THERESA MAY CAN'T SLEEP.......

THERESA MAY asserts that she is being kept awake at nights due to BREXIT and leaving the E.U.

 

Oh how annoying for her; but I express no sympathy for her whatsoever; because, she might be being kept awake at nights over BREXIT; whilst I have bloody "NIGHTMARES" about it; due to the fact that she claims the sole and exclusive right to negotiate the terms for triggering 'Article 50' and the terms for withdrawal from the E.U.

 

BREXIT the actual leaving of the E.U. will affect the lives of everyone in the country; it is going to produce the greatest CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS of this century; and, just as the BREXIT  'Referendum' provided the right for everyone to vote and participate; the actual 'withdrawal' process in order to leave the E.U. must also provide the right of full 'participation' as well.

 

The only way for 'every one in the country' to PARTICIPATE in this; is thru PARLIAMENT.

So, it is PARLIAMENT and not THERESA MAY (and her Tory cronies) who must decide this.

 

Parliament, must set up a "BREXIT WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS COMMITTEE" and Members of that Committee must be drawn from elected Members of Parliament of all the political parties; and, the best and most experienced legal brains in the country well versed and experienced in "Constitutional Law" drawn from the Judiciary and the profession of law.

 

Such "Constitutional PARLIAMENT Committee's" have been set up before; 

The very establishment in law of the, "SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT", was created and determined by such a special committee: The "Rights Committee" of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688.

 

This, BREXIT, "Constitutional Law" requirements necessary for negotiating the withdrawal from the E.U. is actually far more important - to everyone in the country' - than the "Supremacy of Parliament" itself. Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689, only provides the protection of the 'Supremacy' of Parliament; but, the paragraph "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" within that very same Bill provides the "Protection of the People"; and, this rules, that when Parliament applies its 'Supremacy'; that it does so on the condition; that; nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 

This is the established, Precedent of Law.

 

In consequence of this, if THERESA MAY solely and exclusively acts and determines the withdrawal process for leaving the E.U. and, wholly ignores excludes and flouts the interests of all the British people at large; she will be creating the "Prejudice of the People". Which will immediately, cancel and abolish the legal validity, of both ARTICLE 9", and, the "SUPREMACY"

 

Thus; for the lawful withdrawal from the E.U. Legally, PARLIAMENT MUST BE INVOLVED .

 

READ AND SIGN THIS PETITION: https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-jeremy-wright-qc-mp-the-lord-chancellor-brexit-vote-to-leave-challenging-legality-of-the-leaving-process

The Rt Hon Jeremy Wright QC MP; The Lord Chancellor ... www.change.org BREXIT PETITION To. The current Lord Chief Justice - The Right Honourable The Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd. The Attorney General - The Rt Hon Jeremy Wright QC MP

 

SANTANDER BANK TRAVESTY

The transfer of money 'bank to bank' overseas.

 

In wanting to transfer a sum of money to my daughter in Australia from my Santander bank account, for her birthday, on contacting the bank I was informed charges would be as follows:

 

1. £25 standard Santander bank fee for transferring money overseas.
2. 20 Australian dollars for the recipient Australian banks fee.
3. Unspecified charges for some unknown 'middle bank'.

 

But, Santander does not know which 'MIDDLE BANK' that is; nor do they know what fee will be charged. Or, if they knew, they would not tell me.

 

Thus, the consumer has no idea what is the total fee he must pay, and, be deducted from his account, at the time he gives the bank instruction, to transfer the money. He can only verify this, AFTER HE HAS TRANSFERRED THE MONEY.

 

This seems to me to be wholly wrong and unlawful.

 

This "MIDDLE BANK" arrangement as described to me here surely cannot be lawful?

 

In effect it is stealing money without consent. I was quite prepared to accept charges A and B; but, (C), is a sheer tyranny worthy of contempt. I was obliged to find an alternative way to transfer the money. And, I eventually used PAYPAL.

 

I registered the complaint with Santander, but they said, "It was the common banking procedure that all banks use".

 

Therefore, this text as above, is the complaint I have now registered with my Member of Parliament.

 Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

 

BREXIT-THE FINAL ANALYSIS...

BREXIT – The Withdrawal Process;

The Final Analysis…

 

LAW, is not interested in speculation and assumption; LAW, is only concerned, with the “Letter of Law”

 

The referendum ballot paper did not declare any ‘action’ to be carried out at all; voting “LEAVE” in that referendum, only determined the INTENT to leave.

 

 

1. David Cameron did not grant the E.U. Referendum; he merely put the proposition to parliament for the referendum; and it was PARLIAMENT that approved it voting for it by 6 to 1.

 

2. The ballot paper for the referendum was so stupid and so negligent that it only provided two options for selection: to, LEAVE; or to, REMAIN.

 

3. The ballot paper provided no options at all for any 'authority' or, for any 'action’ to be carried out'; nor did it specify, as to what should happen, if the declared results of the voting in that referendum determined, to, LEAVE.

 

4. The ballot paper did not 'authorise' actually, LEAVING THE E.U, it merely expressed by the, 'letter of law', the INTENTION to leave.

 

4. In consequence of this gross error, negligence, and stupidity of government, that ballot paper provided no provision whatsoever as to what should happen next.

 

5. In consequence again, THERESA MAY and her Tory government have no right of claim to the sole and exclusive ‘determinations’ of the 'leaving' process.

 

6. This is the greatest grave national constitutional crisis of this century; absolutely everyone is going to be affected by the outcome; Leaving the E.U. Is for ever; once leaving, this cannot be changed. Thus, it is a National matter of grave urgency affecting the whole NATION; it cannot be left exclusively in the hands of THERESA MAY and her ideological TORY objectives.

 

7. All the people of the country are entitled to be involved in determining that 'leaving' process.

 

8. Accordingly, and in consequence of the fact that PARLIAMENT granted the referendum in the first place; PARLIAMENT, and, only PARLIAMENT, must now decide.

 

9. In order that I and the British People are protected by law in this respect; I have now petitioned the "Supreme Court" and "Her Majesty the Queen" for that protection. Here is my petition:

 

     https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-jeremy-wright-qc-mp-the-lord-chancellor-brexit-vote-to-leave-challenging-legality-of-the-leaving-process

 

SIGN IT, and participate.

 

Read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for proper participation. I pose fourteen questions for you to answer and, I provide the answers, that you need to know. Read and learn how you are being badly and unlawfully governed, and read also how Monarchy holds you in imposed subjugation without your consent. The book is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book and a paperback, and it can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984