MAGNA CARTA

 The charade and hypocrisy taking place today in celebration of the “Commemoration of Magna Carta”, signed by King John 800 years ago, is naught but a ridiculous sham. Her Majesty the Queen and all the ‘elite’ in attendance and, with all the ‘pomp and ceremony’, celebrating the very notion that this ridiculous ancient document has anything to do with ‘LAW’ and, the way the British are governed and ruled today; is positively absurd.

MAGNA CARTA for the ordinary ‘common people’, today, has no more importance or relevance than a ‘piece of toilet paper’, that has just wiped your arse. IT HAS NO RELEVANCE AT ALL.

 

MAGNA CARTA is merely a document whereby the Baron’s (the ‘elite’ of the year, 1215) claimed their independence from the tyrannical rule of a King. It had nothing whatsoever to do with establishing ‘human rights’ of the People. The ‘common people’ of England, of the year 1215, (and, just as prevails, even to this day) have no protection of ‘LAW’ at all.

LAW in Great Britain is merely a ‘myth’ where the ‘elite’ of the Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament, treat, ‘LAW’,  as it being something, that only  the ‘common people’ must obey; whilst, they, flout and breach ‘LAW’ all of the time.

The British ‘common people’ have no protection of ‘LAW’ whatsoever; they have no “Written Constitution”; or, “Bill of Rights”; or, access to a “Supreme Court of Law”; where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the abuses and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament, from within ‘LAW’.

The ‘Reigning Monarch’ sits upon the English throne charged with the duty and responsibility of honouring the “Original Contract” requiring the protection of the People; yet, throughout her entire reign, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has not provided that protection at all.

The only protection of ‘LAW’ that, the British ‘common people’ have; is the “European Human Rights Act”.

And, as I shall reveal here, the most important protection of ‘LAW’, that the British People have: the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”

IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE: two things in respect to this “Statute in Force/The Said Rights Claimed”; firstly, it is the most important ‘protection of law’ that the British have in protecting them from the abuse and prejudice of Parliament; and, secondly, that both Judiciary and Parliament has consistently and calculatingly refused to recognize this ‘Statute’ in order to permanently exercise, domination and control. They have consistently and purposely ignored the very existence of this ‘Statute’, in order that Parliament may do anything it pleases without, ‘The People’, having any say in the matter at all.

Parliament, Government’s and Judiciary give recognition to the “Bill of Rights 1689” for the legal provision of the “Supremacy” of Parliament. Relying upon “Article 9” of that Bill which reads as follows:

“That the Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parliament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament”

 

Both Judiciary and Parliament determine that this prevents all and any challenge to Parliament in the Courts; without, any other considerations at all.

But, both Judiciary and Parliament cannot choose which part of the “Bill of Rights 1689” that it will recognize and which part it will not. If both Judiciary and Parliament recognizes the “Supremacy” of Parliament afforded by “Article 9”; then both Judiciary and Parliament must also recognize all and every other ‘Premises’ of the same Bill. Both Judiciary and Parliament assert that “Article 9” prevents all challenge to Parliament in the Courts; without any other considerations at all.

Yet, the overall ‘authority’ of the entire “Bill of Rights 1689” as determined by the paragraph within that Bill known as, “The Said Rights Claimed” specifically instructs Parliament that, it has the authority ‘over’ all the other “Premises” of the Bill. That is, everything written and recorded, in that Bill.

This paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed” specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament applies or ‘enacts’ any of the “Premises” of the Bill, that Parliament, “OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

THIS IS THE GREATEST PROTECTION OF LAW THE BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE.

Together with the “European Human Rights Act”, this is all the protection of ‘LAW’ the British need. Here is that ‘Statute’, “The Said Rights Claimed”,

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

I am now 88 years of age. Throughout my entire life, until I publish this today, I have never seen one word published in Great Britain, about, “The Said Rights Claimed”. All of my life, its very existence has been purposely hidden from ‘The British People’, in order that the ‘elite’ and the ‘establishment’ may dominate and control. Parliament today does just as it pleases, even unlawfully instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament, on how they must vote. This travesty is carried out in Parliament by the political party WHIPS; and the WHIPS very presence in Parliament, ‘Prejudice the People”;  thereby flouting and breaching, “The Said Rights Claimed”.

If the British People now wish to create and establish a true DEMOCRACY, they must rise up and demand that both Judiciary and Parliament recognizes and complies with the actual present true ‘existence’ in ‘LAW’,  of, “The Said Rights Claimed”. This, ‘Statute’, already exists in British ‘LAW’. Judiciary and Parliament cannot continue to permanently ignore.

With the political party WHIPS wholly dominating and controlling the voting in Parliament, Great Britain cannot be a, DEMOCRACY”. It therefore is a,

TOTALITARIAN REGIME.

Read my book “DEMOCRACY” available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

ELEANOR HAWKINS AND MOUNT KINABULU

Baring Breasts on Mount Kinabulu

 

Eleanor Hawkins is being forced to adopt the pose of 'Sackcloth and Ashes" by her own father and mother who are forcing her to apologise for what she did in Malaysia; baring her breasts on top of Mount Kinabulu.

Eleanor Hawkins and all those other youngsters who climbed that mountain that day; DID NOTHING WRONG; having climbed all the way up to the top of that mountain in sheer playful innocent exuberance they pranced about removing all their clothes.

To them, MOUNT KINABULU, was just a mountain. To them, it wasn't 'sacred' at all.

All that claim that mountain is, 'Sacred'; let them prove that status, in law. The very idea that the mountain is 'sacred' is naught but the sheer FANTASY of those that believe. But, those that, do believe in this FANTASY, have no right whatsoever to impose that 'belief' on those, that do not know about it, or, who do not believe.

All female Humankind has the right to 'bare their breasts' or to be naked wherever and whenever they please. They have the right of, NATURAL LAW, inherent in their genes. NO LAW OF MAN, has the right to overturn or overrule, NATURAL LAW, inherent in the genes. The NATURAL human body of Humankind is beautiful, there is nothing to be 'ashamed' about it, at all.

ELEANOR HAWKINS HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG. IN BARING HER BREATS ON THAT MOUNTAIN, SHE HAS NOTHING TO APOLOGISE FOR.

The fact that some local people; and, the wicked journalists or media; had believed, or had invented the notion that, ‘abuse of the 'spirits' of the 'sacred mountain', had caused an earthquake; and, blaming this on the girls baring their breasts; is beyond all reasonable comprehension of all intelligent Humankind.

Malayan Government officials and the Judiciary insisting that, “If you visit our country you must respect our country and our traditions”; is ridiculous; it is merely asserting that if you visit our country, “You must ‘believe’, what I ‘believe’.

Human being’s have more dignity than that; they, believe, ‘What they want to believe.”

It is Inherent in the genes, to dissent, offend, and discriminate.

Eleanor Hawkins, do not bow your head in shame; stand up tall facing the world. You actually did nothing wrong. All Media, essentially, wanting to sell more newspapers or improve TV News ratings, wantonly vilified you; trying to pacify, Malaysia.

GREAT BRITAIN IS A SEWER OF CORRUPTION

FOCUS ON CORRUPTION
The Reality and The Myth....

In the light of the FIFA football scandal where the American's have intervened arresting and charging several executives of FIFA with serious CORRUPTION; the whole World's media (and especially British media) has been so obsessed and distracted with the hatred of SEPP BLATTER, (the President of that organisation); and, the intent, to vilify him; that they haven't paid any attention at all, as to what has actually created the CORRUPTION. All Media has been so distracted by that 'obsession' to get rid of SEPP BLATTER; that they didn't even bother to look for the 'catalyst' or cause of the corruption.

Virtually every British 'vested interest' news program and every journalist critic of SEPP BLATTER, were so obsessed, with this 'hatred' of him; that, in self riotous proclamation of innocence, they all declared that CORRUPTION is wicked and terrible; yet, implying, that it might be the norm for the 'foreigner'; but, that it is not prevalent, in Britain and in British football today.

Here, I will remove the 'vested interested' blinkers from their eyes; and, I will reveal where Great Britain is naught but a sewer of, CORRUPTION.

Firstly, let's look at the cause of CORRUPTION in football.
CORRUPTION can never occur, if the 'incentive' to be, CORRUPT, is not there.

CORRUPTION CAN ONLY TAKE PLACE, WHEN THE BIG, 'INCENTIVE' OF 'MONEY', is there. Thus, remove the incentive of all the, MONEY, from all football; and, the CORRUPTION is eliminated entirely from the sport. Football, returning, to the so-called "beautiful game"

It is the Sponsors and the 'Sponsorship Money" and the "Television Money" that has so CORRUPTED the game. The merchandising and the paying of obscene wages to the football player for the mere ‘kicking of a ball’ far in excess, monthly, than the nation pays a Prime Minister for managing the affairs of the whole country.  Football, being no longer merely a 'game'; these massive 'slush funds' has turned the 'game' into a wholly rotten and corrupt 'business' and industry. The present big sponsors, contributing more than 1.2 Billion Dollars; FIFA was awash and swamped with MONEY. No wonder there has been, CORRUPTION.

The Myth:
The myth prevailing is that, "all are corrupt but the British"; "every other nation is corrupt"; but, Great Britain and British Football, is free of corruption.

There is a 'racist' element in this British attitude to the hatred of SEPP BLATTER.
Just consider and examine GREG DYKE's comment; in respect of BLATTER'S re-election as President. In a live televised interview he said this,

"The whole of Europe voted against SEPP BLATTER, and, South America, as well. Now this is very important because this is where the major football games are played."

POMPOUS BLATANT RACISM AND ARROGANCE; because, football is just as important, and just as 'major' in both, Africa and Asia, as well. This is the true reason why GREGG DYKE and those like him 'hate' SEPP BLATTER so much. Because, BLATTER, has actively, heavily aided and supported, the promotion of football in those countries. The, EURO football element are so very fearful that they will lose all their domination and control. It is in the very nature of the British, to want to control everything.

But, this 'lilly white' and 'innocent' attitude of assertion that CORRUPTION is something that the British do not do; or the intimation that, Great Britain is free of CORRUPTION; is wholly ludicrous; because, the country is actually a 'sewer' of CORRUPTION. I present the stark vivid evidence here:

The Monarchy:
The 'Reigning Monarch' of England is charged with the duty and responsibility of honouring the "Original Contract", and, this requires the 'protection' of, all 'Subjects of the Crown'. ELIZABETH THE SECOND has sat upon the English throne for sixty years; and she has never once honoured that, 'Contract', or, protected the People. In the complete abandonment of 'duty' she has failed to protect the People from the tyranny of the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of Parliament. She has been provided with two 'legal instruments' that have been specifically designed to assist her to carry out that role; "The Royal Assent" and "The Royal Prerogative". The, 'Reigning Monarch' of England is supposed to, act as "Head of Government", and, to monitor the business of Parliament, in order to verify there is no, CORRUPTION, in the creation of the Bills and Acts, passed by Parliament. Granting, the "Royal Assent" if they are free of corruption and, that they are in the interests of the country and the People; refusing to grant it, if they are not.

IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE: that the 'last time' a 'Reigning Monarch' of England refused to grant the "Royal Assent" was on the, 11th day of March, in the year 1708; when Queen Anne refused to grant it, to the Bill passed by Parliament for the "Settlement of the Militia in Scotland". The British People are now expected to believe, that every Bill and every Act passed by Parliament, ever since that date; has been created, WITHOUT CORRUPTION. And, that is positively absurd. Because, every ‘Bill’ and every ‘Act’ passed by parliament under the influence of the political party WHIPS; is, CORRUPT. Having, no legality at all.

The, "Royal Prerogative" provides the 'Reigning Monarch' with three options for the protection of the 'Subject' they are,
(A), to encourage Minister's of Government.
(B), to warn Minister's of Government.
(C), Whenever, the wishes of the People, are in direct conflict with the actions of the Legislators (Parliament); to order the immediate dissolution of Parliament.

Yet, when in the General Election of 2010 'The People's Vote' determined (a), that no political party should have a majority in Parliament, and, (b), that there should be a Conservative led 'Minority Government; when, the leaders of the political parties decided that they could 'ignore' the people's wishes and then to proceed to create a 'coalition administration' to act as Government entirely on their own; "the People's wishes were in direct conflict with the actions of the Legislators"; but, ELIZABETH THE SECOND did not 'lift a finger' to intervene. All the evidence set out above, proves beyond any doubt, the,

SHEER ABANDONMENT OF HER DUTY. CORRUPTION, ON THE WIDEST POSSIBLE SCALE.


The British Judiciary:
The entire British Judiciary has purposely and intentionally 'conspired to pervert the course of justice' by lying to and deceiving the British people that 'LAW' prevents all challenge to Parliament in the Courts. Ruling, that, "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689", (without any other consideration), prohibits the questioning of Parliament, "In any Court or Place out of Parliament". Thereby, denying that access to the Courts. The British Judiciary, has lied, instructed, and, ruled, that this 'LAW' must apply. And, that there are no other considerations to be taken into account.

Yet, I know; and, I am convinced that, if I know, then the Judiciary must also know; that this is a false interpretation of both "Article 9" and the "Bill of Rights 1689". Because, the true interpretation of that Bill, in the paragraph of the Bill known as, "The Said Rights Claimed", specifically instructs Parliament, and, every reader of the Bill; that, anyone may test, question, or even challenge Parliament in the Courts; whenever Parliament, "Prejudice the People". Consequently, the Judiciary denying challenge to parliament in the Courts,

CORRUPTION, ON THE WIDEST POSSIBLE SCALE.


Parliament:
The people of Great Britain elect their parliament in democratic General Election; but, (a) the majority of the political candidates standing for election are chosen by the political parties, (b), they are financed by the political parties, and, (c) if and when they are elected; they are 'held in allegiance' to the political parties, as well. There are very few 'Independent' candidates elected as 'Members of Parliament'; because, even if they stand for election, they are specifically denied all access to Media, in order to publicise their manifesto’s.

CORRUPT, British Media only promotes and publicises the political parties during any election. In consequence of all this corruption where only the political parties manifesto's are made available for scrutiny by the electorate, the people are denied of all  'rightful' free choice of a 'political representative', who will faithfully represent them in Parliament. Furthermore, when these carefully selected candidates win the 'vote of the people' and they are 'elected' to serve as a Member of Parliament, they do not represent "The People" at all. They give the ‘preference’ and their 'allegiance' to their political party. And, they are then bound to honour and comply with the instructions issued to them by the political party, 'WHIPS'; that instruct them, each week in Parliament, on how they should or must vote. This entire travesty and total denial of 'DEMOCRACY' is wholly unlawful and illegal, for it flouts and breaches the 'precedent of law', set out in the "Bill of Rights 1689"

Thus, although Parliament is 'elected' by the People it is not a "People's Parliament". Parliament is actually dominated and controlled, by the political parties.

 That is not DEMOCRACY. It is, a, "Totalitarian Regime".

CORRUPTION, ON THE WIDEST POSSIBLE SCALE.


British Media:
All British Media, Television News and the Newspapers, readily declare that they are the, "Last bulwark of Freedom” protecting the People against the tyranny of the 'Executive Government' and, all CORRUPTION. They constantly claim the, "Freedom of the Press", in order to carry out this role. Major national newspapers continually publish virtually daily, the hurt, wounding, intimidation, vilification and defamation, upon anyone it sets it's sights upon. Carrying out investigation on anyone or anything; yet, it's 'investigations' are always selective publishing only what that paper wants to, investigate and disclose. To demonstrate how corrupt this is, just consider this: Throughout the entire 'sixty years' that ELIZABETH THE SECOND has sat upon the English throne, no newspaper, no television news broadcaster, and, no journalist, has ever published anything about the duty of the 'Reigning Monarch' being required to honour the "Original Contract"; and, queried, why, she has never honoured it. The entire British News Media has never published anything about, the "Royal Assent" and the "Royal Prerogative". Yet, these are the two 'legal instruments' provided to the 'Reigning Monarch', for the specific purpose of 'protecting' the British people. Why hasn't our so-called "FREE PRESS" ever said a word about this? And, why has no newspaper, broadcaster, or journalist ever questioned the 'legality' of the WHIPS in parliament? Or, even questioned the 'legality' of the Judiciary, always refusing challenge to parliament, in their courts? When, the "Bill of Rights 1689" establishes, that anyone may challenge parliament in the courts, whenever parliament "Prejudice the People".

IT IS BECAUSE ALL MEDIA IS WHOLLY CORRUPT INDOCTRINATING THE 'ESTABLISHEMENT' ALL OF THE TIME.

Every newspaper and every news broadcaster, wholly corruptly, praises ELIZABETH THE SECOND constantly and repeatedly; yet, they have never ever challenged her, for failing to carry out her duty.

The only true legal validity for the Monarchy, in the first place, is based upon the 'unwritten' principles of the "Original Contract"; which is founded upon the principle that, "Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord, for the protection of the Liege Lord". So, the principal duty of Monarchy is to 'protect' the People. “Subjects, of the Crown”.

The whole country can see that ELIZABETH THE SECOND enjoys all the privileges of Monarchy, yet she has given nothing back in return for the “Allegiance” given, throughout her entire reign. She has never ever provided that protection of the people.

 ALL BRITISH MEDIA, assumes, that the People of the country endure their imposed subjugation to the 'Reigning Monarch', (Being denied all protection of Law), in order that the 'Reigning Monarch' should act as patron to charities, host garden parties, and travel the globe promoting British goods and prestige. MEDIA, never ever considers, that she has miserably failed to honour her duty.

CORRUPTION ON THE WIDEST POSSIBLE SCALE.

The worst of all this though is the fact that for the ordinary common British Subject there is no access to LAW whatsoever where one can challenge all this injustice. If you are not extremely wealthy; there is no access to, LAW. And, that is,

THE GREATEST CORRUPTION OF ALL.

Read my book "DEMOCRACY" available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

Gordonj

DAVID CAMERON -THE 'G8' WORLD LEADERS CONFERENCE...

 

 DAVID CAMERON struts the World stage and this G8 Leaders Conference, lecturing the world leaders (excluding, President Tutin, of RUSSIA, one of the most important countries in the world); lecturing them about 'CORRUPTION' in the FIFA organisation.

DAVID CAMERON has no right whatsoever to lecture anyone about 'CORRUPTION', for he is one of the most 'corrupt' world leaders that there has ever been. He, specifically, as the British Prime Minister of an unlawful, ‘Coalition administration masquerading as Government’, denied the British people "DEMOCRACY". And, that is the greatest 'corruption' of all.

When I look at DAVID CAMERON, I do not see the man. DAVID CAMERON, I only see, ADOLF HITLER; for he too presided over a, 'Totalitarian Regime'.

ADOLF HITLER warned the whole world what he would do when he achieved the power to govern. He specifically stated that he would use the democratic process in order to gain power, but, the moment he achieved that power, “Heads would Roll”, and, he would create his own Laws.

The very instant Hitler became ‘Chancellor’, he placed before the ‘Reichstag’, (the German parliament), his “Enabling Act”; providing him with the Supreme power as the, ‘Head of State’; and, permitting him ‘lawfully’ to create his own law. The ‘elected delegates’ of the Reichstag, knew only too well, that, if they voted ‘YES’ to this, “Enabling Act”, that, from that very moment, their place and their participation in the ‘Reichstag’, would became wholly redundant. The, ‘Reichstag’, would no longer create and pass ‘democratic’ law; Adolf Hitler, would create, his own laws.

Yet, that, ‘Reichstag’, voted unanimously to pass this “Enabling Act” with the massive majority of 441 votes for ‘YES’, and, only 94 votes for “No”.

The NAZI ‘Totalitarian Third Reich’ had been born, dominated by Fuhrer Hitler.

 

 DAVID CAMERON, had his own totalitarian, “Enabling Act”; enabling, his ‘political party’ to create and pass, his own laws. Law, in the British Parliament today, is not created and passed by the democratic vote of the ‘elected’ Members of Parliament. The, “Enabling Act”, of the political party ‘WHIPS’; instruct, Members of Parliament, on how they must vote.

Adolf Hitler, at least had the democratic vote of the ‘Reichstag’, to support his right to create his own law. Therefore, there was nothing at all ‘unlawful’, in what he did.

But, the British political parties “Enabling Act”; by the utilization of the political activities of the WHIPS in parliament is wholly ‘unlawful’. Because, their political activities, ‘instructing Members of Parliament on how they should vote’, has no ‘legality’ at all.

The political party WHIPS in parliament instructing 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote; overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' placed upon those Members of Parliament, by the Constituents; this creates the, "Prejudice of the People"

"PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" IS WHOLLY OUTLAWED AND PROSCRIBED BY THE 'PRECEDENT OF LAW' SET OUT IN THE "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689". THE PARAGRAPH, "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED", WITHIN THAT BILL, SPECICALLY INSTRUCTS PARLIAMENT, THAT IN PARLIAMENT APPLYING OR 'ENACTING' ANY OF THE "PREMISES" OF THE BILL; THAT, PARLIAMENT, "OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

Accordingly, DAVID CAMERON'S use of the political party WHIPS in parliament in order to create and pass his own 'LAWS' is wholly, 'CORRUPT'; having, no legality at all.

Here is that paragraph in the Bill of Rights 1689:

 

The Said Rights Claimed

"And they do Claime Demand and insist upon all and singular the Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter, into Consequence or Example"

 

 Note:

Parliament can never vote to approve the use of the political party WHIPS in Parliament without causing the, 'prejudice of the people'. Thus, Parliament can never abolish or amend in any way, the "Bill of Rights 1689". Because, it provides not only the "Supremacy" of Parliament; but, more importantly it provides; the, "Protection of the People".

 

Read my book “DEMOCRACY” available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

Gordonj