LEVI BELLFIELD and 'PAIN'...

 

Levi Bellfield, and, ‘PAIN’

Subsequent to the very detailed confession of LEVI BELLFIELD revealing in stark vivid clarity all the horrendous activities that he carried out upon MILLIE DOWLER during her abduction; we now know all about all the horrendous stress, trauma, and 'PAIN' that she must have endured, in the last few hours of her life.

We also know all about all the stress, trauma, and 'PAIN', that all MILLIE DOWLER's parents, family, and, loved ones, must have endured as well.

For her parents and loved ones to hear all about the very detailed way in which Bellfield raped, tortured, and killed MILLIE DOWLER, must have caused them horrendous, 'PAIN'.

So, how does 'Society' treat and punish this piece of filth, who, with impunity, took away MILLIE DOWLERS right to life; and, subjected her to all this absolute 'hell', before she was actually killed?

We lock him up to serve a 'life sentence' in prison and we allow him to live just as normal as everyone else with the mere exception of taking away his 'liberty'; but in all other respects; he is provided 'free of charge' with a roof over his head, three free meals every day, provided with all his clothing and footwear; and, we give him the stimulus of television, books and newspapers to read; plus looking after his every medical or mental need.

BUT, HOW SHOULD WE BE TREATING THIS SCUM?

WE SHOULD ENSURE THAT WE TRULY 'PUNISH' HIM; AND, IN THAT PUNISHMENT, WE SHOULD ENSURE THAT HE ENDURES, 'PAIN'.

WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING IS THIS:

We should 'flog' him every month for twelve months until his back is raw.
And, when the 'PAIN' of the twelfth 'flogging' starts to diminish; he should be dragged to the gallows, and be hanged.

UNTIL 'PAIN' IS PART OF THE PUNISHMENT METED OUT TO THIS 'FILTH', FOR THIS HORRIBLE CRIME; THERE WILL UNDOUBTEDLY BE MANY MORE BEAUTIFUL YOUNG 'MILLIE DOWLER's  WHO WILL BE RAPED, TORTURED, AND KILLED.

Because, with ‘impunity' the perverted perpetrators of this crime know only too well; that they will never be punished with "PAIN".

THE FOOLISH ‘LIBERAL’S’ AMONGST US FOREVER BELIEVING IN 'FORGIVENESS' AND 'RETRIBUTION'; MUST NOW BE WHOLLY IGNORED.

THIRTY BILLION POUNDS

 30 BILLION POUNDS

 

Petition to determine how you want 30 Billion Pounds of taxpayer’s money to be spent. The following two options provide YOU with the right to choose. Do not allow Government and politicians to decide this issue. Insist, that only all the British People have the right to choose.

 

Option 1

Spend and waste 30 Billion Pounds building four new nuclear submarines and nuclear Trident missiles, (that, Great Britain does not really need), having already sufficient nuclear weaponry at its disposal), to 'deter' any nuclear attack by retaliation in, “Mutually Assured Destruction.”

 

Great Britain having nuclear weapons does not 'deter' any nuclear attack; they cannot prevent an enemy's nuclear missile aimed at the country, landing in the country at all. Great Britain's reliance on the nuclear weapon is solely to provide, 'aggression' in the waging of nuclear war; or, for 'retaliation' if ever attacked, with a nuclear weapon. Spiteful, retaliation, wickedly calculated, to murder millions of innocent people.

 

Or,

 

Option 2

Spend this 30 Billion Pounds of taxpayer’s money trying to improve the treatment and the possible cure of CANCER. Spending all this money on building and installing PROTON BEAM THERAPY machines all over the country, replacing the present "Radio Therapy"; that often causes the present bad side effects. RADIO THERAPY is X-Ray, and irrespective of how it is directed specifically at the cancer tumour, the X-Ray's remain in the body often attacking other tissue and the other vital organs of the body. Whereas, PROTON BEAM THERAPY, can be 'targeted' far more accurately; and, as experience has already shown, has far less of these disastrous side effects.

 

Your right to choose, which of these two options do YOU prefer?

 

Signing this petition indicates that YOU undoubtedly prefer, OPTION 1

 

Note: Great Britain today has no PROTON BEAM THERAPY; the first machine is being installed in the country only now. So, why do we not at present have this wonderful medical technology available in the treatment of CANCER?  Could it be that our governments and politicians have been far more interested in spending billions of pounds of taxpayer’s money on, 'military adventures' in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and now Syria, as well. Constantly, trying to bring about, REGIME CHANGE?

 

Sign this petition and stop this nonsense now.

 https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-george-osborne-mp-chancellor-of-the-exchequer-30-billion-pounds? recruiter=63876526&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive

GOOGLE AND TAXATION...

Google and taxation

GOOGLE, subjected to intimidation by both Government and the Press, and, by wildly 'manipulated' public opinion, has now agreed to pay £130 Million in respect of alleged taxation as demanded by the Treasury; GOOGLE, has also agreed, to pay more taxation in future.

 

I URGE EVERY CORPORATE COMPANY TRADING IN GREAT BRITAIN TO ONLY PAY TAXATION AS SPECIFICALLY DETERMINED BY 'LAW"; AND, NOT TO PAY ANY 'UNNECESSARY' TAXATION, AT ALL. TO AVOID PAYING ANY TAXATION, NOT ACTUALLY REQUIRED BY 'LAW'.

 

WHY?

 

Well, first look at the origin as to where GOOGLE has acquired all this money; it derives solely from the consumer; all the consumers that purchase or use GOOGLE products or services.

 

Now consider, would all or any of those consumers, have actually contributed their money, in purchasing those products and services from GOOGLE; had they known that their money would be used by the British Government, to build four new nuclear submarines and nuclear Trident missiles?

 

WOULD ALL THESE CONSUMERS WILLINGLY HAVE PAID GOOGLE THEIR MONEY IN ORDER THAT IT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO GREAT BRITAIN BEING ABLE TO ACT AS THE WORLD's POLICEMAN DOMINATING AND CONTROLLING THE WORLD IN THE WAY THAT IT FREQUENTLY DOES? WOULD THEY HAVE CONTRIBUTED THEIR MONEY IN ORDER THAT GREAT BRITAIN CAN PURSUE AND RELIVE THE SO CALLED GLORIOUS DAYS OF "EMPIRE" ALL OVER AGAIN?

 

I am confident they would not; and this is why I assert 'unnecessary taxation' should never be paid. You can never trust a British Government.

 

LOOK AT THE FACTS: Just look at Britain's history of domination in the world in respect to REGIME CHANGE: REGIME CHANGE IN AFGHANISTAN; REGIME CHANGE IN IRAQ; REGIME CHANGE IN LIBYA; And, now Britain wants and pursues REGIME CHANGE in Syria as well.

 

DIKTAT; DOMINATION; and, CONTROL. Britain’s "NUCLEAR WEAPONRY" continually threatening and intimidating the World.

 

GOOGLE has been very foolish in paying this £130 Million. It is my ardent hope that AMAZON and others are not so foolish; paying only the taxes that are specifically required by "LAW".

 

THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT PROPOSES TO SPEND "THIRTY BILLION POUNDS" OF THE MONEY RAISED BY TAXATION, IN ORDER TO BUILD FOUR NEW NUCLEAR SUBMARINES AND TRIDENT NUCLEAR MISSILES.

 

Not one penny of this money is being spent on improving the lives of 'The British People'

 Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon MP, is a bare faced liar when he asserts that Britain needs these four nuclear submarines and Trident missiles as a deterrent against nuclear attack; because, all this nuclear weaponry will not 'deter' one nuclear missile from hitting our country; if such a weapon is ever launched against us. 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE NEVER, 'DETERRENTS' THEY ARE SOLELY DESIGNED FOR: 'INTIMIDATION' AND 'SECURING POWER' IN THE WORLD'; 'AGGRESSION' IN THE WAGING OF WAR; OR, FOR, IN RETALIATION, EXACTING REVENGE.

EXACTING, REVENGE, IN THE, SLAUGHTERING OF MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, WHO DID NOT ATTACK OUR COUNTRY AT ALL.

In any case, Great Britain DOES NOT NEED all this new nuclear weaponry; Britain has already got all the nuclear weaponry it needs; in order to exact, that revenge.

 

Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

TONY BLAIR and the DAILY MAIL attack.....

TONY BLAIR and IRAQ

In response to the vicious attack upon Tony Blair by STEPHEN GLOVER of the ‘Daily Mail’ in respect to the ‘Iraq’ affair; I wrote to him as shown below. All, that repeatedly condemn TONY BLAIR in respect to the invasion of Iraq, ought to read this:

20 January, 2011

Stephen Glover

Daily Mail
2 Derry Street
London W8 5TT

 Re. Your feature: “At last, the damning evidence that should bury Blair for his lies over Iraq.”

Sir, with respect,

Read the Attorney General’s advice. Lawyers never instruct their clients on how they should act. They merely provide for their clients the contingencies that may arise and suggest ways of dealing with them. The Attorney General’s advice given to Government; is exactly the same.

Read it carefully, Sir;  Attorney General Lord Goldsmith merely sets out the contingencies that may arise:

In (A) circumstance; (B) might be the circumstance that might follow. But if you do (C) that circumstance might not arise. And, so on throughout the entire advice given. At no stage does he commit himself to determine whether war against Iraq is illegal. Furthermore, Lord Goldsmith does not provide all his advice in one session. There is a break between. In the second session Lord Goldsmith clearly indicates a change of mind. What actually influenced him to change his mind hasn’t actually been made clear; but one of things, that I believe might have done, was the report of UNMOVIC (Hans Blix) to the UN. Precisely at that time. Hans Blix in a worldwide televised report to the UN said this:

“The Iraqi has given some compliance with Resolution 1441 but they have still not provided any material or information in respect to the weapons of mass destruction that we know that they have.”

This was the clear breach of Resolution 1441. I believe that statement by Hans Blix might well have influenced the Attorney General. This statement is actually very interesting indeed: pay particular attention to the words: “that we know that they have.”. Here is the clear emphatic indication that, at that time, prior to the invasion of Iraq “WE” indicates not only UNMOVIC, but all Western Intelligence, at that time, fully believed Iraq did possess ‘weapons of mass destruction’:

 “They have still not provided any material or information in respect of the weapons of mass destruction that we know that they have. “

From the intelligence available at that time both Bush and Blair had every right to believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Sadaam Hussein, though provided with every opportunity by the UN, failed to take that opportunity to properly prove to the UN; that he did not have them. Sadaam Hussein was one of the world’s greatest propagandists; he beat the Nazi Joseph Goebels, in spades. Strategically and militarily it was in Sadaam’s interests to have the nations in the region of Iraq, and the rest of the World, to believe that he did have weapons of mass destruction. And, in that deceit he fooled everybody.

 

There is one other thing that also ought to be made clear about the “45 minute” claim.

Tony Blair in his speech given to parliament mentioned that Iraq could launch a weapon of mass destruction in 45 minutes. The words, “45 minutes” being mentioned only once by Tony Blair throughout his long speech. Furthermore, throughout the rest of the debate in parliament, that night, not one other Member of Parliament referred to those words; nor was it mentioned in any other speech. Parliament barely paid heed to it at all. Yet the very next day the filthy right wing press made a song and dance about it asserting that Tony Blair had informed Parliament that Iraq could attack Britain with weapons of mass destruction and those weapons could be launched against us in 45 minutes. The entire “45 minute claim” is the fiction and manipulation of Media. Tony Blair made no such claim.

Interestingly, at that time, DR. David Kelly, also supported that claim. That, Iraq could launch such a weapon in 45 minutes. Interviewed by a BBC lady reporter, she specifically asked him about this. She asserts that Dr. Kelly replied:

 “Of course Iraq could launch within 45 minutes. If the weapons had been pre-armed and if the trajectories had been pre-programed”

 

Mr. Glover, your hatred for Tony Blair; and the right wing’s hatred of Tony Blair; can be seen for what it is.

 

You, Sir; aspire to and represent TORY rotten concepts and ideas, unbridled Capitalism, the pursuit of individual self aspiration and greed. Whereas, Blair, represents myself and all socialists; believing in the subjugation of the selfish self for the common good. You and your kind are rabidly anti-State. Whereas, we, believe in the “State”; where “The State”, is all of “The People”. You hate me and my political aspirations; and I, forever, hate and detest yours.

It is that ‘hatred’ between us that motivates your writing every day.

I buy the ‘Mail’ every day in order to get my daily dose of hate.

It’s wholly biased contributors, never ever let me down

 

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard

 

PUTTING RAIN BACK IN THE SKY

"Putting rain back in the Sky"

One of the greatest failings of Humankind in Great Britain today, is the way that, 'Yesterday', is always judged by the 'standards' of, 'Today'.

And, this has always resulted in great injustice.

Here are two stark vivid examples of this travesty:

The first:

The Nuremberg Tribunal Trials.

Virtually every NAZI war criminal tried at the Nuremberg Tribunal for horrific crimes, pleaded as their defence, that they were only obeying the orders of a superior.

But, the Tribunal judges, corruptly, would not accept this defence. They, ruled that every defendant, must be 'individually responsible', for one’s own actions.

These judges, "Put rain back in the Sky".

Because, they completely ignored all that had happened in NAZI Germany, from the very moment that, ADOLF HITLER, became 'Chancellor of Germany' in 1933; thru, to the end of World War II, in 1945.

 

HITLER, created the law in Germany known as, the, "FuhrerPrinzip"; (The Leadership Principle); this law, first, applicable to the Military, but, later, during World War II, became applicable to everyone in Germany; required that every German citizen, must obey the order of a superior officer or, a superior official administrator, under the pain of imprisonment, and, even death; if one refused.

The, "FuhrerPrinzip", was an established fact in, German law. And, it, was, LAW. Yet, the judges in the Nuremberg Tribunal, would not 'recognise; this.

 

They,

 "Put rain back in the Sky".

Every war criminal pleading the defence of "FuhrerPrinzip" spoke the absolute truth. But, the 'Judges' corruptly ignored that, “LAW” for expediency. The, 'Law of the Victor'  of World War II; thereby, demanding, that the 'Vanquished' had no right of claim to the protection of, LAW.

Every defendant at Nuremberg was found 'Guilty' of the crimes for which they were tried. They were either imprisoned for very many years, or, they were executed; hung, by the neck, until dead.

It was the greatest travesty of the corruption of, 'LAW' and 'JUSTICE’, of this Century.

The ‘Holocaust’ and the horrific crimes of Nazi Germany deserved the severest punishment; but, every defendant at the, Nuremberg Tribunals, deserved a fair trial. They did not get that ‘fair trial’, because, the ‘corrupt’ Judges, “Put rain back in the Sky”.

The second example:

The 'Child Sex Abuse' hysteria prevailing in Great Britain today.
In this wild hysterical furore, escalating, in more and more allegations of, 'child sexual abuse', being revealed every day, there is the demand being made by Government, many politicians, and, the 'Child Protection Agencies', for an 'Inquiry' to be set up, in order to investigate, "The Culture of the BBC". Allegations, are being made, every day, asserting that, BBC stars, deejays, and celebrity personalities, abused young children on the premises of the BBC. It is not the 'Culture of the BBC' that, requires, to be investigated. What, needs to be understood, is the 'culture' prevailing throughout the entire country, at that time:

 

To, judge, "The Culture of the 1960's thru, to the early, 1970's" by the standards of today, is both corrupt and ridiculous. In order to understand the, accusations that are being made today, to, judge, these, allegations, completely ignoring the 'national culture' that was in existence in the country when these 'asserted' child abuses took place; is to completely deny, all that happened in this period, as though, it had never taken place at all.

 

It, is, "Putting rain back in the Sky".

 

The 1960's brought about the most massive explosion of sexual freedom the country had ever seen, in my lifetime. All the censorship of sex and sexuality, all the repressions of censorship, sex, sexual experimentation, and, sexual exploration, of both Church and State; were all swept away. Providing the greatest era of SEXUAL FREEDOM, the country had ever seen.

 

Women had the 'pill' which enabled them to experiment and enjoy their sexuality without the fear of pregnancy; The 'mini-skirt' was born, allowing young girls and women to display their legs, high up, almost to their 'bare bum'; where, their knickers, were frequently 'on show', when they walked in the street or danced in the disco's. Grown up adult women were even whipping off their 'erotically’ charged 'damp panties' , throwing them at TOM JONES as he sang and performed. Commercial radio with the, 'pirates' , had smashed the previous radio monopoly of the BBC; and, the radio 'deejay' and the 'pop music artists and groups' , became big star attractions, virtually overnight.

Young girls, throughout the Kingdom, embraced this, FREEDOM; and, they joined in. Every pop concert attracted hordes of sexually charged 'horny' young girls 'screaming their heads off' as they watched these artists perform. Anyone who witnessed these young girls at a, “Beatles Concert", could not mistake the 'sexuality' there involved. Young girls became 'fame chasers' throwing themselves at the pop star, pop groups, deejays, and celebrities, exploring, their sexuality; and, even, in some cases, 'notching up conquests on their bedposts', in competition, for sexual favours received.

There was, SEX and SEXUAL FREEDOM, everywhere. A, great, SEXUAL EXPLOSION, for all ages and classes; and, the young girls, were affected as well.

 

EXAMPLE: Personal experience:

 

From late 1965 thru to May of 1976 I served as the promotions manager of two commercial radio stations: Pirate, Radio London, and, Capital Radio. During this time I was responsible for all publicity activities of these companies, outside of the actual broadcasting studios. I mounted concerts, pop shows and disco's all over the catchment area, of Greater London. Daily, I was in the thick of, showbiz, and, the pop groups, pop stars, and the pop music industry. Throughout the whole of this period, although, I witnessed, thousands of young girls and the celebrities; I never once saw any young girl being sexually abused. I, frequently, saw them being 'fondled', often, seeing their 'boobs' being touched; but, always with their complicity, or, at their consent. I also frequently witnessed many of these young girls, competing with each other, to gain points, for the 'sexual conquests' they had achieved.

 

On one occasion, which I recall vividly, I had to accompany a famous American pop group to a BBC studio. They had a 'hit record' out at that time; and, promoting, that record, they were scheduled to perform at the BBC. On arrival at the BBC, the schedule indicated that they were not required immediately, so I left these boys in the dressing room and went out to see the studio set up. Nearing the time when they were required, I returned to the dressing room to alert them to get ready. The dressing room was full of young girls, there was smooching and groping, being performed, by all. And, the drummer was missing. Frantically, I searched the building for this drummer; and, I eventually found him in a 'toilet cubicle' with three girls. I screamed at him to get back to the dressing room, and as he sheepishly left; the three girls emerged, 'laughing their heads off', from the toilet cubicle. Wholly, ignoring me, standing there, they then each in turn, claimed that they had won the competition, describing in detail, what they had sexually done to the boy, and, what, sexually, he had done to them. The details described, ranged from the showing and touching of 'boobs', all the way thru a sexual agenda, culminating, in anal sex.

These girls were not whores or slags, or, of the sex industry. They were ordinary young girls, thoroughly enjoying their sexuality, and, experimenting, with, sex. I made no attempt to report them or to lecture them. I merely 'laughed with them', recognizing fully, that it was the 'culture', of that time.

In judging today, anything that happened 'sexually' then; is to ignore the 'culture' of that time. It is,

 

 "Putting rain back in the Sky".

 Gordonj

 

CORRUPTION?

FIFA, SEBB BLATTER, and CORRUPTION...

FIFA Ethics Committee bans both SEBB BLATTER and MICHEL PLATINI for eight years; but fails to produce one word of actual 'evidence' against them.

The Committee merely responds to the "Hate Blatter" campaign engineered specifically by the British who failed in their "World Cup" bid; and want revenge; and the Americans, who consistently allege, CORRUPTION. But, produce no evidence at all.

 

CORRUPTION

When I hear and witness an American State Prosecutor alleging CORRUPTION; I practically vomit in contempt.

 

It was the rotten CORRUPTION of the entire American Government and Judicial Administration: Government, Judiciary, the trial judge, the Supreme Court Judges, the FBI, and the Security Services; that conspired and falsely and corruptly charged ETHEL and JULIUS ROSENBERG of giving the 'atom bomb secrets' to Russia; and, putting them to death in the electric chair.

That's real, CORRUPTION;

Knowingly and calculatingly, murdering two innocent people, who had nothing to do with the charges levelled against them, at all. The entire evidence against them was false, and it was wholly fabricated by the American Government and the Security Service. Even the President of the United States was a willing participant to this, CORRUPTION.

AMERICA put ETHEL and JULIUS ROSENBERG to death; to satisfy the corrupt and wicked anti-communist 'witch hunts' that hysterically prevailed in the country at that time.

ETHEL and JULIUS were communists, and they did spy for Russia. But, they were both specifically instructed by MOSCOW to discontinue all spying activity; long before the 'incidents' took place for which they were charged. They had no participation in those 'alleged incidents' at all. The evidence, presented during their trial alleging that ETHEL ROSENBERG had typed up the 'secrets of the atom bomb' on a table in a room in her house; was all false. And, the Security Services and the Government - knew that it was false - because, they had entirely fabricated that 'evidence' in every detail.

 

David Greenglass, ETHEL ROSENBERG's, own brother, who worked in the 'Los Alamos' Nuclear Research Establishment where the atom bomb was being produced; had been caught spying; and, the Security Services put pressure on him, in order for him, to implicate the ROSENBERGS. It was his false testimony that actually convicted them both and sentenced them to die in the electric chair. That ‘incident’, “typing up the atom bomb secrets”, actually never took place at all; it was the entire ‘fiction’ of David Greenglass, and, the Security Service.

 

CORRUPTION of the highest degree;

MURDERING TWO INNOCENT PEOPLE; PUTTING THEM TO DEATH IN THE MOST HORRIFIC WAY; VIRTUALLY FRYING THEM, IN THE ELECTRIC CHAIR.

Thus, and thereby, let no American prosecutor ever point the finger at anyone, alleging, CORRUPTION, again.

 

"THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"

Glorious Revolution and, “The Said Rights Claimed”

My letter to KEITH PORTEOUS WOOD of the Secularist Society.

 

Congrats re the banning of prayers at Council Meetings.

I agree, that both prayers in Parliament, and also in the ‘imposition’ in schools, should also be banned in LAW.

 

For your immediate attention and interest and in respect to The Speaker, JOHN BERCOW’s pronouncement that prayers will still be said in Parliament, because Parliament is protected by the “Bill of Rights 1689”,

 

From all experience in this country, my country, sad to say, that it would appear that I am practically the only one in the country that has read and researched the period of “The Glorious Revolution” correctly. Because the ‘evidence’ is abundantly clear that hardly anyone has interpreted the “Bill of Rights 1689” correctly at all.

 

The entire British Educational curriculum and establishment has abysmally failed to teach this correctly. The majority of the People of the country know nothing of Parliaments “Supremacy” and the way that they are being governed today.

 

Parliament and the Courts (Judiciary) have been misinterpreting the “Bill of Rights 1689” for more than 300 years. And, they both continue to misinterpret it, even today.

 

You can ask at random thousands of people in the streets and ask them to list the three principal instruments by which they are governed; and, more than 90 per cent would not know. Ask them to tell you about “Article 9”; and they would be, bewildered.

 

Then ask them to tell you about “The Said Rights Claimed” and they would stand open mouthed before you not having a clue. Even Parliament and the Judiciary know nothing of this “Statute” in the Bill.

 

Parliament claims its lawful validity for its “Supremacy” relying upon “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”. This reads:

 

“The Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament”

 

And. both Parliament and the Judiciary has interpreted that wording as though it was a ‘stand-alone’ piece of legislation requiring no other considerations at all. That is why the Judiciary has always denied the testing, questioning or the challenging of Parliament, in their Courts.

 

But the correct interpretation of “Article 9” and, the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”; proves that “Article 9” is not a ‘stand-alone’ Statute at all’.

Parliaments ‘enactment of “Article 9”, (And all the other, ‘Premises’, of that Bill), are wholly dependent upon the conditions set out in another paragraph of that same Bill: i.e. the paragraph: “The Said Rights Claimed”

 

And, this reads as follows:

 

“The said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

This makes it abundantly clear that as a ‘precedent’ in English Law, that, Parliaments “Supremacy”, legally afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”, is only applicable, in LAW; providing Parliament does not ‘prejudice’ the People. Whenever Parliament does ‘prejudice’ the People; the “Supremacy” of Parliament, has no lawful validity at all.

 

So, when The Speaker, JOHN BERCOW MP or any other Member of Parliament asserts that “Prayers will still be conducted in Parliament” because Parliament is protected by the “Bill of Rights 1689”; anyone can challenge that assertion, in LAW, relying on “The Said Rights Claimed”.

If it can be shown and proved in a Court of LAW that ‘prayers said in Parliament’ does ‘prejudice the People’; the Courts will have no alternative but to rule that ‘prayers said in Parliament', must cease.

Hardly any of the British People are aware; that, even if we do not have a “written constitution” or a proper “Bill of Rights”; and, even if we have no access to LAW to challenge Parliament in a “Supreme Court” of LAW; the British are protected against the ‘prejudice’ and the ‘abuses’ of Parliament; by, “The Said Rights Claimed”

This, has never ever been taught in our schools.

People will never be able to participate in a DEMOCRACY correctly, unless they ‘participate’ twenty four hours of each day; and, unless they are aware of the precise manner by which they are governed. The British have not the slightest conception as to how they are governed. That is why today we are governed by a wholly illegal coalition government; that was not elected by the People, at all. The People’s vote in the General Election of 2010 verified that there should be a ‘Conservative led Minority Government’; but the leaders of the Political party’s elected to Parliament in that election did not like that result. So, they illegally ‘ignored’ the People’s vote; and, they then conspired with each other to foist upon this nation, this coalition government. In ‘ignoring’ the People’s vote in this way, they corruptly, ‘prejudiced’ the People. Which, was wholly prohibited in ‘LAW’ by “The Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/“The Said Rights Claimed”.

The British Parliament though elected by The People; is not a Peoples Parliament.

Parliament is dominated entirely by the Political Party’s; and, the political ‘diktat’ of those parties.

The only way this will ever change, in order to create a truly, ”Peoples Parliament”; is when the entire population of the country recognizes and respects “The Said Rights Claimed”. When that is done, the Offices, Procedures and Practises of the WHIPS in Parliament, (that does ‘prejudice’ the People), will be challenged in LAW; and, will then be abolished. Whereby, every vote taken in Parliament thereafter, would become a ‘free vote’.

Sincerely, Gordonj

PS. Read my book “DEMOCRACY”:  http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984