BREXIT - NO ONE HAS EVEN MENTIONED 'LAW'.....

_{LAW - and the – “Rule of Law”}

 

_{THE SHEER CHAOS, CONFUSION, COMPLICITY, and CORRUPTION taking place now in parliament and, in the country; in respect to everything about BREXIT; and, the legislation;}

_{Where, the Prime Minister and, the 'right wing' element of the Tory Members of Parliament, consistently, are relying upon the fact that the People voted to 'LEAVE' the E.U.; therefore, this is the 'sacrosanct' reason, asserted by their claim, that "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT"; and, that parliament must now recognize and accept that this was the democratic  'vote' of the People, that now must be obeyed.}

 

_{Repeatedly, we hear Members of Parliament proclaiming, "The People have voted to LEAVE we must honour that referendum vote, and ensure we LEAVE"}

 

_{THERE IS ONLY ONE COURSE OF ACTION NOW AVAILABLE TO ALL THAT VOTED "REMAIN"}

 

_{TO CHALLENGE, FROM WITHIN LAW, THE ACTUAL LEGALITY OF THE "BALLOT PAPER" PROVIDED FOR THAT REFERENDUM VOTE.}

 

_{WHAT SICKENS ME ABOUT MY COUNTRY TODAY IS THAT 'LAW' AND THE "RULE OF LAW" IS NEVER EVER EVEN MENTIONED. IN ALL THE "BREXIT" LEGISLATION DEBATES THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN PARLIAMENT; NOT ONE MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT, HAS EVEN MENTIONED THE WORD. "LAW".}

 

_{This is most important, because the British People have no "protection of law" whatsoever.}

_{1.        There is no Written Constitution;}

_{2.        There is no proper "Bill of Rights";}

_{3.        There is no "Supreme Court of Law"; where it is possible to 'question' the 'abuse' of parliament from within, LAW.}

_{4.        Furthermore, the "Reigning Monarch" sitting upon the English throne, charged with the duty of honouring and complying with the "Original Contract" requiring the protection of all "Subjects of the Crown”; has failed miserably to carry out that 'duty'; throughout all the years she has occupied that throne.}

_{5.        Far worse, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has repeatedly granted;  the “ROYAL ASSENT”, to corrupt LAW.}

_{6.        Or, if she has not actually granted that “Assent” by herself; but, has allowed it to be granted, 'in her name', by the despots now dominating and controlling the Monarchy. Irrespective, of whoever granted that, “ROYAL ASSENT”. It, was granted to, "CORRUPT LAW".}

_{7.        All Acts, Motions, and Bills, created and passed by parliament UNDER THE 'DIKTAT' AND INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS, has no 'legality' whatsoever; all such legislation is both UNLAWFUL and CORRUPT.}

_{8.        The, political party WHIPS, instructing Members of Parliament on how the should or must vote; overrules and supplants the Constituents right to 'influence' their Member of Parliament. Therefore, this causes the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".}

_{9.        Yet, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" is specifically proscribed by the, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".}

_{This paragraph of the "Bill of Rights 1689" specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may have its "SUPREMACY" afforded to Parliament by "Article 9"; or, Parliament may 'enact' any of the "PREMISES" of the Bill; but, only by complying with the requirements of, "The Said Rights Claimed". Which states, and requires, that nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".}

 _{ALL THE BREXIT LEGISLATION THAT HAS BEEN PASSED IN PARLIAMENT 'UNDER INSTRUCTION BY THE WHIPS' IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL & CORRUPT. BOTH THE "TRIGGERING OF THE ARTICLE 50 BILL; AND THE "E.U. WITHDRAWAL BILL" PASSED BY PARLIAMENT; IS THEREFORE CORRUPT.}

_{A. MONARCHY DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY, 'PROTECTION OF LAW'}

_{B. PARLIAMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY, 'PROTECTION OF LAW'}

_{C. THE JUDICIARY DO NOT ‘PROTECT THE PEOPLE’ AT ALL;}

 _{In fact, truth, and reality, the rotten JUDICIARY consistently, "Conspires to Pervert the Course of Justice", and deceive the BRITISH PEOPLE; by ruling that, "Parliament may not be 'questioned' in the Courts", UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. -}

_{Whereas, the "Bill of Rights 1689" in the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", wholly verifies that anyone may 'question' or 'challenge' the 'abuses' of Parliament in the Courts; if, and whenever, Parliament,}

_{"PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"}

 

_{Because, "The People" have no 'protection of law' whatsoever;}

_{The 'legality' of the E.U. REFERENDUM "BALLOT PAPER"; must be tested in, "LAW".}

_{I contend;}

_{1.        The 'ballot paper' contained insufficient INFORMATION for the people to properly understand the implications of what they were 'actually' voting for.}

_{2.        The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all in respect to the fact that Britain, in joining the E, U., agreed and signed a "TREATY". And therefore, in order to "LEAVE" the E.U.; Britain would be required to 'negotiate' with the E.U.; in order to, LEAVE.}

_{3.        The ballot paper made no mention of this at all.}

_{4.        The ballot paper made no mention of the triggering of "Article 50".}

_{5.        The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all about a, "Customs Union" or a "Single Market".}

_{6.        The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all about what would happen if the People voted to. "LEAVE".}

_{7.        The People, therefore blindly boarded a 'bus' without any 'destination' being revealed; and, not having a clue, where the 'bus' was going.}

_{8.        NO ONE GETS ON  BUS - NOT KNOWING - WHERE THE BUS IS GOING.}

_{9.        But, that is what the People did, when they voted, in respect to that ballot paper.}

_{10.                  The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all about the role of Parliament.}

 

_{I contend, that, further; the People, were unlawfully motivated to vote "LEAVE" by,}

 

_{1.        The massive ANTI-IMMIGRANT campaign mounted and waged by virtually all British News Media, in the weeks leading up to the actual vote.}

_{2.        Right Wing" Members of Parliament persistently promoting this 'anti-immigrant' stance, in order to 'influence' the voter to vote, "LEAVE".}

_{3.        Plus; The calculated 'lie' told and promoted by the "LEAVE" camp, that, "£350,000 per Week" would be saved to be available for the "National Health Service", if the People, voted to LEAVE.}

_{4.        Plus; The constant 'lie' told and promoted by the "LEAVE" camp; that, "Britain would be far better off and be able to trade successfully with any country in the World, if the People voted to "LEAVE" - Yet, without presenting any 'evidence' at all, to the voter; that this could be, TRUE.}

_{5.        NOT ONE SIGNED CONTRACT, FOR, ANY TRADE DEAL, was provided to the 'voter', in order to verify that claim.}

 

_{I contend,}

_{That no honest person; or honest "COURT OF LAW"; can assert, verify, or rule that the "Referendum Ballot Paper" provided to the voter; was, LAWFUL.}

_{That, 'ballot paper', was wholly UNLAWFUL and CORRUPT.}

_{THE TRUE LEGALITY MUST BE TESTED IN LAW.}

 

 

UNLAWFUL SPECIAL PRIVILEGE OF THE JEWS....

JEWS – The unlawful privilege…

 

According to the last Census; 243,000 JEWS, just the tiny .04165 per cent of the Majority population of 60,500,000, living in the country; have now secured a ‘special exclusive privilege’ for themselves; which the rest of the MAJORITY are denied.

 

They have now secured the protection of ‘LAW’ protecting them from, NON-DISCRIMINATION.

Yet, I, and the MAJORITY have no such ‘protection of law’ whatsoever; when we are discriminated against; by being denied, our rightful access to, DEMOCRACY.

Every minute, of all twenty-four-hours of every day, WE ARE DENIED OUR ACCESS TO A TRUE DEMOCRACY by all the following:

1.  Her Majesty the Queen; denies our access to DEMOCRACY, by, failing to honour and comply with the terms of the “Original Contract”. Requiring, the ‘protection’ of the People.

 

This, “Contract”, although unwritten, is wholly established by precedent of English LAW. It requires, that all “Reigning Monarchs”, must act as, “Head of Government”, to monitor parliament, to ensure that the legislation passed by parliament is not corrupt; thereby, providing the protection of all “Subjects of the Crown”.

 

ELIZABETH the Second, has denied our protection and our access to DEMOCRACY, because, not once, has she honoured that “Contract” throughout all the years she has occupied that throne.

Furthermore; as all legislation passed by parliament must be granted the “Royal Assent” before it can become LAW; She, has consistently granted that, “Royal Assent” to, CORRUPT LAW.

 

Every, Act, Motion, or Bill, passed by parliament under the ‘influence’ and ‘diktat’ of the ‘Political Party Whips’, is wholly UNLAWFUL; and, thereby, all such legislation is, CORRUPT LAW.

When the “Whips” instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this also is UNLAWFUL, because, it both flouts and breaches, the precedent of law, as set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

2.  As can be seen in, (1), above; the political party WHIPS in parliament deny our rightful access to a true DEMOCRACY; because, in instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; the WHIPS overrule and supplant all ‘rightful’ influence that might have been placed upon those, Members of Parliament, by the Constituents.

Who, elected, those, “People’s Representatives”, in the first place.

 

3.  But, most disgracefully, as well; the most wicked of all in denying of our access to a true DEMOCRACY; relies solely on the corruption of the JUDICIARY; that purposely, and consistently, “Conspires to Pervert the Course of Justice” and deceive the British People; by ruling that, Parliament may not be ‘questioned’ in the Courts. Under any circumstance.

 

The JUDICIARY here, relies upon, their wholly mis-interpretation, of the “Bill of Rights 1689”. The JUDICIARY rules that “Article 9” of this Bill, prevents all ‘questioning’ of Parliament in the Courts, under any circumstance; and, this is wholly incorrect and untrue. Because, the paragraph in the Bill known as, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”, completely overrules “Article 9”; if and whenever Parliament, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”. The, political party ‘WHIPS’ in Parliament do, “Prejudice the People”; and thereby, for the Office and political activities of the  ‘WHIPS’, to even be in Parliament; has no ‘legality’ at all.

 

Here, then, is the irrefutable evidence that the JUDICIARY purposely denies our rightful access to a true DEMOCRACY;

Here, then, is the irrefutable evidence that the Queen consistently denies our rightful access to a true DEMOCRACY;

Here, then, is the irrefutable evidence that the political party ‘WHIPS’ denies our rightful access to a true DEMOCRACY;

 

YET, UNLIKE THE 'PRIVILEGED' JEW; WE HAVE NO ACCESS TO ‘LAW’, AT ALL.

 

WHY CAN THE JEW SECURE ALL THAT RIGHTFUL ACCESS, TO PROVIDE THEM, WITH ACCESS TO LAW; WHICH, ALL THE MAJORITY, ARE DENIED?

   

 

SKY NEWS 'MISGUIDED' CAMPAIGNS

SKY NEWS ‘MISGUIDED’ CAMPAIGNS.

 

Sky News, more for its own vested interests, mounts two wholly misguided campaigns. If proven to be successful, both will cause and create considerable harm.

 

1.    TARGET AIMED AT THE CONSUMER; BAN THE USE OF, “ONE TIME PLASTIC”.

2.    PERSUADING THE PUBLIC TO SIGN A PETITION IN SUPPORT OF CREATING AN ‘INDEPENDENT COMMISSION’ TO ADMINISTER AND CONTROL ELECTION ‘LEADERSHIP’ DEBATES.

 

BAN THE USE OF ONE TIME PLASTIC

 

When the consumer purchases fruit or vegetables or other food products from the SUPERMARKET or shop; and, that product is wrapped in plastic; the consumer can be wholly confident that the product so protected; will be free of contamination and disease.

 

When the housewife or cook places ‘left-over’ food from meals in the refrigerator to be eaten the next day or days thereafter; and wraps that food with ‘clingfilm’ (one-time-plastic) for protection; they know that they can be confident that it is protected from decay, contamination, and disease.

 

Thus, the use of ‘one-time-plastic’ is an essential requirement; in every home.

 

Now, when the consumer wants to dispose of this now unwanted and used plastic; they do not, in disposing of it, rush to the nearest seashore, in order to ‘dump’ that plastic into the sea.

They, ‘dutifully’ dispose of that, now unwanted plastic, into the proper, REFUSE BIN. For, the ‘contracted’ refuse collector or the local authority, to take that refuse, away.

From that precise moment that this ‘refuse’ is collected; the consumer has no responsibility whatsoever; if that ‘unwanted’ plastic ends up in the sea.

That ‘responsibility’ then rests entirely on the ‘contracted’ refuse collector or the local authority; but, above all, it is the responsibility of the GOVERNMENT as well.

SKY NEWS HERE, HITS THE WRONG TARGET COMPLETELY, WHOLLY ‘MISGUIDED’; IT SHOULD BE AIMED AT, ‘GOVERNMENT’ – IT IS ENTIRELY GOVERNMENTS RESPONSIBILITY – WHY SO MUCH PLASTIC ENDS UP IN THE SEA.

 

INDEPENDENT COMMISSION TO MANAGE ELECTION LEADERSHIP DEBATES.

 

SKY NEWS, massive ‘misguided’ campaign.

In support of this campaign SKY NEWS featured the American “Head of the Independent Commission” managing and controlling U.S. Presidential Election Debates. He explained to the British viewers how the Commission worked in managing these debates; and he ended his contribution; assuring, that in his opinion, if the same was set up and operating here in the UK, it would be a great benefit to the People, in all future General Elections in the UK.

 

HERE, both he; and, SKY NEWS; are wholly wrong.

The reason for this grave error is entirely abundant for all with any ‘intelligence’ to see.

 

Unlike, the, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

GREAT BRITAIN IS NOT A, DEMOCRACY

 

Great Britain is a, “CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY”

But, here’s the great ‘laugh’; and, ‘tyranny’; – It is a “CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY’; but, without a “CONSTITUTION”.

There is no “Written Constitution”;

There is no proper, “Bill of Rights”;

There is no “Supreme Court of Law” – where both Monarchy and Parliament ‘abuse’ - can be tested, questioned, or challenged from within LAW.

The “Reigning Monarch” is charged with the responsibility and duty to honour the ‘precedent of law’ of the “Original Contract”; and this requires the ‘protection of the people’; but, this ‘protection’ is never provided by Monarchy, at all.

In 1688, KINGS JAMES the Second, was removed from the throne; by the CONVENTION (parliament); being charged with “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People” – the CONVENTION thereby determined that he had “Abdicated the Throne”.

The CONVENTION further ruled that all other “Reigning Monarchs” in the “line of succession” would also be bound by that Contract; and, if ‘breaking that contract’; they too, can be removed from the throne.

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has never ‘honoured’ or complied with that CONTRACT; all of the time she has occupied the throne.

 

ALL BORN TO THE SHORES OF GREAT BRITAIN ARE NOT CLASSIFIED AS HUMAN BEINGS WITH ‘TRUE CITIZENSHIP’ – IN LAW, THEY ARE ALL MERELY CLASSIFIED AS, “SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN”.

BEING BOUND, BY LAW, TO BE IN ‘SUBJUGATION’ TO THE “REIGNING MONARCH”; AND, TO GIVE ALLEGIANCE TO THE “REIGNING MONARCH”; FOR AS LONG AS A MONARCH SHALL REIGN.

 

Thus, all this verifies, that the BRITISH PEOPLE have no ‘protection of law’ whatsoever. It is imperative now, to explore and investigate, how the BRITISH, are governed:

 

THE, GOVERNING;

 BRITAIN is a,

"PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY"

The People, in General Election, vote to ‘elect’ their representative to represent them in Parliament. On being ‘elected’, they become, their, and the Constituency, MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.

THE PEOPLE DO NOT ELECT EITHER A “PRIME MINISTER” OR ANY “POLITICAL PARTY” – THEY ONLY ELECT THEIR “REPREENTATIVE” TO REPRESENT THEM IN PARLIAMENT.

 

THEREFORE, IN ANY GENERAL ELECTION, THE “POLITICAL PARTY” OR A “PRIME MINISTER”, HAS NO RELEVANCE AT ALL.

THE “POLITICAL PARTIES” – NOT BEING ELECTED – HAVE NO RIGHTFUL PLACE IN PARLIAMENT AT ALL.

LIKEWISE, IN RESPECT TO A “PRIME MINISTER”,

THE PEOPLE DO NOT ELECT THE “PRIME MINISTER” – THEY ARE ‘APPOINTED’ BY THE POLITICAL PARTY; THEREFORE, DURING AN ELECTION A “PRIME MINISTER” HAS NO RELEVANCE AT ALL.

AND, AFTER AN ELECTIION, WHEN A “PRIME MINISTER” IS APPOINTED; THEY SHOULD HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE IN PARLIAMENT, DOMINATING AND CONTROLLING, THE VOTE.

 

THE, REVOLUTION AND REFORM OF PARLIAMENT AND GOVERNING SHOULD ENSURE,

Political parties, PRIME MINISTER, and Government, should be ‘outside’ of parliament; they should present their ‘manifesto’s’ or proposed legislation to Parliament, for the approving FREE VOTE of parliament; before such legislation, can become, LAW.

 

Gordon J Sheppard                                                  06/10/2018

 

THEREFORE, SKY NEWS,“MANAGE TV LEADERSHIP DEBATES”, ARE A MERE CALCULATED INTENDED ‘DISTRACTION’ TO ‘MANIPULATE’ THE VOTING IN GENERAL ELECTIONS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.