Travesty of the Trial of Jeremy Forest....
Jeremy Forrest was
tried and convicted, by the feigned, distorted, artificial, ethos of morality,
of prosecution, judge, and, jury.
He was charged, with having abducting MEGAN STAMMERS an under age girl.
He was charged, with having abducting MEGAN STAMMERS an under age girl.
But MEGAN STAMMERS stated in her evidence presented in the trial, that, being
terrified of the paedophile witch hunting police who had seized her phone; she
had panicked and decided to flee. She stated clearly and precisely in her
evidence that, she ‘persuaded’ JEREMY FORREST to go with her. He agreed to go
with her, to protect her, and, together they made the decision to go to France.
MEGAN STAMMERS was not abducted at all; she went to France with JEREMY FORREST,
entirely of her own volition.
He was further charged, vindictively, of having sex with MEGAN STAMMERS an under age girl.
He was further charged, vindictively, of having sex with MEGAN STAMMERS an under age girl.
But, MEGAN STAMMERS, clearly stated in evidence that she
wanted sex with JEREMY STAMMERS, and, that, she always got what she wanted. The
sexual intercourse she experienced on several occasions with JEREMY FORREST was
entirely ‘consensual sex’.
MEGAN
STAMMERS is not an under age girl. She had long past her puberty; she was in
all intents and purposes, a WOMAN. She is a highly intelligent, highly
articulate, young lady, whose inherent genes had ‘kicked in’ and, she was
experimenting with her sexuality. JEREMY FORREST did not force his attentions
upon her in any way.
The artificial ethos of Juries
Juries, individually are as worldly wise as the rest of us:
indeed when not serving on a jury they are the rest of us. But once they
have entered that Jury box and the lawyers start talking to them, they begin to
lose their identity. Individually they are men and women who have masturbated
and fornicated and committed adultery, shown each other dirty books and told
each other dirty stories; and what they have not done they have dreamt of
doing. But, the lawyers impose on them a sort of collective morality, appealing
not to the standards as they are, but to the standards they want them to be
(yet would hate to be, if they ever paused to consider it). It is on this
artificial ethos that both judge and legal counsel concentrate upon, flattering
it, in any trial of a sexual nature, in order to persuade the verdict of
guilty.
Quotation, (slightly
revised), from Ludovic Kennedy’s book: “The trial of Stephen Ward”.
Ah! But, having sex
with an under age girl, breaks the, LAW; all those of this artificial ethos of
morality, will proclaim.
LAW is virtually meaningless in Great Britain today;
LAW, is looked upon by the elite and the establishment; Monarchy, Judiciary,
Government, and, Parliament, as being something that only the ‘common people’
must obey. When, each, and, every one of them, with impunity, flout and breach
“LAW” every day.
For, any, court, judge or jury to uphold that “LAW” denies the
right of MEGAN STAMMERS and JEREMY FORREST to have consensual sex with each
other; Is positively absurd.
When a young girls inherent sexuality ‘kicks in’ nothing
will deter her from the sexual act. When two people are sexually attracted to
each other, of any age, they care little for ludicrous and corrupt, LAW. They will have sex with each other despite
any Law.
The ‘age of consent’ is just a number plucked out of the air; it
takes no notice of the reality, that, ‘sexual attraction’, is a natural act. MEGAN STAMMERS wanted sex
with JEREMY FORREST, she told this to the police, the, social services, and,
the Court, repeatedly. She wanted sex with him; and, she always got what she
wanted.
JEREMY FORREST’S CONVICTION, AND, HIS NOW SITTING IN JAIL,
IS AN ABSOLUTE TRAVESTY.
All that agree should now mount a campaign.
Gordonj
No comments:
Post a Comment