Friday, June 29, 2018

THE 'ROYAL ASSENT' AND THE LIES TOLD.....


PARLIAMENT, THE QUEEN, AND, THE WICKED LIES TOLD…..

 

JUNE 26, 2018

Today the ‘Speaker’ of the House of Commons, JOHN BERCOW MP,

Proudly declared in parliament that,
 
 ‘’The Queen has now granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ to the ‘E.U. WITHDRAWAL BILL’’.

He then asserted that, “this now made it possible for E.U. Law to be translated into British LAW.”

 

Then, dutifully, the entire British Media reported and upheld, the wicked, LIE.

 

THE ‘QUEEN’ HAD NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE GRANTING OF THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ – VERY MANY YEARS AGO THE ‘MONARCHY’ ABANDONED ITS DUTY TO HONOUR THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’; REQUIRING THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE; AND, USING THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ AS THE ‘’LEGAL INSTRUMENT’’, IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE.

THE ‘MONARCHY’ OF ITS OWN VOLITION, SETTLED INSTEAD, TO ENJOY ALL THE PRIVILEGES OF MONARCHY BUT, TO GIVE UP ITS ROLE AND POWER OF ‘ABSOLUTE’ RULE. THE MONARCHY AGREED TO ACCEPT THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY A CORRUPT CONSPIRACY WITH PARLIAMENT, TO SUBMIT TO THE FAR LESSER ROLE OF, ‘’CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCY’’, WHERE THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ HAD NO POWERS AT ALL.

 

TODAY, THE QUEEN HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ‘’ROYAL ASSENT’ AT ALL; IT IS NOW ‘AUTOMATICALLY IMPOSED’ BY THE DESPOTS AND DESPOTISM THAT NOW DOMINATES AND CONTROLS THE MONARCHY. THE QUEEN, AS THE, ‘REIGNING MONARCH’, HAS NO POWER AT ALL. HMQ QUEEN ELIZABETH IS MERELY A ‘PUPPET’ WITH THE DESPOTS AND DESPOTISM; NOW PULLING THE STRINGS.

TODAY, THIS DESPOTISM AND THESE DESPOTS DOMINATES AND CONTROLS EVERYTHING THE MONARCHY DOES. THEY HAVE EVEN REMOVED THE, ‘’PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE’’ REQUIRED BY THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’ – WHEREBY THE PEOPLE NOW – HAVE NO PROTECTION AT ALL.

 

EVERY ‘REIGNING MONARCH’’ SITTING UPON THE ENGLISH THRONE IS REQUIRED BY ‘PRECEDENT OF LAW’ TO HONOUR THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’. THIS CONTRACT, ALTHOUGH UNWRITTEN, IS FULLY ESTABLISHED IN ENGLISH LAW; IT DERIVES FROM THE CONCEPT ESTABLISHED IN ‘OLDE ENGLISH LAW’ THAT, ‘’ALLEGIANCE IS GIVEN TO THE LIEGE LORD, FOR THE PROTECTION, OF THE LIEGE LORD’’; AND, IT REQUIRES THAT, THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ SHALL ACT AS ‘HEAD OF GOVERNMENT’ AND MONITOR PARLIAMENT, IN THE INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY AND THE PEOPLE. ENSURING, THAT THE ‘BILLS’ AND ‘LAWS’ CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT, ARE NOT CORRUPT.

 

IRRESPECTIVE OF ‘’CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY’’ EVERY ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ SITTING UPON THE THRONE OF ENGLAND; IS REQUIRED TO HONOUR AND COMPLY WITH THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’.

FAILURE TO HONOUR THAT CONTRACT – ABDICATES THE THRONE.

KING JAMES II WAS REMOVED FROM THE THRONE FOR, ‘’BREAKING THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT BETWIXT KING AND PEOPLE’’.

WHEN THE ‘CONVENTION’ (PARLIAMENT) OF 1688 REMOVED HIM FROM THE THRONE THEY HELD A MASSIVE DEBATE IN THE PAINTED CHAMBER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS BETWEEN BOTH LORDS AND COMMONS TO DETERMINE THE WORDS ‘’ABDICATED’ AND ‘THE THRONE IS VACANT’ – and it was resolved that KING JAMES II had indeed abdicated the Throne. THE CONVENTION DECLARED: ‘’THE THRONE WAS VACANT”

The Speaker of that CONVENTION and debate, HENRY POWLE, said this: ‘’It is upon those on the throne of England that the People look to for their protection, and to whom for which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, but there being none now that the People can look to for that Regal protection, and to which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, the Commons conceive, The Throne is Vacant.’’

 

The, ‘’Earl of Clarendon’’ in that debate also declared: ‘’The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor breaks the Contract, they too can be Deposed.’’

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not ‘once’ honored that Contract during all the years she has occupied that throne. According to the LAW established by the CONVENTION (PARLIAMENT); She has repeatedly, by failing to honor that Contract, and, failing to protect ‘Her Subjects’ she has ‘Abdicated’ the throne.

 

Every ‘Act’ ‘Motion’ or ‘Bill’ created and passed by parliament – under the influence of the political party WHIPS – is ‘corrupt’ and therefore wholly unlawful. The WHIPS in instructing elected Members of Parliament as to how they should ‘vote’, overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituents. This therefore causes and creates the ‘PREJUDICE’ of the People.

YET,

PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY THE PRECEDENT OF LAW, AS DETERMINED BY THE, ‘STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED’.

Which specifically instructs parliament – and, anyone else reading the Bill – that parliament may have its ‘SUPREMACY’ afforded to parliament by ‘Article 9” of the Bill; or, parliament may ‘enact’ any of the other ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; but only upon the conditions set out in ‘THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED’. This, specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament ‘enacts’ any of the ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; Nothing, ‘OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE’.

 

THUS, EVERY ‘ACT’ ‘MOTION’ AND ‘BILL’ CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT – UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS – IN RECENT YEARS – IS WHOLLY ‘CORRUPT’.

 

FOR MANY YEARS THE DESPOTS OF MONARCHY HAVE BEEN REPEATEDLY AUTOMATICALLY ‘IMPOSING’ THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ TO CORRUPT LAW.

THE, ‘EU WITHDRAWAL BILL’, IN ALL OF ITS STAGES, THRU PARLIAMENT, WAS PASSED UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE WHIPS; IN EVERY STAGE; THEREFORE, THIS ‘BILL’ NOW, HAS NO LAWFUL LEGALITY AT ALL. THE ‘EU WITHDRAWAL BILL’ IN ALL ITS ENTIREITY MUST BE PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT AGAIN; BUT, THIS TIME, IT MUST BE PASSED BY A ‘FREE VOTE’.

 

Friday, June 22, 2018

PROPOSED EU COPYRIGHT LAW


Proposed EU Copyright Law...

 

The proposed EU Copyright Law is naught but the proposition to dominate censor and control, by ‘unlawful’ imposition, all content posted on the INTERNET.

 

IT FLOUTS AND BREACHES THE VERY ‘NATURAL LAW’ INHERENT IN THE GENE.

 

All Humankind born to Planet Earth have the irrefutable right to determine their own destiny.

This provides the rights of ‘free expression’ in respect of anything they please.

Thus, they have the very NATURAL LAW and the right of free expression; inherent in the Gene.

 

Man made “LAW’ cannot ever overrule or supplant the ‘NATURAL LAW’ inherent in the Gene.

 

The EU proposed “COYRIGHT LAW” therefore; has no legal validity at all.

 

Every user of SOCIAL MEDIA has the irrefutable right to post on the INTERNET any thing they please. They must all resist this ‘unlawful’ political diktat and imposition.

 

Your very FREEDOM is at stake.

Thursday, June 21, 2018

UPSKIRTING....


UPSKIRTING….

 

The silly prank of UPSKIRTING might be distasteful and upsetting to some: but ‘UPSKIRTING’ revealing a female’s bare thighs, knickers or ‘no nickers’; to be photographed; is not unlawful, nor is it a criminal offence; unless, the female that is being photographed in this way, IS NAMED.

 

If the female is NAMED; then it becomes an, INVASION OF PRIVACY, and a criminal offence. But, in the event where the female is NOT NAMED, this has not harmed the female in any way at all. And, in that case, it is not a, criminal offence.

 

There are those in parliament today who would BANN or CENSOR the very air that we breathe.

 

It is mostly ‘kids’ that carry out this silly practise. Do they want to criminalise every child? The very proposition is ludicrous.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

 

Friday, June 15, 2018

PISSING ON PARLIAMENT


PISSING ON PARLIAMENT

 

Were I to visit the Central Lobby of Parliament, and, whilst there, took out my penis and then sprayed my urine all over the floor; undoubtedly I would be arrested and be charged for that offence; in LAW.

 

That would immediately provide me, with the only access to LAW, available to me. For, in this rotten undemocratic terrible country we live in today, I have no access whatsoever to the protection of LAW.

 

I HAVE NO ACCESS AT ALL TO,

A, Written Constitution;

Or, a Proper “Bill of Rights”;

Or, a Supreme Court of Law, where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the abuses of Parliament, from within  LAW.

 

Furthermore, although there is a ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ sitting upon the throne, charged by ‘precedent of law’ to honour the, “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”; requiring the protection of the People; ELIZABETH THE SECOND, provides no protection at all. She has not honoured that ‘CONTRACT’ once; throughout all the years she has occupied that throne.

 

Thus and, thereby, “Pissing on Parliament” is the only possible way for me to stand in a British Court of Law; in order to challenge this injustice.

 

Charged with that offence in the Court, I would plead: NOT GUILTY. Whereupon, the ‘prosecution’ must present and provide the evidence against me. At the conclusion of which, it will my turn to present, MY OWN DEFENCE.

 

I would then advise the court that if I wanted and needed true access to LAW; then I had no alternative; but to do precisely what I did.
Denied all access to LAW, I WAS FORCED TO PISS ON PARLIAMENT. There was no other alternative available to me.. I would then challenge the Court to find me Guilty of the charge, when, the very, “Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice”, by the BRITISH JUDICIARY, is actually responsible, for why I am denied all ‘rightful’ access to LAW. And, why I must now stand in this Court.

 

By, this “Conspiracy” and, wicked deceit; the BRITISH JUDICIARY has always ruled and asserted that PARLIAMENT cannot be “questioned’ in the Courts. For, this claim, ruling, and assertion; the BRITISH JUDICIARY rely entirely upon “ARTICLE 9” of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”. They, thereby, determine that this, “ARTICLE 9”, is legally, “ABSOLUTE”.

Ruling that, “under no circumstances”,  may Parliament be  ‘questioned’ in the Courts.

 

But, 'ARTICLE 9' is not, 'ABSOLUTE', at all. It is a conditional 'Article' in the 'Bill of Rights', wholly dependent upon the conditions set out in, 'THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED'; another paragraph; of that very same Bill.

 

THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED, makes it abundantly clear to Parliament; and, anyone else reading the Bill; that it, INSTRUCTS PARLIAMENT, that Parliament may have its SUPREMACY afforded by 'ARTICLE 9' of the Bill; or, parliament may ‘enact’ any of the other 'PREMISES' of the Bill; but, only if Parliament, “OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

THE SAID RIGHT CLAIMED is the overall supreme authority of the entire 'BILL OF RIGHTS 1689'; for, it states within its text; that it is the ‘authority’ over, 'ANY OF THE PREMISES', of the Bill.

 

“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular
The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that
noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the
Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in
any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence

or Example”

 

I, `Piss on Parliament` with sheer contempt; because Parliament is supposed to be a 'democratic representative parliament' and, it is not. Today, it is naught, but a totalitarian regime. It creates and passes 'Acts' 'Motions' and 'Bills' by sheer political party 'diktat'; in the very same way as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their own LAW.

 

HITLER had the perfect legality for creating his own LAW; the democratic “REICHSTAG” the German Parliament on the 23rd March 1933 passed his “ENABLING LAW” - They, overwhelmingly passed it, voting 441 votes for ‘Yes’ and only 94 votes for ‘No’.

 

But, and, in comparison with Germany, the BRITISH “Enabling Act” - the political party WHIPS in Parliament - they have no LEGALITY at all.

 

Conclusion

Keep your eyes on the CENTRAL LOBBY of Parliament - You might see me pissing there one day.

 

Oh! On second thoughts, maybe I don’t have to do that now. After all, in publishing here the sheer deceit and wicked “Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice” by the Judiciary, denying the access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY - the complaint is now registered; and, I don’t have to, ‘Piss on Parliament’, anymore.

 

But, every reader of this feature, must now help me to get that access to LAW - and, if they want a, TRUE DEMOCRACY; then they must take the necessary steps to ABOLISH the political party WHIPS; in Parliament.

READ MY BOOK 'DEMOCRACY' - It is available in two formats, a Kindle download or a paperback. Get it here: : https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW


Gordon J Sheppard  15/06/18

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, June 14, 2018

My letter to, SIMON CLARKE MP


Dear Simon Clarke MP

SIR, you are a liar and a deceitful manipulator.

Evidence for the verification of this; is your ludicrous claim and assertion of “FIDELITY” in the, EU WITHDRAWAL BILL, debate in parliament today.

 

Yet, YOU; subscribe to and comply with the political party WHIPPED votes that have taken place in parliament in all the BREXIT debates and legislation, to date.

 

When, the political party WHIPS in Parliament are wholly unlawful and have no LEGALITY at all.

 

The political party WHIPS in Parliament “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” and thereby flout and breach the ‘precedent of law’ as determined in the “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”

 

The WHIPS overrule and supplant the rightful influence placed upon ‘elected’ Members of Parliament; and this is unlawful because it causes the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” - This is wholly proscribed, in law, by the “Said Rights Claimed”.

 

Yet, you bastards, that always proclaim you believe in and uphold the “LAW”; deny my access to a true DEMOCRACY and, you allow and permit the “Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice” by the BRITISH JUDICIARY that rule and assert that the “SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT” is ABSOLUTE. When, in truth and reality, it is not ABSOLUTE at all.

 

The, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” determines, in LAW that Parliament may have and ‘enact’ its SUPREMACY (as afforded to Parliament by 'Article 9') or, Parliament may ‘enact” any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but, only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or 

Example”

 

The political party WHIPS in Parliament do “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” and thereby, the WHIPS in Parliament has no “LEGALITY” at all.

 

Read my book “DEMOCRACY” (you might learn a lot) it’s available in both paperback and Kindle download here:

 


 

FYI. Parliament and Government are creating and passing “Acts” “Motions” and “Bills” in Parliament today, in precisely the same manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their own LAW. The, only difference being, that HITLER had the perfect LEGALITY for creating his own LAW. He had been given that authority by the democratic vote of the German “REICHSTAG” (Parliament) by their vote of the 23 March 1933; when they passed HITLER’s, “ENABLING ACT”,  by 441 votes to 94.

 

Whereas, the political party’s WHIIPED vote in the British Parliament,

 

HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

KIM JUNG UN CAPITULATES....


Cowardly KIM JUNG UN capitulates; thereby allowing the corrupt “NUCLEAR CLUB” comprising America, Great Britain, France, and other Nations that have the terrible nuclear weapon; to dominate and control the WORLD, yet again.

 

KIM JUNG UN had the greatest opportunity to instruct AMERICA and the WORLD, that if all these Nations, have the nuclear weapon, then both legally and morally, KOREA has the right to have them as well.

 

The so-called, “UN NON PROLIFERATION TREATY”, is naught but the Conspiracy of those that have this nuclear weapon; calculated, to specifically prevent other nations that do not presently have them, from ever having the right to defend their own country. The TREATY is wholly rotten and corrupt; and, has no TRUE legality at all.

 

I am sick and tired of living in a World wholly dominated and controlled by AMERICA and this rotten “NUCLEAR CLUB” - It is the very fact that America and Great Britain have this nuclear weapon that has arrogantly allowed them with impunity, to wage wars all over the Globe; and, inflict “REGIME CHANGE” upon any country that they please. Everywhere, where their military, has set their boots upon foreign land, HAS BEEN A TOTAL DISASTER.

 

IT SHOULD NEVER BE FORGOT; AMERICA IS THE ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WHO HAS EVER USED THE NUCLEAR WEAPON. AMERICA WHOLLY DESTROYED TWO JAPANESE CITIES AND MURDERED THOUSANDS OF ‘INNOCENT’ MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN; WHO WERE NOT THE ‘ENEMY’; AND, WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO, WITH FIGHTING WORLD WAR II. 

 

AMERICA is the greatest threat in the World today.
With DONALD TRUMP in control, WORLD WAR THREE is not so very far away. It’s hysterical hatred of RUSSIA; plus the British always provoking RUSSIA, as well; is the GUARANTEED very certainty of ‘explosive’ conflict ahead.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

.