Monday, July 22, 2019

ATTENTION, ELIZABETH THE SECOND,


WARNING TO HM QUEEN

Honour your 'CORONATION OATH' and the “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”, requiring both the "Governing" and "Protection" of the People. Do not grant, BORIS JOHNSON MP, with the authority to be Prime Minister and form a Government. He is unfit to carry out that role.

Before, BORIS JOHNSON, can be a 'fit and proper person' to be a Prime Minister; he must first stand in a Court of Law defending the charge that he purposely and with intent, “Perverted the Course of Justice” during the EU Referendum of 2016.

He, wickedly and with intent, purposely lied in order to support the, ‘LEAVE’ campaign.

The two key priority ‘lies’ that he told are these,

1.   He specifically stated that, “If YOU vote to leave the EU, £350,000 per week presently paid to the EU, would become available for the National Health Service”.

2.   He specifically stated that, “If YOU vote to leave the EU, Trade with Europe would continue un- interrupted just as it is now; and, Trade with the rest of the World, would be enhanced”.

 

Yet, he provided no EVIDENCE for either (1) or (2) in support. He did not explain how “£350,000 per week” would become available for the NHS. And,

He did not produce one “Trade Contract” that was in ‘negotiation’ with anyone in Europe; or with anyone, in the rest of the World.

 

BORISH JOHNSON IS A PROVEN CONSUMATE ‘LIAR’ AND AS SUCH HE MUST NEVER BE THE ‘PRIME MINISTER’ OF MY COUNTRY.

 

IF HM QUEEN GRANTS BORIS JOHNSON THE AUTHORITY TO FORM A GOVERNMENT; She will be, “Breaking the “Original Contract Betwixt King and People”, in precisely the same manner as in the year 1688, KING JAMES II, did. And, for which offence; the CONVENTION (Parliament) removed him from the throne. The CONVENTION determined and declared that, KING JAMES II, had thereby, ‘abdicated’ the throne. The throne was declared, “VACANT”; and, Prince William of Orange became the next King.

 

The, CONVENTION, further determined that in respect to the “Lineal Descent”; (all future Reigning Monarchs that would succeed to the throne); that,

 

“The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed”.

 

CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY does not relieve , ELIZABETH THE SECOND,  the existing, ‘Reigning Monarch’; from this responsibility. If, She, “Breaks the ‘Original Contract’; She too will ‘abdicate’ the throne.

 

AT THIS PRECISE MOMENT IN TIME – DUE TO BREXIT – GREAT BRITAIN IS IN A STATE OF SHEER PERIL. ELIZABETH THE SECOND MUST PROTECT THE PEOPLE; OR, “ABDICATE THE THRONE.

 

Friday, July 19, 2019

BREXIT HAS NOW PRODUCED A SEWER OF LAWLESSNESS AND CORRUPTION


My country, GREAT BRITAIN, is hardly worth living in anymore.

Government and Parliament and Monarchy are no longer worthy of, TRUST.

BREXIT has wholly destroyed the lovely country I once knew.

 
Did you see the absolute hysterical ranting and raving of that idiotic bumbling babbling buffoon, BORIS JOHNSON MP, during that last “Leadership” debate? How the hell can this idiot be the PRIME MINISTER of my country? He is a proven consummate buffoon and, LIAR.

Instead of campaigning for that esteemed ‘office’ of PRIME MINISTER. he ought to be standing in a court of law as the defendant, defending the charge that he purposely and with wicked intent specifically “Perverted the Course of Justice” by corrupting the people’s vote during the EU REFERENDUM of 2016. During that referendum, he lied repeatedly, in a calculated attempt to persuade the “voter’ to leave the EU.

 
TWO MAJOR SPECIFIC LIES THAT HE TOLD IN TRYING TO CORRUPT THE REFERENDUM, were these,

 

1. £350,000 per week would be available for the NHS if the ‘voter’ voted to leave.

2. He said, “If YOU vote leave” , “Trade with Europe would continue as normal without disruption and trade with the rest of the world would be enhanced.”

 
Yet, he provided no EVIDENCE at all in support. He did not explain how the money would be saved for the NHS; and he did not produce a single “TRADE CONTRACT” that was in the process of negotiation. He did not produce any EVIDENCE that trade would continue with EUROPE without interruption.

 
BORIS JOHNSON WAS IN CHARGE OF THE ENTIRE REFERENDUM LEAVE CAMPAIGN. HE THEREFORE WAS WHOLLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE “LIES” THAT WERE TOLD.

 
This man must never ever be the PRIME MINISTER of my country.

 

Now, in view of the sheer corruption and chaos prevailing re BREXIT at this time; with absolutely no one having a clue what to do or what happens next; and with the QUEEN not even lifting a finger to intervene (and carry out her DUTY) there is but one honourable course to follow; and that is, “LAW” and the “RULE OF LAW”
 
The “WHIPPED VOTE” that passed ‘ARTICLE 50’ in parliament, must now be tested for ‘legality’ in a Court of Law. There is irrefutable ‘prima facie’ EVIDENCE wholly establishing that a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament has no ‘legality’ whatsoever.
 
A. The POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS in Parliament are not ‘entrenched’ in LAW.

B. There is no legal document existing anywhere in the entire National Archive of Great Britain, that verifies, the legality and lawful validity of the WHIPS office and their political party activity, in Parliament.
 
C. THE WHIPS “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” and that is wholly proscribed by the “peoples protection” provided in the, “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” - This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically instructs Parliament that Parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only providing that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

THE ‘WHIPS’ IN PARLIAMENT DO “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”
 
Therefore, the ‘triggering’ of ARTICLE 50 of the EU TREATY was passed in parliament corruptly; and the negligent ‘Reigning Monarch’ granted the ROYAL ASSENT, to that CORRUPT LAW. Obviously the “DESPOTS AND DESPOTISM” that dominates and controls the Monarchy today; did not have a clue regarding this travesty.
 
That’s how badly I am being governed; and, ruled by Monarchy; that, by ‘precedent of law’, should be providing my protection. Yet, so miserably fails to do so.

The QUEEN has dishonoured the “OATH” she swore at her Coronation:- “ I promise faithfully to govern the people” – she swore; but she has not “GOVERNED” once throughout all of her reign.

Furthermore, she has not ‘once’ honoured or complied with the “ORIGINAL CONTRACT” which requires every ‘Reigning Monarch” to protect the people.

King James II was removed from the throne charged with “BREAKING THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT BETWIXT KING AND PEOPLE” , and when the Convention (Parliament) removed him; HENRY POWLE, the ‘Speaker’ of that Convention, in a huge debate between both LORDS and COMMONS, declared this,

“It is on those upon the throne that the people look to for their protection and for which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects” - (but, in referring to KING JAMES II, he then went on to say) -  “But there being none now to whom the people can look to for that Regal protection and for which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, the Commons conceive the throne is Vacant.”
 
The, EARL OF CLARENDON, in that debate, in speaking of thelineal descent’, (all future Reigning Monarchs that would occupy the throne); he said this,

The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed.
 
THE QUEEN HAS THE IRREFUTABLE DUTY TO PROTECT THE BRITISH PEOPLE.

 “ALLEGIANCE IS GIVEN TO THE LIEGE LORD FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE LEIGE LORD”

 This is the only legal validity for a Reigning Monarch to sit on the English throne.

Without that ‘PROTECTION’, there is no legal validity, for a MONARCHY at all.

 

THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE REIGN OF ELIZABETH THE SECOND; SHE HAS NEVER ONCE CARRIED OUT HER DUTY; SHE HAS CONSISTENTLY GRANTED THE “ROYAL ASSENT” TO CORRUPT LAW.

 
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT COWARDLY, AND, POSSIBLY IN IGNORANCE OF THE “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”; STICK RIGIDLY TO THE ‘LOYALTY’ AND ‘DISCIPLINE’ OF THE POLITICAL PARTY MACHINE; That’s why none of them has even considered challenging the ‘legality’ of the “WHIPPED VOTE” In Parliament. But, someday, someone in the country, is going to secure the “ACCESS TO LAW”, In order to test, question, and challenge the Political Party WHIPS in parliament; in a Court of LAW.
 

THIS, LAWLESSNESS CANNOT GO ON MUCH LONGER, EVERY DAY “ACTS” “MOTIONS” AND “ BILLS” ARE BEING PASSED IN THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT TODAY IN PRECISELY THE SAME MANNER AS WHEN ‘ADOLF HITLER’ AND THE ‘NAZIS’ CREATED AND PASSED THEIR OWN LAW.

By, the ‘diktat’ of the “TOTALITARIAN STATE”; and, not by, Democratic consent.

 
It is wholly beyond my comprehension why no Member of Parliament (representing the people) has not yet had the courage to provide that peoples ‘protection’, and, challenged, both the legality of the WHIPPED VOTE’ in parliament; and, the legality of “ARTICLE 50”. It provides the absolute verification that, PARLIAMENT, cannot be trusted anymore.
 

Blind loyalty and moronic unlawful compliance and, the giving of a false allegiance, to a political party; is positively obscene.

Yet, the most 'obscene' in all of this; is the entire British Profession of Law; that has kept absolutely quiet; and has not done a thing about it. Every intelligent and astute lawyer or barrister in the country, if they are indeed expert in law, must be just as aware as I am, that the "Whipped Vote" in parliament is, UNLAWFUL. Yet, as yet, there has not been any one of them, that has ever said 'one word' about this.

In consequence, it is the entire "British Profession of Law" that is the most corrupt.
They are not interested in "LAW" and the "RULE OF LAW" - their only interest is, MONEY. If YOU are rich in Great Britain today, YOU, can buy, "Legal Representation"; but if YOU cannot afford this; there is no 'access' to "LAW" whatsoever. This rotten and corrupt 'profession', provides no help at all.

 

Monday, July 15, 2019

A CORRUPT CRICKET WORLD CUP


BRITAIN WINS CRICKET WORLD CUP

Or did they?

Not on my reckoning they didn’t; it all depends on how the results are counted to determine the ‘WIN’.

 

You can discount the runs scored; both New Zealand and Britain scored equally, 241 runs.

Whereby, the corrupt ‘counting’ method determined, that it was a ‘tied match’; requiring a, “SUPER-OVER”. Which was not necessary at all.

 

On the estimation of ‘best performance’ which in a ‘tied’ circumstance should prevail; New Zealand won the match because their overall performance was better.

 

EVIDENCE – Getting the batsmen “OUT”.

Britain only got “five’ New Zealand  Batsmen, “OUT”.

New Zealand got “eight” “OUT”.

And, on that basis, NEW ZEALAND won the Cup. Or, corruptly; doesn’t this “getting the batsmen out” performance count?

 

The very criteria of the game of cricket is based upon the, “Best runs Scored”; and, “Getting the Batsmen “OUT”.

The sheer ignoring of this in determining the winner of the “Cricket World Cup”; besmirches the very name and game, of “CRICKET”

There was one other corrupt incident during the, “SUPER-OVER” that took place, to New Zealand’s corrupt disadvantage.

One British batsman hit the ball high in the air where it was ‘caught’ fairly and squarely, by the New Zealand fielder. He ‘caught the ball’, without any doubt whatsoever; whilst, he was standing upright fully upon his feet. But, then, he fell backwards; his back crashing into the ‘boundary’ fence. However,, before his body even touched the ground and as he was falling, he threw that ball to another New Zealand fielder. Who caught it.

That ‘ball’, in that circumstance, never ever touched the ground at all; nor did it cross the ‘boundary’ of the pitch. Yet, wholly corruptly; it was determined and decided that the British ‘batsman” was not, “OUT”. Who, then went on to score more runs?

All Britain, and all British News Media, now with sheer ‘hype’ and false patriotism proclaim the “Victory” – But, for me, I see nothing to celebrate at all. In my eyes and for what I had witnessed, NEW ZEALAND WON THAT GAME.

 

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

LAWLESS GREAT BRITAIN TODAY


LAW - Great Britain has now completely abandoned both, LAW and the “Rule of Law”

 

The Queen

THE QUEEN ‘BREAKS THE LAW’ ALL THE TIME.

The Queen, ‘breaks the law’; because, throughout all the time she has occupied the throne; she has not once honoured her “Coronation Oath”; which she swore promising to faithfully, “Govern the People”. Yet, to which, she has she never ever complied.

Furthermore, she further, ‘breaks the law’, by failing to honour and comply with the, “Original Contract”. This is the ‘unwritten’ Contract; yet, which is fully entrenched and established in British Law; by the, ‘precedent of law’; requiring all ‘Reigning Monarch’s to provide the  ‘protection of the people’, throughout their reign.

In the year 1688, King James the Second was removed from the throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) for “Breaking this Contract betwixt King and People”. The CONVENTION ruled and declared that he had thereby,‘abdicated’, the throne. In a huge debate held in the House of Commons ‘Painted Chamber’ between both LORDS and Commons; and, in respect to the ‘Lineal Descent’; (all future Reigning Monarchs); the, Earl of Clarendon, declared, “The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was upon the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed”

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not once honoured that “Contract” or provided the, “Protection of Her Subjects”, in all the sixty years she has sat upon the English throne.

Throughout her entire reign; She has also repeatedly granted the, “ROYAL ASSENT”; to corrupt law.

THE QUEEN, UNDOUBTEDLY, BREAKS THE LAW.

 

The Judiciary

The British Judiciary are the very worst offenders for ‘Breaking the LAW and, the “Rule of Law”; they have consistently, “Conspired to pervert the course of Justice” and, deceive the British People; by their ruling and their determination that Parliament may not be ‘questioned’ in the Courts. When, to the contrary, the ‘protection of the people’, provided by the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” verifies that anyone may ‘question’ or ‘challenge’ parliament in the Courts, if and whenever, parliament causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”

The entire British Judiciary purposely and with malicious intent, breaks the law.

 

Government & Parliament

Both intentionally and with impunity, ‘break the law’ consistently; by creating and passing ‘Acts’ ‘Motions’ and ‘Bills’ in parliament; in precisely the same manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created and imposed their own laws. By, the ‘diktat’ and imposition of the ‘totalitarian regime’; and, not by democratic consent.

Both Government and Parliament are creating and passing ‘legislation’ under the domination and control of a, “Whipped Vote”; where, ‘elected’ Members of Parliament are instructed by the political party ‘Whips’ on how they should or must vote.

This then, overrules and supplants, all ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituent. Yet, the Constituents ‘elected’ those Members, in the first place. This wicked travesty of injustice thereby causes the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”. Which is wholly proscribed by the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”.

In the paragraph, within that Bill, known as, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”, this specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill, (anything written in the Bill), but only upon the conditions, that nothing; “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

1.  The ‘Whips’ office in parliament; and a,

2.  “Whipped Vote” in parliament,

Both do, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” – thereby both has no legality at all.

Both Government & Parliament, do, BREAK THE LAW.

 

BREXIT and 17.4 Million People all voting to leave the EU; also breaks the, LAW.

Foolishly, in either their ignorance or sheer apathy, these idiots in voting to ‘leave’ the EU; they also abandoned the only protection of law, that they had; the, “European Court of Justice”, and, “European Human Rights Law”.

Their, own country, Great Britain, provides no protection of law for them at all. The entire ‘elite’ establishment of MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT, PARLIAMENT; and, the “Profession of Law”; provides no protection whatsoever.

There is no, “Written Constitution”; “Bill of Rights”; or “SUPREME COURT”; where it is possible to ‘question’ or ‘challenge’ the ‘abuses’ of parliament; from within, LAW.

The ‘Reigning Monarch’ charged with the duty of providing their protection of law; provides, no protection at all.

These, 17.4 Million idiots, who voted to ‘leave’ the EU; violated, HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, when they voted to ‘leave’. Because, the “HUMAN RIGHTS” of all of Humankind, verifies and guarantees, the right of access to LAW. Yet, if ever these idiots actually leave the EU; they will abandon; all European, ‘protection of law’;

 

THAT MAY BE OK FOR ALL THESE ‘UNTHINKING’ ‘SELFISH’ BASTARDS; BUT IT IS NOT OK, FOR ME.

I VALUE MY “EUROPEAN PROTECTION OF LAW”; far more than I value being British; THERFORE I MUST RESIST THESE SELFISH BASTARDS, WHO WANT TO TAKE ‘THAT PROTECTION’ AWAY.

 

 

ANTISEMITISM - THE JEWISH CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE LABOUR PARTY.


ANTISEMITISM

ANTISEMITISM is an irrefutable Human Right entrenched in the “Natural Law” inherent in the Gene.

 

All Humankind has the irrefutable right in “NATURAL LAW” to both ‘discriminate’ and ‘offend’.

 

None of Humankind ever born to this Planet Earth had any part in their own creation. They have all been crerated by others, ‘Mother and Father’, ‘sperm and egg’. Thus, BIRTH, is an act of forceful, IMPOSITION;

 

NONE OF US, CHOSE TO BE HERE.

This irrefutable fact, of that ‘imposition’; and, the fact that we are indeed all here on this, Planet Earth; provides for each of Humankind, ALL THE RIGHTS WE NEED.

 

Governments, Institutions; and, MONARCHY, and the JUDICIARY; do not give us our rights. We already have all the 'rights' we need; inherent in our Genes.

 

NO CORRUPT ‘LAW’ CREATED BY MAN CAN EVER OVERRULE THE, ‘NATURAL LAW’, INHERENT IN THE GENE.

 

Therefore, all of HUMANKIND; has the irrefutable right to ‘discriminate’ for or against; any damned thing they choose. If they do not like the ‘Jew’ or, dislike what the ‘Jew’ is doing; and, if they don’t like what the country of ISRAEL is doing; they have the perfect right in their ‘NATURAL LAW’, to both, say anything they choose to say; and, have the ‘perfect right’ to recruit others to support, what they believe.

 

The ‘JEW’ wails and moans consistently about, “ANTISEMITISM”, in order to secure special favourable ‘rights’ and ‘privileges’ for themselves. They, (as the ‘minority’), persistently demand the special privilege of a law; “Protecting the Jew from all  Discrimination”; a ‘special privilege’ for them; that the ‘MAJORITY’ cannot have.

I am discriminated against every hour of every day by the ‘elite’ establishment of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament; that, consistently violates my ‘Human Rights’ by denying my rightful access to ‘LAW’ and a true democracy. Yet, I have no access to the, ‘protection of law’ whatsoever.

My access to the Courts for remedy is wholly denied by the JUDICIARY that constantly determines that; “Parliament may not be ‘questioned’ in the Courts”. Irrespective of any circumstances.

 

Therefore; if. I, of the, MAJORITY; cannot have this protection of LAW; I am going to make damned sure and certain that, no ‘Minority’ is going to have any ‘privilege’ that I cannot have.

 

The, “Holocaust

With the deepest sorrow and respect I feel for the ‘JEW’ whose loved ones were murdered in the travesty of the “Holocaust”. I, truly feel, and share, the same anger and anquish they all must feel.

 

But I loathe and detest the JEW that consistently uses this travesty as a, “Holocaust Business”, in order to repeatedly demand and secure ‘special privilege’ for themselves.