Wednesday, June 28, 2017

HILLSBOROUGH FOOTBALL STADIUM DISASTER - THE CPS CORRUPT DECISION..


Hillsborough Decision

Nearly £100 Million Pounds has already been spent on Inquests and Inquiries trying to manipulate the general public with "Fake News",  and, trying to secure certain objectives. These objectives are:

 

A.   To completely 'absolve' Liverpool; the, Liverpool Football Team; and, all Liverpool Football Supporters; from all blame.

B.    To deny, 'what the eye has already seen', trying to deceive the British people, at large; that there are other "scapegoats" to blame.

 

IRREFUTABLE FACTS:

 

At precisely 14 hours 58 minutes, just two minutes before the 'kick off’ at 15:00 hours, on that fateful day; the "Lapping Road Football Spectator Enclosure" was completely full of football supporters all looking forward to seeing a good football match, which was about to be played. All there, were fully 'alive', very happy, and they were all breathing good fresh air. Yet, just minutes after that 'kick off'; 96 of them were crushed, seriously injured, trampled underfoot, unable to breath, suffocating, and, already 'dying', from the fateful injuries received.

 

 ONLY ONE THING CAUSED THOSE INJURIES AND DEATHS

 

That was the 'unruly' 'disgusting' 'hysterical wild mob' of so-called  football 'supporters', that forced their way into that already 'full' spectator  enclosure; crushing all that were at the front , with no means of escape. The more this 'mob' forced their way forward; the more those at the 'front' were crushed injured, and killed.

 

THE TV CAMERAS RECORDED FAITHFULLY ALL THIS TRAVESTY AND TRAGEDY.

 

So, why have all these, HILLSBOROUGH INQUESTS and INQUIRIES, 'absolved' all these wicked football supporters from all blame? Because, either they were wholly 'CORRUPT’; or, they looked firstly, in the wrong place.

 

Instead of looking at the, actual catalyst, for this travesty and this 'football' disaster; they did not look at what caused the mayhem; they looked at the, pre-catalyst stage, at what actually allowed these 'supporters' to invade that enclosure in the first place. And, they apportioned that, blame, on a variety of causes; the architect who designed the stadium; the design and layout of the stadium; the administration of the stadium; the ambulance men and women who attended the stadium; and, above all, mainly blaming, the Police.

 

The, HILLSBOROUGH DECISION, "CROWN PROSECUTION OFFICE", now has "23 Suspects' that it is investigating, to apportion, BLAME. And, it has charged six of these "Suspects" with serious criminal offences.

 

The important thing, to look out for; is precisely how many of these, "SUSPECTS" were the 'football supporters' that actually 'invaded' that "Lapping Road Enclosure" and, killed 96 people, on that fateful day? The six that have been 'charged' are all of the POLICE. Sheer hypocrisy and corruption.

 

All the INQUESTS AND INQUIRIES consistently blame the police. They allege that if the police had not 'opened' that "LAPPING ROAD GATE", providing entrance to the stadium; and, access to the 'tunnel', that led to that spectator 'enclosure'; no one would have been hurt at all.

 

So, in order, to judge this assertion; and, the actions of the police, in this regard; it is necessary to examine all that actually transpired, at that, "LAPPING ROAD GATE".

 

Prior to the actual 'kick off' that afternoon, a massive mob of unruly football supporters determined to get into the stadium, before the 'kick off', amassed at the LAPPING ROAD TURNSTILES. This mob was so wildly hysterical and unruly that the police, both on foot and on horseback, could not enforce control.

 

This 'mob' shoved and pushed with all of their force to try and get as fast as possible into that stadium before the 'kick off; they forced their way forward with such force, that those at the front, were pushed hard up against the 'turnstiles' and the building; and, the LAPPING ROAD GATE. Those at the front, were being 'knocked off their feet', and, the police, in order, to try and avoid serious injury or deaths; were obliged to open, the Lapping Road Gate. The, police officer in charge of those turnstiles and that gate, had no other alternative available to him, at that time. HE HAD TO OPEN THAT GATE. Or, those ‘supporters’ might be seriously injured or killed.

 

The very instant that this gate was open this wholly unruly mob surged through and, rushing forward with all force at their disposal, they charged into the 'tunnel' leading into the, LAPPING ROAD SPECTATOR ENCLOSURE; that was already full.

 

The very moment this mob was unable to move forward into this tunnel; any intelligent person unable to move forward, would automatically have 'stood still'; waiting for any obstruction to be removed; in order to move forward again. Then, after such delay,  and, then not being able to go forward at all; using that, 'intelligence', they would have completely 'withdrawn'; and, then, have gone home.

 

But, not his unruly wildly hysterical mob; they, were determined, to get into that stadium; come what may.

 

That is why, 96 People were 'murdered' that day.

 

The government can spend a 'BILLION POUNDS' on INQUESTS and INQUIRIES 'rigging' and 'manipulating' the TRUTH; but, nothing will alter, what the TV cameras portrayed, displayed, and, revealed; that fateful day. THOSE, WILD HYSTERICAL FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS, ARE THE ONLY ONES TO BLAME.

 

It is highly relevant also, to examine all other FOOTBALL STADIUM DISASTERS. The, records, all reveal; the so-called, "FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS", are the very 'catalyst' of blame; in virtually, every case.

 

 THERE IS SOMETHING ABOUT THE VERY 'AGGRESSION' OF FOOTBALL; and, FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS; THAT, PROVIDES AND PROMOTES THIS TRAVESTY.

 

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

GOOGLE and FREEDOM....


GOOGLE…

GOOGLE is of far more value to me, than a fucking Queen sitting upon the throne that has never complied with her, DUTY.

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has never once honoured the "Original Contract" throughout all the years she has occupied the throne.

Furthermore, she has repeatedly 'granted' the "ROYAL ASSENT" to corrupt law.

 

GOOGLE is of far more value to me, than a corrupt and rotten parliament that consistently creates and passes 'Act's', 'Motions' and 'Bills' in parliament; UNDER THE 'UNLAWFUL' INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS; in precisely the same way, as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS, created their own laws.

 

GOOGLE is of far more value to me, than all the fucking British Judiciary that, consistently, "Conspires to Pervert the Course of Justice" and, deceive the British people, by ruling that 'LAW' prevents the 'questioning' of parliament in the courts; whereas, the "Bill of Rights 1689" specifically determines that anyone may 'challenge' parliament in the courts, if and whenever, parliament, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 

GOOGLE, FACEBOOK, and, TWITTER are of far more value to me, than all the fucking British 'establishment' that arrogantly denies my access to DEMOCRACY; and, denies my access to the, 'protection' of 'LAW'. The entire British 'establishment' of Monarchy, Judiciary, Parliament, and Government, provides no access to a "Written Constitution", "Bill of Rights" or "Supreme Court of Law", where it is possible, to test, question, or challenge the 'abuse' of parliament, from within 'LAW'.

 

GOOGLE, FACEBOOK, AND TWITTER, PROVIDE ME WITH, "freedom". THE, FREEDOM TO DISSEMINATE AND RECEIVE, ALL 'IDEAS' IN COMPETITION FOR THE MINDS OF HUMANKIND. Whereas, all the British 'Establishment', seeks only, to, DOMINATE and CONTROL.

 

Corrupt politicians can fine GOOGLE, in jealousy and spite, for all they want. But, in my opinion, for the FREEDOM that GOOGLE gives me, it can promote and sell its own products on line, in any way it likes.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

 

Monday, June 26, 2017

TORY & DUP FLOUT DEMOCRACY...


TORY ‘Minority’ Government & DUP

Flout, DEMOCRACY.

 

First Secretary, DAMIEN GREEN, states the Government will pay each year, £20 Million Pounds, to the DUP executive.

Buying, bloody ‘votes’, to secure a ‘majority’ in Parliament; and, actually flouting “The People’s Wishes”, as determined and declared, by democratic vote, in the 2017 General Election.

 

“When the people’s wishes are in direct conflict with the actions of the Legislators”; the, “Reigning Monarch”, has no alternative but to intervene.  The Queen must order the immediate prorogue of parliament and, order, that a new, General Election must be held. Failure to protect the ‘Crown’s Subjects’ in this way, ABDICATES THE THRONE.

 https://www.change.org/p/her-majesty-the-queen-remove-elizabeth-the-second-from-the-throne

QUEEN MUST NOW ACT OR ABDICATE THE THRONE...


ELIZABETH THE SECOND NOW MUST ACT,

OR, ABDICATE THE THRONE.

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND - AS ALL 'REIGNING MONARCH'S' THAT SIT UPON THE THRONE - MUST HONOUR AND COMPLY WITH THE "ORIGINAL CONTRACT"; OR, ABDICATE THE THRONE. SHE IS OBLIGED BY, 'PRECEDENT OF LAW', TO PROVIDE THE PROTECTION OF ALL, "SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN"

 

TODAY, I DEMAND THAT SHE ACTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS 'DUTY'; TO USE THE POWERS OF THE "ROYAL PREROGATIVE"; AND, TO ORDER, THE IMMEDIATE PROROGUE OF PARLIAMENT AND A FRESH GENERAL ELECTION.

 

IN, THE DEMOCRATIC 'GENERAL ELECTION' OF 2017, THE PEOPLE'S VOTE DECLARED AND DETERMINED THAT, "NO POLITICAL PARTY SHOULD HAVE A MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT". THAT, WAS THE DECLARED RESULT AND INTENT OF, 'THE PEOPLE', IN THAT GENERAL ELECTION.

 

TODAY, THE WICKED COMPLICITY AND CONSPIRACY OF BOTH THERESA MAY, OF THE CONSERVATIVE 'MINORITY' GOVERNMENT; AND, ARLENE FOSTER, OF THE 'DEMOCRATIC UNIONIST PARTY; THEY ENTERED INTO AN 'OFFICIAL' ARRANGEMENT WHEREBY, THEY CONSPIRED TOGETHER, TO PURPOSELY FLOUT 'THE PEOPLE'S WISHES', AS DECLARED IN THAT GENERAL ELECTION. IN, ORDER TO CREATE, THAT, "MAJORITY", IN PARLIAMENT.

 

SUBSEQUENT TO A CORRUPT 'INDUCEMENT'; £20 MILLION POUNDS PER YEAR; TO BE PAID TO THE EXECUTIVE OF THE DUP;

The, DUP, agrees to vote, in the issues that are presented to parliament for the vote; in favour of the, CONSERVATIVE PARTY.

THEREBY, PROVIDING THE CONSERVATIVES, WITH THAT, "MAJORITY". WHICH, 'THE PEOPLE'S VOTE’; ACTUALLY PROSCRIBED.

 

THIS IS THE SHEER CORRUPTION OF, 'THE PEOPLE'S WISHES', AS DECLARED IN THAT GENERAL ELECTION OF 2017.

 

'THE PEOPLE' IN THAT DEMOCRATIC GENERAL ELECTION DECLARE THAT, NO POLITICAL PARTY SHOULD HAVE A 'MAJORITY' IN PARLIAMENT' - YET, HERE, BOTH THE CONSERVATIVE 'MINORITY' GOVERNMENT AND THE DUP CONSPIRE TOGETHER, TO ACTUALLY CREATE THAT, 'MAJORITY', IN PARLIAMENT.

 

FURTHERMORE; THIS CORRUPT 'OFFICIAL ARRANGEMENT' BETWIXT THE CONSERVATIVE 'MINORITY' GOVERNMENT & THE DUP; FLOUTS AND BREACHES, THE "NORTHERN IRELAND" "GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMENT"; WHICH, SPECIFICALLY DETERMINES, THAT THE ALL PARTIES SIGNING THE AGREEMENT SHOULD BE "IMPARTIAL". IT IS IMPOSIBLE FOR THE CONSERVATIVE 'MINORITY' GOVERNMENT TO BE "IMPARTIAL" IF IT HAS ALREADY MADE 'SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS’ FAVOURING' THE DUP. WHILST, DENYING THOSE 'ARRANGEMENTS', WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES SIGNING THAT AGREEMENT.

 

LAW

The "Royal Prerogative"

"When the People's wishes are in direct conflict with the actions of the Legislators"; the, 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the throne is obliged to order; "the immediate prorogue of parliament", and, order, that, "a new general election", must be held.

That is our, LAW. 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN has no option but to obey.

 

SHE EITHER,

A. COMPLIES WITH AND HONOURS THE "ORIGINAL CONTRACT";

B. ORDERS ,THE IMMEDIATE PROROGUE OF PARLIAMENT;

 

OR, SHE ABDICATES THE THRONE.

 

 NOTE: THE PEOPLE OF GREAT BRITAIN EITHER LIVE BY 'LAW' AND, THE 'RULE OF LAW';

OR, THEY LIVE BY, SHEER ANARCHY. 'LAW', TRUE AND JUST LAW, APPLIES TO THE 'ELITE', JUST AS WELL AS IT APPLIES TO THE 'COMMON PEOPLE.

 

TODAY, IN GREAT BRITAIN; THE 'ELITE' AND THE 'ESTABLISHMENT' OF MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT, PARLIAMENT, AND, THE POLICE; ALL LOOK UPON 'LAW', AS BEING SOMETHING THAT, "ONLY THE COMMON PEOPLE', MUST OBEY". WHILST, THEY, ALL OF THEM, FLOUT AND BREACH 'LAW', ALL OF THE TIME.

 

I am sick and tired of having 'no protection of law".

 

My ultimatum;

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND, "PROTECT" SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN;

OR, GET OFF, THAT THRONE. GRANTING THE "ROYAL ASSENT" REPEATEDLY TO "CORRUPT LAW"; YOU HAVE OCCUPIED THAT THRONE; FOR FAR TOO LONG.

 


 

Thursday, June 22, 2017

GRENFELL FIRE & BREXIT...


GRENFELL TOWER BLOCK FIRE, the aftermath, and the

Comparisons with ‘leaving’ the E.U.

 

Consider, that this "Tower Block “was Parliament and the entire British nation; hereinafter, referred to as the 'Building' and,

 

Consider, that the fire protective "cladding' of that 'Building' was; the 'right wing' TORY party Members of Parliament, obsessed with leaving the E. U.; hereinafter, referred to as the 'Cladding'

 

Then consider this:

 

The 'Cladding' obsessed with seizing complete domination and control of the British people, (who have no protection of law whatsoever); did not like the 'provision of that legal protection' provided by the "EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT and the "EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT"; so in order to secure that "domination and control" of the British people; they corruptly decided to set fire to the 'Building' to make sure the British people 'left' the E.U.

 

The 'spark' that first ignited the flame to set light to the 'Building' was provided by BILL CASH the Tory Member of Parliament, who hated the E.U.

He set light to the 'Building'; and, the 'Cladding' swept swiftly the 'fire' thereafter, until it wholly consumed the entire 'BUILDING'. The 'fire' was so intense that it ignited the very 'leader' of the TORY party (DAVID CAMERON) and, in an attempt to, put out that 'fire'; he ordered a 'Referendum' for the people to be held; where they could choose whether they wanted to leave the E.U. or not.

 

The 'Cladding' fire now consumed the entire 'Building'; and, the "fire protection services" of that 'Building' should have intervened. And, at this point, they ought to have ‘protected' everyone in the 'BUILDING'; by pointing out and providing information as to precisely what would happen if the 'people' voted to leave the E.U. But, the "fire protection services" failed in this duty, and, did nothing about this at all.

 

The 'Cladding' fire now consumed everything. With their lies, deceit and manipulation; that 'fire' swept with great speed consuming all; thus, and, thereby, leaving the entire 'BUILDING', naught but a burnt out shell.

 

In the INQUEST that must follow a, “Public Inquiry", and a "Criminal Investigation" must be set up now; there must be the most thorough investigation of the "Cladding' and all their activities that caused all this, 'fire'. Every, lie deceit manipulation and activity of the "Cladding", in this 'fire', should now be revealed.

 

Note: During the E.U. 'Referendum' procedure, BORIS JOHNSON and many others representing the "Cladding"; in influencing the people; told whopping great lies.

 "£350.00 per week would be available, FOR THE NHS, if we voted to leave the E.U."

 
That, was a whopping great lie.

 

ALL THAT LIED IN THAT REFERENDUM SHOULD NOW BE SEVERELY PUNISHED. Everyone that voted "REMAIN", should now insist on this thorough 'investigation' and, this, PUNISHMENT.

 

Because. this 'fire', started by all the "Cladding", has consumed us all. Great Britain now is naught but that 'burnt out' shell. And, nobody, can guarantee any, "Repair"

 

Monday, June 19, 2017

GRENFELL FIRE & CORRUPTION


GRENFELL FIRE & The ‘Public’ Inquiries…

 

With 79 people murdered in this fire very serious questions must be asked and, answered. The people throughout this nation must KNOW who, or what is, GUILTY, for this atrocity.

 

1.  The, PUBLIC INQUIRY, must be ‘Public’.

2.  All giving ‘evidence’ to the Inquiry must be provided with legal representation. And, they must be obliged to be ‘interrogated’ by legal counsel as well.

3.  All the ‘hearings’ of the INQUIRY must be televised throughout; and, the ‘transcript’ of all the proceedings daily, must be posted on the Internet.

4.  The ‘CONCLUSIONS’ of the INQUIRY must be made fully ‘PUBLIC’ – There must be no ‘private’ conclusions, sent only, ‘privately’, to the Prime Minister.

5.  Every single word stated; and, every document submitted; to the INQUIRY; must be made, ‘Public’.

 

The, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION:

1.  There must be the most thorough investigation carried out to determine if there has been any CORRUPTION involved in the ‘awarding’ and, the ‘securing’ of the “CLADDING CONTRACTS”; in respect of all or any involved.

2.  “FOLLOW THE MONEY” is the ‘principle’ that must apply.

3.  The investigation must explore,

(a), Why the ‘contract’ for the “CLADDING” was first awarded to one contractor? Yet, was then withdrawn? only to be awarded to another contractor that provided a ‘cheaper’ version of the “CLADDING”? And,

(b) Was there any ‘inducement’ offered, or made, in respect to the ‘withdrawing’ of that contract from the first contractor? And, then ‘awarding’ that contract, to the second contractor?

(c), Did any MONEY or any other ‘inducement’ change hands?

 

The INVESTIGATORS must now seize all bank and financial documents, all or any other documents and email, in respect of all ‘participants’ involved.

 

CORRUPTION undoubtedly exists; it must be rooted out and explored. The ‘GUILTY’ must go to jail for a very long time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, June 16, 2017

TORY & DUP & Corruption....


TORY & DUP 'stitch up' to secure a majority in parliament...

 

This is wholly unlawful, for the reasons as shown below:

 

1.        It flouts and breaches, the Northern Ireland, “Good Friday Agreement". Which, specifically requires, that the British government must be 'impartial' to all the 'parties' of the Agreement. It is impossible to ensure and verify that, 'impartiality', if the government, has entered into any special, contrary arrangement, with the DUP.

The government cannot be 'impartial' at all; if it has entered into any 'special relationship' with the DUP, (being only one 'party' signing that Agreement). Therefore, and, thereby, discriminating against all other ‘party’s’, that have signed. This, verifies, in stark vivid clarity, that a, "CONFLICT OF INTERESTS", exists.

 

2. In the democratic, GENERAL ELECTION, of 2017; the, result of "The People's" vote determined, that, they did not want any political party to have a 'majority' in parliament. That, was the declared intention of, "The People", in that election. TORY & DUP, now acting and determining to ignore or flout this 'intent' of "The People", in order, to create that 'MAJORITY' in parliament; is wholly unlawful. Placing, the onus and the responsibility upon, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, to honour her DUTY; and, intervene.

 

The QUEEN's duty, provided by the, ROYAL PREROGATIVE; requires; that by, 'precedent of law',

 

"Whenever the wishes of the people are in direct conflict with the Legislators", the, ‘REIGNING MONARCH', must intervene. Therefore, the, QUEEN, must order, the immediate 'prorogue' of parliament and a new, General Election.

 

Both, 1 and 2 above, provides overwhelming, EVIDENCE; why the Queen must act.

 

Her Majesty's failure, to protect the BRITISH PEOPLE in this regard; BREACHES AND BREAKS THE, “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”; thereby, SHE ABDICATES THE THRONE.

 

I am sick and tired of living in this land; having no protection of law at all.

 

Monday, June 12, 2017

Flouting the "People's Wishes"


Corruption flouting “The People’s Wishes’ declared in a democratic General Election.

 

If, THERESA MAY and, the leader of the ‘DUP’, enter into any, ‘pre-determined’, arrangement; whereby, the ‘DUP’ will support THERESA MAY and her government; in order to provide her government with a working MAJORITY in parliament. So, that any LEGISLATION presented to parliament for the vote, is afforded that, MAJORITY, by the ‘DUP’; that will be wholly unlawful and corrupt.

 

Because, it will be the corrupt intentional thwarting, overruling and supplanting, of the “People’s Wishes’, as declared by the voting results of that democratic, General Election. Which, specifically determined that,

 

“No political party should have a majority in parliament”.

 

Where, and, when the, “People’s Wishes are in direct conflict with the actions of the Legislators”; like this.  HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, has no alternative available to her. By, ‘precedent of law’, she must use the “ROYAL PREROGATIVE”, to immediately prorogue parliament, and, order, that a new, General Election, must take place.

http://pamphletteer.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/general-election-tyranny-of-dup.html

Sunday, June 11, 2017

GENERAL ELECTION - The tyranny of a 'DUP' "Coaltion Government"


General Election & The ‘DUP’ Shopping List.

 

Apart from the actual Membership of the 'DUP' who may have had an interest in 'DUP' objectives and, voted accordingly, in this General Election; that, 'DUP', 'shopping list'; for every other VOTER in that election, would have had no relevance at all. Therefore, for them, it would not have figured at all in any way, throughout that entire election.

 

The very fact that, now, after the disastrous result for the ‘TORIES’, that the vote result has determined that, 'No political party should have a majority", in parliament; that, the 'DUP' and, its "shopping list', should, influence how the People are to be governed; or, allow, THERESA MAY, in any way, to thwart, overrule, or supplant the declared 'wishes of the people',  that, "no political party should have a majority' in parliament"; and, facilitate, the formation of a, COALITION GOVERNMENT; is wholly corrupt. This has, no 'legality at all'.

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE VOTED; THE VOTE HAS BEEN DECLARED; POLITICIANS NOW DETERMINE, "THE PEOPLE", CAN NOW BE WHOLLY DISCARDED; NOT HAVING, ANY FURTHER 'PARTICIPATION' AT ALL. WHERE, PARLIAMENT, ALONE; MAY EXERCISE, ALL DOMINATION AND CONTROL.

 

This is "MY BLOODY LIFE" at stake here, I want 'protection' from all this tyranny.

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, BOUND IN DUTY, BY THE 'PRECEDENT OF LAW' OF THE, "ORIGINAL CONTRACT"; REQUIRING, THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE; MUST NOW EXERCISE HER RIGHT TO INTERVENE.

 

"WHEN THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE ARE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE ACTIONS OF THE LEGISLATORS";

 

SHE IS OBLIGED TO ACT.

 

SHE IS NOW REQUIRED TO UTILISE HER RIGHT PROVIDED BY THE, "ROYAL PREROGATIVE", TO IMMEDIATELY PROROGUE PARLIAMENT, AND, TO ORDER A NEW GENERAL ELECTION.

 

If she fails to do this; IF SHE FAILS TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE; I shall launch an immediate petition calling for ELIZABETH THE SECOND to be removed from the throne; and, calling, for the 'abolishment', of the MONARCHY.

 

THERE IS NO POINT WHATSOEVER, IN HAVING A ‘MONARCHY’, IF THE “REIGNING MONARCH” FAILS TO HONOUR, THE, “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”.

 

I am sick and tired of living in a wholly "TOTALITARIAN REGIME" where the 'common people' of this land, have no protection of 'LAW' at all.

http://pamphletteer.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/the-rule-of-law-in-respect-to-general.html

 

Saturday, June 10, 2017

The, "RULE OF LAW" in respect to GENERAL ELECTIONS...


General Elections & The Corruption of,

Coalition Governments…

 

Leaders of Political Parties have the perfect right in Parliament to enter into discussions or any arrangement with the ‘Leaders’ of any other political party in parliament, in order, to improve their own political party objectives; or gain support; for any of that party’s policies.

However, it is wholly unlawful, for the leaders, of any political party in parliament, to create and form ‘official coalitions’ or collusion between those parties, in order, to, thwart, subvert, corrupt, alter, or obstruct; the, “Wishes of the People”, as declared and determined by the, “People’s Vote”, in General Election.

In the event where the “People’s Vote” in a democratic General Election has determined that, “No political party shall have a majority in Parliament”; then, that is the decision of, “The People”; in that election; and, in ‘LAW’.

This decision of “The People” is thereby, established in ‘LAW’ – It is, “Written in Stone” - and, it never can be changed.

 When “The People” in democratic General Election determine that, “No political party shall have a majority” in parliament; the political party securing the most seats in parliament; is then FREE to govern as a, “MINORITY GOVERNMENT”. But, if this rightful option is refused; then there must be a new and fresh, General Election.
 
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, bound by, ‘precedent of law’, to honour the “Original Contract”; requiring the, “Protection of the People”; cannot deny the “Wishes of the People” cast by vote in democratic General Election. Therefore, in such instance, where, “Minority Government”, is refused. She is bound by, duty, to order, the immediate ‘prorogue’ of parliament; and, a new General Election.

Friday, June 9, 2017

Letter warning HM Queen re 'Coalition Government'......


31 FALCON COURT  ELMWORTH GROVE LONDON SE21 8RG

0208 670 5795


 

Her Majesty the Queen

Buckingham Palace

London SW1A 1AA

 

June 9, 2017

 

Madam

Subsequent to the results of the General Election declared last night; THERESA MAY, now attends Buckingham Palace today, seeking the permission of Her Majesty, in order to form a new ‘coalition’ Government.

 

I specifically warn you, Madam; that if you grant THERESA MAY this permission; I shall then immediately launch, and, promote extensively throughout all social media; calling for ‘your’ removal from the Throne; and, the complete ‘abolishment’ of the Monarchy. The only ‘legality’ for a Monarchy at all; rests entirely on, “The People’s Consent”.

 

Madam,

You have the ‘DUTY’, on two counts, to “Protect the People”;

(A), The Original Contract.

(B), The Royal Prerogative.

Full details, as set out below.

 

1.    The results of the General Election clearly and specifically declared that “The People” did not want any political party to have a majority in Parliament.

2.    That is the declared “Wishes” of the British People.

3.    The Original Contract requires your ‘protection of the people’.

4.    The “Royal Prerogative” provides the option, legality, and, the legal instrument; that, “When the wishes of ‘The People’ are in direct conflict with the actions of the legislators”; that, the ‘Reigning Monarch’, has the duty, to order the immediate prorogue of parliament; ordering, that a new, General Election, shall take place.

5.    Here, the “Wishes of the People” are abundantly clear.

6.    The People, declared, in democratic General Election, that they did not want any political party to have a majority in parliament.

7.    Therefore, Madam, you have the ‘DUTY’ to protect and comply with the “Wishes” of “The People”. Thereby, denying, THERSA MAY, this right, to form any, ‘coalition’ government.

 

The reasons for this are obvious.

If a, COALITION GOVERNMENT, is permitted by Her Majesty; it flouts and breaches both the “Original Contract” and, the declared “WISHES” of “The People”. Furthermore, it also excludes all ‘participation’ of, “The People”, in that election.

Thus, posing the question: “What the hell, is a General Election for in the first place? If, the declared result of “The People’s Vote”, in that election; is to be ignored? Or, if the “Reigning Monarch” and, an ex, "No Mandate", Prime Minister; can ‘stitch up’ that election result; corruptly; between themselves?

 

MADAM, I WARN YOU, THAT IF YOU GRANT THERESA MAY THE RIGHT TO FORM A “COALITION GOVERNMENT”; THEN, I SHALL LAUNCH AN IMMEDIATE ‘PETITION’ CALLING FOR YOUR ABDICATION; AND, THE COMPLETE ABOLISHMENT, OF THE  MONARCHY.

 

THERE IS NO LEGALITY FOR A MONARCHY AT ALL, IF THE “REIGNING MONARCH” FAILS TO HONOUR THE, “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”

 

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF ALL AS FOLLOWS; AND, THE COPY OF MY PROPOSED PETITION, ENCLOSED.

 

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has the ‘DUTY’ to protect the People.

 

All, ‘Reigning Monarch’s “, of this land, are obliged by ‘precedent of law’ and by ‘duty’ to honour the “Original Contract”; requiring, the protection of the people. If, ELIZABETH THE SECOND fails to provide that protection she, ABDICATES THE THRONE. Precedent of ‘English Law’ determines, that this is so.

 

The British people do not endure their ‘imposed’ subjugation to the British Crown; denied all right of true ‘citizenship’’ and being denied all protection of law; in order that the ‘Reigning Monarch’ – who they are bound in law to give allegiance to – shall enjoy all the privileges of CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY; shall act as patron to various Charites and Institutions; shall officially open new building and establishments; shall host garden parties; and, shall travel the globe promoting British products and British prestige.

 

The days of the “Divine Right of Kings” has long since gone; it departed this land, when, King Charles the First, had his head cut off.

 

Today, in spite of any conspiracy, betwixt Monarch and Parliament when CONSITUTIONAL MONARCHY was introduced, (replacing the “Absolute Monarchy”, there was before), every ‘Reigning Monarch’ of England, who sits on that throne; they are still bound by ‘precedent of law’ to honour the “Original Contract” and protect the People.

 

The actual ‘evidence’ for this, is provided here:

 

A.    King James the Second was removed from the throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688; for, “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People”.

 

B.     The CONVENTION determined that he had ‘failed to protect the people and their religion”, declaring that thereby, he had ‘abdicated the throne’. The CONVENTION declared, “The Throne was Vacant”.

 

C.     In a huge debate named “THE DEBATE AT LARGE” held in the “Painted Chamber” of the House of Commons in early February 1688, between both ‘Lords’ and ‘Commons’, they debated at length the words: “ABDICATED” and “THE THRONE IS VACANT”; and, at the conclusion of this debate, they declared as follows:

 

D.    Henry Powle, The Speaker of the Convention (Parliament) 1688, said this:

 


 

The Earl of CLARENDON’s speech in this debate, is immensely valuable: in the sense that he has realised, that, by their decision that day, they were creating Legal precedent.

(And, that what THEY may do under the precedent then, so also, might Subject’s do, generations later. (As I do now).

The Earl of CLARENDON insists on the Lineal Descent, he states: "when one ceaseth to be King, Allegiance is by Law due to his Legal Heir''; (and, then he goes on to say); “But I say, irrespective of that analysis of the Law from the standpoint of the Divine Right of Kings upholding the Lineal Descent and it's Authority, 'The Protection of the Subject" would be as binding on the Successor, as it was, on the Deposed. And if the Successor "Breached the Contract" as well; he also, could be Deposed."

 

CONCLUSION

 

There can be no ‘legal argument’ against this; if the “Reigning Monarch” of England, “Breaks the Original Contract” and “Fails to protect the People” they, ABDICATE THE THRONE”.

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not honoured that contract, once, all of the time she has occupied that throne. She has repeatedly granted the “Royal Assent” to corrupt laws and bills passed by parliament, under the influence of the political party WHIPS; and, the WHIPS in parliament, has no ‘legality’ at all.

 

What should the Queen be doing?

 

 With the country in a complete state of turmoil; with no government, with no official opposition; with no direction whatsoever from those elected to represent us; with absolutely no one dealing with the fact that the country has decided to leave the EU, and that the people are desperately waiting for ‘direction’ as to what is supposed to happen next; and with absolutely no one taking up negotiations with the EU, as to the terms of our leaving; the Queen has only one option: Under the terms of the “Original Contract”,

 

SHE MUST PROTECT THE, BRITISH PEOPLE.

 

1.     She must use her powers under the “Royal Prerogative” to order the immediate dissolution of parliament; ordering a new general election.

 

2.     When that new government is formed; she must immediately use those powers again to ‘warn’ her Ministers that she will not grant the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law. She must instruct her Ministers that the political party WHIPS in parliament are ‘unlawful’ and that, any ‘Law’ or ‘Bill’ passed in parliament under their influence and direction, is corrupt law.

 

In the event that Her Majesty the Queen does not do this;

 

Then, there is no need, nor any requirement; for a MONARCHY at all.

 

Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord”.

 

IF, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, DOES NOT PROVIDE THIS PROTECTION.

 

She, Abdicates the Throne.