe that BREXIT is, DEMOCRACY.

 

OPTIONS AVAILABLE

1.          Accept THERESA MAY’s “Plan B”.

2.          Leave the E.U. without a deal.

3.          New Referendum and a People’s vote.

4.          Extend the, “29^th March 2019” scheduled date, to leave the E.U.

YET, IN ALL THE DEBATES THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN PARLIAMENT; AND, IN ALL THE DEBATES AND IDEAS MUTED BY MEDIA AND THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY;

NOT ONE ‘MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT’, OR ANY ‘JOURNALIST’, OR, ANY ‘NEWS REPORT’; HAS EVER MENTIONED THE WORD,

“LAW”

No one in the country; and, certainly not one Member of the ‘Profession of Law’; has even mentioned the words, “Law”, “The Rule of Law” or the “Protection of Law”; in respect to all BREXIT debates.

Yet, going to, LAW, is the only way to properly resolve all the problems prevailing.

 

GINA MILLER, a private individual, had to go the trouble and expense of going to ‘LAW’ for Parliament to have the right of the ‘meaningful vote’, the ‘last word’, in the approval or the rejection of the negotiated, “Withdrawal Agreement”, reached with the E.U.

Parliament did not secure this right; GINA MILLER did. Thereby, providing the sheer indication, that Parliament and Members of Parliament have little respect for, LAW. As, is now evident with BREXIT.

 

BREXIT violates “Human Rights Law” because,

A.                       It denies the rightful access to LAW.

B.                        It denies the right to true, DEMOCRACY.

 

The, Statute, “E.U. (Withdrawal) Triggering of Article 50 Bill” passed by Parliament; and, granted the “ROYAL ASSENT”, is wholly CORRUPT; and has no true legal validity in LAW, because it was created and passed by Parliament wholly ‘under the complete imposition, domination, and control of the political party, WHIPS. Which instructed elected Members of Parliament, on how they should or must vote.

This, therefore caused the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” which flouts and breaches the ‘precedent of law’ as set out and established in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/ in the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

THUS, THE “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50 BILL” PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND PROVIDED BY THE GRANTING OF THE “ROYAL ASSENT”; IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL; IT THEREFORE HAS NO LEGAL VALIDITY, AT ALL.

BREXIT – HAS NO LEGALITY WHATSOEVER

IT WAS CREATED CORRUPTLY BY A REFERENDUM, ‘UNLAWFUL BALLOT PAPER’, WHICH PROVIDED NO INFORMATION AT ALL ABOUT THE ‘ADVANTAGES’ AND THE ‘DISADVANTAGES’ WHEN VOTING TO LEAVE THE E.U.

IT PROVIDED ONLY ‘TWO BOXES TO TICK’ – TO, ‘LEAVE’ OR ‘REMAIN’. THUS, WHEN THE VOTER TICKED ‘LEAVE’ – ALL THEY ACTUALLY VOTED FOR – WAS TO DECLARE THE ‘INTENTION’ TO LEAVE THE E.U.

THE ‘BALLOT PAPER’ AND TICKING ‘LEAVE’- PROVIDED NO ‘MANDATE’ WHATSOEVER AS TO WHAT ‘CAME NEXT’ OR ANY INSTRUCTIONS TO ANYONE, ON HOW ‘LEAVING’ THE E.U. SHOULD TAKE PLACE.

 

Therefore, BREXIT as it stands now must be abolished.

If the British still want to LEAVE the E.U.; then a new referendum must take place; and, if the vote result still determines the decision to ‘LEAVE’; then, “ARTICLE 50”, must be triggered again. But, with one crucial difference; This time -WITH THE WHIPS BEING ABOLISHED – Every Member of Parliament would have a ‘FREE VOTE’.

 

QUEEN OFFERS ADVICE - BUT FAILS MISERABLY IN CARRYING OUT HER OWN DUTY.

H M QUEEN ELIZABETH OFFERS ADVICE

Yesterday, the Queen advised as follows,

 “We should all now ‘come together’ and ‘respect each other’s opinions’ in the diversity that now prevails”.

(Or, something like that)

 

Well I have news for ‘Her Maj’

That is absolutely impossible for me, because I hate, loathe, and detest every one of the bastards that voted to ‘LEAVE’ the E.U. – TRYING TO DESTROY MY LIFE – by removing from me – the only ‘protection of law’ that I had. The, “European Court of Justice” and the “European Human Rights Law”.

 

My country, Great Britain, and the ‘elite establishment’ of MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT; provides no ‘protection of ‘LAW’ at all. I have no rightful access to a, ‘Written Constitution’, ‘Bill of Rights’, or, ‘Supreme Court of Law” (where it is possible to test, question, or challenge, the abuses and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament), from within ‘LAW’.

 

Therefore, the long ‘time honoured criterion’ where in ELECTIONS the Majority wins and the Minority accepts the decision gracefully, in this case, can no longer apply.

Here, this fucking ‘MAJORITY’ violates my ‘Human Rights’ – They deny my access to DEMOCRACY, and my, Protection of Law.

 

Furthermore, before ‘Her Maj’ should proffer advice to all our people; She should first carry out a full examination and ‘judgment’ of herself,

 

1. She has repeatedly broken her Coronation Oath; to govern the People; and, she has constantly failed to honour her responsibility and duty; to honour and comply with the, “Original Contract”, requiring her, as the ‘Reigning Monarch’, to provide ‘protection’ of Her People.

2. She has consistently granted; or, she has allowed the, despots and despotism, now controlling the Monarchy; to grant the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’; to CORRUPT LAW.

 

All, Acts, Motions, and Bill’s created and passed by Parliament ‘under the influence, instruction, and diktat’ of the political party WHIPS’;

Is, CORRUPT LAW.

Because, that political activity of the WHIPS in Parliament, is wholly unlawful.

It, overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituents; and, this causes the,

 

“PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.

 

Which is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ set out in the,

“Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

By, failing miserably, to do her DUTY, as indicated above; and by, “Breaking the “Original Contract” Betwixt King and People”; Just as, KING JAMES the Second, did, in 1688;

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND likewise,

 

“ABDICATES THE THRONE”.

URGENT ATTENTION OF E.U. COMMISSION

URGENT ATTENTION OF,

MICHEL BARNIER & THE E.U. COMMISSION.

 

FACT 1:

1.  BREXIT DENIES MY HUMAN RIGHTS. It denies my irrefutable right to the protection of ‘LAW’

2. “STATUTE “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50 E.U. (WITHDRAWAL) BILL”. Denies my access to a true DEMOCRACY.

 

 

FACT 2:

1. I signed up to join the E.U. specifically because my own country Great Britain denied my protection of law. Designated in LAW to be a mere ‘Subject of the British Crown’ and, being held in ‘subjugation’ where I am required give ‘Allegiance’ to the ‘Reigning Monarch’ for as long as a Monarch shall reign; but, being denied, my rightful access to a ‘Written Constitution’, ‘Bill of Rights’, and, a ‘Supreme Court’ that denies my right to ‘question’ the abuse and the prejudice of Parliament, from within law.

2. I needed that ‘protection’ of ‘LAW’ provided by the ‘EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE’ and the, ‘EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW’.

3. Furthermore; there was one other factor which persuaded me to sign up to, EUROPE.

4. I am an, ‘INTERNATIONALIST’, and a, ‘CITIZEN OF PLANET EARTH’. I do not subscribe to, or hold to the belief, that, “British is Best”, “Rule Britannia”, “Wave the Union Jack Flag”, and, wish again for the, “Glorious Days of Empire”.

5. I want none of that; I am, “Internationalist” and a, “CITIZEN OF EUROPE.

 

URGENT PROPOSITION

A.IF THE E.U. COMMISSION; Provides me with the immediate speedy access (free of cost) to the “EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE”. Or,

B. Provides me (free of cost) the services of the most expert E.U. legal representation, well versed in the ‘presentation’ of cases to that Court.

 

I WILL STOP BREXIT.

I WILL PRESENT IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE TO THAT COURT (ECJ) WHOLLY ESTABLISHING THAT ‘BREXIT’ FLOUTS AND BREACHES E.U. HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. AND THAT,

 

THE, “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50 BILL”, IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL; BECAUSE, IT WAS CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT – ‘UNDER THE INFLUENCE AND INSTRUCTION’ OF THE, POLITICAL PARTY ‘WHIPS’. WHICH HAVE NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.

 

THE POLITICAL PARTY ‘WHIPS’ EVEN BEING IN PARLIAMENT; CAUSES THE “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”; THIS FLOUTS AND BREACHES, THE ‘PRECEDENT OF LAW’ AS DETERMINED BY THE, “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED.”

This evidence is irrefutable; the “EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE” will have no alternative but to uphold the claim. The Court will have to declare and rule that the, “Triggering of Article 50”; and the, “Political Party Whips in Parliament”, are unlawful.  Whereby,

1. BREXIT, as it stands today, will be destroyed. Should Britain still wish to leave the E.U.; the whole ‘leaving process’ would have to start all over again. But this time there would be a ‘marked difference’; all the ‘advantages’ and al the ‘disadvantages’ would be known, and published, before even one vote, will take place. And, if the new ‘referendum’ still determined the vote to ‘LEAVE’; this time, without the WHIPS in parliament; every Member of Parliament would have a “FREE VOTE”.

2. The ‘WHIPS’ in parliament, also, will be abolished. Thereby heralding a, TRUE DEMOCRACY.

 

IF, THE E.U COMMISSION, WANTS TO DESTROY BREXIT AND, HELP ALL THE BRITISH PEOPLE WHO WANT TO ‘REMAIN’ IN THE E.U. Then,

Speedily provide me with that access; to submit these claims to that, EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

 

BREXIT - FOR THE ATTENTION OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

BREXIT – For the attention of Members of Parliament, ESPECIALLY, Yvette Cooper & Nick Boles.

Some MPs have taken advice from clerks of the House on a bill that would prevent a No Deal exit. A number of potential draft bills have been published, for example the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Bill, from Nick Boles MP, which would mandate the Government to seek an extension of the Article 50 process to 31 December 2019. Yvette Cooper MP has proposed another.

(Suggested citation: R. Craig, 'Could the Government Advise the Queen to Refuse Royal Assent to a Backbench Bill?', U.K. Const. L. Blog (22nd Jan. 2019) (available at https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/))

 

NOTE: There is no need whatsoever to seek an extension of the “Statute European (Withdrawal) Triggering of Article 50” Bill; because, that ‘Statute’, even though granted the “ROYAL ASSENT”; has no LEGALITY at all.

Passed by Parliament, ‘under the influence diktat and instruction of the political party WHIPS’ the Bill has no legality at all.

Because, when the WHIPS instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must VOTE; that overrules and supplants all ‘’rightful influence’ that might have been placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituents.

This therefore creates the ‘PREJUDICE’ of the people.

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ provided by the, “Statute in Force/ Bill of Rights 1689/ “The Said Rights Claimed”.

This paragraph of the Bill, “The Said Rights Claimed”, was specifically inserted into the Bill by the ‘Rights Committee’ of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 in order to ‘protect’ the People. The Committee had first created the Bill including, all the thirteen ‘articles’, ‘designed to protect Parliament from the ‘interference’ of a King’; when they suddenly realised two important aspects to what they had created, and, what they had omitted.

The first realisation was that the Bill had only been ‘required’ in order to provide Parliament with ‘protection’ from a King. It had never been required or ‘designed’ to protect Parliament; from the People.

The second realisation, therefore, was the fact, that they realised that the Bill as it was (at that stage) could be mis-read and mis-interpreted to the ‘PREJUDICE’ of the People. (Just as Parliament, Judiciary, and Governments, do so now today).

So, they then inserted “The Said Rights Claimed” into the Bill, to protect the People.

But, the Committee (many of them highly intelligent and well versed in ‘LAW’ as well), went even further in their intent to ‘protect the people’; they ensured that “The Said Rights Claimed” was the over all ‘authority’ of the entire Bill, and, everything that was written in the Bill. They, then included in the text of, “The Said Rights Claimed”, that it was the ‘Supreme Authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

Thereby, “The Said Rights Claimed”, even overrules the "Supremacy of Parliament", afforded to Parliament, by "Article 9".

 

Thus; The political party WHIPS in parliament do ‘PREJUDICE’ the people.


Therefore, all the legislation passed by Parliament under the influence and instruction of the WHIPS; has no legality at all.

ALL THAT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO DESTROY ‘BREXIT’ ONCE AND FOR ALL. IS TO SUBMIT TO THE “SUPREME COURT” THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS IN ORDER FOR THE JUDGES TO TEST THE TRUE LEGALITY; TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY ARE ‘LAWFUL’, OR NOT.

 

1.  The ‘Ballot Paper’ provided for the Referendum of 2016.

2.  The Statute, “The Triggering of ‘Article 50’ European (Withdrawal) Bill”.

 

CONTENTION: The Referendum “Ballot Paper” is corrupt, and, therefore unlawful; because, it provided only two options for the Voter to choose: ‘LEAVE’ or ‘REMAIN”; but, it provided no other information at all. It certainly did not provide for any information as to what should happen next; or provide any ‘MANDATE’ for anything at all.
Therefore, when the Voter, ‘ticked’ the box, ‘LEAVE’; all they voted for, was the ‘INTENTION’ to leave the E.U. – BUT, THEY DID NOT DETERMINE, IN ANY WAY, THE ‘LEAVING’ PROCESS’ REQUIRED. In order to, LEAVE.

 

CONTENTION: The, Statute, “Triggering Article 50 European (Withdrawal) Bill”, is also corrupt and unlawful; because, it was passed in Parliament ‘under the influence and diktat’ of the political party WHIPS.

The WHIPS flout and breach “The Said Rights Claimed”. Therefore, the “Triggering of Article 50” has no LEGALITY whatsoever.

Thus; ‘BREXIT’ and the vote to ‘LEAVE the E.U’, cast by, ’17.4 Million Voters’; has no LEGALITY at all.

 

BREXIT - ULTIMATUM TO THE QUEEN 'PROROGUE' PARLIAMENT NOW OR GET OFF THE THRONE.

BREXIT – I NOW SEETHE WITH ANGER;

I have no protection of ‘LAW’ whatsoever. As a mere “Subject of the Crown”; I have no access to the protection of,

A Written Constitution.

A Bill of Rights.

Access to a “Supreme Court of Law” where I can test, question, or challenge the abuses and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament from within, ‘LAW’.

 

Worse than all of that; there is a ‘Reigning Monarch’ sitting upon the English throne charged with the duty and responsibility to honour the terms of the “Original Contract” requiring the protection of the People;

Yet ELIZABETH THE SECOND repeatedly has “Broken that Contract Betwixt King and People”; and, she fails miserably, to provide that protection. Thereby, ABDICATING, the throne.

Furthermore; She has consistently broken and flouted the “OATH” she swore at her Coronation; swearing, to “Govern the People”   

 

The entire fiasco of ‘BREXIT’ is now so rotten confused complex and corrupt; with Parliament dominated and controlled by Prime Minister, THERESA MAY and her ‘right-wing’ rotten government; BREXIT now threatens the Nation, and, all our people, with the greatest peril ever faced since World War Two.

There is not one person in the entire country who can determine now; precisely, what will happen next? Or, where we go from here? THIS NOW CALLS FOR A VERY DRASTIC REMEDY.

 

The, REMEDY,

Either, BREXIT is tested in the “Supreme Court of Law” as to its true legality; submitting the ‘Ballot Paper’ provided for the referendum of 2016; and, testing, the true legality, of the ‘Triggering of Article 50 Statute’ and, all the “E.U Withdrawal Bill” legislation, that was passed in parliament ‘Under the Influence and Diktat” of the political party Whips.

 

OR;

ELIZABETH THE SECOND GETS OFF HER FAT LAZY INCOMPETENT ARSE TO DO HER DUTY; TO USE THE POWERS PROVIDED TO HER; USING THE “ROYAL PREROGATIVE”; TO IMMEDIATELY PROROGUE PARLIAMENT; ORDERING A NEW GENERAL ELECTION.

 

OR;

I WILL START AN IMMEDIATE CAMPAIGN TO, ‘KICK HER OFF THE THRONE’;

IN PRECISELY THE SAME MANNER; AS THE CONVENTION’ (PARLIAMENT) OF 1688 DID; WHEN THEY REMOVED, ‘KING JAMES THE SECOND, FROM THE THRONE.

 

I WILL ALSO CAMPAIGN TO ABOLISH THE MONARCHY, WHICH NOW HAS VERIFIED BEYOND ANY DOUBT, IT NOW HAS NO LONGER, ANY RELEVANCE OR LEGAL VALIDITY WHATSOEVER,

THE VERY LAST TIME A ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ CARRIED OUT THEIR DUTY IN ‘PROTECTING THE PEOPLE’ BY REFUSING TO GRANT THE “ROYAL ASSENT” TO A LAW PASSED BY PARLIAMENT; WAS IN 'MARCH, 1708’; WHEN QUEEN ANNE REFUSED TO GRANT IT TO THE BILL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE ‘MILITIA’ IN SCOTLAND.

 

Ever since that date, March 1708, every ‘Reigning Monarch’ who has sat on the English throne, has merely performed as a ‘village sub-postmaster’ franking and rubber-stamping, every piece of paper laid before them by Parliament. Each ‘Reigning Monarch’ in turn; has blatantly “Broken the Original Contract Betwixt King and People” and they have failed to provide; the ‘protection’ of the People.

With, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, doing precisely likewise also;

THE ‘MONARCHY’ NOW HAS NO VALUE AT ALL.

 READ MY BOOK "DEMOCRACY"
A guide for the British on how to properly participate. Available in two formats: a Kindle download £1.19; Paperback £3.50
Get it here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW

USE 'LAW' TO DESTROY AND SMASH THE MYTH OF BREXIT.

USE ‘LAW’ TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF BREXIT ONCE AND FOR ALL.

 

With THERESA MAY heavily losing her “E.U. Withdrawal Deal” in the ‘meaningful vote’ by 230 votes against her and with 118 Members of her own TORY political party also voting against her; and, with her also narrow winning of the ‘no confidence’ motion tabled by JEREMY CORBYN, by only 19 votes, out of the total of 611 Members of parliament participating in that vote. THERESA MAY has hardly any ‘mandate’ to govern at all.

Yet, in sheer blatant arrogance the very instant the ‘no confidence’ vote was declared; she then stood at the despatch box ‘lecturing’ parliament that the, “People’s decision re BREXIT declared in Referendum of 2016”, must be honoured by all the Members of Parliament.

 

This now requires the ‘destruction’ of the myth of BREXIT once and for all. It is now IMPERATIVE that the legal validity of BREXIT be tested in, ‘LAW’

PARLIAMENT MUST NOW CALL UPON THE JUDGES OF THE ‘SUPREME COURT’ TO VERIFY THE ‘LEGALITY’ OR THE ‘ILLEGALITY’ OF BREXIT; ONCE AND FOR ALL.

 

PARLIAMENT MUST SUBMIT TO THE JUDGES OF THE ‘SUPREME COURT’ THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS FOR THEM TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY ARE ‘LAWFUL’ OR NOT.

 

1. The ‘Ballot Paper’ provided for the voters in the Referendum of 2016.

2. The ‘Triggering of Article 50’ Statute; passed by parliament, under the influence of the political party Whips.

3. The paragraph of the ‘Bill of Rights 1689’ known as, “The Said Rights Claimed”.

The ‘SUPREME COURT to decide whether they are all, lawful or not.

 

A.The ‘Ballot Paper’ – However, it is vitally important and imperative that the ‘SUPREME COURT’ Judges, test and examine the ‘Ballot Paper’; ‘as-it-is’; as it exists; and, not as the VOTER, may have been told, or, what they believed it to be. Or, anyone, who might have ‘assumed’ or ‘speculated’ what it was ‘meant’ to be. The Judges must examine and test that ‘paper’ for the legality; without any other outside ‘vested interests’ at all.
    CONTENTION: When the 'voter' ticked the box 'LEAVE', all they actually voted for was only the 'INTENTION' to LEAVE the E.U.; But, they didn't vote for anything required, that had to happen next; nor did they vote to provide any MANDATE for any actual procedure required, in order to actually LEAVE the E.U.

B. The Judges, however, must take into account, the wicked influences that were bombarded upon the VOTER in order to persuade them to vote, ‘LEAVE’. The wicked ‘LEAVE CAMPAIGN’ lies that were told; IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE THAT VOTE. Listed as follows:

1. Trade and travel will continue to and from Europe as ‘normal’; if the People voted to LEAVE.

2. Trade with the rest of the WORLD would be enhanced. Yet, not providing one import or export order, to prove.

3. £350,000 per week would no longer have to be paid to the E.U.; SO THAT MONEY, WOULD BE AVAILABLE; for the National Health Service.

4. Hordes of Romanians and Turks are just waiting as ‘immigrants’ to come to the U.K. to get our ‘housing’ and ‘benefits’.

5. In the few weeks leading up to the actual Referendum date, and during throughout that date, the right-wing Press and Media mounted and kept up a vicious ‘anti-immigrant’ campaign. Newspapers and TV News was inundated with scare stories about ‘immigration’ – and ‘immigrants’ flooding the country. This, ‘anti-immigrant’ wild hysteria promoted by Media; proved to be the most successful for the ‘objectives’; of the LEAVE CAMPAIGN.

6. This was wholly established; because, just after the ‘vote’ of the Referendum was declared; TV camera reporters asked the People in the streets, why they had voted to LEAVE the E.U. They, repeatedly proclaimed on live TV, that they voted to LEAVE to get rid of the immigrants. This attitude was most prevalent in Hull, Grimsby and Dover; but especially so in READING. When the People were asked this question in READING; they screamed and shouted the response; “To get rid of the bloody Poles in Reading. Reading is full of polish people getting our free housing and benefits. We have just visited a Polish shop and we told the owner we voted LEAVE so we could send him back to where he came from.”

7. That was the wicked ‘anti-immigrant’ tactic that the LEAVE CAMPAIGN used.

 

C.  The “Triggering of Article 50” Statute.

1. This debate and vote in Parliament was finally passed by parliament ‘under the influence’ of the political party Whips.

2. CONTENTION: The Whips political activities in Parliament are wholly unlawful. In instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how the should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all rightful influence placed upon those Members of Parliament; by the Constituents. This therefore causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”. Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is wholly proscribed by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/ in the paragraph,” The Said Rights Claimed”. Thus, verifying that the Whips in parliament; has no LEGALITY at all.

 

D.                       The document, the, “Bill of Rights 1689” and the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”

1. The SUPREME COURT must rule whether the paragraph “The Said Rights Claimed” has true LEGALITY or not.

2. CONTENTION: This ‘paragraph’ inserted into the “Bill of Rights 1689” by the ‘Rights Committee’ of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688; was specifically created by that Committee with the precise intention of ‘protecting the people’ against any mis-interpretation or misuse of the Bill. The sole importance of the Bill was to protect parliament from all interference of a King. It was never ever intended to protect parliament, from the People. Thus, anyone and everyone is entitled to ‘question’ parliament in the Courts, if and whenever, parliament, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

3. CONTENTION: Therefore, the Judges of the “Supreme Court” must decide if their present ruling that “Article 9” is, ABSOLUTE; and, thereby, parliament may not be ‘questioned’ in the Courts, under any circumstance; still has the ‘authority’ and the ‘legality’ to overrule, “The Said Rights Claimed”. Which, specifically contradicts that present ruling of the JUDICIARY, that parliament – ‘under no circumstances’ – may not be ‘questioned’ in the Courts. And, determines that, "Article 9", is not, ABSOLUTE.

4. CONTENTION: This is vital. Because if, “The Said Rights Claimed” does have true LEGALITY; the “Triggering of Article 50” passed by parliament under the influence of the Whips; wholly establishes that all the BREXIT legislation passed and negotiated with the E.U. by government; will have no LEGALITY at all.
   Therefore, the ‘myth’ of BREXIT is destroyed. Resulting, in the country, having to REMAIN in the E.U.; UNTIL SUCH TIME; Britain, still wanting to LEAVE the E.U., sets up a new referendum; and re-triggers ‘Article 50’ all over again.

5. CONTENTION: If the “Supreme Court” rules that, “The Said Rights Claimed” does have true LEGALITY; and, overrules “Article 9” and the “Supremacy” of parliament; if and whenever parliament, “Prejudice the People”; this would mean that the Government could no longer rely on the Whips; in order to force through parliament the corrupt Acts Motions and Bills, that both Government and parliament, do now. This will establish a TRUE DEMOCRACY; replacing the present, Totalitarian Regime.

NOTE: "The Said RIghts Claimed" is the over all 'authority' of the "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689"; including the "SUPREMACY" of parliament; for it states within its text that it is the 'superior authority' over all the "PREMISES" of the Bill. This means, everything written in the Bill.

 

“LAW”

CAN RESOLVE ALL.

Read my book "DEMOCRACY"
A guide for the British on how to properly participate. Two formats available: Kindle down-load £1.19. Paperback £3.50.
Get it here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW