VITAL 'SKY NEWS' LEADERSHIP DEBATE

_{THERESA MAY -V- JEREMY CORBYN}

_{IN THE ‘SKY NEWS’ TV LEADERSHIP DEBATE.}

 

_{GREAT BRITAIN NOW FACES VERY GREAT PERIL}

_{THIS 'GENERAL ELECTION' DETERMINES, WHETHER, UNDER THE PREMIERSHIP OF THERESA MAY,}

_{WHETHER THE COUNTRY BECOMES A TRUE DEMOCRACY? OR, A WHOLLY, "TOTALITARIAN REGIME"?}

 

_{IN THIS SKY NEWS DEBATE, THIS WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION TO ASK THERESA MAY.}

_{THERESA MAY, DO YOU BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY?}

_{Replying in the 'affirmative'; then hit her with this:}

 

_{WHY THEN CANNOT YOU RELY ON "DEMOCRACY" ?
IN ORDER TO GET LEGISLATION PASSED, BY PARLIAMENT?}

_{WHY CANNOT YOU RELY ON THE "FREE VOTE" OF PARLIAMENT IN ORDER TO PASS 'ACTS' 'MOTIONS' AND 'BILLS' IN PARLIAMENT?}

_{WHY MUST YOU USE THE 'POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS' TO INSTRUCT MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE?}

 

_{INFORMATION: THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL IN DETERMINING IF, THERESA MAY, IS ELIGIBLE TO GOVERN THE COUNTRY.}

 _{AN 'UNDEMOCRATIC' PRIME MINISTER IS NOT FIT TO HOLD THAT OFFICE.}

_{To this QUESTION, she can offer no explanation at all.}

_{Because, the 'political party' WHIPS in parliament, has no legality at all.}

 

_EXPLANATION:

 

_{1.       When the political party WHIPS instruct Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote in respect of all legislation being presented to parliament for the vote.}

_{2.       The WHIPS, in doing this, overrule and supplant all 'rightful influence' that might have been placed upon those 'elected' Members of Parliament, by the constituents.}

_{3.       This, therefore, creates, the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"}

_{4.       Yet, the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" by parliament, is specifically outlawed and proscribed by the precedent of law set out in,}

_{5.       "THE STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".}

_{6.       This paragraph, of that Bill, specifically instructs parliament that, parliament may 'enact' any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill, but, only upon the conditions as set out in the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed"; which specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament 'enacts' any of the "Premises" of that Bill, that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".}

 

_{THE POLITICAL PARTY 'WHIPS' IN PARLIAMENT DO "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE" - THEREFORE, THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT - HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.}

 

_{Here is the 'EVIDENCE' for this, here is that paragraph in that Bill,}

 

_{“The Said Rights Claimed”:}

_{“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”}

 

_NOTE:

_{The BRITISH JUDICIARY DETERMINES AND RULES THAT "PARLIAMENT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED IN THE COURTS";}

_{And, in a complete, "Conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice", deceives the British People, by ruling that "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689" provides the legality for that denial. Ruling, that "Article 9" in, 'LAW'; is, "ABSOLUTE".}

 

_{This is a complete and utter 'FABRICATION' because, "Article 9" is not 'absolute' at all; it is wholly 'conditional' and entirely dependent upon the conditions set out in the, ‘precedent’, of law, of, "The Said Rights Claimed".}

_{"Article 9", is merely one of the 13 "Articles" set out in the Bill; but, "The Said Rights Claimed" has the overall 'authority' of the entire Bill. Because, it states within it's text, that it has the 'legal authority' over all other "PREMISES" of the Bill.}

 

_{"THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" OVERRULES "ARTICLE 9" AND, THE, "SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT"; IF AND WHENEVER,}

_{PARLIAMENT, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".}

 

_CONCLUSION:

_{SKY NEWS DID NOT ASK 'THERESA MAY' THIS QUESTION IN THAT TV DEBATE.}

_{THE WHOLE COUNTRY NOW KNOWS THAT 'SKY NEWS' IS WHOLLY GUILTY OF TRANSMITTING, "FAKE NEWS"}

_{BECAUSE, "FAKE NEWS" IS NOT ONLY WHAT HAS BEEN SAID OR IMPLIED, IN REPORTING;}

_{IT IS WHAT HAS BEEN, 'FULLY AWARE OF'; YET, 'PURPOSELY', OMITTED AS WELL.}

 

_{Gordon J Sheppard}

 

TERRORISM - "The Chickens are coming Home"

 

_{“CHICKENS COMING HOME TO ROOST”}

 

<sub>Beware,

"ALL THAT YE SEW, THOU MUST ALSO REAP"

All Western intelligence and governments are all running around like 'headless chickens' desperately trying to resolve the so-called "Terrorist" problem; but, they do not have a clue as the true 'catalyst' or the 'true cause', of the problem.

Why the hell don't they just start, posing this question,

WHY THE HELL DO THEY THINK YOUNG MEN AND YOUNG WOMEN ARE QUITE PREPARED TO STRAP A SUICIDE BELT TO THEIR BODIES OR, CARRY HUGE EXPLOSIVE DEVICES, READY TO BE ACTIVATED BY THEM, TO BLOW THEMSELVES TO SMITHEREENS?

Why do they think that they do this? What do they think causes that terrible suicide?

RADICALIZATION and INDOCTRINATION? Garbage!

The reason they do this are two fold,

Firstly, they have come to the realisation, that both AMERICA and GREAT BRITAIN have waged war and 'Regime Change' all over the Globe; with impunity, bombing, murdering and maiming thousands of innocent people; all in attempt at destroying, their MUSLIM way of 'life' and, their present environment; all in order to impose, their own 'warped' idea of DEMOCRACY; upon, Muslim's and Muslim lands.

Secondly, by killing and destroying many "UNBELIEVERS"; they truly believe, that they will be faithfully fulfilling the commands of the Muslim "Holy Quran"; and, that by doing this, they expect to be rewarded with a seat in "PARADISE" with their beloved Prophet, "MOHAMMED"; where "Seven Virgins" will attend to their every need" - The, very 'promise' held out to them, by that, ISLAMIC QURAN.

These young ISLAMIC DEDICATED young men and young women don't 'kill themselves', for nothing; blowing themselves up to a horrendous death, for nothing. They do it for a, CAUSE. THEIR CAUSE.  The cause, which they implicitly believe in. The, religious, "JIHAD".The, cause, which to them is as worthy and as sacred, as any other cause, of all Humankind.

You can call them 'terrorist'; you can say they have been 'indoctrinated' and 'radicalised'; but if you truly believe this to be the cause' of all the 'terrorism' of today; YOU LEARN NOTHING. YOU WILL NEVER PROPERLY UNDERSTAND THE TRUE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM.

The AMERICANS and the BRITISH must learn that they cannot with impunity wage wars and 'Regime Change' all over the Globe; and expect that there will be no response from, all those affected, by that tyranny.

The 'CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST' - THE MANCHESTER ATROCITY IS THE VERY PROOF THAT THIS IS SO.</sub>

 

A General Election is underway......

 

YOU CAN TELL THERE IS AN ELECTION, IN THE OFFING. TORIES SAYING, THEY CARE ABOUT THE ‘WORKERS’…..

 

THERESA MAY and her proposed, 'wonderful new legislation', to end the BRITISH WORKERS plight, is positively absurd. It is so absurd, as expecting and trusting the DEVIL, to extinguish the fires of Hell.

 

THERESA MAY, and, her fucking 'right wing' TORY totalitarian government administration; doesn’t care a fuck about the, "Worker's".

 

All they care about, is creating undemocratic draconian 'Acts' 'Motions' and 'Bills', and, the furthering of their own greed, and their unbridled capitalist objectives. Yet, all, created in parliament, without any legality at all.

 

THERESA MAY is a downright liar and manipulator. She is a "DICTATOR' and she doesn't believe in "DEMOCRACY" at all.

 

She is as dangerous as any other notorious dictator, like HITLER and STALIN, who without any true legality, created their own 'LAW'.

 

THERESA MAY creates and passes her own 'LAW' in parliament, by her use of the political party WHIPS, who instruct 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they must vote. This overrules and supplants, all 'rightful influence' that might have been placed upon those 'MEMBERS', by the constituents.

 

This therefore creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".

 

"PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" is wholly proscribed by the, 'precedent of law', set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed"

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example

Thus, THERESA MAY, flouts and breaches this "LAW" on every occasion when she instructs the WHIPS, to influence the 'vote' taken in parliament. She is not only, UNDEMOCRATIC; SHE IS A, FUCKING LAW BREAKER; as well.

 I 

THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT, HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

 

CYBER CRIME & YESTERDAY'S ATTACK ON THE NHS..

<sub>CYBER ATTACK and CYBER CRIME

Instead of fucking about with nuclear weapons, renewing TRIDENT FUCKING MISSILES, and building four fucking nuclear submarines; costing well in excess of 200 BILLION POUNDS; that no one wants or needs; far better to spend that money on the NHS; and the prevention of CYBER CRIME. In order that the NHS is not starved of essential funds; and, that the CYBER CRIMINAL can be detected quickly when he or she 'hacks' into anything; and, that they can be heavily punished, when caught.

But, then again, THERESA MAY and her rotten 'right wing' TORY government don't care a fuck about CYBER CRIME; THERESA MAY when she was 'Home Secretary' wholly responsible for the prevention and punishment of CYBER CRIME; actually let one of the worst CYBER CRIMINALS walk out of the jail SCOTT-FREE.

GARY McKINNON who had 'hacked into' the American "National Defence Computers" at the Pentagon in Washington; and who had caused great damage to those computers during the commission of that crime; was never punished at all. THERESA MAY, refused the Americans the right to extradite him; she, didn't fine him; she, didn't arrange to put him on probation; she, didn't place him before a court for punishment, (no trial was necessary because he admitted his guilt). She, didn't punish him at all.

The reason is evident: The corrupt 'DAILY MAIL' had mounted a campaign to "SAVE McKINNON" from being extradited to the USA for trial; asserting that AMERICAN EXTRADITION LAW was inferior to BRITISH EXTRADITION LAW. This wholly "ANTI-AMERICAN" deceitful assertion and claim soon secured massive support from corrupt politicians and vested interests of those of the profession of law. And, THERESA MAY, seeing all this popular support for McKINNON; recognised that here was her chance to further her own political career.

SHE CALCULATED THAT IF SHE SUPPORTED THE "DAILY MAIL" in this campaign; she would have the support of that newspaper for the rest of her political career.

IN ORDER TO FURTHER HER CAREER, (HER EYES ALREADY UPON "NUMBER 10"), SHE LET McKINNON walk free; without any punishment at all.

IT LOOKS VERY MUCH LIKE THE PRESENT TORY HOME SECRETARY IS DOING THE VERY SAME THING. SHE HAS JUST RULED THAT "LAURIE LOVE" ANOTHER "COMPUTER HACKER" WHO HAS HACKED INTO AMERICAN GOVERNMENT BUSINESS; CAN NOW CHALLENGE HIS 'EXTRADITION' IN THE SUPREME COURT.

This is how this filthy rotten TORY government administration; treats, CYBER CRIME.

NOTE: THERESA MAY asserts she let McKINNON 'walk' because his mother and a corrupt doctor had claimed that he was suffering from ASPERGERS disease and, they asserted, that he would 'kill himself' if he was extradited to the U.S. for trial.

BUT THIS IS NO EXCUSE FOR A HOME SECRETARY TO ABANDON HER DUTY - THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND, THE PRISON SYSTEM, IS PERFECTLY ABLE TO TREAT ANY MEDICAL CONDITION; AND, PREVENT ANY INMATE INCARCERATED, FROM KILLING HIMSELF.

Gordon J Sheppard</sub>

 

FACEBOOK

_FACEBOOK

_{The BBC featured a TV program which had the arrogance and cheek to 'quiz' FACEBOOK about its lawful activities. In this Panorama feature, "What Facebook knows about You”, it mounted a wicked attack against, FACEBOOK, throughout. Consistently, throughout this entire feature, both the presenter and the contributors, ( all with their own vested interests), viciously attacked this greatest leader of, "Social Media", in the World today.}

 

_{So, let's put the record straight. As a priority, I value FACEBOOK vastly more than I value, MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT, and, PARLIAMENT.
All four, deny my rightful access to, DEMOCRACY.}

_{They lie, cheat, steal, and, manipulate; every fucking day.}

 

_{FACEBOOK GIVES ME FREEDOM.}

<sub>FACEBOOK PROVIDES DEMOCRACY

The very essence of DEMOCRACY, is, Participation.

Monarchy, Judiciary, Government, Parliament, provide no 'participation' at all. In, law, we are not 'Human Beings'. They classify all us 'common people' in the country, as mere, "SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN". Where, we have no 'participation' at all.</sub> 

<sub>So, fuck the critics, and the corrupt politicians who always seek to dominate and control our lives.

I respectfully urge FACEBOOK EXECUTIVE to ignore all the pressures of the 'vested interested' groups as indicated above; that, continually insist on 'censorship', ‘domination’ and 'control'.

I urge, FACEBOOK, to ignore all this arrogant interference. Instead, I implore the FACEBOOK executive;</sub>

 _{PROTECT THE "FREEDOM" THAT FACEBOOK PROVIDES.}

 <sub>Every user of FACEBOOK has the right and the opportunity, to promote their own thoughts and 'Ideas'.

All, 'IDEAS', in competition, for the 'MINDS of MAN'.</sub>

_{I therefore urge everyone who views, uses, and enjoys FACEBOOK; to stand up now and DEFEND THE FREEDOM THAT FACEBOOK PROVIDES. Stop all the arrogant bastards who consistently want to put 'their fingers' in the pie.}

 

_Gordonj

 

ELITE -v- COMMON HUMANKIND

The, ‘Elite’ -v- The, ‘Common’ People.

 

^{"PRINCE WILLIAM DEMANDS £1.3 MILLION FROM A FRENCH MAGAZINE OVER TOPLESS KATE PHOTOS"}

^{PRINCESS KATE BARED HER BREASTS IN PUBLIC, SHE WAS PHOTGRAPHED, THE PICTURE WAS PUBLISHED; PRINCE WILLIAM NOW PURSUES THE CLAIM FOR 'DAMAGES' COMPENSATION, IN THE COURTS.}

^{Prince William, one of the most, 'elite'; has all the power and majesty of the Monarchy, to influence both court and jury in respect of his claim. Plus, he has all the power of 'DESPOTISM', that consistently upholds and promotes the Monarchy as well. He also has all the money he needs to support his claim in the courts. Furthermore, with all this ‘influence’ at his disposal, he can easily persuade the corrupt 'profession of law' to take his case; and, represent him in the courts.}

 

^{Compare this, then; with the plight of all, 'Common Humankind' living today in the U.K. They also, have the 'equal right' to pursue injustice, and seek damages compensation in the courts. But, their access to the courts, is wholly denied.}

^{Consider this;}

 

^{What has the greater superiority of the claim to, injustice? Princess Kate displaying her breasts and, being photographed and that picture being published? Or, all the U.K. 'Common Humankind', being denied access to a, TRUE DEMOCRACY? Who, here, has the greater lawful valid claim?}

 ^{The, ordinary, common people of Great Britain are denied access to a true DEMOCRACY, because,}

_{THE "POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS" IN PARLIAMENT INSTRUCTING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE;}

_{OVERRULES AND SUPPLANTS; ALL RIGHTFUL INFLUENCE PLACED UPON THOSE MEMBERS BY THE CONSTITUENTS.}

_{THIS, CREATES THE "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE";}

_{AND, THIS IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY THE 'PRECEDENT OF LAW' AS SET OUT IN THE, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"}

 

_{“The Said Rights Claimed”:}

_{“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”}

 

But, in Great Britain today, this wicked injustice, cannot be challenged in law.

 

WHY?

 

^{Because, the rotten and corrupt Judiciary "Conspire to Pervert the Course of Justice" and, deceive the British people, that the "Supremacy of Parliament" is, ABSOLUTE; and, therefore ruling, that Parliament may not be 'Questioned' in the Courts, under any circumstances.}

^{But, Parliaments "SUPREMACY" depends entirely on Parliament complying with the conditions, as set out, in the 'precedent of law' of the, "Said Rights Claimed" (as can be seen above). This specifically determines that anyone can 'question' Parliament in the Courts; if and whenever, Parliament, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"}

^{So, the 'LAW' is clear and emphatic on this point; but the 'common people' cannot present this 'injustice' in any court; because, the 'profession of law' is so cowardly, that it will not represent the 'common people', in such a case.}

CONCLUSION

The political party WHIPS in parliament has no legality at all.

The 'common people' cannot get access to 'law' because, they have none of the power and influence of a Prince, as is described above. With, no access to 'LAW' whatsoever;

Britain, is not a "DEMOCRACY";
It’s a rotten, filthy, TOTALITARIAN REGIME".

 

Where, ‘Acts’, ‘Motions’, and ‘Bills’ are being created and passed in Parliament today, in precisely the same way; as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS, created their own, LAWS.

<sup>"PRINCE WILLIAM DEMANDS £1.3 MILLION FROM FRENCH MAGAZINE OVER TOPLESS KATE PHOTOS"

This must be resisted at all costs.

"WHEN YOU STEP OUTSIDE OF YOUR OWN FRONT DOOR YOU ARE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN"
Irrespective of any corrupt vested interest, of any 'privileged' party.

PRIVACY LAWS ARE WHOLLY CORRUPT.

PRINCESS KATE BARED HER BREASTS IN PUBLIC AND IN DOING SO SHE WAS IN THAT PUBLIC DOMAIN. Therefore, anyone with a camera, long-lens, or not, has the right to photograph what they see. And, furthermore, because they own that camera and that 'picture' taken; they have the right to sell or publish that 'picture' in any way that they please.

Royalty, the Celebrity, the 'elite' and the 'privileged' have no right whatsoever to demand or be given PRIVACY, in law, protecting this 'exclusive' elite from having their 'picture' taken. Just walking out of their 'own front door' and, bearing their breasts, they cannot be protected in true and just law, from all the consequences that follow.

THE ESSENTIAL CRITERION HERE IS THIS:

IF PRINCE WILLIAM IS SUCCESSFUL IN THIS CLAIM AND THE COURT AWARDS HIM ANY SUM IN COMPENSATION; THEN THE 'FLOODGATES ARE OPEN' FOR ANYONE TO CLAIM LIKE COMPENSATION IF THEY BARE THEIR BREASTS, AND, ARE FILMED OR PHOTOGRAPHED, IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN

THIS WOULD MEAN THAT, ANY FEMALE WHO IS SUNBATHING 'BARE BREASTED' ON ANY BEACH IN THE WORLD, BEING FILMED OR PHOTOGRAPHED BY "NEWS MEDIA", AND, WHERE THAT 'IMAGE', IS SUBSEQUENTLY PUBLISHED IN ANY WAY AT ALL; THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SUE. THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SUE IN THE COURTS, IN PRECISELY THE SAME WAY, AS PRINCE WILLIAM, IS PRESSING HIS CLAIM TODAY.

If, PRINCE WILLIAM, is awarded any sum in compensation in this case,

BEWARE ALL 'NEWS MEDIA'
NEVER FILM OR PHOTOGRAPH - NAKED FEMALES ON THE BEACHES ANYWHERE - EVER AGAIN. Because, if you publish those 'images' you will be LIABLE for huge financial compensation claims for every face or body that is published. Frequently, in both film and photograph 'naked women' are shown and published. 'NEWS' media has frequently shown and transmitted hundreds of naked women on the worlds beaches. In future, if PRINCE WILLIAM wins this case. Every female shown in that 'footage' featured on TV, will be able to sue.

You can't have 'special privilege' for a Prince or a Princess; yet deny that 'right' to everyone else.

The court must not award one penny to PRINCE WILLIAM in this case.</sup>