The most important lesson for all Humankind

The Revelation

The most important lesson for all Humankind.

PROTECT AND UPHOLD YOUR DIGNITY….

 

As a young boy I was brought up and indoctrinated with the strictest religion and dogma of Catholicism. My mother, a non-Catholic, to marry my dad, had to become a catholic; and, she went ‘overboard’ for that faith. She was so obsessed with being a catholic; and, complying with the requirement of that faith; to bring up her children in the faith; that she made my life both terrible and unbearable. My enforced education was always in catholic schools; where I was taught by monks and nuns who indoctrinated RELIGION every day. The principle thrust of that teaching was that I should learn to both, “Love and Fear God”.

My mother had the ludicrous idea that I should become a priest. It was her idea that I should start on that path, by becoming an ‘alter-boy’ serving as assistant to the priest during religious ceremonies such as “The Mass”; and, I also had to join the choir.

The catholic school I attended in Crawley, Sussex, was situated directly opposite the catholic “Franciscan Monastery”; and, priests and monks from that monastery frequently attended our school to teach various subjects; but always with the slant on, religion.

One day one of these ‘monks’ attended our class in school and he tried to teach us all about, “GOD’S WONDERFUL UNIVERSE”. This is precisely what he said,

 

“When you look up at God’s wonderful sky at night and look upon God’s bright stars shining in the heaven’s above; it is the light from that star that you actually see. That light has taken millions of years to reach God’s planet earth; so that bright star may no longer exist. It might have reached the end of its life many long years before.” He then explained to us about ‘light years’. He went on to say that the purpose of the lesson was to properly get us to understand that ‘GOD’ created everything. Here, he had created this wonderful, massive, ‘UNIVERSE’. And, he wanted us to properly learn and understand, how vast the ‘UNIVERSE’ was.

 

Well, I pondered that ‘concept’ all day; I could not get my head around it. But, I could not get it out of my head. That night I climbed out of my bedroom window and I sat on the window-sill looking up to the very bright stars filling the sky.

I fixed my eyes on the brightest star and I sat there for ages pondering the concept.  Suddenly, like a ‘first’ flash of lightening, I understood. If it had taken thousand of ‘light years’ for the light of that star to reach plant earth; this indicated and proved how vast the UNIVERSE was. And, in all that vastness our planet ‘Earth’ was virtually insignificant. Compared, to the enormity and vastness of “Space” of the UNIVERSE. Accordingly, if planet earth was so ‘insignificant’ in the order of things; how ‘insignificant’ must I be.

I must be so ‘insignificant’; that I must be merely the tiny pencilled ‘dot’ on a million miles of Virgin white paper. Thus, I HAD NO SIGNIFICANCE AT ALL. In comparison to the size of the UNIVERSE; I AM NOTHING.

 

WOW! This took my breath away.

But, suddenly, like the second ‘flash of lightening’, this properly activated my, BRAIN.

 

Compared to the UNIVERSE I am not, NOTHING.

I AM EVERYTHING.

I AM EVEN FAR GREATER THAN THE UNIVERSE; BECAUSE, I EXIST. I AM HERE ON PLANET EARTH; AND, FOR AS LONG AS THERE WILL EVER BE; FOR, ALL ‘ETERNITY’; THERE WILL ONLY EVER BE, “ONE OF ME”. I AM ‘UNIQUE’.

 

THAT IS MY RIGHT AND MY ‘DIGNITY’ AS A HUMAN BEING.

I AM A ‘FREEBORN’ HUMAN BEING. WITH ALL THE RIGHTS OF A HUMAN BEING. I AM NOT ‘NOTHING’. NOR, AM I, A MERE ‘SUBJECT’, OF THE BRITISH CROWN. Governments, and Monarchy, do not gives us our rights.

THEY EXIST ‘INHERENT’ IN OUR GENES.

RUSSIAN WARSHIP IN THE ENGLISH CHANNEL. ALL BRITISH MEDIA IMMEDIATELY PROMOTES THE COLD WAR.

Today, all British Media features that a Russian warship is being shadowed by the Royal Navy in British waters. Great, I am pleased to see that my Russian 'friends' can demonstrate that this planet earth is not solely dominated by the United States and Britain.

The present 'cold war' constantly waged by the U.S. and Britain sickens me. I can never forget and, they should NEVER forget, how our great 'ally' Russia and the scarifice of the Russian people helped to defeat the Nazis in World War II.

Russia fought the German army every step of the way from Moscow to Berlin. And, millions of Russians died in doing so. If Russia had not done that, World War II could never have been won. In spite of my rotten government and the military constantly declaring that Russia is "Our Enemy". To me, RUSSIA and the RUSSIAN PEOPLE will always be my friend.

DEFAMATION OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS

 

That right-wing Tory arrogant freak, JULIAN SMITH MP; the Chief WHIP in Parliament, readily asserts that he will 'sue' anyone who makes defamatory remarks or claims in respect to the WHIPS activities in parliament.

 

Well, let the bastard 'sue' me; because I specifically loathe the WHIPS in parliament continually depriving me of access to a 'true democracy'; and, I assert and claim, that by 'precedent of law' the political party WHIPS in Parliament, has no legality at all.

 

I ASSERT THAT THE FUCKING POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT AND THEIR UNDEMOCRATIC ACTIVITIES IN PARLIAMENT, HAS NO FUCKING LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

Is that sufficient ‘defamation of the Whips activities’ for JULIAN SMITH to ‘sue’ me? Perhaps not; so what if I accused JULIAN SMITH (as Chief WHIP) of behaving like ADOLF HITLER, and provide the ‘evidence of proof’; that, should be sufficient for him to carry out his ‘promise’, to sue.

 

TODAY ACTS MOTIONS AND BILLS ARE BEING CREATED AND PASSED IN PARLIAMENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF JULIAN SMITH MP AND THE WHIPS; IN PRECISELY THE SAME WAY AS ADOLF HITLER AND THE NAZIS CREATED THEIR OWN LAW.

 

ADOLF HITLER HAD THE PERFECT LEGALITY TO CREATE HIS OWN LAW; BECAUSE HIS "ENABLING ACT" HAD BEEN PASSED BY THE GERMAN REICHSTAG (PARLIAMENT) BY 441 VOTES TO 94. BUT, THE BRITISH, "ENABLING ACT", THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO SUCH 'LEGALITY' AT ALL.

 

WHY?

 

Because, the WHIPS instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote upon the issues presented to parliament for the vote; this overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' that might have been placed upon those MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT by the constituents. This therefore creates the, “Prejudice of the People.”

 

Yet, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE", is wholly proscribed by the 'precedent of law' set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed". This paragraph of the "Bill of Rights 1689", specifically instructs parliament, that parliament may enact any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill, providing that parliament, "OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 

THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS AND THEIR ACTIVITIES IN PARLIAMENT DO "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"; AND, THEREFORE; AND, THEREBY; BY THIS 'PRECEDENT OF LAW'; THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

_{Note: The paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”, is the overall superior authority of the “Bill of Rights 1689”, It claims within its text, that it has the authority over all the “PREMISES” of the  Bill.}

 

 

_{The Said Rights Claimed”:}

_{“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”}

_Note

 

 

 

 

PASSPORTS - and the DESPOTISM prevailing..

PASSPORTS – AND - THE TRUE PURPOSE OF THE PASSPORT.

 

The true purpose of the PASSPORT is to provide immigration officers and the security services of all nations with the ability to ‘identify’ the person standing before them; from the photograph displayed in their passport.

 

This is the sole purpose of the passport. It has no other purpose at all.

 

ONE MILLION PEOPLE could easily identify me from the passport photograph I submitted with my passport application; but the EXAMINER – wielding the power of despotism – blocks the issue of my passport because the ‘size’ of the facial features displayed do not meet his ‘bureaucratic’ requirement. The face displayed must be to an exact certain size. Both height and width.

 

My application was submitted to and received by the HM Passport Office at 7:29 am on 26^th October 2017. I have not received ‘one word’ from that office since then. The EXAMINER rejects the photo’s submitted; but neither he or she has not even had the courtesy to notify me, why?

 

IT IS THIS DESPOTISM PREVAILING IN THIS COUNTRY THAT RUINS SO MANY LIVES. TIN POT ADMINISTRATORS; WIELDING THE POWER OF MONARCHY AND THE ‘CROWN’; IN ORDER TO EXERT ‘POWER’; FOR POWERS’S SAKE.

 

THESE ARE THE BASTARDS TO BE FOUND IN EVERY ‘ADMINISTRATION OF AUTHORITY’ THROUGHOUT OUR LAND.

THESE ARE THE SAME BASTARDS THAT RUINED THE LIVES OF ‘EDWARD and WALLACE SIMPSON’; and PRINCESS MARGARET and PETER TOWNSEND.

 

THESE ARE THE SAME ‘BASTARDS’ THAT TODAY WIELD AND GRANT THE “ROYAL ASSENT”, IN THE NAME OF THE QUEEN.

THESE ARE THE SAME ‘BASTARDS’ THAT CONTROL MONARCHY; AND ALL OUR LIVES TODAY.

 http://pamphletteer.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-despotism-prevailing-in-britain-now.html

The DESPOTISM prevailing in Britain now,,,,,

When despotism has established itself for ages in a country, as in France, it is not in the person of the King only that it resides. It has the appearance of doing so in show, and in nominal authority; but it is not so in practise, and in fact. It has it’s standards everywhere. Every office and department has it’s despotism, founded upon custom and usage. Every place has it’s Bastille, and every Bastille it’s despot. The original hereditary despotism resident in the person of the King, divides and subdivides itself into a thousand shapes and forms, till at last the whole of it is acted by deputation. This was the case in France; and against this species of despotism, proceeding on through an endless labyrinth of office till the source of it is scarcely perceptible, there is no mode of redress. It strengthens itself by assuming the appearance of duty, and tyrannizes under the pretence of obeying.

 

-------------------------------------------

 

O! Ye that love mankind!  Ye that dare oppose not only tyranny but the tyrant, stand forth!  Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her as a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart.

O! receive the fugitive and prepare in time an asylum for mankind!

 

Thomas Paine       “RIGHTS OF MAN”    (published in England 1791)

 

SEXUAL ABUSE: BRITAIN IS LIKE A SEWER TODAY.

Wild Hysterical Allegations of Sexual Abuse

 

“He touched my knee”

 

This mere flippant allegation was sufficient to destroy a man’s life and destroy his, well earned, political career.

 

I am sick and tired of the power seeking feminist brigade always persuading women that they are not “sexual objects” and, persuading them to resist, the ‘unwanted’ sexual attentions of the male.

 

This politically correct brigade, and, everyone else in the country, merely needs to only to look at the population of the World; to see how ridiculous this assertion is. If, the female of the species was not, ‘sexual objects’; that, population of the World, could not exist.

 

From the very instant a human being is born to planet earth, with a vagina and not a penis, for the very ‘life’ of that being, until their demise, they will always be available for the ‘sexual attraction’ of the male.

 

When the male ‘touches a woman’ he pays her the compliment that she is ‘sexually attractive’ to him. He does her no harm. There has been no “Sexual Abuse”. However, were the male go further and aggressively force his intent to grope or fondle the woman intimately or, force ‘penetration’ when the woman says “No” - then that is both ‘sexual assault’ or ‘rape’.

 

But, the mere “touching of a woman” is not ‘sexual abuse’ at all. Because the woman only has to, ‘brush the hands away’, and, indicate or demonstrate, that the ‘touching’ was unwelcome: or possibly offensive to the woman.

 

NO HARM HAS BEEN DONE

 

The male merely exercises the ‘natural instinct’ inherent in his genes; to constantly explore or pursue sexual conquest.

 

In every instance of ‘touching’ the female always possesses the ‘right’ to say “No”. SHE MUST SIGNIFY OR DEMONSTRATE THAT INTENT. It is only the ‘politically correct’; for their own vested interests; that always and purposely exaggerates the mere, ‘touching’; as “Sexual Abuse” or, RAPE.

 

THE WILD ‘SEXUAL ABUSE’ HYSTERIA PREVAILING IN GREAT BRITAIN NOW; IS TURNING ‘LIFE’ IN THE NATION, AS THOUGH WE ALL LIVE IN A ROTTEN SEWER. IT GETS MORE ‘FILTHY’ EVERY DAY.

 

Gordon J Sheppard.   4.11.2017

 

PARLIAMENT "QUESTION TIME"

 _{Question for the Prime Minister}

_{Letter sent to Helen Hayes MP.}

_{Dear Helen Hayes MP}

_{In considering whether to ask the Prime Minister this question, or not. Please consider this:}

 

_{I have no protection of LAW.}

_{LAW today in my country is looked upon by the 'elite' of Monarchy, Judiciary, Government, and Parliament, as being only 'something' that the common people must obey. Whilst they, repeatedly flout and breach LAW all of the time.}

_{HM Queen has not once honoured the "Original Contract" throughout all of the time she has occupied the throne; she has frequently granted the "Royal Assent" to corrupt LAW.}

_{The Judiciary "Conspires to Pervert the Course of Justice" and deceive the British people by ruling that the "Supremacy of Parliament" is ABSOLUTE; thereby denying access to the courts to 'question' Parliament irrespective of any circumstance.}

_{When, the very correct reading of the "Bill of Rights 1689"; actually verifies that anyone may 'question' Parliament in the Courts, if and when ever Parliament, "Prejudice the People".}

_{Parliament today creates and passes 'LAW' in precisely the same way as HITLER and the NAZIS created their own law. By 'diktat' of the political parties and not by democratic consent.}

 _{All, ACT's, MOTIONS, and BILLS created and passed in Parliament today, "UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS" is, CORRUPT LAW. Because, the 'WHIPS' in Parliament, has no legality, whatsoever.}

_{'LAW' TODAY IN GREAT BRITAIN IS NOT PROPERLY UNDERSTOOD.}

_{"LAW IS A MYTH WITHOUT THE 'CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE' THERE IS NO LAW"}

_{The words of LORD HAILSHAM an ex Lord Chancellor of England.}

 

_{Thus, it is the "People's consent to 'live by the rule of law' that is, "LAW"}

_{Thereby, all that give their consent to live by law, are entitled to four specific rights:}

_{A. They are entitle to 'participate' in the creation and framing of law.}

_{B. The are entitled to 'equality' in law.}

_{C. They are entitled to the 'protection' of law.}

_{D. All LAW created must conform to, TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, INTELLIGENCE, LOGIC, and RATIONALE.}

_{Today in Great Britain all, 'A' to 'D' above, is denied.}

_{Dear Helen Hayes, this is why this question must be asked of the Prime Minister. FYI. Whether you 'ask the question' or not; I shall publish this 'question' on all social media; in case you decide to decline.}

_{Regards, and, with sincere respect,} 

_Gordonj

 

_{Question for Prime Minister}

_{​Prime Minister please clarify for all Members of this Parliament, and for all the people of the country;  the true legal status of the SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT.}

_{This is vitally important now; because, with all the complexities and the confusion created by BREXIT, and both Government and Parliament creating both ‘Laws’ and ‘Regulations’ that may affect the very lives of everyone in the country; it is imperative that the true ‘legality’ of the “SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT” is properly explained.}

 _{My constituent, MR GORDON SHEPPARD of West Dulwich asserts. that the offices and political activities of the WHIPS in parliament has no legality at all.}

_{He asserts and claims that he can prove by ‘precedent of law’, that the WHIPS instructing Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote in Parliament; actually creates the “Prejudice of the People”.}

 _{MR SHEPPARD asserts, that this causes the “prejudice of the people” by overruling and supplanting, the Constituents right to ‘influence’   their Member of Parliament; and, he asserts; that this flouts and breaches the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.}

 _{Yet, MR SHEPPARD cannot test this ‘abuse’ by the imposition of the WHIPS in Parliament; he cannot test or ‘Question’ Parliament in, ‘LAW’ and, from within ‘LAW’; because the JUDICIARY refuse to allow any ‘questioning’ of Parliament in the Courts. The JUDICIARY ruling that the “SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT” is ABSOLUTE.}

 

_​

_{But, MR SHEPPARD asserts that by, ‘precedent of law’, he can prove that “Article 9” of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”, is not ABSOLUTE; He asserts and claims that, “Article 9”, as well as, all the other “PREMISES” of that Bill, are wholly dependent upon the conditions set out in the paragraph of the Bill; known as, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.}

 _{MR SHEPPARD claims that this paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed" within this Bill; is the over-all ‘authority’ of the entire Bill. He asserts and claims this, because he says, that the very text of that paragraph in the Bill, verifies that, ‘within its text’, it specifically instructs Parliament; and, all reading that Bill; that it has the ‘authority’ over, “ALL THE ‘PREMISES”, of the Bill.}

_{“THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” specifically instructs Parliament; that in Parliament applying or ‘enacting’ any of the ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.}

_{Thus, PRIME MINISTER, it is imperative that you clarify the true status and legal validity of the “SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT”; right now.}

_{​IS THE “SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT” ABSOLUTE? Or not?}

_{DO THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAVE TRUE LEGALITY? Yes of No?}

 

 _{If ‘YES’ is applicable and asserted to either of the above; then both Government and Judiciary must produce the ‘evidence’ - the legal and lawful instrument - proving that this is so.}

FUNERALS

FUNERAL COSTS

 

Funeral costs today are an obscenity – and your loved ones could be left to shoulder the bill.

.

The average 'cost of dying' today is about £8,000.

This exorbitant sum being spent on funerals, as well as flowers, catering, and estate administration costs, which the government refuses to pay.

 

All, delivering the massive profits to the Funeral Industry; who, like vultures, just wait for the next one to die.

 

 

Here, I do not dictate to anyone, what they should do.

I merely provide the information in respect of an alternative arrangement for when someone dies in your family; and, you want to avoid, that terrible expense.

 

There Is an alternative solution to this problem whereby it will not cost you anything; and, where the rotten Funeral Industry, gets nothing either.

 

A, STATUTORY FUNERAL

 

My wife and I so loathed this 'Funeral Industry' that we arranged a 'pact' with each other that when we 'passed away'; we would never contribute one penny to this industry. My wife always said that she did not want to be "carted around the streets in a box" with "flowers and weeping and wailing"; she did not want a funeral at all.

 

We both determined, that at the very moment of death, the soul leaves the body; that then, all that remains, is merely the shell or the carcass that once held that 'wonderful life' but now rapidly begins the process of decay.

 

We both further determined, that, In Great Britain, as all born to the shores of the land are not classified as 'human beings'; but, in law, are merely classified as, "Subjects of the Crown"; where we have no 'protection of law' whatsoever.

Therefore, as this establishes; that, the British "Crown" assumes that it "Owns the Body". When we die; the "Crown", must dispose of the body.

 

When very sadly my wife passed away on the 10th of July 2017, I merely informed the Coroner of all of this, stressing, that my wife's body was now in the process of rapid decay, and that unless it was speedily removed, it would very soon become a 'public health' risk.

The body was removed the next day.

 

The "Statutory Funeral" and the cremation of my wife's body took place on the 18th July; and, it did not cost me one penny. Relative's and those concerned were able to attend the crematorium for this public ceremony; and, they were provided with access for 'closure' to say goodbye. Just as in any other 'paid' funeral.

 

More importantly, the 'pact' that I had with my wife, I had complied with and honored in full; and, the rotten 'funeral industry' was deprived of all profits, in respect of her demise.

 

FUNERALS ARE FOR THE LIVING;

 

 

THEY DO 'NOTHING' FOR THE DEAD.

 

YOU CAN AVOID PAYING, FUNERAL COSTS

 

 

 

BREXIT VOTE IN PARLIAMENT TONIGHT

Monday 11th September 2017

Whatever the vote tonight; if its under the influence of the political party WHIPS; IT WILL HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL. The WHIPS in parliament in instructing 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote, CAUSES THE PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE. This flouts and breaches the 'precedent of law' set out in, "The Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed". This paragraph of the "Bill of Rights 1689" specifically instructs parliament that in "All the Premises" of the Bill; NOTHING OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE.

THE WHIPS VERY PRESENCE IN PARLIAMENT AND THEIR INSTRUCTING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

LAW, THE TRUE MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF LAW; MEANS NOTHING TO THE WAY PARLIAMENT AND THE JUDICIARY BEHAVES TODAY.

ACTS, MOTIONS AND BILLS ARE BEING CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT TODAY IN PRECISELY THE SAME UNDEMOCRATIC WAY, WHEREBY ADOLF HITLER AND THE NAZIS CREATED THEIR OWN LAW. GREAT BRITAIN TODAY IS NAUGHT BUT A ROTTEN TOTALITARIAN REGIME.

NORTH KOREA MISSILE TESTS

Preening herself before the cameras in Japan today THERESA MAY launched a blistering attack upon NORTH KOREA; asserting, that the firing of test missiles by North Korea was an unlawful act; she calls upon Japan and all other nations, to condemn NORTH KOREA for this illegality; and, urges them to use all means necessary, in order to force NORTH KOREA to stop further testing of these missiles.

 

Sheer pompous arrogance from a persistent lying bitch.

 

The United States has the nuclear weapon.

Great Britain has the nuclear weapon.

Israel and other nations may also have this nuclear weapon.

All assert and claim that they need the 'nuclear weapon' in order to defend their countries from nuclear attack.

 

As all these countries have the nuclear weapon, therefore,

NORTH KOREA HAS EVERY LEGAL AND MORAL RIGHT TO HAVE THEM AS WELL. NORTH KOREA URGENTLY NEEDS TO DEFEND IT SELF FROM CONSISTENT ‘THREATENED’ AMERICAN MILITARY AGRESSION.

 

THE ROTTEN AND CORRUPT U.N. WITH ITS, "NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY" DENYING NORTH KOREA THIS LEGAL RIGHT HAS NO 'LAWFUL' JUSTIFICATION AT ALL.

IT IS MERELY THE 'YAH BOO' RESPONSE OF THE 'NUCLEAR CLUB' PRONOUNCING TO THE WORLD,

"Yah Boo; we have the nuclear weapon, and with it we can use it at any time we choose; but, YOU cannot have them at all".

 

FUCK ALL THESE TREACHEROUS LYING BASTARDS, IF THESE COUNTRIES HAVE THIS WEAPON;

THEN SO DOES, NORTH KOREA.

Personally, I am not 'terrified' that NORTH KOREA has this weapon.

 

I AM CONSISTENTLY 'TERRIFIED' THAT THE 'WAR MONGERING BASTARDS' OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN HAS THIS WEAPON.

WHEN I HEAR THE BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY ASSERT AND DECLARE THAT, "RUSSIA IS OUR ENEMY" AND, THAT'S WHY IT IS NECESSARY TO SPEND IN EXCESS OF TWO HUNDRED BILLION POUNDS IN ORDER TO RENEW THE "TRIDENT MISSILE SYSTEM" AND BUILD FOUR NEW NUCLEAR SUBMARINES;

THEN, I AM 'TERRIFIED' ALL OF THE TIME.

 

THE 'NUCLEAR WEAPON' DEFENDS NOTHING AT ALL. IT IS A WEAPON OF SHEER 'AGGRESSION' OR 'RETALIATORY REVENGE'. WHERE, IF IT WAS USED,

IT WOULD NOT 'FIGHT AND KILL' ANY ARMED ENEMY ATTACKING GREAT BRITAIN; IT WOULD MERELY 'BURN TO A CINDER' AND MURDER MILLIONS OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS, WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ATTACKING GREAT BRITAIN AT ALL.

GREAT BRITAIN ONLY WANTS THIS 'NUCLEAR' WEAPON IN ORDER TO DOMINATE AND CONTROL THE WORLD BOTH POLITICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY.

TO, RELIVE THE "GLORIOUS DAYS OF EMPIRE" ALL OVER AGAIN. JUST LOOK AT THE RECENT HISTORY WHERE THE 'WAGING WAR' MILITARY BOOTS AND MILITARY 'INFLUENCE' OF THE BRITISH HAS BEEN;

AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, SYRIA.

HOW MANY MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE THE UNITED STATES AND THE BRITISH NEEDING TO KILL? 

 I WANT "OUT" OF THIS ROTTEN FILTHY "TOTALITARIAN REGIME".

 

MY BOOK "DEMOCRACY"

 

_{MY BOOK,
 “DEMOCRACY”
IS A HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL AND AN 'EXPLOSIVE' DOCUMENT. IT IS AS ‘EXPLOSIVE’ AND ‘REVOLUTIONARY’ AS ‘THOMAS PAINE’S’ BOOK “COMMON SENSE”, WHICH SPARKED THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION. BY LAW AND PRECEDENT OF LAW, MY BOOK REVEALS ALL ‘TYRANNY’ AS FOLLOWS,}

 

_{1.           ELIZABETH THE SECOND HAS NO 'LEGAL' RIGHT TO REIGN AS QUEEN - SHE HAS CONSISTENTLY "BROKEN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT BETWIXT KING AND PEOPLE". THEREBY, SHE ABDICATES THE THRONE. LEGAL PRECEDENT VERIFIES; KING JAMES II WAS REMOVED FROM THE THRONE FOR “BREAKING THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT BETWIXT KING AND PEOPLE”.}

_{2.           FURTHERMORE, SHE HAS CONSISTENTLY GRANTED THE "ROYAL ASSENT" TO CORRUPT LAW; GRANTED, IN HER NAME.}

_{3.           THE BRITISH JUDICIARY HAS CONSISTENTLY "CONSPIRED TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE" AND "DECEIVE THE BRITISH PEOPLE"; BY RULING THAT THE "QUESTIONING OF PARLIAMENT" IN THE COURTS IS DENIED; RELYING UPON THEIR RULING; THAT, "ARTICLE 9" OF THE "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689" IS "ABSOLUTE". THEREBY, DENYING THAT ACCESS TO THE COURTS, IRRESPECTIVE OF ALL CIRCUMSTANCE.}

_{4.           MY BOOK REVEALS, THIS IS A SHEER AND WICKED DECEPTION. THE CORRECT READING OF THE "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689" REVEALS THAT ANYONE MAY 'LAWFULLY' QUESTION PARLIAMENT IN THE COURTS; IF AND WHENEVER PARLIAMENT, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".}

_{5.           MY BOOK FURTHER REVEALS, THE POLITICAL PARTY ACTIVITIES, OF THE POLITICAL PARTY 'WHIPS' IN PARLIAMENT; HAS NO 'LEGALITY' AT ALL.}

_{6.           THE 'WHIPS' ISSUE INSTRUCTION TO 'ELECTED' MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT EACH WEEK; INSTRUCTING THEM ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE UPON ALL THE LEGISLATION BEING PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT, FOR THE VOTE. THIS IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL. THIS STANDARD WEEKLY PRACTICE OF THE 'WHIPS', OVERRULES AND SUPPLANTS ALL RIGHTFUL INFLUENCE THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN PLACED UPON THOSE MEMBERS, BY THE CONSTITUENTS.}

_{7.           THIS CREATES THE "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".}

_{8.           PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY THE, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".}

 

_{“The Said Rights Claimed”:}

_{“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular}

_{The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that}

_{noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the}

_{Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in}

_{any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”}

 

_{9.            ALL 'ACTS' 'MOTIONS' AND 'BILLS' CREATED AND PASSED IN PARLIAMENT 'UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS', IS CORRUPT LAW. BECAUSE, THE 'WHIPS' IN PARLIAMENT, ARE WHOLLY UNLAWFUL, HAVING NO 'LEGALITY' AT ALL.}

 

_{BY LAW AND PRECEDENT OF LAW MY BOOK ESTABLISHES:}

_{A. THE QUEEN "ELIZABETH THE SECOND" HAS NO LAWFUL RIGHT TO REIGN.}

_{B. THE BRITISH JUDICIARY "CONSPIRES TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE".}

_{C. THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.}

_{D. IN CONSEQUENCE OF ALL OF THE ABOVE: GREAT BRITAIN IS NOT A DEMOCRACY.}

_{E. GREAT BRITAIN, AT PRESENT, IS NAUGHT BUT A ROTTEN TOTALITARIAN REGIME".}

 _{Read my book, its available cheaply in both paperback at £3.50 and, Kindle e-book download, at only £1.19. Both available here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00KGZT5DW}