All true and just 'LAW' must conform to certain
criterion:
That it is consistent with:
TRUTH; FREEDOM; JUSTICE; INTELLIGENCE; LOGIC, and, RATIONALE.
The verdicts in the PISTORIUS TRIAL flouts every one of this criterion.
The verdict pronounced by the Judge that PISTORIUS was not guilty in respect to the charge of 'premeditated murder'; and, that he was not guilty in respect to 'intent to murder'; is positively absurd and obscene.
TRUTH; both of these verdicts are not truthful.
FREEDOM, they both conflict with the recognition and the right of the FREEDOM of the victim murdered in this case.
JUSTICE, REEVA STEENKAMP, the victim murdered, got no 'justice' at all.
INTELLIGENCE, when the person charged with murder in this case, admits to firing four shots through a toilet door; although he had never ever seen any intruder, and, had never even seen anything that actually threatened his life; and, those four bullets fired through that door brought about the death of REEVA STEENKAMP; THERE CAN BE NO OTHER CHARGE BUT MURDER. Because, if you fire four shots through a toilet door, in that highly confined space of that toilet, it is wholly obvious that there is the intent to hurt, to wound, or to kill. The fact that REEVA STEENKAMP was actually killed by those shots; proves beyond any reasonable doubt PISTORIUS murdered her and INTENDED TO KILL. For the Judge to pronounce his 'innocence' in this regard, flouts the very INTELLIGENCE of all of Humankind.
LOGIC, in assessing the 'facts' set out in 'INTELLIGENCE' above; proves beyond any doubt that these verdicts have no 'LOGIC' at all.
RATIONALE, likewise, there is no 'RATIONALE' whatsoever. The 'verdicts' are entirely false and unbelievable.
The verdicts of the Judge in this case are ridiculous.
If she asserts and rules that PISTORIUS is not guilty of 'premeditated murder' and, she asserts, that there was no 'intent to murder'; then she must explain to the World, what was the intent of PISTORIUS when he fired four shots through that bathroom toilet door? What was his true 'intent' when he fired four shots through that door, into that very confined space? What other motives could he have had?
REEVA STEENKAMP WAS 'MURDERED' AND, THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS IT.
SOUTH AFRICA AND SOUTH AFRICAN's IN CONTEMPT, SPIT UPON HER GRAVE.
Gordon J Sheppard
That it is consistent with:
TRUTH; FREEDOM; JUSTICE; INTELLIGENCE; LOGIC, and, RATIONALE.
The verdicts in the PISTORIUS TRIAL flouts every one of this criterion.
The verdict pronounced by the Judge that PISTORIUS was not guilty in respect to the charge of 'premeditated murder'; and, that he was not guilty in respect to 'intent to murder'; is positively absurd and obscene.
TRUTH; both of these verdicts are not truthful.
FREEDOM, they both conflict with the recognition and the right of the FREEDOM of the victim murdered in this case.
JUSTICE, REEVA STEENKAMP, the victim murdered, got no 'justice' at all.
INTELLIGENCE, when the person charged with murder in this case, admits to firing four shots through a toilet door; although he had never ever seen any intruder, and, had never even seen anything that actually threatened his life; and, those four bullets fired through that door brought about the death of REEVA STEENKAMP; THERE CAN BE NO OTHER CHARGE BUT MURDER. Because, if you fire four shots through a toilet door, in that highly confined space of that toilet, it is wholly obvious that there is the intent to hurt, to wound, or to kill. The fact that REEVA STEENKAMP was actually killed by those shots; proves beyond any reasonable doubt PISTORIUS murdered her and INTENDED TO KILL. For the Judge to pronounce his 'innocence' in this regard, flouts the very INTELLIGENCE of all of Humankind.
LOGIC, in assessing the 'facts' set out in 'INTELLIGENCE' above; proves beyond any doubt that these verdicts have no 'LOGIC' at all.
RATIONALE, likewise, there is no 'RATIONALE' whatsoever. The 'verdicts' are entirely false and unbelievable.
The verdicts of the Judge in this case are ridiculous.
If she asserts and rules that PISTORIUS is not guilty of 'premeditated murder' and, she asserts, that there was no 'intent to murder'; then she must explain to the World, what was the intent of PISTORIUS when he fired four shots through that bathroom toilet door? What was his true 'intent' when he fired four shots through that door, into that very confined space? What other motives could he have had?
REEVA STEENKAMP WAS 'MURDERED' AND, THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS IT.
SOUTH AFRICA AND SOUTH AFRICAN's IN CONTEMPT, SPIT UPON HER GRAVE.
Gordon J Sheppard
No comments:
Post a Comment